Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
What do people think? I will wait to see what are we interested
on doing before aproaching Bill. I know him from my time at Maryland,
hope he still remembers me.
I'm very interested.
If we do get an implementation for JDK1.2 - then it makes sense to have
it in the
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With respect on providing a version of pack200 usable by lesser JDKs
I think than rather trying to reproduce the thing from scratch, we
could just as well ask Bill Puig if he would be willing to
contribute such a task or at
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With respect on providing a version of pack200 usable by
lesser JDKs I
think than rather trying to reproduce the thing from
scratch, we could
just as well ask
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Alexey N. Solofnenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr200/index.html
I can't seem to find a link describing the pack algorithm (detailed
enough that I'd be able to reimplement it) that has finally been
implemented for Tiger from
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antlib.
If we really want to reimplement the algorithm so that it becomes
usable for JDK 1.5 I agree with this. It sounds like a candidate
for a Pack200 library in Commons plus Ant tasks plus command line
utilities IMHO.
If we
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Pugh's article is marked as a starting point. but I'm not
sure that this is identical to the algorithm finally used. And I
don't see an example implementation at his homepage (as hinted in
the conclusion of his article)
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Alexey N. Solofnenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr200/index.html
I can't seem to find a link describing the pack algorithm (detailed
enough that I'd be able to reimplement it)
On 11 Feb 2004, Denis N. Antonioli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The specification is in the jsr itself, you'll need to get the zip.
See the 'Download' link on:
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr200/index.html
This is what you get for setting Accept images that come from the
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we stick with JDK 1.5 only, this would become a two very simple
tasks, so I'm not sure about the antlib approach.
Why not support pack200/unpack200 directly from the zip and jar,
whenever running on JDK 1.5?
In zip/jar, it would add a
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we stick with JDK 1.5 only, this would become a two very simple
tasks, so I'm not sure about the antlib approach.
Why not support pack200/unpack200 directly from the zip and
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we stick with JDK 1.5 only, this would become a two very simple
tasks, so I'm not sure about the antlib approach.
Why not
From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 February 2004 14:59
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: Task for the new Pack200 format
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we stick with JDK 1.5 only, this would become a two very simple
tasks, so I'm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with the goal to make as many things antlibs as possible, I
could even be convinced that we start to break up our
current set of
core/optional tasks into antlibs with independent release cycles.
Then we´ll earn the whole
Hi,
Java 1.5 comes with support for a new archive format Pack200[1] which
basically works by using a special compression algorithm that is very
effective on Java class files. The way to create such an archive is
to create a plain old jar first and then turn ot into a Pack200
archive -
Java 1.5 comes with support for a new archive format Pack200[1] which
basically works by using a special compression algorithm that is very
effective on Java class files. The way to create such an archive is
to create a plain old jar first and then turn ot into a Pack200
archive -
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as an adoption of jar, so the user doesn´t has to create the
JAR bofore pack200ing.
Yes, sounds useful. In particular since the Pack200 class deals with
streams, so we could create the initial jar in memory - if it is small
enough,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Java 1.5 comes with support for a new archive format Pack200[1] which
basically works by using a special compression algorithm that is very
effective on Java class files. The way to create such an archive is
to create a plain old jar first and then turn ot into a Pack200
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because its based only on (new) standard classes I
would do that as
core tasks. And as an adoption of jar, so the user
doesn´t has to
create the JAR bofore pack200ing.
+1
-Matt
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund
Do we want to make them core tasks or do we want to farm
them out into
an antlib of their own?
Because its based only on (new) standard classes I would do that as
core tasks. And as an adoption of jar, so the user doesn´t has to
create the JAR bofore pack200ing.
core tasks would
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
core tasks would be the right solution if it could be implemented
using JDK1.3
1.2, you mean 8-)
So far I haven't found a technical spec for the format so I don't know
whether we can implement it. A JDK 1.5 only implementation
It is there:
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr200/index.html
- Alexey.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
core tasks would be the right solution if it could be implemented
using JDK1.3
1.2, you mean 8-)
So far I haven't
(butchered for context)
--- Alexey N. Solofnenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
So far I haven't found a technical spec for the
format so I don't know
whether we can implement it.
It is there:
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr200/index.html
Stefan
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
Java 1.5 comes with support for a new archive format Pack200[1] which
basically works by using a special compression algorithm that is very
effective on Java class files. The way to create such an archive is
to create a plain old jar first and then turn ot into a Pack200
23 matches
Mail list logo
