At 04:53 PM 6/5/2003 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On http://www.jguru.com/forums/answer.jsp?op=62EID=1091298 there is a nice
question.
Maybe we should add that pattern as example.
Following the diff.
Thanks for the diff, but I think the examples should be as illuminating as
possible, rather
It´s ok. But I think the
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?AntProjectPages
should be listed in the Navbar of the Homepage
(xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml ?).
Something like
item name=Ant´s Wiki
href=http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?AntProjectPages/
Jan
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-06-06/test-ant.html
Build results exceed maximum length.
Please see URL above for details.
Last 50
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10350.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18192.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20547.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Here is a radical idea that I'd like to kick around a little.
The prohibition against more than one target of the same name in the
same build script seems logical, but it impedes a form of reuse that I
think would be very handy to use.
If you include one build file within another (using ENTITY
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Title: AW: Overridable targets?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Freitag, 6. Juni 2003 16:54
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Overridable targets?
Here is a radical idea that I'd like to kick around a little.
The prohibition
I can see that that would work, but it seems to be more difficult than
what I am proposing. You have to make sure that EVERY build file that
includes your generics defines the changeable behavior, and you can't
have a overridable default implemenation in the generic file. Or am I
missing
Personally I'd find this very useful, our Ant script started off quite small
with limited uses. But like most things in software it soon became a victim
of its own success and soon became quite unwieldy. Obviously this was down
to our lack of fore throught.
We currently use Ant calls to separate
Hi,
Would appreciate it if you would take a look at iFtp-Ant and consider adding
it to The External tools and tasks list.
Index: external.xml
===
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/OSS/external.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20554.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Steve Cohen wrote, On 06/06/2003 16.54:
Here is a radical idea that I'd like to kick around a little.
The prohibition against more than one target of the same name in the
same build script seems logical, but it impedes a form of reuse that I
think would be very handy to use.
It is already done
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Dawid,
You may consider having a parallel set of code
for bsh CVS head as some of the bsh apis
have changed since 1.2.x
Peter.
On Friday 06 June 2003 15:53, Dawid Weiss wrote:
Dear ANT community,
I thought one day: maybe it would be fun if I could define ANT tasks INSIDE
the ANT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20547.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
A propos, Nicola, and Costin
In the path docs/manual/CoreTasks of the ant CVS, there is some room between
gzip.html and input.html for ... guess what.
Antoine
- Original Message -
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:04 PM
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20554.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20554.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
A new entry into the External Tools and Tasks section.
Name: FMPP
Description:
FMPP is a general-purpose text file preprocessor tool that uses
FreeMarker templates. It is particularly designed for HTML preprocessor,
for the generation of complete (static) homepages: directory structure
that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20566.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
antoine 2003/06/06 14:12:13
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/perforce
P4HandlerAdapter.java P4Handler.java
Added: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/perforce
P4OutputStream.java
Log:
Fix
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18956.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks. I knew it was a feasible idea.
-Original Message-
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Overridable targets?
Steve Cohen wrote, On 06/06/2003 16.54:
Here is a radical idea that I'd like to
Peter, you are not the only one who sees failures on Windows for these
tests. Additionnally, on my machine a couple of other tests fail (Image,
Antlr, ...)
That is not so good. We need to work on these failing tests (to see if the
testcases or the classes being tested are wrong, and fix whatever
Your patch looks OK.
But it cannot go into ant 1.5.3, it can go into ant 1.6alpha and later into
ant 1.6 final.
Antoine
- Original Message -
From: Michael Beauregard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:51 PM
Subject: patch to ant 1.5.3: add option to
32 matches
Mail list logo
