Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/188#issuecomment-95821124
Shouldn't the files have licensing information in them?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/188#issuecomment-95822665
@agneya2001 some functionality like?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shwetaag commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/188#issuecomment-95824131
@agneya2001 this is version 1.
I know enhancement are possible .
Like db comparison based on versions but that will come in next version
---
If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/185
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/190
CLOUDSTACK-8394: Use custom decorator to skip test case
When the tests are skipped through setUpClass, the statement raise
unittest.SkipTest() is used. This is seen as exception in the
Marcus, I think we decided to take small steps in the direction of
something resambling git-workflow instead of adopting it as a
standard. merging branches for fixes and features was one of those
steps. We had a pre-vote discussion on git-flow and it was rejected as
such. That shouldn't stop us
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/190
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
I will reply my own question in case someone needs the same.
In an Ajax request, when you give the projectid parameter a -1 then you
will get the id of the current project where you are currently in.
Cheers!
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Ramzi Youssefi ryouss...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
Hello everyone,
I'm currently developing a UI Javascript Plugin for Cloudstack and I was
wondering if there is a global variable that tells me in which project I'm
currently in.
For example, if I list something in the ViewList, than the context will be
something like this:
var description =
Github user svscorp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/185#issuecomment-95872015
@bhaisaab Oh yes, it would be perfect. Should I make a PR, Rohit?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Have been trying to run some marvin test cases. Need to know how to interpret
the result.
On running test cases I see several success and failure messages. Lets take
example of each from output of
/root/cloudstack/test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py on ACS
4.5, taking a
+1
@Marcus: This is also something on my wish list :-)
@Nux: When we look at SELinux, we should also make it work with AppArmor
(Ubuntu). I think it should not be too hard to fix this for the KVM agent,
as both provide tools to record the permissions and create profiles. But
you never know what
Github user agneya2001 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/188#issuecomment-95858828
Was thinking of more of a script with a wizard interface, instead of bunch
of scripts, that guides the user during upgrade.
Some suggestions:
A way to fix
Hi Abhi,
FAILED indicates it’s an assertion error. Even if the test case is expecting a
failure, it must have been written in such a way that when an operation fails,
test case passes.
Here it indicates that operation which should have failed has succeeded, might
be a product issue.
Exception
Do you have console proxies for all your systems? If you do, then
never mind. You could query the db for remnance.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:31 AM, fight300...@sina.com wrote:
There was an error when i upgraded cloudstack4.2.1 to 4.4.2.
According to the cloudstack-release-notes-4.4.2,in the
nope, I was wrong.. is done automatically as soon one select a project.
Cool!
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Ramzi Youssefi ryouss...@gmail.com wrote:
I will reply my own question in case someone needs the same.
In an Ajax request, when you give the projectid parameter a -1 then you
will
SystemVMs are stored here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5
On 23-Apr-2015, at 4:16 pm, Keerthiraja SJ sjkeer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to validate ACS 4.5.1 rpm installation. Kindly let me know
which repo should I have to point.
There is no rpm's
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/185#issuecomment-95871580
@svscorp Thanks, do you want to merge this on 4.5 branch as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Rohit, the issues you mention are not as painful if we release in a
two week schedule as the period of creating a fix to seeing it in a
release will be shorter. Some releases will be broken for some people,
I don't think we can prevent this. The target we are aiming for is to
big to cover it
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/185#issuecomment-95912561
@svscorp yes please, I tried to cherry-pick the change but it failed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Pierre-Luc did push the tag before the announcement. It didn't make it
to github. So did so push the tag to github directly? (thanks for
that)
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
You’ll require access to the readthedocs site and the release
I think we need to have a faster release management to speed up process in
general, and for that I propose that we have at least two co-pilots for the
release manager who would support them with things like reviewing/merging
patches, creating RC candidates etc whenever necessary. Having only
Github user K0zka commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/180#issuecomment-95947645
ping? :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Daan - I think I confused you. Let me try again - once you git push the tag to
wip git repo (also, you cannot push on github since it’s a mirror); you need to
log into https://readthedocs.org/accounts/login (in case you don’t have an
account create one and ask Sebastien or any other admin to
Hi All,
This is the email about why can we merge the cloudrouter.org in cloudstack
in the new 4.6.
I basic idea is in Advance Networking when we choose VLAN isolatation why
do we need more router.
Can we do something like same what Nuage Network Provides.
In Advance Networking configuration
Hi Daan,
You’ll require access to the readthedocs site and the release notes project.
I’ve published RN 4.4.3 tag yesterday.
On 21-Apr-2015, at 8:59 am, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone link me to a description on how to publish the release
notes. I did update the
Hi,
With 4.5 there are some restrictions applied to VMs that have VM snapshots.
According to CLOUDSTACK-7688
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7688 VM snapshot stops
working when the following operations are performed on VM with VM snapshots:
1. Volumes of VM are migrated to other
ok, clear. thanks
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Daan - I think I confused you. Let me try again - once you git push the tag
to wip git repo (also, you cannot push on github since it’s a mirror); you
need to log into
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Abhi, went through the logs. The tests which have FAILED have failed because
product behavior is not as expected in the test.
Tests with Exception seem have issue in test code.
Regards,
Gaurav Aradhye
On Apr 24, 2015, at 4:47 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Github user svscorp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/191#discussion_r29093521
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/usage/UsageServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -224,11 +224,11 @@ public boolean
generateUsageRecords(GenerateUsageRecordsCmd cmd) {
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/191#issuecomment-96117513
@svscorp somehow asfgit failed to close it, please close the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/191#discussion_r29092546
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/usage/UsageServiceImpl.java ---
@@ -224,11 +224,11 @@ public boolean
generateUsageRecords(GenerateUsageRecordsCmd cmd) {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/180
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/180#issuecomment-95956196
Merged on master and 4.5 branches.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Hi Gaurav,
Your réponse will definitely help us in focusing in the right direction.
Thanks a lot !
-abhi
On 24-Apr-2015, at 7:11 pm, Gaurav Aradhye gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com wrote:
Abhi, went through the logs. The tests which have FAILED have failed because
product behavior is not as
Daan,
On 24-Apr-2015, at 3:53 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Rohit, the issues you mention are not as painful if we release in a
two week schedule as the period of creating a fix to seeing it in a
release will be shorter. Some releases will be broken for some people,
I
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/180#issuecomment-95954176
@K0zka pong, looks good to me. Merging now. Should I also merge it on 4.5?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Daan,
On 24-Apr-2015, at 3:53 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Rohit, the issues you mention are not as painful if we release in a
two week schedule as the period of creating a fix to seeing it in a
You can use http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.5/job/build-systemvm-4.5/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Keerthiraja SJ sjkeer...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 24 April, 2015 06:13:50
Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/189#discussion_r29025553
--- Diff:
test/integration/component/test_escalation_listTemplateDomainAdmin.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user agneya2001 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/188#issuecomment-95811296
It appears that some functionality still needs to be completed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/189#discussion_r29025564
--- Diff:
test/integration/component/test_escalation_listTemplateDomainAdmin.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software
A nice vision Keerthi. I would love to see something like this implemented
in CloudStack.
Sometimes we just want to link VMs at Layer 2. I¹m aware that there are
ways of doing this without instantiating virtual routers, but these
methods are not officially supported. CloudStack seems very much
GitHub user svscorp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/191
Get usage records new input format start date end date (for 4.5 branch)
Port of an improvement from PR: #185
@bhaisaab @kishankavala Here it is.
You can merge this pull request into a
52 matches
Mail list logo
