RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

I prefer the focus on support that comes with David's suggestion. Targeting the latest stable release for a new platform greatly reduces the number of permutations to test. Pursuing legacy systems limits the flexibility of ACS to evolve. For instance, we'll probably be on Java 7 in the next w

Re: Fwd: Warning from dev@cloudstack.apache.org

On 02/20/2014 05:01 PM, Frankie Onuonga wrote: Hi guys, I got this in my mail box from last year. I honestly do not know how I missed this. Isn't this a little odd as I have been able to mail you guys successfully. I've been getting the same. I started ignoring them since my e-mail works j

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

On 21.02.2014 06:01, Marcus wrote: If someone gets around to it they can add in root resize support via the patch I've posted to the list once or twice. I can maybe look at updating it for master and testing if I can find some time. It's a very short patch, but the testing is what I don't have ti

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > I find a little ironic that the internal policies are a lot more restrictive > than the Apache license itself :S > > Meanwhile, isn't CloudStack falling into the MySQL FOSS exception? > http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/foss

RE: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

Hi Murali, Thanks for clarifying this. However, I would not consider bug CLOUDSTACK-5967 fixed until UI support is restored for this basic functionality. It is a hack. We cannot expect an end user to go into that level of detail. Will look at how much effort is involved to add UI support. >From

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

There is a bug filed for live migration on ESXi 5.5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6146 I feel we need to fix this bug too in 4.3. Thanks, ~Talluri On 20/02/14 11:19 pm, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chip Childers >wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 a

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Hi, I agree with Florin about GRE tunnel. It is very problematic. If i can't get GRE tunnels working with xenserver 6.2, i won't be able to use the ACS 4.3 So the jira CLOUDSTACK-5967 is not resolved, isn't it ? Murali, you said on the Feb 14th (CLOUDSTACK-5967) that if there is a new RC : "Fix

RE: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130

-Original Message- From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 21 February 2014 1:15 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Hugo Trippaers; Ian Southam Subject: Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130 Sent from my iPhone > On 20 feb. 2014, at 18:

Review Request 18352: CLOUDSTACK-6151: Local data disk with tag goes to the wrong local storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18352/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das and Prachi Damle. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

For DB HA we have included a new class StaticStrategy.java which is having compile time dependency on mysql -connector-java. I will make change in pom, as provided scope dependency instead of compile time so that maven will not include in the bundle while packaging. Thanks & Regards Damodar/

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

FOSS seems to apply to us but the question is whether Apache recognises that. On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Francois Gaudreault > wrote: > >> I find a little ironic that the internal policies are a lot more restrictive >> than the

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Animesh, Having followed the legal discussions and remarks from David on these matters, I will have to retract my +1 and cast a -1 (binding). I suggest we postpone 4.3 indefinitely awaiting legal advice and discussion on how to proceed on this list. sorry, Daan On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM,

Re: Review Request 17702: CLOUDSTACK-2232: Adding automation test cases for Persistent Networks feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/#review35141 --- Commit 2091211c2828dfd4b6e15eae9c459fbb09b9a27f in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 17702: CLOUDSTACK-2232: Adding automation test cases for Persistent Networks feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/#review35142 --- Commit c03fd70ed22d4b0b2ea41fdb923f4432664219d1 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 17702: CLOUDSTACK-2232: Adding automation test cases for Persistent Networks feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/#review35143 --- Ship it! Committed to master and 4.3-forward - Girish Shilamkar

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Daan, It seems that the dependency on the connector can be changed so that the connector is not packaged with the product. Once Damodar, who is fixing it provides a patch we can take a call. -abhi On 21/02/14 5:31 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >Animesh, > >Having followed the legal discussion

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

sure, we will need to do something in install instructions as well, do we? thanks, Daan On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > Daan, > > It seems that the dependency on the connector can be changed so that the > connector is not packaged with the product. > Once Damodar,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

What I get is that by fixing the pom.xml, maven will not package the connector. The dependency for the connector was set to compile time that made the maven to download the connector at compile time instead of at run-time. Due to this the connector got packaged. Now changing it to provided will ma

Review Request 18353: Removed compile time dependency of mysql-connecotr-java

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Chip Childers, and David Nall

Re: Review Request 18353: Removed compile time dependency of mysql-connecotr-java

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/ --- (Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 12:51 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childer

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I have created a defect for this at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6152 I have put the patch in review board at : https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/ Please review the same and commit it to the branch(4.3-forward) if these changes are fine. Otherwise please let me know if we

Re: Review Request 18353: Removed compile time dependency of mysql-connecotr-java

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/ --- (Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 1:15 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Heya, Just pushed commit ac00ab0087ca8f59184121697f7ac4343a694093 Author: Hugo Trippaers Date: Fri Feb 21 14:54:38 2014 +0100 Cleanup all mysql dependencies and set all to provided. This will set all mysql dependencies to provided and clean them up in the process. Tested: Hugos-MacBoo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Forgot to mention that this is pushed to master so we can test it before we drag it to 4.3 Cheers, Hugo On 21 feb. 2014, at 14:56, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Heya, > > Just pushed commit ac00ab0087ca8f59184121697f7ac4343a694093 > Author: Hugo Trippaers > Date: Fri Feb 21 14:54:38 2014

Re: Review Request 18353: Removed compile time dependency of mysql-connecotr-java

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/#review35145 --- Hey, I think the main problem here is that there are references in

Re: Review Request 18353: Removed compile time dependency of mysql-connecotr-java

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/#review35146 --- Note that this change does not actually make a difference unless all

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Packages already depend on the mysql connector, so no changes there. We do need to configure tomcat to include the os provided mysql-connector into the class path of the application. Cheers, Hugo On 21 feb. 2014, at 14:57, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Forgot to mention that this is pushed to ma

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Initially I thought my change caused to bundle the mysql-connector-java into RPM in 4.3... but after did more analysis I found that mysql-connector is already getting bundled into RPM in 4.2.x as well. Looks like issue is something else as well.. I am not sure this will fix the actual issue.

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Damodar, Did you see my review comments? Cheers, Hugo On 21 feb. 2014, at 16:00, Damoder Reddy wrote: > Initially I thought my change caused to bundle the mysql-connector-java into > RPM in 4.3... but after did more analysis I found that mysql-connector is > already getting bundled into RPM

Re: Review Request 18353: Removed compile time dependency of mysql-connecotr-java

> On Feb. 21, 2014, 2:01 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Note that this change does not actually make a difference unless all other > > poms that have mysql as a requirement are modified. Yes I realized this after changes are done to my original changes related to DB HA. I realized that it is

Re: [DOCS][DISCUSS] heads-up main docs repo refactor

On Feb 20, 2014, at 6:11 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Hi, > > From Citrix-perspective, this is going to be effort intensive considering the > current head count for documentation. > > For 4.3, we would like to continue with DocBook, as per our earlier > consensus. > > I shall come ba

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-rn pull request: Update rnotes.rst

GitHub user NuxRo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/3 Update rnotes.rst corrected small typos regarding version numbers You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/NuxRo/cloudstack-docs-r

Re: VMware and NFS

So, just curious here, but why wouldn't the ESX(i) host simply be able to create an NFS datastore that points to the NFS share on the secondary storage location directly? On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > For XS that¹s not required as its pushed into XS directly. > > I also

RE: VMware and NFS

Actually I am pretty sure that is what it doesSo I changed like 4-5 things "my mistake", then I noticed a datastore with a "GUID" looking name popped up on my hosts. This datastore was mapped to my NFS share. Once that showed up CS started creating the system VMs. So I am trying to back trac

RE: [PROPOSAL] Granular Controller Support in CloudStack over VMware deployments

Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com] > Sent: 17 February 2014 10:18 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [PROPOSAL] Granular Controller Support in CloudStack over VMware > deployments > > Hi, > > I would like

RE: [PROPOSAL] Granular Controller Support in CloudStack over VMware deployments

> -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: 17 February 2014 11:13 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Anthony Xu > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Granular Controller Support in CloudStack over VMware > deployments > > Sateesh, > > I think if you want to do

RE: [PROPOSAL] Granular Controller Support in CloudStack over VMware deployments

> -Original Message- > From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] > Sent: 17 February 2014 12:55 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Granular Controller Support in CloudStack over VMware > deployments > > I don't think this should be tied to the template, but rath

Review Request 18358: NetUtils unit testing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18358/ --- Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers. Repository: cl

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Damoder: your patch merely piled on to an existing problem. I'll respond more to this in a bit, but I think your approach solves your bit of the problem. I have a much longer email that talks about why coming up. Thanks for working on getting a patch up so rapidly. --David On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 a

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-rn pull request: Update rnotes.rst

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/3 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. To do so, please top-post your response. If your project does not have this featu

RE: VMware and NFS

Success!! So what I had to do was to mount "/mnt/sec" on the mgmt server to the secondary NFS storageOnce I did that all the secondary vm's were created and the mgmt server created the "GUID" named datastore on the hypervisors back to the NFS share... Funny that this was not documented anywh

Re: VMware and NFS

Thanks for the clarification. I was pretty confident an ESX host creates an NFS datastore (with a UUID for a name) that maps to the NFS share. This is similar to how a XenServer host creates an NFS storage repository that maps to the NFS share. On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Michael Phillips w

Re: VMware and NFS

I believe I had trouble with that in my development environment about 10 or so months ago. I think it turned out to be a permissions issue. Perhaps I didn't have my username in the sudoers file or something. My thinking is the management server is supposed to create /mnt/sec for you. I wonder whic

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Thanks for this detailed explanation, Hugo! That was really useful info. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > OK, the systemvm status is making more sense now. > > > For everybody just as confused as me by the current discussion let me try > to summarize. > > SystemVM templa

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

I've been a little behind on e-mail and just reading up on this legal issue in more detail now. I agree we should be -1 on 4.3 until we have a good resolution for it. Thanks On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Animesh, > > Having followed the legal discussions and remarks f

Re: Review Request 18358: NetUtils unit testing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18358/#review35179 --- Hi Miguel, I started working on verification and I ran into some de

RE: VMware and NFS

Definitely not sure why the mgmt server does not create /mnt/sec for you and auto mount it Dev guys, is it possible to get this feature added in a future build? Also what would it take to document this is the current doumentation? If you have multiple secondary storages, my guess is that you woul

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

Hi Joris, This patch hasn't been applied yet, sorry for my second thought. Could you comment on it? --Sheng On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/18310/ > > On February 20th, 2014, 6

RE: VMware and NFS

Any idea why the default centos5.3 template would be "stuck" downloading at 88%?? The secondary storage where it is getting downloaded to has 44GB of free space. > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:34:18 -0700 > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS > From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.

[Discuss] GRE Tunnel issue on XenServer 6.2

Hi guys, Some people (Florin and Benoit) complain about the GRE tunnel issue on XenServer 6.2. Actually it has not been fixed completely, although Murali submitted a patch to bypass without any exception. Personally I stuck in how can we make XenServer 6.2 HOSTs recognize the GRE network created b

Re: Review Request 18358: NetUtils unit testing

Miguel, here is my patch that for me fixed the dependency problems. Other than that, it looks good. Thank you, Laszlo On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/18358/ > > Hi Miguel, > >

Re: VMware and NFS

Have you tried manually downloading it (outside of CloudStack) to see if that works? On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Michael Phillips wrote: > Any idea why the default centos5.3 template would be "stuck" downloading > at 88%?? > The secondary storage where it is getting downloaded to has 44GB

RE: VMware and NFS

How would you go about manually downloading it? > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:05:20 -0700 > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS > From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Have you tried manually downloading it (outside of CloudStack) to see if > that works? > > > On Fri, Feb

Re: VMware and NFS

If you look in the vm_template table in the cloud DB, you should be able to find a URL for that template. On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Michael Phillips wrote: > How would you go about manually downloading it? > > > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:05:20 -0700 > > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS > > Fr

RE: VMware and NFS

Gotcha, thought about trying to upload my own template or iso to see how that worked.. > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:16:15 -0700 > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS > From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > If you look in the vm_template table in the cloud DB, you should b

Re: VMware and NFS

I use a mix of both of those approaches. Sometimes I use the built-in ones; sometimes I upload my own. On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Michael Phillips wrote: > Gotcha, thought about trying to upload my own template or iso to see how > that worked.. > > > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:16:15 -0700

Re: VMware and NFS

Please don't email me this stuff anynmore remove me from your listing Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you! -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:21:27 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: VMwa

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #335

See Changes: [Alena Prokharchyk] Display flag support for LB/InternalLB/NetworkACL rules -- [...truncated 1303 lines...] [INFO] Deleting

Re: VMware and NFS

Chantel - If you're looking to unsubscribe from this mailing this, please send a message here: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:22 PM, < chantel_piore...@mobileemail.vodafonesa.co.za> wrote: > Please don't email me this stuff anynmore remove me from your listing >

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #336

See

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

OK - so hoping to inject some clarification to this discussion - maybe it will make more sense. Lets start with definitions, and I'll try and use caps when referring to this definitions. LEGAL - when I talk about legal problems below I refer to liability incurred by individuals in the project, es

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 3:23 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker? > > OK - so hoping to inject some clarification to this discussion - maybe it will > make more sense. > > L

Re: Review Request 16867: Test Suite for Testing Remote Access VPN on VPC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16867/ --- (Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 11:52 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shila

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

>> LEGAL - when I talk about legal problems below I refer to liability incurred >> by >> individuals in the project, especially the release manager, > > [Animesh] Can you clarify 'especially the release manager' part? Release > manager is just like any other volunteer and does not have any specia

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:13 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker? > > >> LEGAL - when I talk about legal problems below I refer to liability > >> incurred by individuals in t

Review Request 18392: CLOUDSTACK-6156: remove rampart maven dependencies to fix?

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18392/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6156 https://issues.apache.

[Cancelled][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Formally canceling this VOTE because of mysql-connector license dependency. Thanks Animesh On Feb 18, 2014, at 8:25 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>> wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we hav