DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23647] - when build fails due to character-encoding problems, no linenumber is given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23659] - Jar Task should support the M option

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23660] New: - Added "Rename" action to the FTP task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Antidote Builds Antidoge: Weird console message

Why does using Antidote to build Antidote result in this console message? main: Duplicated project name in import. Project Antidote defined first in /usr/local/src/ant/antidote/ant-antidote/build.xml and again in /usr/local/src/ant/antidote/ant-antidote/build.xml -- Jack J. Woehr # You mea

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23659] New: - Jar Task should support the M option

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16427] - Output return value of setLastModified/document behaviour

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: files and properties

Matt Benson wrote: (Apologies in advance for the length of this post) The feeling has been growing in me that a future version of Ant should abstract the concept of file I/O with an interface that can supply InputStreams and OutputStreams, or Readers and Writers if we can restrict to character cont

Re: Bug 23526: should support nested elements

Matt Benson wrote: Has anyone had a look at this stuff? It's a very minor change, but since it's an enhancement I'm guessing it's not going to make 1.6. What will it take to get it added to the 1.7 tree (assuming it can't make 1.6)? It'll go into 1.7, barring any objections from anyone. I know it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23647] - when build fails due to character-encoding problems, no linenumber is given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug 23526: should support nested elements

Has anyone had a look at this stuff? It's a very minor change, but since it's an enhancement I'm guessing it's not going to make 1.6. What will it take to get it added to the 1.7 tree (assuming it can't make 1.6)? -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping -

cvs commit: ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/xml XMLWriter.java

chrisw 2003/10/07 09:39:59 Modified:src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/xml XMLWriter.java Log: Cleans up a little more how a comment gets persisted to an XML-File. Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +7 -1 ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/xml/XMLWriter.java

Re: failonerror; general solution

Thanks. --- peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is in the 1.6 beta release manual off the > "concepts and types" section. > > Peter > > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 15:21, Matt Benson wrote: > > Could someone please point me to the antlib > > documentation? > > > > Thanks, > > Matt > > >

Re: cvs commit: ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/customizer package.html

Hi Antoine! > Reviewed by is to be filled in only if another antidote > committer (outside > of you) had reviewed the code. Hmm... So I just have to fill in the comment in normal commits, right!?! Has this been changed lately...? I am using an IDE (eclipse) for the commits now - previousely using

Re: failonerror; general solution

On Tue, 07 Oct 2003, Dale Anson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The source for ant-contrib's has your name as the author, > so "them" is "you"??! "I" am part of "them" and have already agreed to sign all papers that are needed (if that is needed at all, given I've already signed a couple of other p

Re: failonerror; general solution

Stefan, The source for ant-contrib's has your name as the author, so "them" is "you"??! Dale Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 06 Oct 2003, Gus Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sequential has the advantage of not needing to get the ant-contrib folks to give it to us (which I seem to remember was the

Re: failonerror; general solution

It is in the 1.6 beta release manual off the "concepts and types" section. Peter On Tuesday 07 October 2003 15:21, Matt Benson wrote: > Could someone please point me to the antlib > documentation? > > Thanks, > Matt > > --- Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > Actually, we co

files and properties

(Apologies in advance for the length of this post) The feeling has been growing in me that a future version of Ant should abstract the concept of file I/O with an interface that can supply InputStreams and OutputStreams, or Readers and Writers if we can restrict to character content--which would b

cvs commit: ant/xdocs faq.xml

bodewig 2003/10/07 07:29:30 Modified:docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH faq.html xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH faq.xml Log: Update the delegating-classloader FAQ Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.77.2.1 +19 -1

cvs commit: ant/xdocs faq.xml

bodewig 2003/10/07 07:28:25 Modified:docs faq.html xdocsfaq.xml Log: Update the delegating-classloader FAQ Revision ChangesPath 1.79 +19 -1 ant/docs/faq.html Index: faq.html ===

RE: failonerror; general solution

Could someone please point me to the antlib documentation? Thanks, Matt --- Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, we could just ask them to put it in an > ANTLIB > and get permission to ship the jar version. That > should be quite > straight > forward. Otherwise it means m

AW: cvs commit: ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/customizer package.html

Hi Chris, for the next submission, I think that the correct filling of the CVS commit message should have been : Submitted by: Jack Woehr AFAIK Obtained from is only to fill in if the code is transferred to Apache from another organization. Reviewed by is to be filled in only if another antido

RE: cvs commit: ant build.xml

Cool, haven´t looked at that. But nice "introduction" in :-) Jan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: ant build.xml > > > bodewig 2003/10/07 04:44:34 > >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23649] New: - Requirement for a method to not make entries in the xml reports.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant build.xml

bodewig 2003/10/07 04:44:48 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH build.xml Log: Reintroduce ant-jdepend.jar Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.392.2.5 +1 -0 ant/build.xml Index: build.xml

cvs commit: ant build.xml

bodewig 2003/10/07 04:44:34 Modified:.build.xml Log: Reintroduce ant-jdepend.jar Revision ChangesPath 1.398 +1 -0 ant/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/build.xml

Re: GUMP-Failure

On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe the JDepend classes are not on that Gump installation? Even then a manifest-only jar should be created. Oops, looks as if I had accidently removed jdepend when I introduced the optional-jar macro. Stefan ---

GUMP-Failure

While discussion about Gump on AntUser I took a look at some resources. And some projects are failung because Ant´s build doesn´t produce the exptected results: http://gump.cocoondev.org/ant-testutil.html Missing prereq /usr/serverlocal/gump/ant/build/lib/ant-jdepend.jar from dist-ant But dist

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23647] - when build fails due to character-encoding problems, no linenumber is given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23647] - when build fails due to character-encoding problems, no linenumber is given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23647] New: - when build fails due to character-encoding problems, no linenumber is given

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: failonerror; general solution

Actually, we could just ask them to put it in an ANTLIB and get permission to ship the jar version. That should be quite straight forward. Otherwise it means migrating the tasks to new packages, etc. I think ANTCONTRIB is one of the best candidates for antlib that we have. Jose Alberto > -Or

New ANT Image Transformation Tasks

I have developed a set of very simple ANT Image Tasks. It is actually one task with nested elements for transformations. Since lot of projects (atleast web apps) have images, this might be helpful. It can be used for thumb-nailing, writing copyright information on the images, overlaying images OR

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23645] - Timeout on task results in wrong statistics

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23645] New: - Timeout on task results in 0 tests and 1 error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: failonerror; general solution

On Mon, 06 Oct 2003, Gus Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sequential has the advantage of not needing to get the ant-contrib > folks to give it to us (which I seem to remember was the sticking > point b4) AFAIR the "sticking point" has been that we haven't asked them yet 8-) Stefan ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23639] New: - library jars placed in root directory of war package.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu