On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:33:11PM -0400, Greg Ames wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > FreeBSD sendfile: return an error if the kernel returns 0 & no bytes sent.
> > This probably means the file became smaller after it was stat()ed.
>
> While testing this on daedalus, I noticed yet anoth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FreeBSD sendfile: return an error if the kernel returns 0 & no bytes sent.
> This probably means the file became smaller after it was stat()ed.
While testing this on daedalus, I noticed yet another sendfile_it_all assert
dump in /tmp, dated May 10. I think I'll put
At 10:27 AM 5/17/2002, you wrote:
Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > trawick 02/05/17 07:58:27
> >
> > Modified:strings apr_cpystrn.c
> > Log:
> > don't check for malloc() failure in our strdup() replacement
>
> E - why not?
we're going to g
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:51:13PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> OtherBill's recent commit reminded me that I never got around to following
> up on http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=101647219122386&w=2,
> wherein we decided that it was okay for APR_XtOffsetOf to get renamed to
> APR_OFFS
OtherBill's recent commit reminded me that I never got around to following
up on http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=101647219122386&w=2,
wherein we decided that it was okay for APR_XtOffsetOf to get renamed to
APR_OFFSETOF. I've made all the changes and will commit them. My only
question
On Fri, 17 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There is a:
>
> #define APR_WANT_MEMFUNC
>
> This seems to interact with the above; i.e. when you do not get apr_pools
> in early enough. Is this avoidable; can we warn for this ?
I'm not sure I understand what the problem is. Is there a part
There is a:
#define APR_WANT_MEMFUNC
in both apr_allocators and apr_pools. Both apr_pools and apr_thread* get
included from various places. Once they are included their _H sentiniel
is defined; making sure they are never included again.
This seems to interact with the above; i.e. when y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> linux sendfile: exit with an error if the file gets smaller in the middle
> of
> a request.
btw, thanks Justin for analysing the dump from the new trap on daedalus.
Greg
Please see apr/network_io/unix/sockopt.c line 214.
The comment above that check says:
/* must disable the incomplete read support if we change to a
* blocking socket.
*/
if (on == 0) {
...disable incomplete reads...
}
But, if on == 0, we're a non-blocking socket (timeout value of 0
implies
Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > trawick 02/05/17 07:58:27
> >
> > Modified:strings apr_cpystrn.c
> > Log:
> > don't check for malloc() failure in our strdup() replacement
>
> E - why not?
we're going to get segfaults inside strdup()
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> trawick 02/05/17 07:58:27
>
> Modified:strings apr_cpystrn.c
> Log:
> don't check for malloc() failure in our strdup() replacement
E - why not?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
"There is no limi
>size_t len = strlen(str) + 1;
>
>if (!(sdup = (char *) malloc(len))) {
> -/* ### whoops! we can't call Apache logging routines here... */
> -#if 0
> -apr_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_STARTUP | APLOG_NOERRNO, 0, NULL,
> - "Ouch! Out of
12 matches
Mail list logo
