---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24778
---
Commit 9ec8d48945f465b74284034b94f12efdd319bd0f in branch
On Aug. 7, 2013, 12:03 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java, line 2433
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/diff/1/?file=337776#file337776line2433
It's better to show the semantic of if this is the last nic in the
subnet in code. Say, if
Hi Dave, I see what you mean by colons wouldn't be allowed. Nothing
changed but I went for this solution for consistency (over backward
compatibility). I will change again. Let me get to work first. nice working
around the globe;)
Daan
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Sheng Yang
Sheng,
Some of this code will be used in a feature allowing vpc gateways to be
plugged to sdn networks and to allow multiple gateways to share that
network. I am using that in a hack on 4.1.1 and porting the code to master
now, bit by bit so to speak.
This is why you see some functions that seem
Hi,
my goal is obtain an url (API generated) to open directly the Console
from my custom Cloud interface...
Thanks.
Regards.
Il 06/08/2013 21:28, Musayev, Ilya ha scritto:
Antonio,
Would you explain what the end goal is?
Console access is token based and works directly with your browser
ok,
+0 then, I'm off for a coffee.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Jessica Tomechak
jessica.tomec...@citrix.com wrote:
I'm +0 on it. Don't really mind either way.
Jessica T.
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday,
Hi Marcus,
I wonder could we take the most recent Jenkins-built System VM template and
get it hosted
somewhere, then let people know the URL? We could then replace the old
acton systemvm
URL [1] with the new URL wherever it appears in docs etc. I'd imagine the
template doesn't
change all that
Hi,
I will be working on implementing the CS storage plugin for CloudByte's
Elastistor.
This new plugin should be based on the newly refactored storage plugin
changes which has gone into 4.2 release already.
Which CS release can accommodate this new storage plugin feature ?
Regards,
Amit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/#review24780
---
Commit 23aaeafd21aa667a82dca813e7314ab60a6b2ac7 in branch
The next release will probably be 4.3. You can target the CloudByte plugin for
that release. The can find more information on CloudStack release cycle here
[1].
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Releases
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Amit Das
I think Citrix has done this, at least that's why comes out of the db now:
|
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
|
|
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
|
|
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/
---
(Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 8:50 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24787
---
Three minor comments, but my main concerns are addressed by this
I under-kinda-stand,
Does this mean I should live with the whole build failing for a while
once in a while? Meaning should I change this test and submit a patch
or is there some windows or java setting I should look at?
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
things are falling into place in slow-motion. Thanks Alex! And Soheil
for bringing this up. Let's have a hack session on this at the next
CCC.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
I'll say it's a bad design. He he I designed it. :( We had to make
some
will do, to busy now but is bound to get priority without further
pushing from my side:|
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
Daan,
Take this back - the error was on my part it seems (I've used cloudmonkey
with api/secret keys for another test user).
Once
Prabakaran,
Can you make 'I got null pointer exception' more explicit?
regards,
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Prabakaran R praba...@cusdelight.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create image of virtual machine in cloudcentral using JClouds.
Following is my code snippet
Talluri,
did you check the history of the files involved in creating a zone?
regards,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri
srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote:
Createstoragepool fails during zone creation while creating zone using zone
create wizard. This is
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Gaurav Aradhye
gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com wrote:
While forcefully deleting a domain through test case, it fails. The
resources in the domain and the domain itself gets cleaned up, but the code
fails with following error.
After cleaning up the resources, it says
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/#review24788
---
I will rebase it in a few days.
This patch only includes support
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy.
Bugs: Cloudstack-4138
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/#review24789
---
setup/db/db/schema-307to410-cleanup.sql
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13374/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
Thanks Saksham.
They have been incorporated. The guide is refreshed and posted to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850.
From: Saksham Srivastava
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:06 PM
To: Radhika Puthiyetath; us...@cloudstack.apache.org;
dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Abhinav Roy
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13370/#review24791
---
Commit d3666b96cd6aec4a5ac8b968f89d9f60a638572c in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13324/#review24792
---
Commit a3ba198e5aba35297201bdf6b1ef127c0a5b01a5 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13372/#review24790
---
Commit 5dd155d02b5e03d20faf6826cc86f570b95b6d37 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13324/#review24795
---
Commit 61c7aa7afea078239146c8957f49e8ea07ebd5db in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13370/#review24794
---
Commit d9568c89d7afea84387f4e265e3b400c33c4dda9 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13372/#review24793
---
Commit 3de6cdb4f9422264babf14728e3ffa939d72c0b1 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13324/#review24796
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 6, 2013, 12:53 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13370/#review24797
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 7, 2013, 8:12 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13372/#review24798
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 7, 2013, 9:07 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13375/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4144
Thanks, but it resolved.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:43 PM
To: dev; Prabakaran R
Subject: Re: Unable to create image on Cloudcentral
Prabakaran,
Can you make 'I got null pointer exception' more explicit?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/
---
(Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 1:02 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/
---
(Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 1:02 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/#review24799
---
Ship it!
commit 95f36798559c71d1de9f34fedad597d12f09766b
- Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/
---
(Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 1:25 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13376/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal and Devdeep Singh.
Repository:
Hi Chip,
I just sent the pull request for the cloudstack_ruby_client on
Github. Please have a look!
I did some restructure works, let me know if you have any concerns, thanks.
Regards
Isaac
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
Happy to accept
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13374/#review24800
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 7, 2013, 11:18 a.m.,
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:05:13PM +0800, Isaac Chiang wrote:
Hi Chip,
I just sent the pull request for the cloudstack_ruby_client on
Github. Please have a look!
I did some restructure works, let me know if you have any concerns, thanks.
Regards
Isaac
Looks great Isaac. I
Daan, thanks a million for doing this!
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:24 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev
the three from week 30 where still open. I asked
On 07/08/13 1:40 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
I'll say it's a bad design. He he I designed it. :( We had to make
some compromises due to time constraints.
I always intended to move the ip allocation into NetworkGurus and
actually attempted to several times but, at the end
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13378/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Ashutosh Kelkar and Prasanna Santhanam.
That sounds reasonable to me.
Do you know if a bug exists for this or perhaps I should create one?
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Ryan Lei ryan...@cht.com.tw wrote:
I noticed this issue long ago, and I agree with you.
In my understanding, while the tab in the VM wizard always says Data
less and less a problem :P
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
Daan, thanks a million for doing this!
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:24 AM
To:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/
---
(Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 4:18 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh
Feel free to take a look at the SolidFire plug-in I developed for 4.2. I
built it to support QoS (Min and Max IOPS guarantees), which may be of
interest to you.
In 4.2, it works for Disk Offerings only (hopefully Compute Offerings, as
well, in 4.3).
Also, since the hypervisor plug-ins needed to
We have time based releases, so as long as your feature is code complete
(not necessarily bug-free) by 9/30, it will hit 4.3.
But first you have to formally propose the feature. Please see
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/0h-VAQ
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ni-VAQ
Hi,
I have an instance which has VM snapshots. (VMWARE hypervisor)
Now I am trying to attach DATA volume to this instance. It failed saying
Unable to attach volume, please specify a VM that does not have VM snapshots
Is there any limitation not to add additional volumes if it has VM
On Aug. 6, 2013, 11:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 79
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/5/?file=337785#file337785line79
I don't quite understand this part. Why // is missing in this case?
Who would require // and who wouldn't?
Thanks Mike.
I have started looking into the storage related changes due to SolidFire
storage plugin.
I shall start the formal proposal process communicate my git feature
branch soon.
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/#review24812
---
Ship it!
commit 059e4b2ae0a44205a8567a79bf9a154a54a83492
Author:
Donal,
The mix of vlan://number and number is one of the issues i had to deal
with doing this. The vlan not being handled by my first patch correctly is
why this second one was made. for vlans it reverts what I did before. What
is it you are seeing? And how does it relate to the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/#review24813
---
Vijay, as the schema is empty, you don't have to have this file.
Hi,
In our production setups we have seen some crashes of the KVM agent.
This could happen for all kinds of reasons, but that's not what I wanted
to discuss.
Also see this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3954
What I've been writing for a PoC in our company is a small
I think this is a consensus of where we are:
We would follow the path of NetworkElement meaning the infrastructure to
create a service offering, the provider concept and the use of agent/host
infrastructure to support external providers. (The external NetworkGuru also
uses many of the same
I'd say the test needs to be changed to allow for a negative skew.
On 8/7/13 2:05 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I under-kinda-stand,
Does this mean I should live with the whole build failing for a while
once in a while? Meaning should I change this test and submit a patch
or
Hi All,
Below are total and Blocker/Critical defects in resolved state. Pl take some
time to close them. Even if you get to close Cortical/Blocker that would be
great.
Reporter Total Blocker/Critical
Abhinandan Prateek 1 1
Abhinav Roy 8 7
I think 'private zones' are assigned to RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN
On 8/7/13 1:29 AM, Ryan Lei ryan...@cht.com.tw wrote:
Curious for long. When does the rule RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN come in place
in
CloudStack?
A CloudStack account can only be root admin, domain admin, or user.
Does
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: shadow...@gmail.com
Subject: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations
Hi,
In our production setups we have seen some crashes of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13376/#review24814
---
Ship it!
In the future, please format patches so that they can be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/
---
(Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 7:01 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and John
Looks like a bug to me.
On 8/6/13 11:28 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a small Linux ISO (http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/download.html)
I've
uploaded to my secondary storage NFS location.
I can create VM instances just fine with it.
I stopped one of my VMs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/#review24818
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chiradeep Vittal
On Aug. 7, 2013, 7:01
ok, in the mean while please have another look at
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ please?
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
I'd say the test needs to be changed to allow for a negative skew.
On 8/7/13 2:05 AM, Daan Hoogland
why not use systemd and launchd facilities ?
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc:
Hi All,
Thanks for your inputs. I have tried with the suggested changes but could
not get it working. I started from scratch again to see if it helps. But I
seem to be going wrong in some place.
Can some one kinldy go though the below setup and tell me if its right. I
am stuck since a week
4.2 build failing with latest head, someone please look this ASAP ?
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @
cloud-api ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
Local storage wasn't working at all yesterday in 4.2. Fixed last night. Not
sure if that is related.
On Aug 7, 2013 1:32 PM, Sarath Chandra sarath.cloudst...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for your inputs. I have tried with the suggested changes but could
not get it working. I started from
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:50:28PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Local storage wasn't working at all yesterday in 4.2. Fixed last night. Not
sure if that is related.
The master / 4.2 quality seems to be churning a ton... this isn't a
good sign IMO. Did we cram in too much at the end again?
No idea, it's been mostly off of my radar. I just happened to try to
test a few fixes and 4.2 was having problems with local storage. At
the least I'd say it's not a good idea for someone to use it (or any
non-production version) right now if they're setting up cloudstack for
the first time.
On
Latest build works; please ignore
-Original Message-
From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 12:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 4.2 build failing with latest head
4.2 build failing with latest head, someone
There is long time issue related to KVM HA, see bug: CLOUDSTACK-3535.
Basically, HA won't be triggered, if KVM agent is stopped either normally nor
abnormally, HA only be triggered if the network between mgt server and kvm host
is disconnected and the network between KVM hosts in the same
For me the most useful part is that I can take down the agent without
anything freaking out. It's fairly common to upgrade the agent (or
stop for a minute or two) without putting the host into maintenance
and dealing with migrations. That's by far the normal case for when
the agent isn't running,
Does KVMInvestigator work on all shared primary storage, or just NFS?
I'm only familiar with the NFS KVMHA directories.
From this it seems like a clean stop of the KVM agent still shouldn't
trigger any issues/HA, correct?
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/#review24826
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sheng Yang
On Aug. 7, 2013, 8:53 a.m.,
I'm not sure we can rely on IPMI to tell us much about the host status
itself. It's easy to use it for checking on basic poweron/poweroff,
temperature, etc, but not so easy to tell if something is wrong with
the OS, config, or at the software level.
However, I did mention support in that thread
Yes, I think so
On 8/7/13 10:59 AM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote:
I think this is a consensus of where we are:
We would follow the path of NetworkElement meaning the infrastructure
to create a service offering, the provider concept and the use of
agent/host infrastructure to support
On Aug. 7, 2013, 8:46 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Ship It!
Please uppercase the bug id(CLOUDSTACK- rather than Cloudstack-xxx) next
time, otherwise jira won't recognize it. I also removed the unnecessary import
and blank line.
- Sheng
On Aug. 7, 2013, 8:46 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Ship It!
Sheng Yang wrote:
Please uppercase the bug id(CLOUDSTACK- rather than Cloudstack-xxx)
next time, otherwise jira won't recognize it. I also removed the unnecessary
import and blank line.
Pushed to 4.2
Bharat, please send
I went ahead and logged a JIRA ticket for this issue.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
That sounds reasonable to me.
Do you know if a bug exists for this or perhaps I should create one?
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Ryan Lei
I bulk updated the comment for these tickets asking for verifying the issues
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 11:02 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS42] Closing Resolved Defects
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 1:42 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KVM HA
Does KVMInvestigator work on all shared primary storage, or just NFS?
Right now, the agent only writes
I was wondering if we can use binary diffs to hotpatch ACS.
Currently, the way for me to identify what patch could have caused issue X,
would be - try to find the suspects - it could be several. Revert 1 commit,
rebuild and retry, if failed, restore previously reverted commit, revert 2nd
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 1:46 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KVM HA
I'm not sure we can rely on IPMI to tell us much about the host status itself.
It's easy to use it for
Let's get this applied! 4.1 branch has been broken for over a week!
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Will send out a patch shortly.
Regards,
Vijay
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:09 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk
Cc: Min Chen; Chip Childers; cloudstack; Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Subject: Re:
Hi Mike,
The problem is with handling the command
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand, look at the log before this
error and see if there is any problem with the registered agent that is suppose
to handle this command.
-Soheil
From: Mike
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/#review24838
---
Look fine to me.
Make sure when you test it, you tested both
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/#review24840
---
Pushed the patch to 4.1 branch with commit id
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/#review24841
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alena Prokharchyk
On Aug. 7, 2013, 10:44
On Aug. 7, 2013, 10:58 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Ship It!
Vijay will open a separate reviewboard request for 411-412 upgrade path for
master branch. The patch is going to be different given the presence of 4.2
release.
- Alena
Here's the issue... local storage isn't mounted like remote storage is.
This is invalid for local storage:
String lockFile = _mountPoint + File.separator + pool.getUUIDString()
+ File.separator + _lockfile;
Need to look at storage pool type and change lockfile to path for local storage
On Wed,
Here's the debugging I put in:
2013-08-07 17:39:12,286 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) attempting to lock pool
2a9c418e-dd56-3f2c-9081-032b877d5644 with file
'/mnt/2a9c418e-dd56-3f2c-9081-032b877d5644/KVMFILELOCK/.lock'
2013-08-07 17:39:12,425 DEBUG
The local path of storage pool should be able to get from LibvirtStoragePoolDef.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 4:43 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re:
It is currently a limitation. After VM is running in VM-snapshot mode, it
is not allowed to change VM's disk membership status
Kelven
On 8/7/13 10:09 AM, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I have an instance which has VM snapshots. (VMWARE hypervisor)
Now I am trying to attach
Hi,
I noticed that Review Board messages are still going to
cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org.
Should we switch that to dev@cloudstack.apache.org ? If so, who has the
access to do so?
Thanks,
Dave.
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
