airflow-providers-celery/3.7.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.3.1rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
.
Full list of released PyPI packages:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.3.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-teradata/2.2.0/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on May 30, 2024 have been accepted.
Provider amazon is excluded from the release thus not counting votes
related to this provider.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Jarek Potiuk
- Ephraim Anierobi
2 "+1" non-binding votes
I agree with Jarek
I am a bit worried about the mental model of this proposal as you are
offering to deliver a feature but you are not offering being a community
member.
I had a lot of frustration with the MsSQL backend tests, it really caused
me pain as a contributor. According to your mental
ion
after the
RC candidates are released.
You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.3.0rc2/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.24.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-teradata/2.2.0rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.11.1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-zendesk/4.7.1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on May 26, 2024 have been accepted.
Provider cncf.kubernetes is excluded from the release thus not counting
votes related to this provider.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Jarek Potiuk
- Hussein Awala
4 "+1" non-bi
I have a general question about (maybe somehow related to the DAG Bundle
concept introduced in the AIPs)
The way I see it DAGs are tightly coupled with Datasets. Tasks take
dependency on dataset or/and produce a dataset.
We are focused on the versions of the code (DAG) but to make this play
nicely
argument 'pod' in the read_namespaced_pod_log
> > call.
> > > >> Thanks to Wei for raising the fix PR
> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39874>.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Rahul Vats
> >
Thank you Bolke!
Interesting read.
I have a question about what is the pain we try to solve here. Most use
cases I encountered were about the need to sync dags from a branch in
GitHub (or equivalent) to the Airflow DAG folder.
Correct me if I am wrong but this AIP does not handle this. A sync
> In order for this to become a reality, Backfills need to be handled by the
Airflow Scheduler as a normal DAG execution
I think it's a good idea.
It should solve natively problems like
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11302
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 10:58 PM Vikram Koka
wrote:
> Fellow
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.4.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.11.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-zendesk/4.7.1rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hi Akos,
Can you please elaborate about the reasoning?
You mentioned the pain of setting up a custom provider. How will this be
resolved by having it as an official Airflow provider?
I took a look at the stats of the 3rd party package
https://pypistats.org/packages/airflow-tm1 it has less than 90
Hi everyone,
great discussion.
I talked with several community members and I think that we should have a
non technical discussion thread before we proceed.
To give an example:
We have several actors: Cluster Admin, Dag Author, UI user. In Airflow 2
perspective all these actors are the same user.
-azure/10.1.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-tabular/1.5.1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024 have been accepted.
Provider pinecone is excluded from the release thus not counting votes
related to this provider.
4 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Jarek Potiuk
- Hussein Awala
- Kaxil Naik
5 "+1&quo
gle/10.18.0rc2/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/10.1.0rc2/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-pinecone/2.0.0rc2/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-tabular/1.5.1rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
ng team)
> Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 1:40 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Apache Airflow Providers prepared on May 1, 2024 have been accepted.
> > Providers pinecone, microsof
/5.7.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-vertica/3.8.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.4.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.11.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-zendesk/4.7.0/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
ot;+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Hussein Awala
- Andrey Anshin
- Kaxil Naik
5 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Vincent Beck
- Amogh Desai
- Pankaj Singh
- Wei Lee
- Pankaj Koti
- Rom Sharon
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/h2y4623hk0s7y35l184h14brjsl
uccessfully against
> > > apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.21.0rc1. You can see the results
> here:
> > >
> >
> https://aws-mwaa.github.io/#/open-source/system-tests/version/fe4605a10e26f1b8a180979ba5765d1cb7fb0111_8.21.0rc1.html
> > .
> > > The only failure (example_bedrock) i
project/apache-airflow-providers-vertica/3.8.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.4.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.11.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-zendesk/4.7.0rc2/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
.
Full list of released PyPI packages:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.1.1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/6.3.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/1.0.4/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on April 16, 2024 have been accepted.
Provider databricks is excluded from the release thus not counting votes
related to this provider.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Jarek Potiuk
- Hussein Awala
4 "+1" non-binding v
ion
after the
RC candidates are released.
You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.1.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/6.3.0rc3/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/1.0.4rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
.
Full list of released PyPI packages:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.10.0/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on April 13, 2024 have been accepted.
Provider databricks is excluded from the release thus not counting votes
related to this provider.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Jarek Potiuk
- Hussein Awala
Vote thread:
https://lists.
ed PRs in
> the
> RC to work well.
> Also added a
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/38997#issuecomment-2053904837 on
> the status issue.
>
>
> On Sun, 14 Apr 2024, 02:07 Elad Kalif, wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have just cut *RC2* version for Airf
ypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.10.0rc2/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
/apache-airflow-providers-sftp/4.9.1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-slack/8.6.2/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/5.4.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.3.4/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on April 10, 2024 have been accepted.
Providers databricks and yandex are excluded from the release
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Jarek Potiuk
- Hussein Awala
7 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Vincent beck
- Panka
> here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38887). You can see the results
> > > here:
> > >
> >
> https://aws-mwaa.github.io/#/open-source/system-tests/version/3d804351aa7a875dfdba824c2b27300cc5ce9e92_8.20.0rc1.html
> > >
> > > On 2024
oviders-slack/8.6.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/5.4.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.3.4rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.9.1rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Congrats!
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 7:15 AM Vikram Koka
wrote:
> Awesome! Congratulations Wei!
>
> Very well deserved. A tremendous amount of contributions in a
> relatively short time!
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 2:27 PM Oliveira, Niko >
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Wei! Well deserved :)
> >
> >
+1 (binding)
tested some of my dags. everything works as expected
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 7:55 AM Phani Kumar
wrote:
> +1 non binding.Verified by running few example DAGs
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:17 AM Rahul Vats wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Verified running example DAGs and
ortant PRs included in the RC
candidates.
Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
after the
RC candidates are released.
You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/1.0.2rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
I am -0 for removal at this time.
I think we better wait at least till major cloud vendors of Airflow stop
supporting older versions of Airflow from my check both AWS and Google
still support 1.10
I see that Google supports it until September 13, 2024
The issue here is not just about decorators it happens also with regular
operators (operator inside operator) and also with operator inside
on_x_callback
For example:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64291042/airflow-call-a-operator-inside-a-function/
/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.6.3/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.3.3/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on February 23, 2024 have been accepted.
Provider cncf.kubernetes is excluded thus not counting votes casted on it.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Jarek Potiuk
- Hussein Awala
4 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Vince
> > > >> version to be able to remove it (so even if it is deprecated 2
> months
> > > ago
> > > >> but we had release with the deprecation, it's ok to remove it in the
> > > next
> > > >> breaking change.
> > > &g
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-smtp/1.6.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-telegram/4.4.0rc2/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.6.3rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.3.3rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
This is not too much different than what we already do.
We deprecate then we remove. We almost never create breaking change without
deprecating first.
I'd like to raise a few notes:
1. Major releases can happen frequently. I see no problem with it. This is
more a question of what are the
.
Full list of released PyPI packages:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-teradata/2.0.0/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on February 23, 2024 have been accepted.
Provider cncf.kubernetes is excluded thus not counting votes casted on it.
4 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Andrey Anshin
- Jarek Potiuk
- Hussein Awala
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.
+1 binding
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 12:03 PM Phani Kumar
wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 4:00 AM Hussein Awala wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) ran the same checks and tests as the RC2; all look good.
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 8:22 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> >
> > > +1
+1 (binding)
checked some of my dags. Looks good
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 6:25 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * Installed and ran it locally. Ran a few DAGs, inspected the wheel/sdist/
> to see if all the requirements are correct. Converted the sdist to wheel
> with pip wheel (this
he documentation
after the
RC candidates are released.
You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-teradata/2.0.0rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
.
Full list of released PyPI packages:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024 have been accepted.
Provider cncf.kubernetes is excluded thus not counting votes casted on it.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Andrey Anshin
- Jarek Potiuk
5 "+1" non-binding votes received:
-
che-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc3/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
.
Full list of released PyPI packages:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.18.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.11.0/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on February 17, 2024 have been accepted.
Provider cncf.kubernetes is excluded thus not counting votes casted on it.
4 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Husein Awala
- Andrey Anshin
- Jarek Potiuk
3 "+1" non-binding vot
>> Public keys are available at:
> > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [ ] +1 approv
ject/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.18.0rc2/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc2/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.11.0rc3/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.3.2/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.9.0/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024 have been accepted.
Providers amazon, cncf.kubernetes and common.sql are excluded thus not
counting votes casted on these providers.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Husein Awala
- Jarek Potiuk
5 "+1&quo
#37279
> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37279> is too risky and
> needs
> > >> some
> > >>> testing, I will try to find some time to test all the cases
> (especially
> > >> the
> > >>> compatibility with GKE and E
ypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-vertica/3.7.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.3.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.9.0rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
I'm not sure about #best-practices - To my perspective best practice is
normally a symbol of something that should be improved. Things should be
simple/easy enough thus avoiding the need to have best practice on them.
Thus any best practice discussion needs to be done on GitHub Discussion or
I'm -0 (binding)
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 10:51 AM Akash Sharma <2akash111...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 13:30 Jarek Potiuk, wrote:
>
> > Since this is a controversial topic, just a kind reminder - the voting
> ends
> > today in ~ 8 hrs. If you feel (even
.
Full list of released PyPI packages:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/9.0.0/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on January 30, 2024 have been accepted.
4 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Jarek Potiuk
- Ephraim Anierobi
- Husein Awala
6 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Wei Lee
- Pankaj Singh
- Rahul Vats
- Pankaj Koti
- Andrey Anshi
I agree with Ash.
I think leaving threads open is a feature not a problem.
I used it with referencing todos in new issues and I think it's easier when
the thread is kept open.
Personally if I have a review that is important to me to follow up on then
I publish it as request changes not as
lished in the documentation
after the
RC candidates are released.
You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/9.0.0rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 2:08 AM Hussein Awala wrote:
> +1 (binding) I did the same tests and checks as for the first RC.
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:28 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> > Just a small comment - most of this has already been checked, so if we
> can
> > have PMC
egram/4.4.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.6.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.3.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.8.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-zendesk/4.7.0rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Proposal looks solid and covers all needed aspects
Thank you for the time invested in drafting it.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:49 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Fantastic :). Will take a look. I think with all those - if there are no
> comments from others in a day or so - might be a good time to
+1 binding
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:52 PM Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> +1 binding.
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 11:00, Hussein Awala wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences and sources, I also
> > ran some testing DAGs; all look good.
> >
> >
> > On Thu 18 Jan 2024 at
Hi David,
Thanks for raising this discussion.
following the protocol established about accepting new providers -
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/PROVIDERS.rst#accepting-new-community-providers
My main concern here is how will provide ongoing mantaince for this
provider?
This provider
/project/apache-airflow-providers-opsgenie/5.5.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-pagerduty/3.6.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-redis/3.6.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-samba/4.5.0/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on January 07, 2024 have been accepted.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif (binding)
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Husein Awala (binding)
9 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Wei Lee
- Rahul Vats
- Pankaj Koti
- Amogh Desai
- V
Welcome to the new members who joined the triage team.
Please read the triage process guidelines to avoid wrong tagging
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/ISSUE_TRIAGE_PROCESS.rst
Feel free to join the #issue-triage channel on slack
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 10:25 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
g/project/apache-airflow-providers-samba/4.5.0rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 2:54 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> 1 more binding vote needed for Waeviate :)
>
> On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 6:11 AM Pankaj Singh
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 8:29 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 12:44 AM Hussein Awala wrote:
> +1 (binding) I ran all the checks (signatures, licences, checksums, and
> sources) and tested my changes; all looked good.
>
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 12:16 PM Phani Kumar
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > On Sat, 30 Dec
Hi Sunil,
Proposal looks very solid and I do see the value in having a Teradata
provider.
I agree with Jarek and I am +1 for it.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:27 PM K Mallam, Sunil
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m Sunil Mallam, a Staff Product Manager with Teradata, owning the
> Third-Party Connectors and
I am not sure I understand what is the problem that we are trying to solve
here?
I think it's the maintainer's responsibility to check if the PR is ready to
be merged (closed threads or open).
I actually sometimes consider leaving some of the threads open - especially
when referencing a followup
+1 binding
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 12:50 PM Phani Kumar
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 4:13 PM Hussein Awala wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) I checked the checksums, the signatures, the licences and
> the
> > sources, I also ran some testing dags with Breeze. all looks good.
> >
hi Alexander
Once we move to lazy consensus thread it will be attached with PR to change
the docs + newsfragmant to explain that the feature is now fully supported.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 7:06 PM Alexander Shorin wrote:
> According the docs
>
>
>
gh Desai <
> amoghdesai@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1, sounds reasonable to me
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 3:25 PM, Pierre Jeambrun
> > > > > > > > >
If There were no issues discovered so far I am +1 in making it non
experimental for 2.9
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 2:45 PM Maciej Obuchowski
wrote:
> Make it non -experimental in 2.9 - forgot to add.
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, 13:43 Maciej Obuchowski
> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> > The listener
packages.
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers (based on RC1) have been accepted.
Providers Google, ODBC, Databricks, Docker are excluded from RC1
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif (binding)
- Hussein Awala (binding)
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
5 "+1" non-binding votes rece
it, but anyway, there is
> a
> > bug on the mentioned PR, and the provider will probably be excluded from
> > RC1.
> >
> > +1 (binding) for the other providers.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:39 AM Elad Kalif wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
>
project/apache-airflow-providers-vertica/3.7.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/1.1.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.7.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-zendesk/4.5.0rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
/docs/apache-airflow-providers/installing-from-sources
You can install the providers via PyPI:
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers/installing-from-pypi
The documentation is available at https://airflow.apache.org/docs/ and
linked from the PyPI packages.
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers (based on RC1) have been accepted.
4 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif (binding)
- Hussein Awala (binding)
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Bolke de Bruin (binding)
8 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Pankaj Koti
- Wei Lee
- Amogh
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.4.1rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Now that the code is in its own provider we can check the download stats of
the library via Pypi stats.
בתאריך יום ד׳, 15 בנוב׳ 2023, 15:32, מאת Jarek Potiuk :
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I would like to start discussion about potential suspension and eventually
> removal of Daskexecutor provider.
>
from the PyPI packages.
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers (based on RC1) have been accepted.
Providers http and discord have been excluded from this wave and RC2 will
follow shortly
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif (binding)
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Hussein Awala (binding)
1 "+1&quo
well as detailed changelog following the below
links:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-discord/3.4.1rc2/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-http/4.7.0rc2/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers/installing-from-pypi
The documentation is available at https://airflow.apache.org/docs/ and
linked from the PyPI packages.
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers (based on RC1) have been accepted.
Providers http and discord have been excluded from this wave and RC2 will
follow shortly
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif (binding)
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Hussein Awala (binding)
- Kaxil Naik (bindi
g
> >>> this
> >>> > > release
> >>> > > with impeccable timing. We (Astronomer) truly value this effort and
> >>> are
> >>> > > enthusiastic
> >>> > > about the establishment of a placeholder and initial space in
> >>>
ders-weaviate/1.0.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/3.6.0rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers/installing-from-pypi
The documentation is available at https://airflow.apache.org/docs/ and
linked from the PyPI packages.
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers (based on RC1) have been accepted.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif (binding)
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Hussein Awala (binding)
3 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Vincent Beck
- Wei Lee
- Rahul Vats
Vote thread:
https://lis
pache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/4.3.0rc1/changelog.html
>
> Is there any other way I can check this?
>
> Thanks,
> Utkarsh Sharma
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 11:25 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have just cut the new wave Airflow
1 - 100 of 379 matches
Mail list logo
