Re: Review Request 22075: Database Information missing in Alter table statements in a commit to schema-430to440.sql

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22075/ --- (Updated May 30, 2014, 6:41 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kava

Review Request 22077: CLOUDSTACK-6669 Support volume resize in usage server

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22077/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6669 http

Re: Review Request 22075: Database Information missing in Alter table statements in a commit to schema-430to440.sql

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22075/ --- (Updated May 30, 2014, 6:33 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kava

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

Hi Andrija, Daan asked me to have a look at this as well. Looking at you issue I recall having seen something similar. Back then when upgrading 4.2.1 to 4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom build svm template. Let me fire off some questions before explaining what the cause was in our case

Review Request 22075: Database Information missing in Alter table statements in a commit to schema-430to440.sql

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22075/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6808 http

Re: [ACS4.4] [Issue] Unable to create a autoscalevmprofile

Hi Daan, I'm testing on 4.4-forward-iam branch. Thanks Meghna. On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Megha, > > in my current 4.4 line 411 of DeployVMCmd reads > if (accountId == null) { > hence it doesn't refer a pointer at that line. > which version are you using t

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Thanks everyone !! Regards, Saksham -Original Message- From: Gaurav Aradhye [mailto:gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:35 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer Congrats Saksham! Regards, Gaurav On Fri, May 30, 2

Re: Need help with simstack vagrant box

Thanks Sebastien for the clarification.  Cheers, Madan On 29 May 2014 at 3:42:55 pm, sebgoa (run...@gmail.com) wrote: On May 29, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Madan Ganesh V wrote: > Hello CloudStack forum, > > We are following the steps mentioned: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CL

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congrats Saksham! Regards, Gaurav On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu < sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com> wrote: > Congrats Saksham !! > > -Original Message- > From: Vaibhav Gupta [mailto:vaibhav.gu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:03 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.ap

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congrats Saksham !! -Original Message- From: Vaibhav Gupta [mailto:vaibhav.gu...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:03 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer Congratulations Saksham.. Thanks, Vaibhav -Original Message-

Re: License to be signed for contributing to CloudStack

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Ritu Sabharwal wrote: > Hi, > > > > I wanted to know if there are any license to be signed by individuals or > corporates to contribute to CloudStack. > > Thanks & Regards, > Ritu S. So, it depends. If you or your company is donating a significant contribution o

Re: License to be signed for contributing to CloudStack

Ritu, Many companies donate their code to apache cloudstack. There is no license to sign, however there is Intellectual Property Clearance process you need to go through. From what i recall, you describe what it is you would like to donate, we put it to a vote and once approved the code is me

License to be signed for contributing to CloudStack

Hi, I wanted to know if there are any license to be signed by individuals or corporates to contribute to CloudStack. Thanks & Regards, Ritu S.

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congrats Saksham > -Original Message- > From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:48 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Saksha

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congratulations Saksham! -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:14 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer Congrats Saksham :) On 28/05/14 11:47 PM, "sebgoa" wrote: >The Proj

[ACS4.4] Cherry pick 63090434b1cb4e7b87f0e024fbbc644faee863f7

Hi Daan, Can you please cherry-pick 63090434b1cb4e7b87f0e024fbbc644faee863f7 to 4.4, "system template always create with name master instead of current git branch" Regards, Rayees

Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze

In an effort to help keep our releases from getting out of hand, I think we should consider moving the Feature Proposal deadline up, as well. My main concern is that many people have three CloudStack-related "threads" executing right now, though: 1) People are still testing 4.4. 2) People are de

Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze

That is what I want with this thread, yes. Please counter propose or amend as you like. On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Marcus wrote: > Perhaps we need to review/replace the release plan as a whole, find > something that will get us on track and keep us on track. > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11

Re: Feature Frezee date for 4.5 release.

feature should be done (in it's branch) by 19th july. merging and fixing issues may take to mid august. On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Ritu Sabharwal wrote: > Hi Daan, > > Read your amended proposal. Just to clarify, does it mean the feature > proposal deadline is 19th June and the feature cod

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congrats Saksham :) On 28/05/14 11:47 PM, "sebgoa" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has >asked Saksham Srivastava to become a committer and we are pleased to >announce >that he has accepted. > >Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more >aut

Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze

Perhaps we need to review/replace the release plan as a whole, find something that will get us on track and keep us on track. On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Seeing what objections there might be I want to amend my proposal to > > 1. move forward feature freeze not on t

RE: Feature Frezee date for 4.5 release.

Hi Daan, Read your amended proposal. Just to clarify, does it mean the feature proposal deadline is 19th June and the feature code complete, testing and merging to master branch is mid-August? Thanks & Regards, Ritu S. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.

Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze

Seeing what objections there might be I want to amend my proposal to 1. move forward feature freeze not on the coming but on the next release. 2. set feature proposal dealine for the coming release on 19th of June flames? other thoughts? Daan On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Ritu Sabharwal wrot

Re: Feature Frezee date for 4.5 release.

Good reason, and I would certainly retract my proposal if it wouldn't mean that a lot of new features will come in last minute. You won't have to be done earlier. So let me amend my proposal On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Ritu Sabharwal wrote: > Hi Daan, > > We are tracking to deliver our plug

RE: Feature Frezee date for 4.5 release.

Hi Daan, We are tracking to deliver our plugin (Brocade Network plugin for VDX switches) as per earlier communication of feature freeze for 4.5 release on mid-August. Based on your proposal for moving in the code freeze to mid-June is too early for us to provide the support for this release. I

Re: seeing "Unknown parameters : ctxdetails" for addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail

If removing the worker means that unknown parameters are never logged i am -1 removing it. On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Antonio - Can you please remove this worker ? I had filed a bug > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6658 for the same > > Thanks, > -Niti

Re: seeing "Unknown parameters : ctxdetails" for addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail

Antonio - Can you please remove this worker ? I had filed a bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6658 for the same Thanks, -Nitin On 29/05/14 5:06 AM, "Santhosh Edukulla" wrote: >We still see "Unknown parameters..." huge number of logs in server log. >May be, we can make this as

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

welcome Saksham, go get On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Marcus wrote: > Good job! > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Rayees Namathponnan < > rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Congrats Saksham. >> >> Regards, >> Rayees >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:s

RE: [DISCUSS] Brocade network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VCS cluster for CloudStack 4.5

Hi, Can you please review the proposal and let me know if I need to add anything else here? Thanks & Regards, Ritu S. -Original Message- From: Ritu Sabharwal [mailto:rsabh...@brocade.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:34 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Brocade

Re: [ACS 4.3] listUsageRecords API bug related to CLOUDSTACK-6472

H Hiroki, those calls are for ServiceOfferingVO not for VMInstanceVO. So they are not the same issue but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't those the be counted when deleted either. On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Hiroki Ohashi wrote: > Hi Daan, Rajani > > I looked at a code of master and 4.4

Re: Erro: No remote endpoint to send command, check if host or ssvm is down?

UPDATE: I finally cracked it. Even though the systemvm.iso files were updated into the xen servers, there was a .vhd file that is created into the local storage of the servers that are running the system VMs that contains the systemvm.iso files. Therefore, I had to stop the CS MSs delete those .vhd

RE: [PROPOSAL] - Change Primary IP Address

CloudStack supports 'cloud' workloads and 'enterprise' workloads as has been highlighted numerous times recently in e-mails comparing CloudStack to OpenStack. Yes 'cloudy' workloads should not need this, but enterprise workloads most definitely do. This is something which regularly comes up on

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-rn pull request: updated formatting to be consiste...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/14 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feat

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-rn pull request: updated formatting to be consiste...

GitHub user swill opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/14 updated formatting to be consistent with the rest of the docs You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/cloudops/cloudstack-docs-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Good job! On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Rayees Namathponnan < rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote: > Congrats Saksham. > > Regards, > Rayees > > -Original Message- > From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 1:49 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apach

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congrats Saksham. Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 1:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer Congratulations Saksham. -Original Message- From:

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to submit NuageVsp plugin support in CloudStack 4.5

Hi, Looks like the attachment was stripped. So, please find the proposal below: *Introduction:* We are planning to develop NuageVsp networking plugin that will bring Nuage VSP network virtualization technology to CloudStack. *Feature Summary:* For the Nuage VSP Plugin, we

Review Request 22019: CLOUDSTACK-6732: [OVS][UI] Network Service Providers page displays two ovs providers

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22019/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK

Re: [ACS4.4] [Issue] Unable to create a autoscalevmprofile

Megha, in my current 4.4 line 411 of DeployVMCmd reads if (accountId == null) { hence it doesn't refer a pointer at that line. which version are you using to get this: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd.getEntityOwnerId(DeployVM

Re: seeing "Unknown parameters : ctxdetails" for addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail

grep -v is your friend (or grep -ev even) On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > We still see "Unknown parameters..." huge number of logs in server log. May > be, we can make this as configurable or dump to some other log say misc log, > > if mandatory params are not sent

Re: Review Request 20316: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Adding automation test cases for Primary Storage Limits

> On May 8, 2014, 5:06 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > tools/marvin/marvin/lib/common.py, line 1103 > > > > > > Please dont add asserts to lib functions, just check the output in test > > code and take it accordin

Re: Erro: No remote endpoint to send command, check if host or ssvm is down?

Hi, Before I ran any kind of command I decided to dive a little deeper into this issue. So, I checked the systemvm.iso that is inside CS MS. and it turned out that it has the jars for the CS agent 4.3.0. However, I also checked the systemvm.iso that is in the xen hosts in "/usr/share/xcp/packages/i

Re: Review Request 21628: CLOUDSTACK-6282: Automated network API Tests and uploaded patch

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21628/#review44256 --- Commit cdf4047ce823edcdd73f9a1562abc9c27f473557 in cloudstack's bran

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congratulations Saksham.. Thanks, Vaibhav -Original Message- From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com] Sent: 29 May 2014 15:39 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer Congratulations Saksham. --Sanjay -Original Message

RE: [PROPOSAL] - Change Primary IP Address

Wido, It's something I'll look into over time however there are a few more complexities to overcome with a basic zone. Once Advanced has been done hopefully Basic will follow shortly behind. Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587 -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mail

RE: seeing "Unknown parameters : ctxdetails" for addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail

We still see "Unknown parameters..." huge number of logs in server log. May be, we can make this as configurable or dump to some other log say misc log, if mandatory params are not sent as per request, dump to the log and return, if arg types and arguments as per validation are wrong, then du

[ACS4.4] [Issue] Unable to create a autoscalevmprofile

Hi All, I was trying to create a autoscalevmprofile with a sample data for a test case. Can anyone help me to know is there anything I'm missing in the input parameters ? I get a nullpointer error is it due to the missing deployParams parameter ? I'm running this test on simulator. self.acc

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net (that is both tagged vlan 500, and untagged packets travel over same KVM bridge, and over eth1 to outside world)... On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Are these two traffic types in one physical net? or two physical nets > on the same interfa

Re: Need help with simstack vagrant box

On May 29, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Madan Ganesh V wrote: > Hello CloudStack forum, > > We are following the steps mentioned: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Create+config+management+recipes+to+install+CloudStack > & https://github.com/runseb/simstack to bring up a cloudsta

Re: [ACS 4.3] listUsageRecords API bug related to CLOUDSTACK-6472

Hi Daan, Rajani I looked at a code of master and 4.4 branch. findById is used at line 3031 of master branch and line 3299 of 4.4 branch, so I think this leads to an same problem. The code snippets of master and 4.4 branch are below. [master] server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java 298

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congratulations Saksham. --Sanjay -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Saks

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

Are these two traffic types in one physical net? or two physical nets on the same interface (seems wrong). On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > I don't think editing DB table will work. > > -Jayapal > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > >> It's like this:

Need help with simstack vagrant box

Hello CloudStack forum, We are following the steps mentioned:  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Create+config+management+recipes+to+install+CloudStack & https://github.com/runseb/simstack to bring up a cloudstack dev instance. After running vagrant up and vagrant reload —pr

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

I don't think editing DB table will work. -Jayapal On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > It's like this: > > I have public subnet /24. > > half is dedicated for Guest traffic (vlan 500) and the second half is > dedicated to Public traffic/network (no vlan tags, that is untagged pa

Re: [ACS 4.3] listUsageRecords API bug related to CLOUDSTACK-6472

On May 29, 2014, at 11:20 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > The fix is already in 4.4 > > commit 3a3457e7132d22f52aa38179d40a6eb9b0b29677 > Author: Sam Schmit > AuthorDate: Fri May 2 13:07:34 2014 -0500 > Commit: Daan Hoogland > CommitDate: Tue May 6 17:46:20 2014 +0200 > >CLOUDSTACK

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

It's like this: I have public subnet /24. half is dedicated for Guest traffic (vlan 500) and the second half is dedicated to Public traffic/network (no vlan tags, that is untagged packets) Both vlan500 and untagged packets travel over physical eth1 interface on hypervisors and can reach Internet

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congratulations Saksham.. ~Rajani On 29-May-2014, at 2:19 pm, Sailaja Mada wrote: > Congratulations Saksham. > > -Original Message- > From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: 29 May 2014 12:18 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as commit

Re: [ACS 4.3] listUsageRecords API bug related to CLOUDSTACK-6472

The fix is already in 4.4 commit 3a3457e7132d22f52aa38179d40a6eb9b0b29677 Author: Sam Schmit AuthorDate: Fri May 2 13:07:34 2014 -0500 Commit: Daan Hoogland CommitDate: Tue May 6 17:46:20 2014 +0200 CLOUDSTACK-6472 listUsageRecords: Pull information from removed items as well, fixi

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrija Panic wrote: > 500 is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork or your physical network? You wouldn't want to have two nets with vlan 500! -- Daan

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

Well, on the same eth1 device I have both untagged packets and tagged one (vlan 500) having reall access to public IPs/network. So I would need to replace "untagged" with "500" somewhere inside database...not sure where, that's the question :) Thanks. On 29 May 2014 10:53, Daan Hoogland wrote:

Re: [ACS 4.3] listUsageRecords API bug related to CLOUDSTACK-6472

Hiroki, Did you have a look at 4.4 or master as well? tell us when it works, so we can cherry-pick the fix to later versions. On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Hiroki Ohashi wrote: > sebgoa > > > 2014-05-29 16:52 GMT+09:00 sebgoa : >> >> On May 29, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Hiroki Ohashi wrote: >> >>>

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

untagged means that no vlan-id is assigned. 'tagged' doesn't exist. I am not sure how your topography looks. Giving you a clue to solve it now would be guessing. That said, my guess is your public net needs a vlan assigned. I am not sure if it is your public physical net (updatePhysicalNetwork) or

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congratulations Saksham. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 29 May 2014 12:18 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Saksham Srivastava to beco

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congrats Saksham! On 29-May-2014, at 12:17 PM, sebgoa wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Saksham Srivastava to become a committer and we are pleased to announce > that he has accepted. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute mo

Re: Review Request 19902: CLOUDSTACK-6223. removeNicFromVirtualMachine fails if another instance in another domain has a nic with the same ip and a forwarding rule configured on it

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19902/#review44250 --- Ship it! e9af5f44ae080da3f191cba57b55747801c3100e on master (consid

Re: Review Request 19902: CLOUDSTACK-6223. removeNicFromVirtualMachine fails if another instance in another domain has a nic with the same ip and a forwarding rule configured on it

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19902/#review44249 --- Commit e9af5f44ae080da3f191cba57b55747801c3100e in cloudstack's bran

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

congratulations Saksham! On 29-May-2014, at 12:17 PM, sebgoa wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Saksham Srivastava to become a committer and we are pleased to announce > that he has accepted. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contr

Re: [ACS 4.3] listUsageRecords API bug related to CLOUDSTACK-6472

sebgoa 2014-05-29 16:52 GMT+09:00 sebgoa : > > On May 29, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Hiroki Ohashi wrote: > >> Dear guys >> >> I found a bug about listUsageRecords API in 4.3 related to a issue >> CLOUDSTACK-6472 and made a patch. Would you review the patch and >> correct me if I am wrong? >> >> Sam Schm

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congratulations Saksham !! :) -Original Message- From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 1:50 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer Many many congratulations Saksham! -Original Message---

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

Daan, thanks for info. And one final question - is it possible to change Public vlan/range from untagged to tagged - editing "vlan" table and making change, does not really make changes after I restart VPC router... THanks On 29 May 2014 10:15, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Andrija, we plan to releas

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Many many congratulations Saksham! -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Saks

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

Andrija, we plan to release it soon. It depends on how quickly issues in it are fixed. The branch has been created, so you could test it and report on it if you have an env to spare. On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andrija Panic wrote: > Will try, thx. Not sure good question - when is 4.4 sched

Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1

Will try, thx. Not sure good question - when is 4.4 scheduled to be releases - few months, or more ? Thanks On 29 May 2014 06:15, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi Andrija, > > Same issue with public vlan tagged got fixed, CLOUDSTACK-5505. > > Thanks, > Jayapal > > On 29-May-2014, at 9:38 AM, Jay

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Hearty Congrats Saksham! > -Original Message- > From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congrats Saksham!! -Original Message- From: Anshul Gangwar [mailto:anshul.gang...@citrix.com] Sent: 29 May 2014 13:32 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer Congrats Saksham -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congrats Saksham -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Saksham Srivastava to

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congrats Saksham. > -Original Message- > From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Saksha

Re: [ACS 4.3] listUsageRecords API bug related to CLOUDSTACK-6472

On May 29, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Hiroki Ohashi wrote: > Dear guys > > I found a bug about listUsageRecords API in 4.3 related to a issue > CLOUDSTACK-6472 and made a patch. Would you review the patch and > correct me if I am wrong? > > Sam Schmit push a commit about NPEs/Null UUIDs at May 5th but

[ACS 4.3] listUsageRecords API bug related to CLOUDSTACK-6472

Dear guys I found a bug about listUsageRecords API in 4.3 related to a issue CLOUDSTACK-6472 and made a patch. Would you review the patch and correct me if I am wrong? Sam Schmit push a commit about NPEs/Null UUIDs at May 5th but I think his commit is not enough. commit e8047e11db7ef2bdc44bb