i-metrics/pull/108
[3]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/vtx5crnr05tc0npxj2yf7c2ko346n3h9
Kengo Seki
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:37 AM Brahma Reddy Battula wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry,again. Did I miss anything, Not sure why we are in a hurry, without
> discussing the version and road map
+1 (binding)
* verified checksum and signature
* checked contents in the source tarball
* made sure the source tarball was successfully built without unit test failure
Kengo Seki
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:13 PM Zhiguo Wu wrote:
>
> Hello Community,
>
> This is a call for vot
98-log-1264
Zhiguo and I have fixed the existing unit test failures in
AMBARI-25869, AMBARI-25870, AMBARI-25874, AMBARI-25877, and
AMBARI-25878.
So I'm going to remove the property above from the CI job for trunk.
Please let me know if this chan
ng for users to publish our upcoming
release as 2.0.0.
How about canceling this vote, and publishing it as 2.8.0 or higher?
Kengo Seki
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 10:06 PM Kengo Seki wrote:
>
> Hi Brahma,
>
> Thank you for indicating the points we missed.
> Though all points are important a
27;t mean the vote failed immediately.
If there are three binding +1s and the number of binding +1s
are larger than -1s, and you don't think the issues pointed out
are critical, you still can move forward the release, as its manager.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-25859
[2]:
+1 (binding)
* verified checksum and signature
* checked contents in the source tarball
* made sure the source tarball was successfully built without unit test failure
Thanks for driving this release, Zhiguo!
Kengo Seki
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 7:07 PM Zhiguo Wu wrote:
>
> Hello Com
:36:41+09:00
[INFO]
```
So far so good, but I found some unit test failures and filed as
AMBARI-25864, 25865 and 25866.
Some of them seem to be a problem of tests themselves, but I'm not
sure if all of them are so. I need some time to investigate.
Keng
igtop-select"
- Consistent with the stack name
- No concern about infringing others' trademark
[1]:
https://github.com/apache/ambari/tree/release-2.7.6/ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/BIGTOP/0.8
[2]: https://github.com/apache/bigtop/tree/master/bigtop-packages/src/common
So it doesn't have the risk of trademark infringement.
[1]:
https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html#what-makes-the-apache-way-so-hard-to-define
[2]: https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#mailing-list-naming-policy
[3]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/list/
Kengo Seki
O
jp/en/bigdataplatform/
[3]:
https://help.talend.com/r/en-US/8.0/studio-getting-started-guide-big-data-platform/introduction
[4]: https://www.harmony-alliance.eu/bigdata-platform/big-data-platform
Kengo Seki
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:51 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy wrote:
>
> >Do you mean th
void the conflict or user's confusion with existing
trademarks or products)
Kengo Seki
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:08 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy
wrote:
>
> > The name of stack based no Bigtop should be Bigtop.
> > If you can not accept the name like bigtop-*, the work shou
work on that branch and ensuring that it works expectedly,
we can merge it into master, I think.
Kengo Seki
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 4:21 PM Battula, Brahma Reddy
wrote:
>
> Thanks @Viraj Jasani to start discussing on this.
>
> IMO, For upcoming ambari release(2.7.7) , we should ha
https://github.com/apache/ambari/blob/release-2.7.6/ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.6/repos/repoinfo.xml
[3]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/m77lhzo0njr2dhoock5twtm0c19j2py8
Kengo Seki
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 8:05 PM Battula, Brahma Reddy
wrote:
>
> We'll not use the
rding to ASF's release policy [1], we must publish the
corresponding source releases whenever we publish binary artifacts,
such as RPM and DEB packages for HDP.
[1]: https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#compiled-packages
Kengo Seki
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 6:19 PM Battula, Brahma
Oh, I've just noticed that I submitted an additional question into the
wrong thread mistakenly.
https://lists.apache.org/thread/j6kc2h1lphvjvsblcthcl5yzzmjk3tb5 is
originally intended as a reply to this thread. Sorry for the
confusion.
Kengo Seki
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:31 AM Kengo
Sorry, I have one question.
Assuming that we support HDP in the 2.7.x line, can we still download
and deploy its packages from a public repository?
I think Cloudera's repositories went behind a paywall, but maybe I
don't understand its usage or terms of use so much.
Kengo Seki
On M
[2]:
https://github.com/apache/ambari/tree/release-2.7.6/ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/BIGTOP/0.8
Kengo Seki
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 9:26 AM Viraj Jasani wrote:
>
> Thanks for the nice draft, Brahma!
>
> IMHO, as we narrow down to 2.7.7 release, it might be still worth
7.6), we can provide the Bigtop stack
only through Mpack, so we use it.
* Since Ambari 2.8.0 (or 2.7.7?), we replace the default stack with
Bigtop's one as built-in, which allows us to drop the Bigtop Mpack.
Kengo Seki
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 8:33 AM Viraj Jasani wrote:
>
> FWIW, I agr
18 matches
Mail list logo
