On 19-Aug-2014, at 1:54 am, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
[Min] I don't quite understand why you are saying that it won't cause
conflicts when we do 4.2 fast-forward to 4.3 branch. What if the codebase
in 4.3 has been changed a lot?
That was an example, yes conflicts can happen but
Thanks guys,
I was more interested in changing the policy of the default network, not adding
another. But adding a new one seems like the neater way of doing it.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Radhika Puthiyetath
+1
just one question (which was not clear from the email), once RM merges into
release branch, who merges into master ?
-sebastien
On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:18 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
On 19-Aug-2014, at 1:54 am, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
[Min] I don't
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23150/#review50963
---
Ship it!
applied to master and merged in 4.4 for 4.4.1 release
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23985/#review50964
---
Ship it!
thanks applied to master, 4.3 and 4.4 for 4.4.1 release
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:58 am, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
just one question (which was not clear from the email), once RM merges into
release branch, who merges into master ?
Merging on master can be done by the RM or any of the committers (can be even
more than once a
On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:23 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:58 am, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
just one question (which was not clear from the email), once RM merges into
release branch, who merges into master ?
Merging on
On 19-Aug-2014, at 11:29 am, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Say you grab a patch from review board and stick it in a hotfix branch, test
that …call for merge on release branch.
Do we *merge* to master or can we apply the patch directly to master (git am
-s…) ?
Once the hotfix
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/6
updated instructions to install jdk1.7
for apt-get and yum corrected the java install commands to install jdk1.7
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Hi,
I have 4 networks defined (public, guest, storage and mgmt). It looks like the
VR sets up two internal NIcs (eth2 and eth3) for connecting to the public
network. It also sets the same IP address on them.
Egress = Allow is also ignored and my VMs can't reach anything.
Has anyone seen this
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/15
CLOUDSTACK-6634
updated the ldap section in admin guide
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Right, so the SNAT on the VR is done on eth3 instead of eth2, not sure why this
is happening. Can't spot anything dodgy in the logs.
Once I remove the SNAT and add it on the eth2 (which has the same IP) then all
my egress rules start to work again.
I'll try to recreate the zone and hope this
Have you used the same address range for your public network as your management?
--
Ian
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: dinsdag 19 augustus 2014 14:25
To: dev; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: VRouter sets the same public IP on 2 interfaces
Right, so
Hi,
I think we’re ready to do next release of cloudmonkey, please go ahead and test
out cloudmonkey using latest master. Please go through the changelog and advise
on the compatibility issues.
The wiki docs were updated, this notes the new multiple profiles feature:
Hi,
No, they are entirely different ranges and physical links.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Ian Southam isout...@schubergphilis.com
To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org, us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday,
Rohit,
That might just do it. Is this feature available in the new version already?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
How about I introduce a
Hi All,
I've created a 5.2.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up
for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/5.2
Commit: b66b7dd62cebd77b0f1d74046170810e931fe852
List of changes:
Hi Lucian,
So, I’ve started a voting thread for the release. You may find the candidate
artifacts here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.2.0/
If all goes well we would release it on Friday and party :)
Cheers.
On 19-Aug-2014, at 3:20 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
I've added another zone and the problem is sadly very repeatable. :(
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org, us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 19 August, 2014
Hi Daan and Ian,
I’m going ahead with adding entries of old releases of CloudStack and
cloudmonkey on the archive page.
Cheers.
On 25-Jul-2014, at 9:19 am, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure I should know this: How do I edit the downloads.html on
cloudstack.apache.org?
So the VR in the UI shows 3 NICs: isolated, control and public, but in SSH I
see 4 NICs, of which eth2 and eth3 have the same IP settings and the SNAT is
done on the wrong NIC (eth3 which doesn't seem to work, instead of eth2).
Any ideas? Where is this VR taking it's settings exactly?
--
Go ahead,
biligual spelling checker used.read at your own risk
Op 19 aug. 2014 15:43 schreef Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com:
Hi Daan and Ian,
I’m going ahead with adding entries of old releases of CloudStack and
cloudmonkey on the archive page.
Cheers.
On 25-Jul-2014, at 9:19 am,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23806/
---
(Updated Aug. 19, 2014, 2:23 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
Pierre-Luc,
What is this supposed to do? I see no change in the logic in your commit:
commit 62d9843e0ce9e9c2418258697e583dd9de4a68d0
Author: Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org
Date: Thu Aug 14 13:07:32 2014 -0400
NfsSecondaryStorageResource.java:remove empty spaces
diff --git
merged
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
Hi Daan,
Could you please merge in hotfix/4.4-kvm-diskcache into 4.4?
It's already in master, but this solves a issue which could prevent
Instances from starting. Ran into it myself just now while testing
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23806/
---
(Updated Aug. 19, 2014, 2:39 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
+1 , CI shouldn't be another topic?
What is required or missing to have CI in place?
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w
Daan,
The one you are looking at is only removing end of line spaces.
the commit 29c12bb78c37bf8c7ae4c2fd6f528974fc44e707 is the real fix. I've
tested it and it fixe the current 4.4.0 issue while using Swift as SS. It
is a cut and paste of a previous commit of yours for S3.
Thanks!
Pierre-Luc
I would rather CI be considered together with this thread, since this thread
needs to decide at what condition RM can merge a hotfix/bugfic branch to
release branch.
Thanks
-min
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 19, 2014, at 8:09 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
+1 , CI shouldn't be
Thanks Min for the comment, make sense.
Rohit, how do we plan to managed merge request or submit one? I don't
think using the mailing list to keep track of merge request is good, does
https://reviews.apache.org/account/login/ is keep up to date and all merge
request should go there ?
What about
On 19-Aug-2014, at 5:08 pm, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
+1 , CI shouldn't be another topic?
What is required or missing to have CI in place?
We need more servers for running Jenkins slaves on them and automation around
kicking builds for hotfixes that have a for release
Hey,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 5:34 pm, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
Thanks Min for the comment, make sense.
Rohit, how do we plan to managed merge request or submit one? I don't
think using the mailing list to keep track of merge request is good, does
In that case, we should call out this procedure
If (you¹re a committer) {
Go create a hotfix branch and ask RM to pick it up
} else {
Go upload your patch and get RM to review your request from reviewboard
}
in your proposal. I don't want people to have a misunderstanding that with
this
Hi,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 6:48 pm, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
In that case, we should call out this procedure
If (you¹re a committer) {
Go create a hotfix branch and ask RM to pick it up
} else {
Go upload your patch and get RM to review your request from reviewboard
}
in your
Hi Nux,
I may have encountered the same issue when using 4.3.0.1 with VMware +
distributed switching.
If it's the same issue then you might find that while an isolated network will
have this problem, a VPC router will work fine. I've also found this issue to
not occur with standard vSwitches.
Thanks Eric,
I'm on KVM right now, I have not yet tested VPC (as I do not need it).
I'll try to find some solution..
Cheers
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Eric Neumann - AOD eric.neum...@aod-cloud.com
To:
I will hesitate on this No enforcement approach in the flow. I bet that
without some kind of enforcement, based on past experience, after one
release, we will come together to discuss flaw in our flow again:) Sorry
if I am too pessimistic on this.
Thanks
-min
On 8/19/14 10:00 AM, Rohit Yadav
Hi,
Following are couple of issues that have been logged to track this issue:
CLOUDSTACK-5395 - When backup snapshot fails because of backup.snapshot.wait
time exceeding , the vhd entries form the primary store is not getting cleared.
This bug was reopened to address - cleaning up of snapshot
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/153/changes
Changes:
[santhosh.edukulla] Fixed few coverity issues
--
[...truncated 5995 lines...]
T E S T S
---
Running
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
I have 4 networks defined (public, guest, storage and mgmt). It looks like
the VR sets up two internal NIcs (eth2 and eth3) for connecting to the
public network. It also sets the same IP address on them.
Egress = Allow is also
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
-what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
-taken action to resolve those issues
-guarantees that 4.5 will be on time
If we don't do that, I don't even know why we are putting ourselves through
the pain of a
Hi, all
I have asked this question on users list, but got no answers, so moving the
question to dev list:
When adding a new (kvm) host to a cluster, the UI asks for a user name (doc
says “usually the root”) and its password. It seems that CS management server
will ssh into port 22 of new
+1 on what David said. Shared the same feelings as him, we really need to
focus on the high priority issue facing CloudStack. Gerrit/Github pull
request will definitely help in this regards.
Thanks
-min
On 8/19/14 10:15 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
IMHO we should not even release
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24420/
---
(Updated Aug. 19, 2014, 5:42 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24420/
---
(Updated Aug. 19, 2014, 5:46 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24425/
---
(Updated Aug. 19, 2014, 5:54 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark,
tl;dr? hope you read it;
On 19-Aug-2014, at 7:10 pm, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
I will hesitate on this No enforcement approach in the flow. I bet that
without some kind of enforcement, based on past experience, after one
Stakeholder will always care. The system should be optimistic
GitHub user terbolous opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/16
CLOUDSTACK-5879: Updated rabbitmq eventbus path
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/terbolous/cloudstack-docs-admin
There is another apache project using github model, I said in another mail
thread: https://wiki.apache.org/cordova/GitWorkflow.
Please, let's take action, and move forward, to solve the long time issue
around Apache CloudStack: no code review, no CI.
Should we start another around of discussion
I personally don't think introducing CI or gerrit or github pull request
will take away a committer's privilege to commit. If you are a stakeholder
who really care about your product, you will not be scared away by this
extra enforcement, this will actually make our cloudstack ecosystem better
and
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/154/
My opinion is totally the same as Min's.
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 11:12 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
I personally don't think introducing CI or gerrit
Hey David!
Before you or anyone reads this, I want to say that I support what you’re
trying to do here.
I’ve few ideas and concerns so if anyone is skimming please go to the bottom
and read the list.
On 19-Aug-2014, at 7:15 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
IMHO we should not even
Thanks Erik, that's close, but not quite it. I do not have the vlan issue in my
deployment.
Wish it was the case. :-)
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com
To: dev
+1 Agree that we need to have some form of CI to control basic quality
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.5 RM
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed
On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and
design doc on the wiki.
Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any
problem with using them but a lot of
On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and
design doc on the wiki.
Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any
problem with using them but a lot of
On 19-Aug-2014, at 8:11 pm, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
I personally don't think introducing CI or gerrit or github pull request
will take away a committer's privilege to commit. If you are a stakeholder
who really care about your product, you will not be scared away by this
extra
On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and
design doc on the wiki.
Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any
problem with using them but a lot of
Hello,
Is it possible to toss in an IPv6 subnet in a basic setup?
- Mo
On 08/19/2014 09:23 PM, Mo wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to toss in an IPv6 subnet in a basic setup?
Yes. I'm doing so in a setup, but it goes outside CloudStack. Simply
configure your router to do Router Advertisements and your guests will
get a IPv6 address.
Be aware though, security
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:15 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
-what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
-taken action to resolve those issues
-guarantees that 4.5 will be on time
If we don't do
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Aug 19, 2014, at 2:32 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
+1 Agree that we need to have some form of CI to control basic quality
I don't think anyone would vote -1 on better CI
The fact that we basically have none, pushes me to argue for a change in git
workflow (see several
Hi Sebastien,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that we basically have none, pushes me to argue for a change in git
workflow (see several other threads). because it will be way faster to start
gating commits using a new agreed upon workflow
I personally think that everyone has used Github and it would take
everyone less time to start using it
Plus one to using github. I found using review board for uploading .patch
files to be a horrible experience.
The fork and pull request nature of github in my view compliments git and a
neat
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi,
I'm hitting some issues with 4.3 and I'm hopeful I'll get luckier with 4.4. I
know it suffers from some bugs here and there so my question is, should I
decide to upgrade today, should I go for 4.4 proper or some git branch?
Cheers
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg
On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that we basically have none, pushes me to argue for a change in git
workflow (see several other threads). because it
Thanks Rohit, I'll build something from the 4.4 branch tomorrow.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 19 August, 2014 10:28:07 PM
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
David
Since CI has been mentioned several times, do you know where we stand
with donated hardware?
Thanks
ilya
On 8/19/14, 10:15 AM, David Nalley wrote:
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
-what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
-taken action
Sebastian,
I'd like to help you with Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 release that is if you
need help.
If you do need help, lets sync up via call, GTM, IRC or whatever else
works.
Regards
ilya
Hi Radhika,
I've just created the branch 4.4 from the master branch for
cloudstack-docs-admin. so master should be used for the next version, 4.5.
Regards,
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* |
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/15#issuecomment-52720766
Karuturi, you can close this pull request (I can't), it as been merged
into 4.3 and master.
I've modify the highlight.
Thank you :)
---
If
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/16#issuecomment-52720829
terbolous: I've push the PR, you can close it now (I can't). it is merge in
master and 4.3 branches.
Thank you :)
---
If your project is set up
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi,
When install cloudstack-agent from my own repos which built from source, it
failed
[root@devstack ~]# rpm -ivh
http://192.168.129.7/ieureka/cloudstack-agent-4.3.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
Retrieving
http://192.168.129.7/ieureka/cloudstack-agent-4.3.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
At that point, shouldn't we put all the efforts on 4.4.1 instead?
Francois
On 2014-08-19, 8:28 PM, ilya musayev wrote:
Sebastian,
I'd like to help you with Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 release that is if
you need help.
If you do need help, lets sync up via call, GTM, IRC or whatever else
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi everyone,
As you probably know, I have worked on this project whose goal is making
the GUI support adding primary storage to CS that is based on storage
plug-ins.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Create+GUI+to+add+primary+storage+based+on+plug-ins
The pencils down firm
Did you create a libvirt rpm and install that way?
On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:08 PM, Yitao Jiang willier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When install cloudstack-agent from my own repos which built from source, it
failed
[root@devstack ~]# rpm -ivh
Yitao,
If you're building your own CS rpms, you should be able to remove the
Requires: libvirt from the cloud.spec file under packaging/centos63 prior to
running the build.
- Si
From: Yitao Jiang willier...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014
Thanks Simon, I'll hava a try
---
Thanks,
Yitao(依涛 姜)
jiangyt.github.io
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Simon Weller swel...@ena.com wrote:
Yitao,
If you're building your own CS rpms, you should be able to remove the
Requires: libvirt from the cloud.spec file under packaging/centos63
I once create a libvirt rpm, but after install that on CentOS, it appears
not support RBD, so i installed it from source
---
Thanks,
Yitao(依涛 姜)
jiangyt.github.io
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com
wrote:
Did you create a libvirt rpm and install that way?
Hi Nux,
Can you please check /var/cache/cloud/cmdline for interfaces info.
If that is correct then as part of acquired public ip configuration
the extra nic might have created, check that also.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 19-Aug-2014, at 11:55 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Thanks Erik, that's close,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24882/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6282
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/15#issuecomment-52734745
closing it as it is merged to upstream
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user karuturi closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/15
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Hi pdion,
Thanks for taking care. I closed the pull request. Can you check the
formatting for the default value of ldap.username.attribute? I think it has
gone to a new line.
Also, I see the new doc only for 4.4[1]. where as master[2] and 4.3[3]
still has the old one. Why is it so?
[1]
90 matches
Mail list logo
