Patch for Orion EjbJar support

I have attached a patch adding an OrionDeploymentTool so that the ejbjar task supports the Orion application server. The patch is against Ant version 1.5.3-1. diff -urN apache-ant-1.5.3-1/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ejb/EjbJar.java apache-ant-1.5.3-1.orion/src/main/org/apache/to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19358] - Add timezone to FTP

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19358] - Add timezone to FTP

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net FTP.java

antoine 2003/08/07 15:23:35 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net FTP.java Log: Removed unused variable Revision ChangesPath 1.45 +0 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/net/FTP.java Index: FTP.java ==

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks ftp.html

antoine 2003/08/07 15:20:34 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks ftp.html Log: There have been several bug reports showing that users did not understand the meaning of remotedir and of the nested fileset(s) for the different actions of the ftp task. I have added a table to expla

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18175] - Attempting to FTP causes ant to hang.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13876] - FTP task "remotedir" attribute support also for GET action

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12258] - Ant's ftp "mkdir" does not create subdirectories

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18240] - filesets in conjunction with FTP.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21044] - ftp mkdir fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22223] - bogus condition results

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22223] - bogus condition results

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22221] - telnet session skips read/write

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2236] - Visual Age vajload task - ability to load open projects in workspace

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22227] New: - available task should support references IMO

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22223] - bogus condition results

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22221] - telnet session skips read/write

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22221] - telnet session skips read/write

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: and Mono (was Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional dotnet.xml)

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 06 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yup. We either want no refs, or we want the mono refs. With /nostdlib+ and Mono refs it doesn't work (Mono tries to open the refs in read/write mode, no idea why). So in the case of Mono I'd vote for no refs. OK

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22223] New: - bogus condition results

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22221] - telnet session skips read/write

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: override

I stumbled upon this thread late, and have tried to catch up, but am far from there, sorry. My perspective is I import (include) things for "scriptlet re-use", I am not trying to override. I guess w/ property immutability I'd just assumed target immutability (although I know importing can change t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18280] - FTP task with nested doesn't work.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22221] New: - telnet session skips read/write

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: override

Knut Wannheden wrote, On 07/08/2003 16.13: ... Maybe it would be better to think in the term of "mixin" as some languages (e.g. some Lisp flavours and Ruby) use. The following two exerpts are from the Modules chapter of the free book "Programming Ruby: The Pragmatic Programmer's Guide" (http://www

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22220] New: - CVS task does not interoperate with cvsnt client

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/lib README xercesImpl.jar

bodewig 2003/08/07 08:07:33 Modified:.Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH WHATSNEW lib Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH README xercesImpl.jar Log: This branch already contained a newer Xerces than 1.5.3 anyway - upgrade to 2.5.0 Revision ChangesPath No rev

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2236] - Visual Age vajload task - ability to load open projects in workspace

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18667] - javah module no longer works with Java 1.4.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22080] - VAJImport task fails with NullPointerException when using DirectoryScanner

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: override

> From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > I don't know _any_ programming language where import is used for > inheritance. > Believe it or not, XSLT is a programming language. :-) And it uses the term import for inheritance. > Well, KISS is my conc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20457] - VAJRemoteUtil calls getAbsolutePath instead of getPath

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10016] - VAJ Tasks broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: override

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote, On 07/08/2003 16.15: Some comments on the issues inside: From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Well, IMHO I personally don't see a real, strong, compelling reason to have targets have crosstalk between themselves, but I do have an equally strong

Re: override

Sorry if the mail becomes long, I have difficulty in deciding what to snip ;-) Costin Manolache wrote, On 07/08/2003 15.56: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Thanks for the overview, Nicola ! Just to get you up to speed, the current issue is about multiple inheritance, and how the current system allows c

Ant project status report

Status Report for the Ant project o Ant 1.5.3-1 This was a supplementary release made on April 16th. There was no functional change. from Ant 1.5.3 - it just removed a copy of junit.jar which had inadvertently been included in the Ant 1.5.3 build. o Ant 1.5.4 This is scheduled for release in

RE: PH2-provided from proposal in 1.5 branch

I wanted to look again at proposals/embeb, which supported a version of thru ProjectHelperImpl2.java, supposedly compatible with Ant 1.5.x. I'll need sooner than 1.6 will be coming my way apparently, and need to investigate all my alternatives, from PH2 above, and the recently announced AntMerge

Re: PH2-provided from proposal in 1.5 branch

On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are all the proposals gone from the 1.5 branch? I've removed the proposals from the 1.5 branch a while ago as they've been unmaintained (i.e. changes made in the main branch have not been ported to the 1.5 branch). What exac

RE: override

Some comments on the issues inside: > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Costin Manolache wrote, On 07/08/2003 4.43: > > >>- add possibility of prefix in import declaration > >> > > > > This would work as a "qualified name" ? > > I think basically yes, but > > > What

Re: override

> >> > >>>Just to get you up to speed, the current issue is about multiple > >>>inheritance, and how the current system allows cross-import (unwanted?) > >>>side-effects, as Conor has brilliantly shown. > >> > >> What I'm not sure I understand is what import has to do with multiple > >> inheritance

RE: PH2-provided from proposal in 1.5 branch

Anyone? Stefan? Why are all the proposals gone from the 1.5 branch? Please... --DD > -Original Message- > From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:03 PM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: PH2-provided from proposal in 1.5 branch > >

Re: override

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: >> Thanks for the overview, Nicola ! >> >>>Just to get you up to speed, the current issue is about multiple >>>inheritance, and how the current system allows cross-import (unwanted?) >>>side-effects, as Conor has brilliantly shown. >> >> What I'm not sure I understand

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22211] - Javadoc task : cannot link to other api doc with a relative path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22211] - Javadoc task : cannot link to other api doc with a relative path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: override

Costin Manolache wrote, On 07/08/2003 4.43: Thanks for the overview, Nicola ! Just to get you up to speed, the current issue is about multiple inheritance, and how the current system allows cross-import (unwanted?) side-effects, as Conor has brilliantly shown. What I'm not sure I understand is what

[GUMP] Build Failure - ant-testutil

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml prepare: check_for_optional_packages: build: [co

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22211] New: - Javadoc task : cannot link to other api doc with a relative path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan

- Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Apart from the reason I've mentioned (only a handful of well tested > changes), there is another one. If we make an RC, people will expect > that we fix bugs found in that RC. We already know about bugs in it, > namely th

[vms] case sensitivity and s

The old native file system (ODS-2) on OpenVMS is completely case insensitive. A file will have all uppercase letters in the name and can be accessed using lowercase, uppercase, or mixed case. With the new ODS-5 file system this is a little bit different; I'd call it "partially case sensitive". F

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan

On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:28:37PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Paul Nasrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please can the javacc fix go in too. > > I wouldn't want to. Not because the change was too big, but simply to > keep this release (and its process) as low level as

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan

On Thursday 07 August 2003 12:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > VAJ is in as the people who will benefit from the changes won't > benefit from Ant 1.6 (as VAJ runs on a JDK 1.1 VM). Ah! Now I understand... +1 for the release - To uns

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan

On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Paul Nasrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please can the javacc fix go in too. I wouldn't want to. Not because the change was too big, but simply to keep this release (and its process) as low level as possible. If we add the javacc changes, why not do the same for the VSS cha

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:46:24PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > No long winded plan as this one should be rather trivial IMHO. > > The plan: Sounds good. > The only changes over 1.5.3 will be the changes to and the VAJ > tasks. Therefore I plan to explicitly state in the release notes as >

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar TarRoundTripTest.java

bodewig 2003/08/07 04:17:17 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar TarRoundTripTest.java Log: Add missing import Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -0 ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar/TarRoundTripTest.java Index: TarRoundTripTest.java ==

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar TarRoundTripTest.java

bodewig 2003/08/07 04:14:14 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/tar TarInputStream.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar TarRoundTripTest.java Log: 2003 and missing license Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/tar/TarInpu

Re: getExcludedFiles() and slowScan()

On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have never understood, why do we need getExcludedFiles() or > getNotIncludedFiles(). What kind of tasks need this functionality? No built-in task does, but there are custom tasks that do. I once broke getNotIncludedFiles a

RE: getExcludedFiles() and slowScan()

I have never understood, why do we need getExcludedFiles() or getNotIncludedFiles(). What kind of tasks need this functionality? Jose Alberto > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 07 August 2003 07:59 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: getExclud

Re: and Mono (was Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional dotnet.xml)

On Wed, 06 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yup. We either want no refs, or we want the mono refs. With /nostdlib+ and Mono refs it doesn't work (Mono tries to open the refs in read/write mode, no idea why). So in the case of Mono I'd vote for no refs. > I was thinking of s

Re: getExcludedFiles() and slowScan()

On Wed, 06 Aug 2003, Alex Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A fast scan ignores directories which can't possibly hold any > included files/directories, but getExcludedFiles() says it doesn't > care about these because it will never return them. The fast scan will also exclude directories that ar

Re: override

Thanks for the overview, Nicola ! > Just to get you up to speed, the current issue is about multiple > inheritance, and how the current system allows cross-import (unwanted?) > side-effects, as Conor has brilliantly shown. What I'm not sure I understand is what import has to do with multiple inhe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15230] - TAR long path names (GNU format) append a trailing 0 char

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu