Thank you all for the feedback.
I committed the change for Calcite [1] and Avatica [2]. I checked locally
and things seemed to work fine.
I published the Calcite website with the changes today so if you notice any
problems please let me know.
Best,
Stamatis
[1]
+1 for removing those 2 scripts. They are for compatibility with very
old browsers that have been discontinued for many years, so it makes
sense to reduce the bloat.
Francis
On 3/06/2021 5:25 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
+0 to remove them entirely, if that is possible.
-1 to keep in git but
+0 to remove them entirely, if that is possible.
-1 to keep in git but remove from source releases. We are already in
compliance with Apache policy, best I can tell.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 12:08 PM Haisheng Yuan wrote:
>
> +1 for removing them entirely.
>
> Thanks,
> Haisheng Yuan
>
> On
+1 for removing them entirely.
Thanks,
Haisheng Yuan
On 2021/06/02 13:36:05, Alessandro Solimando
wrote:
> Hi all,
> +1 for removing them as well, all the mentioned sw versions in [5,6]
> are extremely, extremely old.
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 14:38, Michael
Hi all,
+1 for removing them as well, all the mentioned sw versions in [5,6]
are extremely, extremely old.
Best regards,
Alessandro
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 14:38, Michael Mior wrote:
>
> +1 for removing these entirely. I don't believe they are currently necessary.
> --
> Michael Mior
>
+1 for removing these entirely. I don't believe they are currently necessary.
--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org
Le mer. 2 juin 2021 à 06:13, Stamatis Zampetakis a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the recent votes for Calcite [1] and Avatica [2] there were some -1
> votes regarding minified javascript
Hi all,
In the recent votes for Calcite [1] and Avatica [2] there were some -1
votes regarding minified javascript files present in the source releases.
The concerns are raised for the following files:
site/js/html5shiv.min.js
site/js/respond.min.js
>From discussions in other lists it seems
