Re: [PROPOSAL] systemvm upgrade process

apparently Global settings for VR already exist ! router.template.xen router.template.kvm router.template.vmware Sheng, I hope you will have some time to spend on your idea to use package repo :-) Thanks, *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.568

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #29

See Changes: [sudison] remove unused servlet -- [...truncated 2579 lines...] [INFO] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #1296

See Changes: [sudison] remove unused servlet -- [...truncated 1977 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-network --- [INFO] Surefire report directo

Re: running agent in eclipse

Thanks, that’s really helpful! I got them up and running. In case others are interested in doing this, what I did was the following, on each compute host: wget http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/package-deb-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/debian/cloudstack-common_4.5.0-snapshot_all.de

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #1295

See Changes: [sudison] CLOUDSTACK-7226: in case lun number is not provided, addprimarystorage cmd should report error instead of NPE -- [...truncated 1977 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-p

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #28

See Changes: [sudison] CLOUDSTACK-7226: in case lun number is not provided, addprimarystorage cmd should report error instead of NPE -- [...truncated 2579 lines...] [INFO]

Re: [PROPOSAL] systemvm upgrade process

sounds cool! no chance we could have something fast and simple to put in place like a global or region setting for the name of the latest systemvm template? Thanks, *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagiq

Re: running agent in eclipse

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Kuang-Ching Wang wrote: > Hi, I am implementing features on the master branch of the management > server, hence I need to run the latest master cloudstack agent via eclipse > as well (since currently only cloudstack-agent 4.3 is available via > apt-get). > > You

running agent in eclipse

Hi, I am implementing features on the master branch of the management server, hence I need to run the latest master cloudstack agent via eclipse as well (since currently only cloudstack-agent 4.3 is available via apt-get). How do I run it? 'mvn -pl :cloud-agent jetty:run’? Thanks, KC

Re: Review Request 21696: CLOUDSTACK-6716: /usr volume is to small on SVMs. Reshuffling some space to fix that.

I think we should, it is based on our custom templates anyway so it does work in some situations. Let's see what it does. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/21696/ > > On May 24th, 20

Re: Review Request 24182: CLOUDSTACK-7223 Wait for System VM agent state to be connected before verication

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24182/ --- (Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 7:13 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Ed

Re: CloudStack Dev Env

Thanks for the details. Yes, I am setting up environment right now, so I will see how it goes. I just realized that your setup basically requires all the same commands as what I use for devcloud, but we just point to your json file instead of the devcloud json file. *Correction*: I was wrong ab

Re: CloudStack Dev Env

> I had issues getting advanced networking to work. I also had issues with the VT pass through on Xen on VirtualBox Virtualbox is a no go for VT. However, with xenserver this isn't an issue (Open to correction here). We can run 32bit VMs nested without issue, we can run VMs in PV mode without is

CloudStack Dev Env

Hey All, I figure I should just start a thread for this because it is worth its own discussion. I have been building, developing and testing CS code for quite some time now. I have a bit of a system down now, but it is still a battle every time. I know that a lot of you probably have your own sy

Jenkins build is back to normal : simulator-singlerun #25

See

Re: Review Request 24111: Coverity findings for brocade-plugin

> On Aug. 1, 2014, 5:57 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > plugins/network-elements/brocade-vcs/src/com/cloud/network/brocade/BrocadeVcsApi.java, > > line 547 > > > > > > It seems there is no corresponding catch here,

Re: Review Request 24185: CLOUDSTACK-7224: Fixed marvin code for async jobs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24185/#review49354 --- Commit 93c64cd7f210f4a11b1e8b71f8cf7edcc8eb in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 24185: CLOUDSTACK-7224: Fixed marvin code for async jobs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24185/#review49353 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On Aug. 1, 2014, 4:23 p.m.

Re: issue with devcloud on 4.3

thanks Ian. :) *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > If you run into any issues give me a shout will :-) > On 1 Aug 2014 17:13,

Re: issue with devcloud on 4.3

If you run into any issues give me a shout will :-) On 1 Aug 2014 17:13, "Will Stevens" wrote: > Thanks, I will give it a shot... > > ws > > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @Clou

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #24

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] developer: add commonly used glboal config in developer-prefill.sql -- [...truncated 7244 lines...] log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#

RE: [VOTE] git workflow

> -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 7:42 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] git workflow > > > On Aug 1, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Nate Gordon > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On CI, I think it should run on

Review Request 24185: CLOUDSTACK-7224: Fixed marvin code for async jobs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24185/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7224

Re: issue with devcloud on 4.3

Thanks, I will give it a shot... ws *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Will, > > you might want to try: > > https:/

Re: Problem using DevCloud2 with 4.2

Thanks Seb. That is very similar to the setup that I use, but I am using snapshots on VMware Fusion as my foundation. I will look into building up a new env with this. Thx, Will *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1

Re: [JENKINS] simulator build

Thanks Hugo for setting it up. On 01-Aug-2014, at 7:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > hey all, > > I’ve managed to get the simulator build running again to jenkins.b.o. Its > running as a single job called simulator-singlerun and builds, runs and tests > cloudstack using the simulator. I’ve conf

Re: Review Request 24184: CLOUDSTACK-1389 Fixing sudo access to keytool

> On Aug. 1, 2014, 3:07 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Thanks Eric for picking this up, looks good but need to test. Sorry, didn't see your review before i committed mine. Anyway it works for me. - Hugo --- This is an automatically genera

Re: Review Request 24184: CLOUDSTACK-1389 Fixing sudo access to keytool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24184/#review49346 --- Ship it! Thanks for the fix! commit 451e2ab851518832f44c77830347d9

Re: Review Request 21696: CLOUDSTACK-6716: /usr volume is to small on SVMs. Reshuffling some space to fix that.

> On May 24, 2014, 7:29 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Thanks for the patch, the variables are subjective and would need testing > > before merging. Looks good. > > daan Hoogland wrote: > Joris, correct me if I am wrong: We are using these in our environments > at the moment. > > Joris van

Re: Problem using DevCloud2 with 4.2

Thanks - Seif (my GSoC student) uses it. I typically build up an entire cloud with a script of my own (adding primary storage that's based on a SolidFire SAN and related Compute and Disk Offerings). On Friday, August 1, 2014, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:11 PM, Mike Tutko

Re: Review Request 24182: CLOUDSTACK-7223 Wait for System VM agent state to be connected before verication

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24182/#review49340 --- test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py

Re: Review Request 23805: Added "state" parameter to the "listPublicIpAddresses" API call

> On July 29, 2014, 10:20 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Looks fine, we still need to test it before we land it on master. I > > unfortunately don't have my hardware (and some parts) setup will try with > > DevCloud or hope someone else would review, test and ship it :) > > Ilia Shakitko wrote:

Re: Review Request 24184: CLOUDSTACK-1389 Fixing sudo access to keytool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24184/#review49343 --- Thanks Eric for picking this up, looks good but need to test. - Roh

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #23

See -- [...truncated 7220 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (default) @ cloud-developer

Re: How to speed up testing using BVT/smoke tests with Simulator

I’ve added config in developer/developer-prefill.sql to have three new config params commonly used by devs and to speed up account cleanup (60s now). 137655d4e11cb490391d0f4982c52262bbb7427c master a68d8986829c462d655bf59a0cbcc0d4e8b1cc3e 4.4 Regards. On 01-Aug-2014, at 7:27 am, Santhosh Edukul

Review Request 24184: CLOUDSTACK-1389 Fixing sudo access to keytool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24184/ --- Review request for cloudstack and edison su. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-1389 https://

Re: [ACS44]{DISCUSS] remove from the site

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2014, at 4:56 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> H, >> >> In the last couple of days a lot of problems with 4.4.0 have been >> reported. Workarounds, if at all available, are hard and require >> intimate sysadmin experience. It s

Re: [ACS44] template upgrade code

This is pretty important….anyone out there On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:33 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > + Abhi > >> -Original Message- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:14 PM >> To: dev >> Subject: [ACS44] template upgrade cod

Re: [ACS44]{DISCUSS] remove from the site

On Aug 1, 2014, at 4:56 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > In the last couple of days a lot of problems with 4.4.0 have been > reported. Workarounds, if at all available, are hard and require > intimate sysadmin experience. It seems to me we didn't deliver the > quality we want to. > > One of t

Re: Problem using DevCloud2 with 4.2

On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:11 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hey Will, > > Unfortunately no, I didn't take any special steps to get around the issue. > I cleaned everything up, tried again and it worked. > > Sorry I can't be of more help here. > you guys should start looking at https://github.com/

Re: issue with devcloud on 4.3

Will, you might want to try: https://github.com/imduffy15/GSoC-2014 I find it more reliable and transparent than devcloud. On Jul 31, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I am trying to use devcloud to deploy my xenserver (I do this all the > time). I am getting this same issue with the 4

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

On Aug 1, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Nate Gordon wrote: > +1 > > On CI, I think it should run on any branch that wants to maintain quality. > So master, develop, releases, hotfixes, and support. It would be awesome if > I could elect to have my random other branches run CI as well, but my guess > is th

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

+1 On CI, I think it should run on any branch that wants to maintain quality. So master, develop, releases, hotfixes, and support. It would be awesome if I could elect to have my random other branches run CI as well, but my guess is that we would need more hardware to pull that off. Hopefully I'll

Re: [JENKINS] simulator build

Hey Rohit, It’s based on this script : https://github.com/spark404/cs-functional-test/blob/master/simulator.sh I just split it in a number of different maven and shell tasks for jenkins changed a few parameters, but this is basically it. Cheers, Hugo On 1 aug. 2014, at 16:08, Rohit Yadav w

Re: [JENKINS] simulator build

On 01-Aug-2014, at 3:51 pm, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > hey all, > > I’ve managed to get the simulator build running again to jenkins.b.o. Its > running as a single job called simulator-singlerun and builds, runs and tests > cloudstack using the simulator. I’ve configured the job to trigger when t

[JENKINS] simulator build

hey all, I’ve managed to get the simulator build running again to jenkins.b.o. Its running as a single job called simulator-singlerun and builds, runs and tests cloudstack using the simulator. I’ve configured the job to trigger when the regular master build has completed to help the devs see th

Review Request 24182: CLOUDSTACK-7223 Wait for System VM agent state to be connected before verication

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24182/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7223

Re: [ACS44]{DISCUSS] remove from the site

Daan, In Japan, already some of press has announced 4.4 release and already some of users tried this version so I think we should be keep expose 4.4 on site. And if issues only depend on systemvm, It should be add note about links for fixed systemvm template and explain workaround to avoid this

RE: bug in marvin?

may be different sources of marvin, one in installed path and one about to be installed. So, pip install --upgrade should have worked, but uninstall and install is equally good. Santhosh From: Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August

Re: bug in marvin?

fixed it: i had marvin installed with pip from dist/Marvin* did pip uninstall and then python setup.py install now it finds the marvin nose plugin, thanks Santhosh In retrospective: pip install should have worked as well, shouldn't it? On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On F

Re: [ACS44]{DISCUSS] remove from the site

If you get hit by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6893 there is no workaround in 4.4.0 as far as I know. you can download the patch and apply it to 4.4.0 and rebuild, but then it isn't 4.4.0 any more is it? I've been hit by it in lab once, I don't know if it only happens in some

Re: bug in marvin?

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > import requests > print requests.__version__ > print requests.__path__ seems fine: \\ebi\daan:~/cloudstack-4.4/cloudstack (4.4)> python Python 2.7.5 (default, Mar 9 2014, 22:15:05) [GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 5.0 (clang-500.0.68)]

RE: bug in marvin?

I just built cs master and ran python setup.py install under tools/marvin folder, i could see that requests version 2.3.0 is properly validated. =Logs== Using /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paramiko-1.14.0-py2.7.egg Searching for requests==2.3.0 Best match: request

Re: [ACS44]{DISCUSS] remove from the site

Hi, Since a workaround available I don't think removing it is necessary. However, I think users should be made aware via the site and 4.4 documentation that there is known issues and that upgrading is possibly dangerous.

Re: Error while building Cloudstack

Priyanka, I have a windows build in the office (not in now) it builds fine. Also lots of people work on debian devcloud instances. both should work fine. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Priyanka Deepala wrote: > I'm building on Windows. Last time I used Cygwin but now I'm using DevCloud2.0 > wh

Re: Error while building Cloudstack

I'm building on Windows. Last time I used Cygwin but now I'm using DevCloud2.0 which is running on VirtualBox (Debian OS). Will it work? On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Alex Hitchins wrote: > Priyanka, > > I had this issue when building on Windows. Are you building on W

Re: Error while building Cloudstack

Priyanka, I had this issue when building on Windows. Are you building on Windows? I think you posted a question recently about doing so. It doesn't work as I believe file paths are different between Win/Lin systems. Really, my advice to you is to do your dev on a Linux flavour or OSX. Does the

Re: Error while building Cloudstack

Priyanka, It displayed an error before this summary. the project apidoc failed, that much is clear. Please give more information. Preferably put the full output of the mvn command in a pastebin and send a link to the list. That way people can do better diagnoses of your problem. kind regards, On

Re: Error while building Cloudstack

This is the error [INFO]--- BUILD FAILURE -- Total time: 33:01.074s Finished at: Thu Jul 31 15:15:55 UTC 2014 Final Memory: 73M/178M

Re: [ACS441]please test

Because we throw away the tag on a released version that way. Maybe we should anyway as 4.4 has barely or not been tested before releasing. Most if not all testing by citrix qa has been done on 4.4-forward and hardly anyone else has or manages to upgrade (clean installs seem to work). On Fri, Aug

Re: Building of Hyper-V Agent seems broken in 4.4 branch

Thanks all :-) -- Erik On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Devdeep Singh wrote: > Applied the patch to 4.4 branch and pushed. Thanks Anshul. > > Regards, > Devdeep > > > -Original Message- > > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 2:13 PM >

Re: Error while building Cloudstack

Priyanka, no images on this list, please cut and paste the text On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Priyanka Deepala wrote: > Hiii > I'm building CS in DevCloud in VitualBox. While building the CS using > mvn-P developer,systemvm clean install command it's displaying an error. I > attached the

bug in marvin?

H Marvin complains it doesn't have requests >=2.2.1. pip says it has 2.3.0. Should I downgrade? \\ebi\daan:~/cloudstack-4.4/cloudstack (4.4)> sudo pip show requests --- Name: requests Version: 2.3.0 Location: /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages Requires: \\ebi\daan:~/cloudstack-4.4/cloudstack (4.

RE: Building of Hyper-V Agent seems broken in 4.4 branch

Applied the patch to 4.4 branch and pushed. Thanks Anshul. Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 2:13 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: Building of Hyper-V Agent seems broken in 4.4 branch > > Anshul, go ahea

Re: Review Request 24174: CLOUDSTACK-7220: fixed hyper-v agent broken in 4.4 branch

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24174/#review49336 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 1, 2014, 5:21 a.m., An

RE: [ACS441]please test

The order of cherry-picked commits is not maintained. i.e. the order in which commits are made in 4.4-forwrad is not same in 4.4. This will create more regressions instead of fixing. One fix(Hyper-V agent build is broken) which I made is occurred due to this. To verify fixes, which one has made

Re: Review Request 24174: CLOUDSTACK-7220: fixed hyper-v agent broken in 4.4 branch

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24174/#review49335 --- Commit cda088470b069b4361e87e12e96f2769305e96d9 in cloudstack's bran

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

On 01-Aug-2014, at 1:40 am, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > Thank you, Rohit. Couple more things we have to clarify in the wiki. The > doc says "Developer should run the BVT on the simulator before doing a > checkin², but it doesn¹t mention anything about the CI. So here are my > questions: > > 1) C

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

Hi, On 01-Aug-2014, at 1:59 am, Sheng Yang wrote: > Work need to be tested, but create one branch for every bug seems over > doing. Branch in Git suppose to use with substantial changes. I don't think > anyone would like the idea to have 2 commits for every bug fixes(one merge > commit and one r

RE: [VOTE] git workflow

> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Work need to be tested, but create one branch for every bug seems over doing. > Branch in Git suppose to use with substantial changes. Actually, I don't agree with you on that point. I think git is unusual among source control systems in that the gi

[ACS44]{DISCUSS] remove from the site

H, In the last couple of days a lot of problems with 4.4.0 have been reported. Workarounds, if at all available, are hard and require intimate sysadmin experience. It seems to me we didn't deliver the quality we want to. One of the problems is that the systemvms need an upgrade because of our jav

Re: Building of Hyper-V Agent seems broken in 4.4 branch

Anshul, go ahead. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > I have created the patch https://reviews.apache.org/r/24174/ to fix the issue. > Is it ok to go ahead and commit it into 4.4 branch? > > Regards, > Anshul > > -Original Message- > From: Anshul Gangwar [mailto:anshul

Re: Error while building CloudStack

This is the error [INFO]--- BUILD FAILURE -- Total time: 33:01.074s Finished at: Thu Jul 31 15:15:55 UTC 2014 Final Memory: 73M/178M

Re: Error while building CloudStack

Priyanka, Images and other attachments are not accepted on this mailinglist. Either provide a link to the image or paste your error as plain text. Cheers, Hugo On 1 aug. 2014, at 09:23, Priyanka Deepala wrote: > I attached the image in this mail please check it out > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 201

Re: Error while building CloudStack

I attached the image in this mail please check it out On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > Images are stripped on the mailing list. > On 1 Aug 2014 07:23, "Priyanka Deepala" > wrote: > > > Hiii > > I'm building CS in DevCloud in VitualBox. While building the CS > using > >

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

+1 On 31 Jul 2014 21:33, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: > +1 on the proposal. But I second Rohit and Sheng Yang - we should agree on > all the flow points before we adopt it for CloudStack. We can¹t just > blindly follow http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/, > plus some use cases a

Re: Error while building CloudStack

Images are stripped on the mailing list. On 1 Aug 2014 07:23, "Priyanka Deepala" wrote: > Hiii > I'm building CS in DevCloud in VitualBox. While building the CS using > mvn-P developer,systemvm clean install command it's > displaying an error. I attached the screenshot of