Re: How to enforce data disk selection

As an example, you might want to look at the Wizard path related to kicking off a VM that is based on an ISO (as opposed to a template). In that path, the Disk Offering is required. On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Exactly...through the cu

Re: Review Request 13008: Fix usage of vm.instancename.flag when generating VM names on ESX hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/#review24602 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kelven Yang On Aug. 2, 2013, 12:49 a.m., Ven

Re: Cannot deploy db on latest 4.1 branch

Happens because the management server version was changed to 4.1.2 on the 4.1 branch, but the db upgrade path to 4.1.2 is not present in the databaseupgrade checker. Adding 411-412 db upgrade path – empty if there were no db changes between the releases- should fix this problem. -alena. From:

Cannot deploy db on latest 4.1 branch

I'm trying to do a simple fresh install of the mgmt. server and db using the latest 4.1 branch, and the building of the code and the deploydb go through smoothly. However, when I attempt to startup the mgmt. server using " mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run", I run into a problem with the upgrad

Re: Review Request 12976: Remove duplicate row from guest_os table

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12976/#review24590 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alena Prokharchyk On Aug. 2, 2013, 10:43 p.m

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24589 --- plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/Libvir

Re: Review Request 12976: Remove duplicate row from guest_os table

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12976/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 10:43 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokhar

Re: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simpler to use for admin tasks

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > I needed a different configuration than DevCloud provided, so I turned to > CloudMonkey to automate setup of my test environment. > > This led to a blog on automating with CloudMonkey at > http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/using-cloudm

Re: Review Request 13240: dealt with some warnings in NetworkServiceImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/#review24576 --- server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java

Re: Review Request 13192: create private network test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/#review24571 --- Ship it! Needs license headers. Fixed locally and committed. Please

Re: Review Request 12976: Remove duplicate row from guest_os table

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12976/#review24559 --- The fix is good, but the patch failed to apply: alena@macbookpro: [

Re: [Doc] PVLAN Doc is Ready for Review

Hi Radhika, Thank you for your work! Some comments: For other Catalyst PVLAN support switch, connect the switch to upper switch by using cables. The number of cables should be greater than the number of PVLANs used. This is a little confusion. Should be "by using multiple cables, which one cab

Re: Review Request 13192: create private network test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 8:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vitt

Re: Review Request 13192: create private network test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 8:23 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das an

Re: Review Request 13192: create private network test

> On Aug. 2, 2013, 5:26 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > server/test/com/cloud/network/CreatePrivateNetworkTest.java, line 163 > > > > > > Use logger.error instead of printStackTrace? This way the logfile will > > co

CloudStack WorkShop in NYC / Free Training

I'm brain-storming hosting a CloudStack workshop in NYC. I'm under impression that meetups are too informational - and not enough hands on. End user must bring a laptop with Virtual Box pre-installed and template downloaded prior to attending the workshop. I will also have few USB sticks with

CloudStack Bay Area Meetup on August 7th

I am happy to announce the CloudStack Bay area meetup is on August 7th. Here is the link for meetup details http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-SF-Bay-Area-Users-Group/events/117379992/. If you wish to be the speaker for this meetup please reach out to Karen Vuong, John Kinsella or Animesh. Than

RE: Physical Network / Guest Network / Service Offering Interactions for Basic Networking

Following up this thread, I initialized my database and created a new deployment and verified that everything worked fine with creating a shared guest network for basic networking using a different NetworkServiceOffering other than the default "defaultSharedSGNetworkOffering. -Soheil ___

Re: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.....

On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:06:53AM +, Ram Ganesh wrote: > Hi, > > While triaging bugs I noticed that many bugs had affectedVersion > field as empty. This makes it difficult to guess the > version/release the reporter was on while filing the bug. Can we > make the affectedVersion field a manda

RE: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.....

+10 How can we reproduce and verify without an affected version. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 10:56 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field ma

Re: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.....

+1 On 8/2/13 4:06 AM, "Ram Ganesh" wrote: >Hi, > >While triaging bugs I noticed that many bugs had affectedVersion field as >empty. This makes it difficult to guess the version/release the reporter >was on while filing the bug. Can we make the affectedVersion field a >mandatory field instead? >

Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage

> On Aug. 2, 2013, 11:29 a.m., Jenkins Cloudstack.org wrote: > > Review 13237 failed the build test : FAILURE > > The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #106 is : > > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/106/ patch is not generated on master branch hence this fa

Re: Unable to start domR(VR) in devcloud using laster 4.1/master.

On 4.1? On 8/2/13 1:05 AM, "Nguyen Anh Tu" wrote: >Hi guys, > >So how to fix this? I got the same error > >Thanks, > > >2013/4/1 Rajesh Battala > >> I had debugged and found that from devcloud unable to ssh to the router >> vm. When it tries to execute the GetDomRVersionCmd its getting failing

Re: Review Request 13192: create private network test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/#review24547 --- server/test/com/cloud/network/CreatePrivateNetworkTest.java

Re: How to enforce data disk selection

Exactly...through the current CS GUI, this is hard coded to be optional - although it probably wouldn't be hard to make required if you change instanceWizard.js. On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Sanjay Tripathi wrote: > There is no any gc to enforce the datadisk selection; perhaps you can hack >

RE: Reverting 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921

Ok...i spoke too soon. Just talked with Prasanna. He pointed out that it's a large change that's been in since May. So I won't revert it. But the rule is no one can change create-schema.sql until the community decided we want to based off of a new copy of the create-schema. --Alex > -O

Reverting 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921

Saksham, I'm reverting commit id: 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921 in master. It changed the create-schema.sql. We've established since 4.1 that create-schema.sql should not be changed and everything done through upgrades. I believe this commit causes a fresh deployment to fail. --

Re: Review Request 13190: CLOUDSTACK-4010: Change required in the UI to pass startdate/enddate parameter rather than olderthan parameter in the archive/delete alerts/events API.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13190/#review24540 --- Commit 80ae4830ae63ab73a06ab033bc3feb3dd701cbb2 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13190: CLOUDSTACK-4010: Change required in the UI to pass startdate/enddate parameter rather than olderthan parameter in the archive/delete alerts/events API.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13190/#review24541 --- Commit 977b0eca973b721fe158768f3f3c5515b9d2aab7 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13190: CLOUDSTACK-4010: Change required in the UI to pass startdate/enddate parameter rather than olderthan parameter in the archive/delete alerts/events API.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13190/#review24538 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Federle On Aug. 1, 2013, 11:05 a.m., S

RE: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.....

+1 Thanks, -- Toshiaki -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 05:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory. +1 > -Original Message- > From: Ram Ganesh [mail

Force delete domain through test case

Hi all, While forcefully deleting a domain through test case, it fails. The resources in the domain and the domain itself gets cleaned up, but the code fails with following error. After cleaning up the resources, it says can't find the specific domain. Has anybody seen this issue before? Log: 2

Re: [4.1] getVMPassword > how to decrypt

No it doesn't. Keeping both destroys the benefit of public key cryptography. The idea is that you can hand out the public key and never need share the private. On Aug 2, 2013 7:02 AM, "Antonio Petrocelli" wrote: > This key must alreay be on the system... > > Only i need to retrieve it API wa

Re: Review Request 13241: was not populating the overcommit details in uservm details when overcommit is decreased to one.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13241/#review24530 --- Review 13241 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Re: Review Request 13072: Print agent host name in logging of agent commands

Yes, I thought of that, which is one of the reasons I asked for feedback. I'm not quite sure how to do it the was Alex suggests, but I'll look into it. I'm guessing some sort of id to hostname map that populates as attaches are created. On Aug 2, 2013 12:19 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: > This of

RE: Review Request 13072: Print agent host name in logging of agent commands

Yes. I like the idea but we should just load the hostname during the attache's creation rather than on every communication. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal > Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:20 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen > Cc: cloudstack; A

Re: Review Request 13240: dealt with some warnings in NetworkServiceImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/#review24529 --- Review 13240 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Re: Review Request 13241: was not populating the overcommit details in uservm details when overcommit is decreased to one.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13241/#review24528 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On Aug. 2, 2013, 1:36 p.m

Re: Review Request 13131: Default field identifier

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13131/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:38 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle,

Re: Review Request 13132: Field default value functions

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13132/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:37 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle,

Re: Review Request 13134: has_units UI Field Type

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13134/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:37 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle,

Review Request 13241: was not populating the overcommit details in uservm details when overcommit is decreased to one.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13241/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Bugs: Cloudstack-1695 R

Re: Review Request 13128: Zone Chart Extension

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13128/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:37 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle,

Re: Review Request 13127: UI Plugin Internationalization

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13127/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:36 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle,

Review Request 13240: dealt with some warnings in NetworkServiceImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:03 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su and

[Doc] PVLAN Doc is Ready for Review

Hi, PVLAN documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850. Please see 15.14. Isolation in Advanced Zone Using Private VLAN (141), and provide your feedback. Regards -Radhika

Re: Review Request 13238: JIRA-3701 : VM instantiation : Sending network information to a new VM instance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13238/#review24526 --- Review 13238 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

[Doc] IP Address Reservation is Ready for Review

Hi, IP Reservation documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850. Please see 15.7. IP Reservation in Isolated Guest Networks, and provide your feedback. Regards -Radhika

[Doc] Egress Firewall Rules for Review

Hi, Egress Firewall Rules documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2685 Please see 15.22.2. Egress Firewall Rules in Advanced Zone(165), and provide your feedback. Regards -Radhika

Review Request 13238: JIRA-3701 : VM instantiation : Sending network information to a new VM instance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13238/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: How to fix libvirt storage pool refresh issue?

On 08/02/2013 01:22 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: Wido, You applied the libvirt patch on your production system, and this issue disappeared, right? Yes, I applied that patch and rebuild libvirt. The issue never came back. If so, that is good. I expect the redhat community can accep the patch (or the

Re: Review Request 12360: custom cpu model for kvm guest.the default model 'QEMU Virtual CPU version xxx' affect the activation of Windows OS and low performance.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12360/#review24525 --- Review 12360 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/#review24524 --- Review 13237 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

> On Aug. 2, 2013, 11:09 a.m., Wido den Hollander wrote: > > I haven't tested the patch, but I'm missing some comments. > > > > Can we add clear comments as to WHY this is in the code? Otherwise I'm > > afraid this will become legacy and in 6 months new committer won't have the > > slightest i

RE: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.....

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:38 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory. > > Hi, > > While triaging bugs I noticed that many bugs had affectedVer

Re: Review Request 13236: CLOUDSTACK: 3798: Fixed test_accounts.TestUserLogin.test_LoginApiUuidResponse

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13236/#review24522 --- Ship it! The problem will be seen only when using marvin.sync to up

Re: How to fix libvirt storage pool refresh issue?

Wido, You applied the libvirt patch on your production system, and this issue disappeared, right? If so, that is good. I expect the redhat community can accep the patch (or the v2 https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-July/msg00639.html) ASAP. -Wei 2013/8/2 Wido den Hollander > >

Re: Review Request 13112: upgrade to ASF 4.2 "cloud" Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - Table "volumes"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 11:16 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: Review Request 13239: fixed the test test_non_contigiousvlan.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13239/#review24521 --- Review 13239 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24520 --- I haven't tested the patch, but I'm missing some comments. Can we a

[DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.....

Hi, While triaging bugs I noticed that many bugs had affectedVersion field as empty. This makes it difficult to guess the version/release the reporter was on while filing the bug. Can we make the affectedVersion field a mandatory field instead? Thanks, RamG

Re: Review Request 13239: fixed the test test_non_contigiousvlan.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13239/#review24519 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 2, 2013, 10:54 a.m., bharat

Re: [4.1] getVMPassword > how to decrypt

This key must alreay be on the system... Only i need to retrieve it API wan't i need a different solution Thanks Il 02/08/2013 12:51, Wei ZHOU ha scritto: Antonio, For almost all clients, they do not want the provider storing the private key (on management server). It is a big securit

Review Request 13239: fixed the test test_non_contigiousvlan.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13239/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: Cloudstack-3753 R

Re: [4.1] getVMPassword > how to decrypt

Antonio, For almost all clients, they do not want the provider storing the private key (on management server). It is a big security risk for clients. You have to store the key by yourself. -Wei 2013/8/2 Antonio Petrocelli > Thanks a lot. > > It work. > > I'm unable to retrive PRIVATEKEY with

Re: [4.1] getVMPassword > how to decrypt

Thanks a lot. It work. I'm unable to retrive PRIVATEKEY with API call: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/domain_admin/listSSHKeyPairs.html the only way to retrieve is from: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/domain_adm

Re: Review Request 13112: upgrade to ASF 4.2 "cloud" Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - Table "volumes"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/#review24518 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On Aug. 1, 2013, 6:01 p.m

Re: Values within commands.properties.in

Cool, thanks Ilya. I should of spotted that! On 2 August 2013 11:32, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Ian, > > You can combine numbers to get the specific permission, for example > > 15 is the sum of 1, 2, 4, and 8 - which also means everyone has access > 3 is the sum of 1 and 2 and only admin and resource

RE: Values within commands.properties.in

Ian, You can combine numbers to get the specific permission, for example 15 is the sum of 1, 2, 4, and 8 - which also means everyone has access 3 is the sum of 1 and 2 and only admin and resource admin have access Regards ilya -Original Message- From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie

Re: [ACS42] Release Status Update: After Code Freeze Next Steps

On 08/02/2013 11:22 AM, Dave Cahill wrote: Now that we've bumped the version number, do we need to create Upgrade420to430 and add it to engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java ? Yes, I forgot that. I created the SQL file, but I didn't create the Java files. Wido

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/#review24517 --- test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py

Re: How to fix libvirt storage pool refresh issue?

On 08/02/2013 01:55 AM, Edison Su wrote: Hi Wei, regarding to the bug CLOUDSTACK-2729, I removed storage.refresh during getStoragePool in LibvirtStorageAdaptor, but the issue still happened in BVT. I am thinking add file lock on primary storage, seems you already have the patch, could you sha

Values within commands.properties.in

Hi, This query is in relation to the permissions set for commands via client/tomcatconf/commands.properties.in Within the header of the file it states: "bitmap of permissions at the end of each classname, 1 = ADMIN, 2 = RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN, 4 = DOMAIN_ADMIN, 8 = USER" However, throughout the f

RE: How to enforce data disk selection

There is no any gc to enforce the datadisk selection; perhaps you can hack "instanceWizard.js" file in ui-custom folder to disable the "No thanks" option. --Sanjay > -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 3:17 PM > To: dev@clo

Re: [ACS42] Release Status Update: After Code Freeze Next Steps

Now that we've bumped the version number, do we need to create Upgrade420to430 and add it to engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java ? I ran "mvn -P developer -pl developer,tools/devcloud -Ddeploydb" (from [1]) on a fresh checkout of master and got: [ERROR] Failed to execu

Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, edison su, and Ram Ganesh. Bugs:

Re: Review Request 12360: custom cpu model for kvm guest.the default model 'QEMU Virtual CPU version xxx' affect the activation of Windows OS and low performance.

> On Aug. 2, 2013, 9:57 a.m., Wei Zhou wrote: > > Ship It! committed: 2903bb5fd9d59803980102854d11e33ebe56088b in master, and 725d281cb28c89b8f1536de769d7acf87f53fbe6 in 4.2 - Wei --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply

Re: Review Request 13236: CLOUDSTACK: 3798: Fixed test_accounts.TestUserLogin.test_LoginApiUuidResponse

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13236/#review24515 --- The reason for failure of the login tests is that Marvin is not pack

Re: Review Request 12360: custom cpu model for kvm guest.the default model 'QEMU Virtual CPU version xxx' affect the activation of Windows OS and low performance.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12360/#review24514 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Wei Zhou On July 14, 2013, 3:38 a.m., Jijun

RE: How to enforce data disk selection

Mike, That is correct, we need to enforce data disk selection when user goes through deploying instance wizard in UI. Is there a config to do this or should I hack some .js files? Thanks ilya -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Friday, A

Review Request 13236: CLOUDSTACK: 3798: Fixed test_accounts.TestUserLogin.test_LoginApiUuidResponse

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13236/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

reviewer wanted

Can https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/ be reviewed please. regards, Daan

Re: Review Request 13109: CLOUDSTACK-3594: Fixes related to affinity groups

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13109/#review24513 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Prasanna Santhanam On July 31, 2013, 12:13 p

Re: S3 Object Store testing

Sanjeev, Any further ideas on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3229 John worked and I worked on it quite a lot yesterday (he had a long day or rather a short night). We're passed the S3 plugin issue but snapshots are still failing on what looks like the last step. Tom. On Tue, 2

Re: Can not launch instances on 4.2 today

Thanks Prasanna, I've confirmed that the vmdata.py is on the router vm. root@r-7-VM:~# find / -name vmdata.py /opt/cloud/bin/vmdata.py Maybe some other commit fixed the problem at the same time for me. Tom. On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 14:42 +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I made a mistake - the v

Re: Can not launch instances on 4.2 today

I made a mistake - the vmdata goes into the router deployed by cloudstack but is called by the router_proxy.sh script within the /usr/lib/xcp directory of the host over ssh. root@r-5-VM:/# find . -name vmdata.py ./opt/cloud/bin/vmdata.py The tests are passing now and VM deploy works fine: nosete

Re: Can not launch instances on 4.2 today

Prasanna, when I first ran deploysvr after a new database install, I had quite a lot of starting and crashing of the system vms (which seems new to me) but I waited and it settled down. I was then able to launch an instance again after the usual other steps. The instance now tells me the password

Re: Unable to start domR(VR) in devcloud using laster 4.1/master.

Hi guys, So how to fix this? I got the same error Thanks, 2013/4/1 Rajesh Battala > I had debugged and found that from devcloud unable to ssh to the router > vm. When it tries to execute the GetDomRVersionCmd its getting failing and > router vm is getting destroyed. > > I had tried manually

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24511 --- Review 13223 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Re: Can not launch instances on 4.2 today

Ok. I've just copied it over. Its the only one that ends with .py and I've chmod'd it to 755 also. Will check it shortly. I'm building. Tom. root@devcloud:~# ls -l /usr/lib/xcp/plugins/ total 164 -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8304 Nov 5 2012 coalesce-leaf -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 301 Nov 27 2012 ec

Re: Can not launch instances on 4.2 today

Yeah this was a recent change that Marcus made to optimize the vmdata passed to guests. I'll verify why the change is not working shortly. Running some other tests at the moment on my setup. Meanwhile, Could you manually copy that to where you see the s3xen plugin and retry? On Fri, Aug 02, 2013

[Doc] Multiple IP Address per NIC for Review

Hi, Multiple IP Address per NIC documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-809. Please see 15.9. Configuring Multiple IP Addresses on a Single NIC (134), and provide your feedback. Regards -Radhika