Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2003-06-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: trawick 2003/06/11 08:10:46 Modified:.configure.in Log: pick up apr-determined cflags and cppflags for apr-util configure I didn't add logic to pick up special includes directories learned by apr... not 100% confident that it should be omitted, but

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in Makefile.in

2001-08-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: dreid 01/08/31 02:47:53 Modified:srclib Makefile.in .configure.in Makefile.in Log: With my normal sense of missing the boat :) This gets the build working on BeOS again :) Apologies for the delay :( Jeff

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in Makefile.in

2001-08-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: dreid 01/08/31 02:47:53 Modified:srclib Makefile.in .configure.in Makefile.in Log: With my normal sense of missing the boat :) This gets the build working on BeOS again :) Apologies for the delay :( Jeff

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in Makefile.in

2001-08-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
, all the way around. Trying to toggle build orders by model will just get messier and messier. Bill - Original Message - From: Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@apr.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 8:41 AM Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in Makefile.in

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 31 August 2001 08:52, Jeff Trawick wrote: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 31 August 2001 07:48, Jeff Trawick wrote: -1 This is where we were before I made the change a few weeks ago. APR-util relies on APR to build, duplicating the build logic is a bad idea,

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in Makefile.in

2001-08-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 31 August 2001 08:52, Jeff Trawick wrote: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 31 August 2001 07:48, Jeff Trawick wrote: -1 This is where we were before I made the change a few weeks ago. APR-util relies on APR to build,

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in Makefile.in

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 31 August 2001 09:43, Jeff Trawick wrote: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 31 August 2001 08:52, Jeff Trawick wrote: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 31 August 2001 07:48, Jeff Trawick wrote: -1 This is where we were before I made the change

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2001-07-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: rbb 01/07/30 08:09:02 Modified:.configure.in Log: Grab the libtool.m4 files from APR. This fixes the bug Jeff just reported. You will only see the bug if you have removed the old aclocal.m4 file. c00l -- Jeff Trawick

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2001-05-09 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Index: configure.in === RCS file: /home/cvs/apr-util/configure.in,v *) dnl libtoolize requires that the following not be indented -AC_PROG_LIBTOOL +AC_PROG_LIBTOOL Look at the

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2001-05-09 Thread David Reid
Strange. Thanks Jeff. I figured as it was within a switch case we'd be OK, but apparently not! david trawick 01/05/09 10:10:33 Modified:.configure.in Log: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL can't be invoked more than once in a configure.in without causing weird side-effects, so

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2001-03-09 Thread Greg Stein
No. We run xml/expat/configure, and it produces that Makefile. APRUTIL shouldn't be doing this. Please back out this change. -g On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:29:04AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: martin 01/03/09 00:29:03 Modified:.configure.in Log: Make Makefile in

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2001-03-09 Thread David Reid
This change gets things building for me on BeOS... david No. We run xml/expat/configure, and it produces that Makefile. APRUTIL shouldn't be doing this. Please back out this change. -g On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:29:04AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: martin 01/03/09 00:29:03

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2001-03-09 Thread Martin Kraemer
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 05:06:25AM -0800, Greg Stein wrote: No. We run xml/expat/configure, and it produces that Makefile. APRUTIL shouldn't be doing this. Please back out this change. That is not really true. It definitely did not generate the Makefile, that's why I added the patch in the

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2001-03-09 Thread rbb
I have found recently, that buildconf doesn't really do what you expect in a lot of cases. Namely, it doesn't tend to traverse into srclib/apr and srclib/apr-util, and run those buildconf's. Try running those manually right now. I was going to investigate further before posting the bug, but

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2001-03-09 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 03:01:36PM +0100, Martin Kraemer wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 05:06:25AM -0800, Greg Stein wrote: No. We run xml/expat/configure, and it produces that Makefile. APRUTIL shouldn't be doing this. Please back out this change. That is not really true. It

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2001-03-09 Thread Greg Stein
That is probably the stupid dependency stuff in build2.mk. httpd's buildconf should unconditionally recurse. But Martin's error is something else, I believe (see other note). I'm testing a fix now. Cheers, -g On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 06:25:40AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have found

Re: cvs commit: apr-util configure.in

2001-03-09 Thread rbb
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Greg Stein wrote: That is probably the stupid dependency stuff in build2.mk. httpd's buildconf should unconditionally recurse. But Martin's error is something else, I believe (see other note). I'm testing a fix now. Okay, and that fix needs to go in (I mentioned it in my