---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15763/#review29649
---
core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/MigrateCommand.java
I have posted my review comments. Except for a few minor comments changes look
good to me.
-Koushik
On 02-Dec-2013, at 9:15 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote:
All,
It's been a while since this review was requested, so can anyone review
this to move on?
Thanks in advance.
Alex
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15875/
---
(Updated Dec. 3, 2013, 8:52 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy
On Dec. 3, 2013, 8:44 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/MigrateCommand.java, line 32
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15763/diff/1/?file=389559#file389559line32
I see that you have tested for XS. In the mail thread people have
mentioned that it should work on
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't think we should try to go beyond the hypervisor extensions on
the vms (unless it's the systemvms) is this what you mean?
on the systemvm it seems we could indeed. Is that what you mean?
on the others we
Congratulations Giles!
Kind Regards,
Tariq Iqbal
Senior Consultant
S: +44(0)20 3603 0540 | M: +44(0)790 9911600
tariq.iq...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue
ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
From:
Do we have any outstanding issues preventing 4.2.1 to be released ?
Yes, the 4.2.1 is going to be re-spun as a critical issue has been found
recently. The new RC candidate will be up for voting in some hours from
now.
-abhi
On 03/12/13 2:57 pm, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we have any outstanding issues preventing 4.2.1 to be released ?
I like,
2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
I think it must even.
1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron rberg...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Laszlo Hornyak
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/92/changes
Changes:
[anthony.xu] put shell scripts to a seperate directory in XS
--
[...truncated 3734 lines...]
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15875/
---
(Updated Dec. 3, 2013, 10:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu t...@apache.org wrote:
+ what SNMP software we use? I found Net-SNMP but not sure it's okie. Need
to try and review it.
There are a lot of oopen source and commercial once out there. We need
an open source one. Given that we are probably going to
Hi,
I am Malintha Adikari from Sri Lanka ,a fresh engineer who works in an
open source software company and I want to engage cloudStack project. I am
very interesting in cloud computing concepts but I have least hands-on
experience. I am experience in Java and C development.I have checked out
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15897/#review29653
---
patch does not compile on master. Fails with error:
[ERROR]
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15725/#review29654
---
Commit 03ba659ae7263ca4fdb7c1c0eaccbecdf45594e8 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15722/#review29655
---
Ship it!
commit 03ba659ae7263ca4fdb7c1c0eaccbecdf45594e8
- Murali
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15725/#review29656
---
patch does not apply on master. Please resubmit. Also do you want
Hi All,
There were some issues found in the 4.2.1 RC that was earlier approved by
voters.
As a result the RC has to be re-spun. There is not much of a difference between
this and the one approved earlier apart from some additional fixes.
The current vote is to approve the current RC
Hi Gaurav,
addLdapConfiguration and deleteLdapConfiguration are the new commands.
more information is available @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LDAP+user+provisioning
--
Thanks,
Rajani
Original Message-
Reply-to: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
To:
So we are breaking API compatibility?
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi Gaurav,
addLdapConfiguration and deleteLdapConfiguration are the new commands.
more information is available @
On Dec 3, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi All,
There were some issues found in the 4.2.1 RC that was earlier approved by
voters.
As a result the RC has to be re-spun. There is not much of a difference
between this and the one approved
Dear all,
I am running CloudStack version 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisor, Ceph RBD primary
storage and NFS secondary storage.
Since yesterday, I am not able to create/register a new template. Normally
I would be converting a root-disk volume into a template. In this case, the
process of creating the
http://markmail.org/message/lf4unndbuig7pu6w sdX-devices became
vdX-devices in CloudStack-4.2.0 by Vladimir Melnik
http://markmail.org/message/iz5x2cbkakw3dun5 the question of upgrade
from 4.0.x to 4.1.0 by Steven Liang
http://markmail.org/message/twawkkfhwmuheihj 4.2.0 LoadBalancing
Question with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15962/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Hi Malintha,
Should be a good starting point for you I think:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Development+101
Keep in touch in mail list and enjoy IRC #cloudstack-dev.
Cheers,
--Tuna
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Malintha Adikari malin...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
I am
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15963/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Hi All,
I had triggered the (generate systemvm64 bit) Jenkins job as I had made some
changes for the HyperV systemvm template.
Job was successfully but from the log I didn't see any message where the
archive got published.
Can anyone please let me know how to download the newly generated image?
Rajani,
Is there any specific reason for removing existing API's.why don't we show
them as deprecated api but still it should work right
Regards
Sadhu
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 December 2013 18:17
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org;
Why are they even changing?
Once we publish an API, we should stick with it... otherwise we have
to bump to version 5.0.0 for our next feature release.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Suresh Sadhu suresh.sa...@citrix.com wrote:
Rajani,
Is there any specific reason for removing existing
They were removed before i got started on ACS.
Ian/abhi should be able to answer.
Thanks,
-
Rajani
From: Chip Childers [chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 8:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ldap APIs
Why are they
Hello Darren,
I'm reading your reply - I shall post comments when I've got through it
completely.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 December 2013 17:33
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: persistence layer
Alright, this is
Yes, Well done!
Alexander Hitchins
-Original Message-
From: Tariq Iqbal [mailto:tariq.iq...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 03 December 2013 09:22
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Giles Sirett
Subject: RE: ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Giles Sirett
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15725/
---
(Updated Dec. 3, 2013, 4:50 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15763/
---
(Updated Dec. 3, 2013, 5:07 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
Thank Koushik, and I modified what you pointed out (for 'MigrateCommand'
text) and updated the diffs.
Let me know if there is anything missing/incorrect.
Thanks
Alex Ough
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
I have posted my review comments. Except for a
I'm going to vote -1 on this one. I think
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5145 should be
addressed as cloudstack is leaking data from users to other users who
don't own the data. The data isn't extremely sensitive, it only gives
away vpc ids that you don't own and acl information
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:48 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you be more specific ? what fixes required a re-vote ?
There was a security vulnerability reported in the release of
sufficient severity to cause the security team to request Abhi hold
off on publishing the release and to
I'm going to miss the monkey. Are you sure there's not any way to work it
in??
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Laszlo Hornyak laszlo.horn...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Thank you all for the feedback!
- stretching: yes, that is true and it does
Hi,
Thank you all for the feedback!
- stretching: yes, that is true and it does not look good
- apache: If I have to put the apache there, then I will have to completely
rearrange the design. Are you sure it is a must-have? Wikipedia displays a
logo without the apache.
Here is the link for the FS:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Alert+publishing+via+Web+ROOT+admin+API
-Alena.
From: Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.commailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
Date: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:55 PM
To:
Agree that we should have at least 1 implemented monitoring plugin.
Before we jump into SNMP etc, I'd like to see the public interfaces of the
monitoring and AS services.
In the figure I had sketched out, I'd like to see the specifications of
all the APIs.
We can then enumerate the autoscaling
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/ ?
On 12/3/13 6:47 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
I had triggered the (generate systemvm64 bit) Jenkins job as I had made
some changes for the HyperV systemvm template.
Job was successfully but
Congrats Giles !!!.
On 03/12/13 8:40 AM, Alex Hitchins cloudst...@alexhitchins.com wrote:
Yes, Well done!
Alexander Hitchins
-Original Message-
From: Tariq Iqbal [mailto:tariq.iq...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 03 December 2013 09:22
To:
I will give it a try, but we can not have all and everything in 120x80
pixels. I have a not quite complete, reverse-engineered svg monkey, feel
free to reuse it.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm going to miss the monkey. Are you sure there's not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15521/#review29679
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Dec. 3, 2013, 6:58 p.m., Chris
H Marcus,
It breaks behavior of the API, you say. Is this in comparison to 4.2
or to prior versions?
thanks,
Daan
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:48 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you be more specific ? what fixes
Running the same API call on versions lower than 4.2.0 yields correct
results, since 4.2.0 the API call returns incorrect data. The API
itself is compatible, but for example if an application or user
consuming the API makes those calls it will get incorrect data. For
example, you now may get a
On 12/2/13, 5:00 PM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote:
It's really long
I don't know if it's impossible to move us to JPA but I do agree that
whatever
path we choose it's lot of work to do.
Given you have tried JOOQ and Lukas's explanation, my only concern is if
we can leverage
Does anybody experience this test failure on the latest master?
Results :
Tests in error:
getColumnName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest)
getColumnName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest): Could not initialize class
com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy
isPersistable(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest): Could
I am encountering the same.
Thanks
-min
On 12/3/13 4:41 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
Does anybody experience this test failure on the latest master?
Results :
Tests in error:
getColumnName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest)
getColumnName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest):
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/org.apache.cloudstack$cloud-awsapi/101/
Hi Tuna,
Thank you very much for the reply. I will keep in touch and try to get in
as soon as possible.
Thanks,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu t...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Malintha,
Should be a good starting point for you I think:
Yes. Thanks I got it
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 12:04 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Regarding systemvm jenksin job
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/
We need to have the pre-existing API¹s working.
Also I am not sure if we can even mark these depreciated in 4.3.
We can move to the new and more flexible APIs completely in 5.0 release
and deprecate the current APIs.
On 03/12/13 9:28 pm, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
They
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15897/
---
(Updated Dec. 4, 2013, 4:44 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Murali
hi ,
deplay the cloudstack in your own machine using devcloud2 and play around
it at the start.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DevCloud this link
is very helpful, thanks.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Malintha Adikari malin...@wso2.com wrote:
Thanks Rajani
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15962/#review29703
---
Commit f05063f377087d41d9df5bae8680ce5121b6ec94 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15962/#review29706
---
Commit 27c2c125d8e11cba5c58f1fcda57926832f75ebe in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15962/#review29704
---
Commit 171c7e950b22a4aa6cd6e8b9051436794bb41373 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15962/#review29705
---
Ship it!
Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master
- Girish Shilamkar
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15875/#review29707
---
Commit e5cfe948186b825d2b28c99ce2915a5ca8498aff in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15942/#review29708
---
Commit 6b955958c6165f69de8dbaf6310868d8f5c2a3b1 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15942/#review29709
---
Ship it!
Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master.
- Girish Shilamkar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15942/#review29710
---
Commit e5047141a9fd305be186fc303f7cfdfc68a4bfd3 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15942/#review29711
---
Commit 11231d6b12770c98d32e533d94ec63183cc19eda in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15963/#review29712
---
Commit 291eafadaefc66ca030c26e0bbc78256ac8a8dbd in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15963/#review29715
---
Commit 454912d7b2d36f4578d3355798c737f5adba827c in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15763/#review29716
---
Looks like the latest patch has some issues, the diff is not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15963/#review29714
---
Ship it!
Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master.
- Girish Shilamkar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15761/#review29718
---
Commit 0aa17c4213adb5ec513151478c578015c6690050 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15761/#review29717
---
Commit 4b5a0ca4c27f511e48c6cc094ce4bec731c0d8fb in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15761/#review29719
---
Commit 8525dfd9310df409a7ddcb925e6b85299f6e4436 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15761/#review29720
---
Ship it!
Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master.
- Girish Shilamkar
73 matches
Mail list logo
