Sean Broeder created CALCITE-4633:
-
Summary: Enable RelFieldTrimmer to trim fields on a distinct UNION
Key: CALCITE-4633
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4633
Project: Calcite
Steven Talbot created CALCITE-4632:
--
Summary: Exception in RelToSqlConverter: "Cannot convert x to
DECIMAL(n, m) due to overflow"
Key: CALCITE-4632
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4632
I ran those queries against Calcite. Calcite gives the correct result.
RelFieldTrimmer does the right thing.
I was explaining, in simple terms, what would break if you made your proposed
change to RelFieldTrimmer.
> On Jun 2, 2021, at 3:12 PM, Sean Broeder wrote:
>
> Thank you Julian.
>
>
+1 for removing those 2 scripts. They are for compatibility with very
old browsers that have been discontinued for many years, so it makes
sense to reduce the bloat.
Francis
On 3/06/2021 5:25 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
+0 to remove them entirely, if that is possible.
-1 to keep in git but
Thank you Julian.
I am able to reproduce your findings.
I am curious if the results highlight a bug in Calcite where we should expect 4
to be returned or is this a query that Calcite should not support?
Sean
> On Jun 2, 2021, at 11:37 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> Here’s a query that would
If it is de facto deprecated, then could it not just be deprecated with a
comment stating why it has not been deleted? Calcite seems to have several
API that are defacto deprecated and there is no way of knowing by reading
the code. This would personally have made me much simpler for myself to
+0 to remove them entirely, if that is possible.
-1 to keep in git but remove from source releases. We are already in
compliance with Apache policy, best I can tell.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 12:08 PM Haisheng Yuan wrote:
>
> +1 for removing them entirely.
>
> Thanks,
> Haisheng Yuan
>
> On
+1 for removing them entirely.
Thanks,
Haisheng Yuan
On 2021/06/02 13:36:05, Alessandro Solimando
wrote:
> Hi all,
> +1 for removing them as well, all the mentioned sw versions in [5,6]
> are extremely, extremely old.
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 14:38, Michael
Master is a moving target. Apparently you are using a version of the
code from sometime in March. These links work better:
[1]
https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/796675c9b33e0461bc45a72780162d474a4b098b/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/sql2rel/SqlToRelConverter.java#L2881
[2]
Thanks Stamatis for taking care of this release.
+1
- Calcite tests locally (macOS Catalina 10.15.7 + JVM 11.0.8 (AdoptOpenJDK
11.0.8+10) + Gradle 6.8.3): ok
- Unit and integration tests of the downstream project using Calcite 1.27.0 RC0
: ok
Igor
On 31 May 2021, 18:29 +0300,
Here’s a query that would give the wrong answer if you trim:
select count(*) from (
select deptno from scott.emp
union
select deptno from scott.dept);
returns 4. Note that ‘deptno’ is not used. But when I trim it away,
select count(*) from (
select 'a' from scott.emp
Steven Talbot created CALCITE-4631:
--
Summary: sql->rel->sql bug with unparsing timestampdiff
Key: CALCITE-4631
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4631
Project: Calcite
Issue
Dmitry Sysolyatin created CALCITE-4630:
--
Summary: Wrong logical plan for INNER JOIN with subquery
Key: CALCITE-4630
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4630
Project: Calcite
Hi all,
+1 for removing them as well, all the mentioned sw versions in [5,6]
are extremely, extremely old.
Best regards,
Alessandro
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 14:38, Michael Mior wrote:
>
> +1 for removing these entirely. I don't believe they are currently necessary.
> --
> Michael Mior
>
Currently the RefFieldTrimmer only trims on a UNION ALL operation. I've
been experimenting to see if it is also possible to trim on UNION
DISTINCT. Is there a simple query that demonstrates why this is not
possible?
Thanks,
Sean
+1 for removing these entirely. I don't believe they are currently necessary.
--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org
Le mer. 2 juin 2021 à 06:13, Stamatis Zampetakis a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the recent votes for Calcite [1] and Avatica [2] there were some -1
> votes regarding minified javascript
Hi all,
In the recent votes for Calcite [1] and Avatica [2] there were some -1
votes regarding minified javascript files present in the source releases.
The concerns are raised for the following files:
site/js/html5shiv.min.js
site/js/respond.min.js
>From discussions in other lists it seems
Thanks Stamatis for taking care of this release.
+1 (binding)
- Signature: ok
- Checksum: ok
- Tests locally (Windows10 + JDK 1.8.0_212 + Gradle 6.8.3): ok
- Calcite-based application test suite: ok
- Release notes: ok (apart from the minor date issue mentioned by
Alessandro)
Ruben
On Wed, Jun
18 matches
Mail list logo
