LS,
in the past we had set a set of rules in the community under which PR could
be merged. I want to reiterate them here as it seems we are kind of
slacking. Please chime in if there are any issues or omissions:
For a PR to be merged it has to adhere to the following conditions:
- In any case
-- A
n Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 08:08, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 9/3/19 2:55 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:22 PM Wido den Hollander
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 9/3/19 9:57 AM, D
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:22 PM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 9/3/19 9:57 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > Can you find/look at the line before in the log. It is probably the one
> > containing the hindering data. Or otherwise it *might* be a clue where in
> > the flow
Can you find/look at the line before in the log. It is probably the one
containing the hindering data. Or otherwise it *might* be a clue where in
the flow it happens.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:22 AM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 9/2/19 10:18 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> > Hi Wido,
> >
> > I had sim
the count in the fragment has an obvious trivial bug: it counts objects
while one of the objects is the actual count.
it should read
```
if (count < (objects.size() - 1)) {
count = objects.size() - 1;
}
```
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:57 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> In some
Paul, a commitsgh has been published and could be used from just that mail.
I would go for a new release name. Whether that is 4.11.3.1 or something
else is of little consequence. (€0.02)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 3:43 PM Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have any strong views on whether we
Is 4.13 already in freeze? I'd say let's update before the freeze, if we
still can.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 2:25 PM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> All,
>
>
> JDK 8 (lts) has already reached EOL and we're dependent on
> distro/maintainers and the next available LTS jdk is JDK 11.
>
>
> Here's the proposal:
Richard, I think it will be easiest to replace the jar in
/usr/share/cloudstack (by head, don't hold me to the exact path). Depending
on the distribution you run on you can edit the classpath in the startup
script, but I'd go for replacing the jar!
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:30 PM Richard Lawley
wr
he initial
validation. Or if you feel that is unacceptable!
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 10:51 AM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Ok, I will see if I can split and/or reduce the Travis test jobs. These
> are not covering full regression checks anyway and are just indicators to
> the most blatant errors in
/*test_primary_storage*".
> > That is one of the reasons why this test is there on its own.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:54 AM Daan Hoogland
> > wrote:
> >
> > > LS,
> > > Lately travis tests show more and more random failures. somtimes thes
LS,
Lately travis tests show more and more random failures. somtimes these
succeed on stuborn retry but lately these are getting more persistent.
Especially job .7 is hard to get past/passed. I am very irritated and
looking for ways to resolve this without just ignoring.
Is there anybody here that
d
> > to db in ActionEventUtils.java (server project).
> > Additional information is being stored to log files (api.log) in
> > ApiServlet.java (server project).
> >
> > My goal is to combine the information of the EventVO (as defined in
> > CloudStack) and the api
Nikos, I am not sure if I understand your objective. It would seem to me
that all information to proces an event should be in the event. Does it
suffice to add information to the event message for your purposes?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:52 AM Nikolaos Dalezios
wrote:
> Hello developers. I am i
mon Weller
> escreveu:
>
> > I know Nathan and Gabriel discussed this a couple of weeks ago, as Nathan
> > does his dev builds on a mac. I'm not sure if a patch idea came out of
> that
> > discussion or not.
> >
> > -Si
> >
> >
> >
LS,
Due to changes in LibvirtResource recently merged, the project will err out
during unit tests on macos. This happens because of
c496c84c6c727a84862cbbe2d870ff57939488b4 that changes the initialisation of
memstats, requiring /proc/meminfo to exist (during unit tests). The
requirement makes perf
I forgot to mention the cloudstack event model. You'll have to look at that
as well
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> H Nikolaos,
> have a look at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2992. it was
> -1'd but i think it would fit your ideas. have a
H Nikolaos,
have a look at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2992. it was -1'd
but i think it would fit your ideas. have a look see if you can add your
thoughts to that and I'll be happy to look at PRs to the base branch of
that one.
regards
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:41 AM Nikolaos Dalezio
welcome to the guilty party, Andrija.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:16 AM Boris Stoyanov
wrote:
> Congrats Andrija!
>
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> > On 19 Nov 2018, at 7:27, Sateesh Chodapuneedi <
> satee
People, I know this is not a sexy subject but it needs attention. There is
a PR [1] out for preparational work on upgrading antiquated logging
frameworks. It needs attention if only :+1: or an argument not to do it.
Several other similar jobs need doing as well. I wasn't in Montreal so i
don't know
Sorry to hear you are reducing your activity on CloudStack, Marc-Aurele.
Hope you fare well.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 10:10 PM Marc-Aurèle Brothier
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> (Again as the email formatting has been removed and was hard to read -
> I hope it will be better this time).
>
> While try
Paul, the apache jobs get cleaned up quite fast, so the 404 is probably
just the job output that isn't found. Look at
https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-pr-analysis/ to see if there are
jobs with more output. The definitions is such that at most 5 jobs are kept
for at most 14 days.
On Sun, S
sounds nice Ivan, Do you have a whitepaper on it? I strugle to see a clear
usecase for this plugin. maybe you have a casus or two!?!
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:02 AM Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Hello, community.
>
> We glad to announce a new Open Source plug-in for Apache CloudStack which
> helps t
devs,
I started a small FS [1] on migrating stopped VMs (and detached volumes) in
vmware. It has no API or UI consequences but some architectural;
I am planning an added method finalizeMigration that returns a list of
commands to send to the resource. The default implementation returns null,
meani
i'm +1 on this it has not been developed for the longest while. (changed
the title to indicate _all_ people are supposed to have an opinion.)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
wrote:
> Hello Community
>
> Following up after PR#2613[1] to cleanup POMs across the whole repository,
hey Ivan, I don't have much experience with anything but bind, but this
looks nice!
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Hello, users, devs.
>
> We developed a small service for the creation of DNS records (A, , PTR)
> in the PowerDNS and published it in the GitHub:
>
>
andrija,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> HI guys, hi Mike.T.,
>
> we have removed all NFS and CEPH storages, and are now purely running on
> SolidFire (KVM).
>
> Now I want to do serious snapshot cleanup (for reason explained at the end
> of email) - since "snapshots" an
Stephan, are you planning PRs for these chances?
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Stephan Seitz
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Having 4.11.1 at the horizon (btw. Thank You!), I've recently built
> packages and systemvm templates and wanted to share some thoughts about the
> systemvm.
>
> Here a few things i ca
t; ShapeBlue
>
> On 10/07/2018, 21:08, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>
> how about the macchinina images as build in? At least for development
> those
> are very convenient.
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <
> gabrasc.
Fellow devs,
I am trying for some migration code in the vmware resource and noticed that
the virtualDiskManagerMO is implemented but never used. For instance ther
is an extendVirtualDisk implemented but the resize method uses a worker vm
to attach the disk an resize it there.
Does anyone know if t
how about the macchinina images as build in? At least for development those
are very convenient.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <
gabrasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You are right Rafael, I was not clear with the "*(KVM)*". The idea would be
> to update others as well ;)
>
> 2
Sean,
I've been busy with that scenario for a while and it is not a consistent
error. I have the feeling that it happens more4 lately but just yesterday I
manually testit several times 2 VPC with connected private gw and static
routes to each other. I could restart with no problem.
On Fri, Jun 22,
Wido, I like the idea that we can generate from git what has happened since
last time. I also recognise that we don't do that properly all the time.
What this comes down to is discipline, however we implement it. Deciding if
a change is big enough would be up to both the author and the reviewer and
]?
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Roadmap
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > Wido, there used to be a page on cwiki with plans for 5.0, I can not find
> > it anymore but this should be added to it.
> &
orks
>> - Java 9?
>> - Drop support for Ubuntu 12.04
>> - Other fancy stuff?
>> - Support ConfigDrive in all scenarios properly
>>
>> How would that sound?
>>
>> Wido
>>
>> >> On Jun 19, 201
I like this initiative, and here comes the big but even though I myself
might think it is not valid; Basic zones are there to give a simple start
for new users. If we can give a one-knob start/one page wizard for creating
a shared network in advanced zone with security groups and userdata, great.
A
Devs,
I just noticed that com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper and its
parent package com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource have a number cyclic
dependencies. These seem to be very old and only a way of organising the
command wrappers. They do prevent intellij from navigating properly though.
Any
- release checksums all check out.
- I installed an all-KVM 4.9.3.1 with a redundant VPC and two nets with
VMs. I upgraded to 4.11.1. The only glitch was that the documentation says
to register new system VMs as 'systemvm-kvm-4.11'. This should be
'systemvm-kvm-4.11.1'. The nets kept running and up
Wido, I think we can remove ip data from the vlan table, though it is going
to require some hacking. Removing the vlan table seems not prudent to me,
especially since we now have l2 networks (without ip provisioned).
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking a
t-2.2.1
>
> Running setup.py install for pycparser: started
>
> Running setup.py install for pycparser: finished with status 'done'
>
> Found existing installation: netaddr 0.7.5
>
> DEPRECATION: Uninstalling a distutils installed project (netaddr) has
Devs,
We have a number of issues out for milestone 4.11.1 but non of them are
blockers asaik. So unless there are any i don't know of, lets cut RC2
tomorrow.
any opinions?
--
Daan
are
> if it still in place.
>
> пн, 28 мая 2018 г., 19:50 Daan Hoogland :
>
> > Ivan can you share the log bit during startup where it tries to run the
> > 41000to41100 sql file?
> >
> > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev <
> > kudryavtsev.
Ivan can you share the log bit during startup where it tries to run the
41000to41100 sql file?
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Hello, yes It looks like the problem is like that, I just suggested it
> could be connected with 'delimiter' because that sql file isn't evalu
I checked three verification files, unpacked and build the code, and am
trusting the process otherwise:
0 (binding)
The reason I am not giving a +1 is because the code presently does not
build on anything but linux, due to the configdrive test not building on
macosx (and I presume windows) If we ad
, Glen.
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Glen Baars
wrote:
> Hello Daan,
>
> It seems that they are getting a similar result but from a different cause.
>
> Is a network suppose to have a placeholder record?
>
> Kind regards,
> Glen Baars
> -Original Message-
>
mkisofs can be installed using brew indeed. It won't help out off the box
though. I think it should not be used from a unit test but at best from an
integration test. As it is an integration with an external tool. (look
later)
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
> ____
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 2:56:34 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: build/replace.properties
>
> Anyone knows any reason we have this file called bui
Anyone knows any reason we have this file called build/replace.properties
(still)? It is reported to be in the .gitignore file, yet it has a history
in git.
--
Daan
Glenn, this sounds like it is related to a bug that was just fixed;
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2653
Did you do a AddNicToVMCmd manually or was it a consequential action as a
result?
When saying it is related I do not think it is the same.
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 6:21 AM, Glen Baars
> role. Don't think it's good for business cases.
>
> 2018-05-18 15:41 GMT+07:00 Daan Hoogland :
>
> > actually whet is in place is moving users between accounts, and thus
> > allowing for their role to change. The accounts would stay the same, but
> > the ef
actually whet is in place is moving users between accounts, and thus
allowing for their role to change. The accounts would stay the same, but
the effective role of the users changes with it's account. MoverUserCmd is
the API.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Hello, Ilya
Wow, nice surprise
On Wed, 2 May 2018, 18:38 Dag Sonstebo, wrote:
> Congratulations both!
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 02/05/2018, 17:33, "Nitin Kumar Maharana" <
> nitinkumar.mahar...@accelerite.com> wrote:
>
> Congratulations!!
>
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue
can be driven towards making all VRs redundant enabled by
> default that can allow for a firewall+connections state transfer
> (conntrackd + VRRP2/3 based) during rolling reboots.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
> ___
H,
I just merged forward some commits that had been waiting on the upgrade
paths PR [1]. There where conflicts but I think I solved them correctly. As
far as I can tell the affected PRs where:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2563
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2567
https://gith
hang tough, Mike! And thanks, Wido.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:37 AM, Boris Stoyanov <
boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Thank you Wido and congrats Mike!
>
> -Boris Stoyanov
>
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeb
hey Dag, keep up the good work, thanks and welcome
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Simon Weller
wrote:
> Congrats Dag, much deserved!
>
>
> From: John Kinsella
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 8:58 AM
> To:
> Subject: New committer: Dag Sonstebo
>
> The Project
nice going Gabriel and congratulations to PCextreme!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <
gabrasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you, guys :)
>
> 2018-03-20 16:23 GMT-03:00 Wei ZHOU :
>
> > Congratulations Gabriel!
> >
> > Welcome to NL :)
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-03-20 14:50 GMT+0
ocess of individual
> instances?
>
> Thanks,
> Rohit Vavaldas
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Rohit, nice to see you here. What you should be looking at is mostly
> > the register template API and service calls and
Let me add to the below that I do think a ticketing system is a big help
for keeping track of *un*implemented changes and *un*fixed bugs.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Boris, I hate to be strongly opinionated but I have to violently disagree
> with you on some
t; wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> What do you mean by issue? PR or issue (Github issue)?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> >> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>&
right, also when an issue is created?
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We already have. All messages on ACS' GH go to commits@c.a.o
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> &g
be a PR)? Those are point
> of
> > view exchanges with messages & links, with a final status, most of the
> time
> > without a strong link to a release number. If they do, they can be added
> to
> > a milestone.
> >
> > So far I don't see how things
Will, you are speaking my mind; any external registration tool should be
based on the source. The only reason for having an external tool without
relation to the code is to keep track of what is *not* (or not fully)
implemented.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart
them public?
>
> I guess it would be better for anyone to see the list, and not make them to
> register first.
>
> [1]: http://s.apache.org/gsoc2018ideas
>
> Khosrow Moossavi
>
> <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:21 AM, Daan Hoo
Hey Rohit, nice to see you here. What you should be looking at is mostly
the register template API and service calls and then the update version
code for the last version that required an upgrade. Off the top of my head
it is in the class Upgrade410to411.java (don't kill me if I'm off by a few
char
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ulrich Stärk
Date: Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 10:19 PM
Subject: Google Summer of Code 2018 Mentor Registration
To: ment...@community.apache.org
Cc: "d...@community.apache.org"
Dear PMCs,
I'm happy to announce that the ASF has made it onto the list of acc
did you resolve this yet, @rafael?
it doesn't seem right that a commit other then a pom change has such a tag.
On the other hand it says it is an RC-tag which could be deleted by now, or
replaced by a GA-tag.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrot
Thanks Wido,
I suspect to start a PoC on fase 1 shortly.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 02/15/2018 04:36 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> The intention of this proposal is to have a way forward to reducing
>> maintenance downtime for vi
So that's where that new fellow's from ;) welcome Khosrow!
Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico
On 23 Feb 2018 16:51, "Nicolas Vazquez"
wrote:
> Welcome Khosrow!
>
>
> From: Giles Sirett
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 12:45:37 PM
> To: dev@clo
Khosrow,
If I read your description correct you want the script to (effectively)
build the systemvm64template if I pass appliance name "bla" on the
commandline. I don't think we want that. What am I missing?
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just noticed that t
The intention of this proposal is to have a way forward to reducing maintenance
downtime for virtual routers. There are two parts to this proposal;
1. Dealing with legacy routers and replacing them before shutting down.
2. Unifying router embodiments and making use of redundancy mechanisms
work to do in terms of solving merge conflicts but these are
generally less then port work as the order of any commits to the
intemediats is always preserved.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Rene Moser wrote:
> Hi Daan
>
> On 02/14/2018 05:26 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > Rene,
&g
Rene,
The issue is certainly not due the git workflow but to upgrade schemes we
have.
The result of this workflow for us is that it is easier to find to which
branches a particular commit is added as by merging forward the commit id
of the actual fix doesn't change. so instead of looking in each
is someone on making this repo dir in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/7/
?
I think I did this in 4.4 but I totally forgot howto.
--
Daan
to stop the vote and continue the discussion. I personally want unification
of all router vms: VR, 'shared network', rVR, VPC, rVPC, and eventually the
one we want to create for 'enterprise topology hand-off points'. And I
think we have some level of consensus on that but the path there is a
concer
if the redundant VPC is rock solid, you most
> likely
> > don't even want single VPCs any more. But that will come.
> >
> > As I said, we're rolling this out as we speak. In a few weeks when
> > everything is upgraded I can share what we learned and how well it works
come.
>
> As I said, we're rolling this out as we speak. In a few weeks when
> everything is upgraded I can share what we learned and how well it works.
> CloudStack could use a similar approach.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Remi
>
>
>
> On 05/02/2018, 16:44, "Daan H
I'm afraid I don't agree on some of your comments, Wido.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2018 04:44 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> H devs,
>>
>> I have recently (re-)submitted two PRs, one by Wei [1] and one by
gt;
>> As a project, especially around the topic of 'releases', I
>> assume we should
>> leverage any SEO placement we can use. I don't have specific
>> content I
>> think we should put there, but if it is well
ion. Basically, placement of the page in google
> searches...
>
> *Will Stevens*
> Chief Technology Officer
> c 514.826.0190
>
> <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > I read over that acronym, and "
>
echnology Officer
> c 514.826.0190
>
> <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > no one had made use of it since the RM for 4.4 (no who was that again) We
> > can undelete if you wish. I copied the only worthwhile pag
e
> been good to take advantage of the SEO that page already had working for us
> and just update the content to represent the latest details. No?
>
> *Will Stevens*
> Chief Technology Officer
> c 514.826.0190
>
> <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
>
> On Mon, Fe
deleted
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Ron Wheeler
wrote:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Relea
> ses+in+Progress is old and needs to be update to talk about ACS 4.10,
> 4.11 and 4.12.
>
> Ron
>
> --
> Ron Wheeler
> President
> Artifact Software Inc
> email: rwhee...@ar
Ron, this page is outdated and we are still adhering somewhat to the 4.6
release principles, other then that LTS support has been added. Do you want
to edit that page so they are in line?
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Ron Wheeler
wrote:
> If you search in Google with "cloudstack release sched
H devs,
I have recently (re-)submitted two PRs, one by Wei [1] and one by Remi [2],
that reduce downtime for redundant routers and redundant VPCs respectively.
(please review those)
Now from customers we hear that they also want to reduce downtime for
regular VRs so as we discussed this we came to
what he said !!!
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:58 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I will be at Fosdem in Brussels this weekend, and I know Daan is going to
> be there too - if you're going it would be lovely to meet you and discuss
> CloudStack among other things, tweet me @rhtyd.
>
> Cheers.
>
People,
I went ahead and added some projects with label gsoc2018 to ur issues list.
I'm sure all of you can do way better then me ;)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2018
regards,
--
Daan
did package verification with all three sig files and including my own
monkeying and Boris testing;
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.11.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
> testing and a vote:
>
> Git Branch and C
I am unclear of our present state. have we opened master for merging again?
--
Daan
tnx Özhan,
that sounds like a feasible workaround. The bigger issue is that
dhcp_release should be called on instance removal. There is code to delete
the dhcp leases file already. I wonder why this isn't called in your case.
We actually have complaints that it is being cleaned to rigorously as we
devs,
Google Summer of Code is coming again. Apache is applying as organisation
and we can hitch on that.
I know we have a lot of ideas with varying probability of success for which
we have no time ourselves.
Let me share some relevant information:
Google Summer of Code [1] is a program sponsore
ve
> created a PR for this problem which is below:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10242
>
> I select its priority as blocker, if its wrong developers will update its
> priority.
>
> Thanks
> Özhan
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Da
Özhan, this is sure to break ipv6. can you make it use another delimiter?
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman <
oruzgarkara...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rohit;
> This is a fresh install of 4.11 rc1 and we have only ipv4 setup on our test
> environment no ipv6 addresses, our VR's ar
new mindblow
called meltdown. I think in general we should try to keep the 72 hours but for
this release it is not realistic.
On 17/01/2018, 15:48, "Rene Moser" wrote:
On 01/17/2018 03:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> People, People,
>
> a lot of us are busy with
People, People,
a lot of us are busy with meltdown fixes and a full component test takes about
the 72 hours that we have for our voting, I propose to extend the vote period
until at least Monday.
Is that a good idea?
On 17/01/2018, 14:33, "Kris Sterckx" wrote:
4.11.0 looks like an awesom
m: +37256850001
> E-mail: k...@wavecom.ee
> Skype: kristian.liivak
> http://www.wavecom.ee
> http://www.facebook.com/wavecom.ee
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Daan Hoogland"
> To: "users"
> Cc: "dev"
> Sent: Monday, Januar
I suggest you discuss it on the vote thread for RC1 Kristian.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Kristian Liivak wrote:
>
> This fix is only for smaller part of password management..
> Is´t possible that someone have look VR password distribution with
> instance creation ?
--
Daan
Kristian,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Kristian Liivak wrote:
>>
> ...
As for this one:
> Also there is major security hole. When instance is destroyd and expunged
>> > and new instance is created with old IP all old data is unaffected in VR
>> > New instance will get then old ro
liivak
> http://www.wavecom.ee
> http://www.facebook.com/wavecom.ee
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Daan Hoogland"
> To: "users"
> Cc: "dev"
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 1:22:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for
ince no new regression
> >> failures were seen I accepted and merge it on that discretion. The PR
> was
> >> originally on the 4.11 milestone, however, due to it lacking a JIRA id
> and
> >> no response from the author it was only recently removed from the
> mileston
he above PR.
> >
> >
> > - Rohit
> >
> > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Wido den Hollander
> > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:17:26 PM
> > To: d
301 - 400 of 3867 matches
Mail list logo