Hi
Just an update. Hadrian has started the 2.6 release today.
So keep an eye when he announces the VOTE and the binaries so we can
give it a last minute test spin.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hadrian
Can you keep us posted on the progress
of work requires longer time to do.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
which
would be interesting to have a Camel story and components out of the
box.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 24. Januar 2011 15:49
An: dev@camel.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping support for java 1.5 from camel-2.7.0 onwards
with dual-patching pain (back porting to slf4j and
commons-logging in parallel etc).
On 24 January 2011 14:49, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Camel-2.6.0 is being build while I write this. One
, right? The annotations are much cleaner but I don't see a
pressing need to migrate existing tests.
Ah yeah thats true.
I think we once upgraded to junit4 in camel-core and hit some issues.
But that was with an earlier version of junit 4.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib
Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.6.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
Vote is open for 72 hours.
Here's my +1
Hadrian
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http
Hope this post safes time for someone of you which upgrades to Maven 3 and
run into the same issue...
Christian
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action
-lang-OutOfMemoryError-tp3356207p3356248.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action
into it. Keep you
posted...
Cheers,
Christian
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-InOut-Performance-Issues-with-Correlation-Mechanism-tp489714p3356523.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
();
+ }
+
+}
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
at the async-http-client
project. That is really taking off.
https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client
There is a Camel JIRA ticket to create a new camel component for it.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog
=seda:foo?concurrentConsumers=20/
+ to uri=mock:success/
+ /route
+ /camelContext
+
+/beans
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel
As well as implement the performance optimizations in the routing
engine, which may entail a slight API chance / behavior on the EIPs
and Exchange. And some of the other improvements we have listed on
the roadmap.
That kind of work requires longer time to do.
--
Claus Ibsen
Hi
I have created a wiki page for the 2.7 roadmap with the goals we have
discussed here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Camel+2.7+-+Roadmap
I took the liberty to add some goals for improved testing.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
the logic lazy creates the registry and thus it needs
synchronization when creating.
Can we avoid this?
TypeConverter is used a lot in camel and it can be a bottleneck if we
are not careful.
So I would like the logic to create the registry up-front.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
and http4 have almost the same options
in the endpoint uri offered by Camel.
For example bridgeEndpoint and so forth.
But of course there could be never features in http4 which doesnt
existing in the old http component.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web
Hi
I have created some tickets for the roadmap
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3603
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3604
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3605
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have created
.
There is also code in camel-jms which should be removed.
And some pieces in camel-spring as well.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com
as I will have to do multiple commits to get it fully migrated.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Hi
Okay seems ready for one of the first commits for the migration.
There is an issue with OSGi blueprint, which I will have to revisit.
That OSGi stuff can as usual be a bit tricky to decipher wtf is wrong.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan
, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Okay seems ready for one of the first commits for the migration.
There is an issue with OSGi blueprint, which I will have to revisit.
That OSGi stuff can as usual be a bit tricky to decipher wtf is wrong.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Claus
...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Yeah:
Karaf 2.1.x uses PAX logging 1.5.x and SLF4J 1.5.8.
Karaf 2.2.x uses PAX logging 1.6.0 (that Guillaume and I have released last
week), PAX logging 1.6.0 supports SLF4J 1.6.1.
Regards
JB
On 01/31/2011 05:25 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:14 PM
the trunk code a test on your system.
For example trying out the example using both Maven and ANT.
Also double check the distribution kit includes the JAR needs as well.
I will update the release notes with some API changes and details
about the commons-logging to slf4j.
--
Claus Ibsen
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
sooner we can upgrade and require Maven 3.0.2+ as minimum.
For that to happen it would be nice to align with SMX, AMQ, CXF
projects so they all require and use the same version.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
(not from trunk). But unzip the
tar/zip and cd examples, and then try out from there.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
The migration is almost complete. I added a TODO about a Logger class
in Camel which would clash with the Logger in slf4j. So I
will be then the
first version to be released to public repo.
Yeah thats fine. Keep em. They artifacts is only distributed at the
google project site.
--
Henryk Konsek
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Hi
Camel 2.7 roadmap
http://camel.apache.org/camel-27-roadmap.html
The switching to slf4j logging is now complete on trunk.
Are we ready for the next step? To drop JDK 1.5?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3603
When we get started on this, there is no turning back.
--
Claus
(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:205)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Regards,
Nilesh Soni
--
Nilesh Soni
--
Claus
can control if a route should be enlisted or not
We could even add options to dictate which kind of mbeans you want enlisted
- consumers, producers, endpoints, routes, components
Maybe you just want routes, as all you want is to be able to
start/stop a given route.
Any thoughts?
--
Claus
.
Hadrian
On Feb 4, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
Camel 2.7 roadmap
http://camel.apache.org/camel-27-roadmap.html
The switching to slf4j logging is now complete on trunk.
Are we ready for the next step? To drop JDK 1.5?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3603
Hi
I have upgraded to Spring 3.0 as minimum now.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
to add RSS then yeah lest do it. For example if there is
some switch in Confluence.
Otherwise I propose to wait till we modernize the website.
Christian
--
http://www.liquid-reality.de
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http
+ public boolean isRunning() {
+ return alreadyRegistered;
+ }
+
+}
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
I also prefer option #2
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Christian Müller
christian.muel...@gmail.com wrote:
I would also prefer option #2.
Christian
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http
1.5 / spring 2.x dropped.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, you're absolutely right Claus. Easiest it to do it in a few smaller
steps.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On Feb 5, 2011, at 3:08 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 3:40 AM
.
I think any solution that would prevent operations from managing/monitoring
whatever they need is not a good one.
We can add option so end user can decide behavior. To register:
always, onlyOnStartingRoute etc.
Hadrian
On Feb 4, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
I might as well
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
for using the
spring-jdbc, eg the Spring JdbcTemplate.
So I would suggest camel-sql.
If you put it in camel-spring, then that adds a dep on spring-jdbc,
which we really dont want.
Christian
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter
Hi
In fact we got this new camel-jdbc-aggregator. We could consider
moving that into camel-sql as well.
Then we have all pieces in the same component for JDBC using spring
JdbcTemplate.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011
to control this behavior.
See Camel JMX for more details.
You can see the Camel JMX wiki page for more details as well.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel
-i -e 's/(\@version
+)?\$Revision: *[0-9]+ *\$//g'
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Many of the Java files in Camel source code have $revision$ tags.
I propose we remove those. It makes comparing branches and files more tricky.
And the git people told me it also makes some problem there as well.
We got this nice command to remove
- scopeAsChoice
Any good name?
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
(Type) this;
}
...
}
Thus you preserve the type safety and you example works.
Regards,
Mitko
From:
Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com
To:
dev dev@camel.apache.org
Date:
17.02.2011 09:49
Subject:
[DISCUSS] - Java DSL caveat with the Content Based Router
Hi
DSL in plain
) and whatever methods.
because
extends ProcessorDefinitionType
gives processor definition the right type.
Regards,
Mitko
From:
Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com
To:
dev@camel.apache.org
Date:
17.02.2011 12:36
Subject:
Re: [DISCUSS] - Java DSL caveat with the Content Based
and use direct
endpoint to link them.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the suggestions. I have created a ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3678
I managed to get a bit further. I will attach a patch with as far as I
this they would have to create new routes and use direct
endpoint to link them.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the suggestions. I have created a ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3678
I managed to get a bit further. I
at 2:08 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have created a ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3676
Does anyone know if the regexp could be improved to remove the source
code line, instead of replacing it with empty content?
eg I am looking for a \XXX to indicate
2.8 at the usual time, which would be in mid / end of April.
You thoughts?
And are there any tickets which is a must have for a Camel 2.7 release?
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http
which offers specialized DSL for unit testing.
Take a look at the wiki pages as they have examples.
Feedback welcome, especially about the DSL and if the chosen fluent
builder is named reasonable.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
?
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
As part of the roadmap for Camel 2.7
http://camel.apache.org/camel-27-roadmap.html
We had improved testing on the agenda.
So I have improved this offering the following new features
- added assertPeriod
of the tickets I moved to 2.8, but you would be able to resolve
those in this week, then you are welcome to move them back to 2.7.
But we should start to close down on the 2.7 release and fix what must
be fixed and then focus on bug fixes and tests.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib
http://www.catify.com
office 5. floor, heßstr. 56, 80798 munich
__
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel
,
looks good. Thank you :)
On 23.02.2011 09:13, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Claus Straubeclaus.stra...@catify.com
wrote:
okay - I've registered. My username is:
clausstraube
Hi
Can you try again. You may have to re-login.
On 23.02.2011 08:57, Claus Ibsen wrote
]
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
release time, there is a new spring WS release which works with OSGi.
Can you take a look at the issue assigned to your
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?sorter/field=updatedsorter/order=DESC
And either postpone to 2.8 or try to implement and fix it this week.
--
Claus
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I think we should start getting the last issues resolved this week so
we can start the release next week.
There issue ticker roadmap don't have any bugs and the pending tickets
can be post poned to 2.8.
https
Hi
We should keep en eye on Hudson.
hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/
I have deleted the duplicate camel.fulltest.jdk16 project as the other
fulltest was already set to use JDK 1.6.
No point having 2 projects with exactly the same settings.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email
version. We will
address this when we make the web console deployable as a feature in
Apache Karaf.
- 2305: Its a bug in AMQ. Nothing we can do from the Camel side, but to wait :)
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter
IllegalArgumentException);
}
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Mar 9 17:22:46 2011
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
nameCamel :: Platforms :: Apache Karaf/name
properties
- karaf-version2.1.4/karaf-version
+ karaf-version2.2.0/karaf-version
/properties
modules
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web
, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hadrian
I think this commit is bad.
OSGi is something that can really play tricks on you!
And should have time to be throughly tested.
You can't just go around changing feature files and whatnot 5 seconds
before you build a release
2.7?
Cheers,
Hadrian
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:33 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
I am casting a -1 due CAMEL-3763
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3763
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
Note:
The manual was again not generated correctly
release plan:
- to have ServiceMix 4.4.0 powered by Karaf 2.1.x and Camel 2.7 (and I need to
check for other parts such as ActiveMQ, etc)
- to have ServiceMix 4.5.0 powered by Karaf 2.2.x and Camel 2.8 (and
dependencies
alignment using OBR)
Regards
JB
On Thu 10/03/11 11:44, Claus Ibsen
as is. And aim for 2.8 in SMX 4.4.
And in between the Karaf team may have found their gremlins in their
new 2.2.0 release and cut a 2.2.1+ we can use for SMX 4.4.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http
func. Change was that servlet improvements which imho is a
very good improvement. After this we fixed all the maven archetypes so
they are working again. Other than that its bug fixes and test fixes
leading up till the cut time.
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Claus Ibsen
and whatnot is needed by either or both the
SMX or AMQ team for their upcoming releases (SMX 4.4 and AMQ 5.5).
Thanks,
Hadrian
On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
On Thursday, March 10, 2011, Christian Schneider cschnei...@talend.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I think the same way
, at 8:08 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
On Thursday, March 10, 2011, Christian
Schneidercschnei...@talend.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think the same way as Claus. We should try to not add any
functional changes a few days before a release. That is the only way
to make sure people have time to run
speak up. I hope us to
be in position to make a decision early next week.
Thanks,
Hadrian
On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
On Thursday, March 10, 2011, Christian
Schneidercschnei...@talend.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think the same way as Claus. We should try to not add
wrote:
+1
Christian
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
+1
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
(or somebody) will be able to make the improvements.
Thanks,
Hadrian
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Site+Update+Ideas
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http
is OK (looks a bit coy) but so far my
favourite is D as its simple, cute, recognisable and I don't have any
negative feelings towards it (unlike most of the others really).
On 25 March 2011 10:37, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I dislike the A,B and C proposals.
Especially
the client can use. And then Future
in the return type makes sense to indicate its an asynchronous
invocation.
Any thoughts?
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
a forum for their first kind of questions. Signing up with a
mailing list is often not what ppl really want to do, just to ask How
do I do X.
Hadrian, or Dan maybe you can provide more details how and if we can
do forum moderation at Nabble?
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib
list so that
you can test the examples out against a staged version of the camel
distribution
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http
.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/HEADS-UP-Camel-will-now-fail-on-startup-if-annotation-type-converter-could-not-find-any-converters-tp3345966p4271664.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Wednesday 30 March 2011 4:19:55 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
I think we have a couple of issues with running our open source
project at Apache.
1)
People have send me private mails about why they cannot join the
Apache
on apache camel project like it has
been done for other projects which are using apache camel.
any help in this direction would be much appreciated.
regards,
sumit
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
CamelOne 2011: http
I haven't had the luxury of testing this 2.7.1 release so I will
abstain from voting.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
CamelOne 2011: http://fusesource.com/camelone2011/
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Ben O'Day
ben.o...@initekconsulting.com wrote:
great...my Confluence user name is boday...thanks
Hi Ben
Can you try now, to see if you can edit the wiki pages.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
CamelOne 2011: http://fusesource.com/camelone2011/
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
--
Principle Technical Writer
FuseSource
Phone: (781) 280-4174
E-Mail: emjohn...@fusesource.com
Blog: http://documentingit.blogspot.com/
Twitter: finnmccumial
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
CamelOne 2011: http://fusesource.com
bugs now.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Charles Moulliard
cmoulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you provide info about what Oracle plan to do that and how we
generate XSD schema from JAXB now ?
Many thanks in advance,
Regards,
Charles
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib
, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
This is the Oracle ticket
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAXB-273
And this was from the original request (they closed this as a
duplicate of that above)
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAXB-369
And this is the Camel ticket
FtpComponent extends RemoteFileComponentFTPFile {
public FtpComponent() {
}
public FtpComponent(CamelContext context) {
super(context);
}
So How could it be possible to use what you suggest with jaxb
annotation -- xchema -- Doc ?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Claus Ibsen
the annotation to Camel.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is a JAXBDocument annotation in the JDK then we can use that
instead of inventing our own annotation.
And frankly its an universal problem. So there must be better
solutions out there than adding
A bit related there is these JIRA tickets
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-2801
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-1388
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
CamelOne 2011: http://fusesource.com/camelone2011
Hi
I recently commited a change to camel-jms with some optimize
instructions to AMQ.
This cut down unit test time a bit. I see roughly about 1min or better
on my system.
But in case some unit tests start to mis behave on your system. Then
please report back so we can take a look.
--
Claus
slow at booting up its XML files. (Spring 2.0 or older
was much faster at this).
Cheers
Heath
On Apr 26, 2011, at 1:35 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
I recently commited a change to camel-jms with some optimize
instructions to AMQ.
This cut down unit test time a bit. I see roughly about 1min
.
On the Exchange there is a header (or property on exchange) with a
Exchange.TO_ENDPOINT key that ought to have the uri of the endpoint
where the recipient list send it.
Oh and you should use the @user mailinglist for questions about using Camel.
Thanks!
Sandi
--
Claus Ibsen
, select * from
customer order by id, List.class);
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
CamelOne 2011: http://fusesource.com/camelone2011/
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http
are consumed in fifo order with jms. As far as I know that part
is tested to death in amq, so the issues may be with the test framework, but
I didn't see errors like this in ages.
Hadrian
On Apr 26, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Heath Kesler hkes
Aufsichtsratsvors.: Prof. Dr. Christof Hettich
Firmensitz: 69190 Walldorf, Altrottstraße 31
AG Mannheim HRB 351761 / USt.-IdNr.: DE 198388516
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
CamelOne 2011: http://fusesource.com/camelone2011/
Twitter
to expand the jmx Consumer/Producer objects to find
to which endpoint they belong.
Yeah I think we can improve that as it helps in the overview to faster
spot the desired consumer.
Fell free to create a JIRA ticket
Regards,
Mitko
From:
Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com
To:
dev
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
Setting the cxf-version to 2.4.0 should fix that.
Dan
Thanks. I have commited an upgrade to the pom.xml. All tests in
camel-cxf passes as well.
601 - 700 of 12046 matches
Mail list logo
