Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-27 Thread Mathias Bauer
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: WHat is this? I gather from your comments that the guide is proprietary. If this is the case then perhaps it is time for the OOo folk to think about having one of their own. Certainly an incentive for a project. Thanks. It seems that you don't know all the facts,

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-27 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 08:27 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: G. Roderick Singleton wrote: WHat is this? I gather from your comments that the guide is proprietary. If this is the case then perhaps it is time for the OOo folk to think about having one of their own. Certainly an incentive for a

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-27 Thread Mathias Bauer
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: Actually I think he reacted so strongly to my comment on the component perhaps being incorrect. The doc project does not have the source for the document but the issue shows up in our queue. I thought that we might help. Help is always appreciated. :-) As I

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-27 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 18:29 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: G. Roderick Singleton wrote: Actually I think he reacted so strongly to my comment on the component perhaps being incorrect. The doc project does not have the source for the document but the issue shows up in our queue. I thought

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-27 Thread Laurent Godard
Hi all Sorry if i hurted some of you by being so unpatient This will still not change a lot as most of the content will still come from the core developers but at least there will be a chance for others to contribute and of course to translate. Let's hope for the best. i'll be patient, so

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-26 Thread Knut Olav Bøhmer
On 9/25/06, Stephan Wunderlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cut If the documentation doesn't explain in sufficient way I'd consider that as an issue. By using Issuetracker you have the chance to report such issues and someone for sure will take care to fix the problem. The idl-documentation has

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-26 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 13:48 +0200, Laurent Godard wrote: Hi I agree. One problem though, the documentation project does not have the source documents so it is unlikely that the documents in the issues will ever be updated. Perhaps the component on the issues is wrong. this is a

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-26 Thread Laurent Godard
Hi I agree. One problem though, the documentation project does not have the source documents so it is unlikely that the documents in the issues will ever be updated. Perhaps the component on the issues is wrong. this is a real problem moreover, a lot of enhancements could be done such as -

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-26 Thread Stephan Wunderlich
Hi Knut, Ok, thanx. I'll make shure to file issues. There is a lot of them.. Starting with: 69861 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi? id=69861 and 69863 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69863 That is great :-) ... As you already pointed out a good documentation

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-26 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:31 +0200, Stephan Wunderlich wrote: Hi Knut, Ok, thanx. I'll make shure to file issues. There is a lot of them.. Starting with: 69861 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi? id=69861 and 69863 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69863

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-26 Thread Knut Olav Bøhmer
On 9/26/06, Laurent Godard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I agree. One problem though, the documentation project does not have the source documents so it is unlikely that the documents in the issues will ever be updated. Perhaps the component on the issues is wrong. this is a real problem

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-26 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 13:48 +0200, Laurent Godard wrote: Hi I agree. One problem though, the documentation project does not have the source documents so it is unlikely that the documents in the issues will ever be updated. Perhaps the component on the issues is

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-26 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 18:45 +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 13:48 +0200, Laurent Godard wrote: Hi I agree. One problem though, the documentation project does not have the source documents so it is unlikely that the documents in the issues

Re: [api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-26 Thread Mathias Bauer
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:31 +0200, Stephan Wunderlich wrote: Hi Knut, Ok, thanx. I'll make shure to file issues. There is a lot of them.. Starting with: 69861 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi? id=69861 and 69863

[api-dev] Obscure documentation (Was: [api-dev] insertnewbookmark)

2006-09-25 Thread Knut Olav Bøhmer
On 9/25/06, Stephan Wunderlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Knut, I couldn't find any service that pretends to implement the Interface XBookmarkInsertTool, so I suppose it has never been implemented. So the following seems to be the way to go when you want to insert a bookmark xText =