Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/932#issuecomment-150648494
@DaanHoogland I have the same result as @borisroman reports:
```
Deploy DC Started
Exception Occurred: ['Traceback (most recent call
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150652979
@remibergsma not for the HypervisorGuru, as they are really specific, It
does however conflict with the original idea behind the Gurus if I'm not
mistaken, as a Guru
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/964#issuecomment-150653911
@remibergsma thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150657287
@snuf @remibergsma I like this idea. I actually think we should have this
kind behavior everywhere...
Here's another example of non-deterministic
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962#issuecomment-150657334
@NuxRo @karuturi Superseded by #975 and in . Closing this one!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user snuf closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/970#issuecomment-150662299
Based on code review, LGTM :+1:
I haven't spun up a cluster to run integration tests...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/973#issuecomment-150662287
Oh and push again so Jenkins can restart, please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/965
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user snuf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/975
Ovm3HypervisorGuru wrong answer and snapshot to volume implementation.
Fixes the wrong answer that is given for host delegation, the snapshot to
volume is implemented and a small logger is added
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/970#issuecomment-150663941
@borisroman Thanks, will ask @wilderrodrigues to run some integration tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150660824
This seems like a pragmatic fix for 4.6. In the long term, I am concerns
that the method provides an inaccurate view of system state. When no answer is
found, it
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150661801
@jburwell I think it should be 2 commits... They fix 2 different things.
The first fixes the Guru issue, while the second one makes it possible to
create
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150663033
@DaanHoogland At present, I don't have any way to run SolidFire integration
tests inside of the Apache community. Perhaps I can leverage a virtual
appliance
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150665355
@borisroman it fixes one ticket -- it should be one commit. In the grand
scheme of the master log, the distinction is not valuable -- it only obfuscates
the
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Milamber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%):
>
> French (France) 100%
> Portuguese (Brazil) 99%
> Japanese (Japan)99%
> Chinese (China)
Github user borisroman closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/890
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
If you have some time, join us now :-)
On 22/10/15 22:48, "Pierre-Luc Dion" wrote:
>Hi,
>Just as a quick reminder, we will do the First QA days tomorrow. We should
>use the Slack channel: #qa_days and IRC channel #cloudstack-dev for live
>communications.
>The idea, tests
Github user NuxRo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962#issuecomment-150537570
@Snuf is there a list of all hv gurus? I'd like to exclude all of them (bar
kvm), see if that helps.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/966#issuecomment-150546240
See also PR #812 and the comments there. Can anyone combine the two and
address the comments in PR #812 please? If it can be done soon, we can merge it
in 4.6.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/963
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/932#issuecomment-150553777
@DaanHoogland Could you please have a look again?
```
WARN [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (StatsCollector-1:ctx-94b6fe0e) Exception
while sending
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/966#issuecomment-150553318
Agreed with @remibergsma, but the code-wise this is a LGTM.
One PR which includes #812 as well would be nice.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user dmabry commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/966#issuecomment-150588016
@DaanHoogland Sounds good. I'll hold off. Thanks for the help.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Hello,
The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%):
French (France) 100%
Portuguese (Brazil) 99%
Japanese (Japan)99%
Chinese (China) 99%
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway) 99%
Hungarian 98%
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/963#issuecomment-150547987
@remibergsma All green now! LGTM :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#discussion_r42860960
--- Diff: framework/db/src/com/cloud/utils/db/Transaction.java ---
@@ -59,4 +59,30 @@ public T doInTransaction(TransactionStatus status)
throws
Github user dmabry commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/966#issuecomment-150582452
I'll take a look at #812 and see about combining them into this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/966#issuecomment-150585840
@dmabry I am already writng a combination. please review when done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user pdube commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150575383
The fix looks like it will work, but it seems like it is just a workaround.
Shouldn't the column be updated correctly instead?
Either in this method or the
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/936#issuecomment-150578738
@remibergsma Did the same :) KVM Basic setup though. Integeration test:
smoke/test_vm_life_cycle.py returned all success!
LGTM :+1:
---
If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/936
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#discussion_r42860149
--- Diff: framework/db/src/com/cloud/utils/db/Transaction.java ---
@@ -59,4 +59,30 @@ public T doInTransaction(TransactionStatus status)
throws
Github user michaelandersen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/971#issuecomment-150571635
ran the following test:
```
nosetests --with-marvin --log-folder-path=/tmp/marvin/
--marvin-config=../../../mct-zone1-kvm1.cfg -a tags=advanced
Perhaps it would be nice to put the logging in all the GURUs so you can
actually see which
ones are used, and how it is used ?
Cheers,
Funs
> On 23 Oct 2015, at 11:21, Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> As I said in previous mail, the request should be sent to
> KVMHypervisorGuru,
GitHub user michaelandersen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/971
Fix template not ready error
Add wait for template download
Refactored template section of services
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/936#issuecomment-150572549
LGTM, built infra and run this test:
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
tags=advanced,required_hardware=false
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/925#issuecomment-150550247
Hi @atrbgithub thanks for the patch! Can you supply this patch also to
master? We can only merge it, if it enters master first (will change soon, but
right now
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/799
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/970
CLOUDSTACK-8987 call s3xen/swiftxen plugins with their name
It's called `s3xen`, not `s3xenserver`. While investigating, I found the
same issue for `swiftxen`.
Regresion from
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/960#issuecomment-150535530
Who's going to propose a PR that moves the test? Then we're done and can
focus on getting 4.6 released!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user NuxRo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150545386
I can confirm Wei's modifications fixes my problem.
Both operations (create tmpl and create vol from snapshot) succeed with
RPMs built from
As I said in previous mail, the request should be sent to
KVMHypervisorGuru, not others.
Mike, can you try my PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954
2015-10-23 8:49 GMT+02:00 Rajani Karuturi :
> Interesting. Incase of KVM, its the reverse. The command
I'm on IRC, me and the wind. :)
Time is limited though - the biggest problem with these synchronous meetings.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Remi Bergsma"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962#issuecomment-150525837
@borisroman problem is that some of our jenkins build slaves ("our" are the
project ones) fail, so "restarting" it and hoping you'll end up on a build
slave that does
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962#issuecomment-150536000
@NuxRo tested all the scenarios and I'm getting different results as before
and different results than you, this is an excerpt of the log testing the
various options:
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/799#issuecomment-150552760
In the mean while work has been done on CentOS 7 (systemd) so that is not
relevant any more. There also is another open issue that needs to address
CentOS 7
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/970#issuecomment-150526387
Verified this is also broken in `4.5` btw.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/926#issuecomment-150531546
Talked to @DaanHoogland and he wants this in 4.6. It seems like a feature
and not a bug fix, but pinging @karuturi to align.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150637364
@NuxRo Thanks! I'll count it as a LGTY? :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/967#issuecomment-150630220
Cool. Will run the build again with this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/950#issuecomment-150638131
@ke4qqq Are you OK with including it in the Developer profile as well. This
obviously is not the default build. This would allow for war drop deployments
in
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150642505
@NuxRo @remi it works like a charm and also prevents little accidents from
happening. The interesting thing is that the XenserverGuru.java contains the
exact same code
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/974#issuecomment-150642444
Thanks, great stuff @milamberspace !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user NuxRo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150638003
Count it, but @karuturi gave me the impression she was going for a
different kind of fix, on the ovm3 side of things, might want to check with her.
---
If your
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/973#issuecomment-150640879
Nice work @dahn, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/965#issuecomment-150646084
Compilation and testing went successfull. As it only involved a change of a
unit test, I hadn't ran integration tests.
```
Running
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150647256
@Nuxro @remibergsma @karuturi by adding a simple log line to the
XenServerGuru.java you get the following when doing a snap to vol and a snap to
temp:
'2015-10-23
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/972#issuecomment-150635269
Thanks @miguelaferreira, run the tests and it works fine! LGTM
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/950#issuecomment-150638411
LGTM, build several times and it succeeds. The resulting war now works in
tomcat, which is awesome.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150639519
@NuxRo I agree, I want a solution that you, @snuf and @karuturi agree on :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user milamberspace opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/974
Update L10N resource files with 4.6 strings from Transifex (20151023)
This is a "open" PR until the RC1 for Apache CloudStack.
I will updated this PR next week
Hi,
Thank you for the reminder!
I can not promise it will ever be 100%, but I will review and cleanup the
translation.
Best regards,
Laszlo
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Milamber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%):
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/964#issuecomment-150632854
LGTM, based on a set of tests that I run on this branch (results below).
Also looked at the labels and they look fine. Thanks @snuf !
```
nosetests
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/967#issuecomment-150638792
Ping @remibergsma @miguelaferreira @DaanHoogland @borisroman
More tests:
* 2 KVM hosts on CentOS 7.1
* Agent + Common built from source
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/973#issuecomment-150647352
@DaanHoogland IMHO I think the unit test is a bit inconclusive. It would
pass if 8 out of 10 of the possible prefixes were removed
And maybe remove
Github user rodrigo93 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/943#issuecomment-150744688
@borisroman Hi borisroman, sure! What about this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Hi Wei,
So, I am able to spin up a VM using local storage now on VMware with your
PR; however, I still see the following exceptions thrown when I look at the
CS MS console:
INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-6:ctx-6046512a
job-263/job-264 ctx-d61972a5) Unable to contact
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/950#issuecomment-150670213
@miguelaferreira Could you force push your commit again? So we're all
green? :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user pdube commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150675450
@mike-tutkowski Thanks. That makes more sense now. So concurrent deletions
would still be a problem?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150671146
@borisroman yes, you are right. Should I seperate this PR to two ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/943#issuecomment-150672917
@rodrigo93 Thanks for squashing! Could you also rename the commit title to
something more sensible?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
4.5 should be OK. I tested this kind of stuff back then and didn't notice
anything.
Let me make sure I'm running with the most recent system VM template for
4.6.
Prior to using your PR, I was not able to deploy a VM to local storage on
VMware.
With your PR, I was able to perform such a
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150676794
@borisroman done. #954 and #976
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
I just tried it, though, with managed storage and it doesn't work. Same
error of sending the CopyCommand to the wrong server.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> So, I am able to spin up a VM using local storage now on VMware with
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150678276
Perhaps the management server serializes delete commands that it sends
to a given
plug-in.
On Friday, October 23, 2015, Mike Tutkowski
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/961#issuecomment-150667050
Verified with curl -v => LGTM :+1:
Before:
```
[root@cs1 cloudstack]# curl -v 192.168.22.61:8080/client/
* About to connect() to
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150677439
I have actually not witnessed any issue with concurrent deletions. I've run
tests on that and they passed just fine.
On Friday, October 23, 2015,
> On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:05 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Milamber wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%):
>>
>> French (France) 100%
>> Portuguese
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/972#issuecomment-150668944
Ok, here they are:
```
=== TestName: test_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes | Status : SUCCESS
===
ok
=== TestName:
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150672117
@ustcweizhou You may do so! Then also separate the ticket.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Hi Mike,
Does it work without this commit? I want to know if it is caused by this
commit.
Moreover, does it work on cloudstack 4.5 ?
2015-10-23 21:31 GMT+02:00 Mike Tutkowski :
> I just tried it, though, with managed storage and it doesn't work. Same
> error of
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/935#issuecomment-150676496
@miguelaferreira thanks a lot for your help and advices! As suggested I
post test_nicira_controller.py results:
$ cat
GitHub user ustcweizhou opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/976
CLOUDSTACK-8964: Can't create volume from snapshot of a removed volume
This issue happens on KVM as well.
This is because the volume info is missing in the CopyCommand once the
volume
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/860#issuecomment-150681274
@karuturi @remibergsma Is this still actual? If so, could you please
rebase? I'll then test it and it can be a bugfix for 4.6 :)
---
If your project is set up
As long as it's functional logging, GOOD IDEA!
> On October 23, 2015 at 4:03 PM Funs Kessen wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps it would be nice to put the logging in all the GURUs so you can
> actually see which
> ones are used, and how it is used ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Funs
>
> >
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/972#issuecomment-150602167
I've tested this in a 2 KVM hosts setup (a.k.a
Github user atrbgithub commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/925#issuecomment-150595815
Hi Remi, I've forced-pushed the commit (amended the commit message and
re-pushed) and it looks like the tests are running once more. I had a look at
making a
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/971#issuecomment-150604553
@michaelandersen you did not specify `required_hardware=true` are you sure
the tests have actually ran?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user miguelaferreira opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/972
Fix error message in test_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes
While running test_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes it is expected
that SSH'ing into a VM does not work
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/967#issuecomment-150605611
Ping @remibergsma @miguelaferreira @borisroman @DaanHoogland
It's now fixed for real!
```
Test create VPC offering ... === TestName:
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/973
Interface pattern check
thsi closes #812 and #966 as well
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/DaanHoogland/cloudstack
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962#issuecomment-150590628
@NuxRo here's a list, there is no KVM Guru... ?
funs@cs-mgmt:~/cloudstack/plugins/hypervisors$ find . -type f -name *.xml |
xargs grep -A 1 Guru | grep property |
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150490749
checked with the regular tests of the SBP integration test suits and there
all pass (except for the vp offering things) @mike-tutkowski Do you have any
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/963#issuecomment-150495362
@ustcweizhou I confirmed it working. Could you please force push your last
commit so Jenkins will run again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Interesting. Incase of KVM, its the reverse. The command which is supposed to
goto SSVM ended up on KVM host.
~Rajani
On 23-Oct-2015, at 10:49 am, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Hi Rajani,
>
> I seem to get the same error.
>
> "Are you sure you got the right type
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/967#issuecomment-150497392
I'm running the new test now. Once done, I will push it and you can proceed
with testing the PR.
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If your project is set up
Hello,
Thanks for the translation.
I've just open the 2.2 resource for acceptance of translated strings,
you can now grow to 100% for All versions of CloudStack.
Milamber
On 23/10/2015 21:58, Yiping Zhang wrote:
I took a look at Chinese, and finished last two messages for 4.5/4.6. All
Well, is version 2.2 still relevant at all ? Why waste time on it ?
On 10/23/15, 2:09 PM, "Milamber" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Thanks for the translation.
>
>I've just open the 2.2 resource for acceptance of translated strings,
>you can now grow to 100% for All versions of
Hello translators,
The way to translate the web UI of CloudStack is to go on Transifex
website [1]. Apache CloudStack uses this specialized service to
facilitate the translation process.
It's very easy, you just need to create an account (free) and start to
translate with the Transifex
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo