Re: kvm: /var/log/cloudstack/agent/agent.log is a binary file

Can you find/look at the line before in the log. It is probably the one containing the hindering data. Or otherwise it *might* be a clue where in the flow it happens. On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:22 AM Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 9/2/19 10:18 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > > Hi Wido, > > > > I had

Re: Question about GenericDaoBase#searchAndCount method

the count in the fragment has an obvious trivial bug: it counts objects while one of the objects is the actual count. it should read ``` if (count < (objects.size() - 1)) { count = objects.size() - 1; } ``` On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:57 AM Rohit Yadav wrote: > In some

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache CloudStack 4.11.3.0

Paul, a commitsgh has been published and could be used from just that mail. I would go for a new release name. Whether that is 4.11.3.1 or something else is of little consequence. (€0.02) On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 3:43 PM Paul Angus wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone have any strong views on whether we

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to JDK 11 (LTS) after 4.13

Is 4.13 already in freeze? I'd say let's update before the freeze, if we still can. On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 2:25 PM Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > > JDK 8 (lts) has already reached EOL and we're dependent on > distro/maintainers and the next available LTS jdk is JDK 11. > > > Here's the

Re: Running Self-Compiled Packages on Production

Richard, I think it will be easiest to replace the jar in /usr/share/cloudstack (by head, don't hold me to the exact path). Depending on the distribution you run on you can edit the classpath in the startup script, but I'd go for replacing the jar! On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:30 PM Richard Lawley

Re: [DISCUSS] travis tests

validation. Or if you feel that is unacceptable! On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 10:51 AM Daan Hoogland wrote: > Ok, I will see if I can split and/or reduce the Travis test jobs. These > are not covering full regression checks anyway and are just indicators to > the most blatant errors in PRs. W

Re: [DISCUSS] travis tests

mary_storage*". > > That is one of the reasons why this test is there on its own. > > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:54 AM Daan Hoogland > > wrote: > > > > > LS, > > > Lately travis tests show more and more random failures. somtimes these >

[DISCUSS] travis tests

LS, Lately travis tests show more and more random failures. somtimes these succeed on stuborn retry but lately these are getting more persistent. Especially job .7 is hard to get past/passed. I am very irritated and looking for ways to resolve this without just ignoring. Is there anybody here that

Re: [DISCUSS] CallContext and related questions

; to db in ActionEventUtils.java (server project). > > Additional information is being stored to log files (api.log) in > > ApiServlet.java (server project). > > > > My goal is to combine the information of the EventVO (as defined in > > CloudStack) and the api.log recor

Re: [DISCUSS] CallContext and related questions

Nikos, I am not sure if I understand your objective. It would seem to me that all information to proces an event should be in the event. Does it suffice to add information to the event message for your purposes? On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:52 AM Nikolaos Dalezios wrote: > Hello developers. I am

Re: project does not build anymore on macos

mon Weller > escreveu: > > > I know Nathan and Gabriel discussed this a couple of weeks ago, as Nathan > > does his dev builds on a mac. I'm not sure if a patch idea came out of > that > > discussion or not. > > > > -Si > > > > > > -

project does not build anymore on macos

LS, Due to changes in LibvirtResource recently merged, the project will err out during unit tests on macos. This happens because of c496c84c6c727a84862cbbe2d870ff57939488b4 that changes the initialisation of memstats, requiring /proc/meminfo to exist (during unit tests). The requirement makes

Re: DMTF CADF event model implementation

I forgot to mention the cloudstack event model. You'll have to look at that as well On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Daan Hoogland wrote: > H Nikolaos, > have a look at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2992. it was > -1'd but i think it would fit your ideas. have a look see i

Re: DMTF CADF event model implementation

H Nikolaos, have a look at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2992. it was -1'd but i think it would fit your ideas. have a look see if you can add your thoughts to that and I'll be happy to look at PRs to the base branch of that one. regards On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:41 AM Nikolaos

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Andrija Panić

welcome to the guilty party, Andrija. On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:16 AM Boris Stoyanov wrote: > Congrats Andrija! > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > On 19 Nov 2018, at 7:27, Sateesh Chodapuneedi < >

[DISCUSS] [CALL TO ARMS] library upgrades

People, I know this is not a sexy subject but it needs attention. There is a PR [1] out for preparational work on upgrading antiquated logging frameworks. It needs attention if only :+1: or an argument not to do it. Several other similar jobs need doing as well. I wasn't in Montreal so i don't

Re: Caching / Ehcache

Sorry to hear you are reducing your activity on CloudStack, Marc-Aurele. Hope you fare well. On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 10:10 PM Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote: > Hi everyone, > > (Again as the email formatting has been removed and was hard to read - > I hope it will be better this time). > > While

Re: Jenkins jobs

Paul, the apache jobs get cleaned up quite fast, so the 404 is probably just the job output that isn't found. Look at https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-pr-analysis/ to see if there are jobs with more output. The definitions is such that at most 5 jobs are kept for at most 14 days. On Sun,

Re: Apache CloudStack Generic Key-Value and Communication Plug-in

sounds nice Ivan, Do you have a whitepaper on it? I strugle to see a clear usecase for this plugin. maybe you have a casus or two!?! On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:02 AM Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hello, community. > > We glad to announce a new Open Source plug-in for Apache CloudStack which > helps

offline migration in vmware

devs, I started a small FS [1] on migrating stopped VMs (and detached volumes) in vmware. It has no API or UI consequences but some architectural; I am planning an added method finalizeMigration that returns a list of commands to send to the resource. The default implementation returns null,

[DISCUSS] Removing IAM services

i'm +1 on this it has not been developed for the longest while. (changed the title to indicate _all_ people are supposed to have an opinion.) On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Khosrow Moossavi wrote: > Hello Community > > Following up after PR#2613[1] to cleanup POMs across the whole repository,

Re: CloudStack DNS names to PowerDNS export

hey Ivan, I don't have much experience with anything but bind, but this looks nice! On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hello, users, devs. > > We developed a small service for the creation of DNS records (A, , PTR) > in the PowerDNS and published it in the GitHub: >

Re: advice needed: snapshot DB/table cleanup

andrija, On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Andrija Panic wrote: > HI guys, hi Mike.T., > > we have removed all NFS and CEPH storages, and are now purely running on > SolidFire (KVM). > > Now I want to do serious snapshot cleanup (for reason explained at the end > of email) - since "snapshots"

Re: suggestions for tiny changes in the systemvm templates

Stephan, are you planning PRs for these chances? On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Stephan Seitz wrote: > Hi! > > Having 4.11.1 at the horizon (btw. Thank You!), I've recently built > packages and systemvm templates and wanted to share some thoughts about the > systemvm. > > Here a few things i

Re: Update default template from CentOS 5.5 to CentOS 7

ue > > On 10/07/2018, 21:08, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > > how about the macchinina images as build in? At least for development > those > are very convenient. > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher < > gabrasc..

[QUESTION] vmware disk MO use in cloudstack

Fellow devs, I am trying for some migration code in the vmware resource and noticed that the virtualDiskManagerMO is implemented but never used. For instance ther is an extendVirtualDisk implemented but the resize method uses a worker vm to attach the disk an resize it there. Does anyone know if

Re: Update default template from CentOS 5.5 to CentOS 7

how about the macchinina images as build in? At least for development those are very convenient. On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher < gabrasc...@gmail.com> wrote: > You are right Rafael, I was not clear with the "*(KVM)*". The idea would be > to update others as well ;) > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.1.0 LTS [RC3]

Sean, I've been busy with that scenario for a while and it is not a consistent error. I have the feeling that it happens more4 lately but just yesterday I manually testit several times 2 VPC with connected private gw and static routes to each other. I could restart with no problem. On Fri, Jun

Re: Working with a 'PendingReleaseNotes' file

Wido, I like the idea that we can generate from git what has happened since last time. I also recognise that we don't do that properly all the time. What this comes down to is discipline, however we implement it. Deciding if a change is big enough would be up to both the author and the reviewer

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

]? > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Roadmap > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > Wido, there used to be a page on cwiki with plans for 5.0, I can not find > > it anymore but this should be added to it. > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

>> - Java 9? >> - Drop support for Ubuntu 12.04 >> - Other fancy stuff? >> - Support ConfigDrive in all scenarios properly >> >> How would that sound? >> >> Wido >> >> >> On Jun 19, 2018, at

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

I like this initiative, and here comes the big but even though I myself might think it is not valid; Basic zones are there to give a simple start for new users. If we can give a one-knob start/one page wizard for creating a shared network in advanced zone with security groups and userdata, great.

cyclic package dependncy in KVM hypervisor plugin

Devs, I just noticed that com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper and its parent package com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource have a number cyclic dependencies. These seem to be very old and only a way of organising the command wrappers. They do prevent intellij from navigating properly though.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.1.0 LTS [RC2]

- release checksums all check out. - I installed an all-KVM 4.9.3.1 with a redundant VPC and two nets with VMs. I upgraded to 4.11.1. The only glitch was that the documentation says to register new system VMs as 'systemvm-kvm-4.11'. This should be 'systemvm-kvm-4.11.1'. The nets kept running and

Re: Why does a VLAN and Network have IP information?

Wido, I think we can remove ip data from the vlan table, though it is going to require some hacking. Removing the vlan table seems not prudent to me, especially since we now have l2 networks (without ip provisioned). On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > Looking

Re: {ANNOUNCE] 4.11.1 RC2 cut

y install for pycparser: started > > Running setup.py install for pycparser: finished with status 'done' > > Found existing installation: netaddr 0.7.5 > > DEPRECATION: Uninstalling a distutils installed project (netaddr) has > been deprecated and will be removed in a

{ANNOUNCE] 4.11.1 RC2 cut

Devs, We have a number of issues out for milestone 4.11.1 but non of them are blockers asaik. So unless there are any i don't know of, lets cut RC2 tomorrow. ​any opinions?​ -- Daan

Re: CS 4.10 to 4.11.1 upgrade error

em, but I'll share > if it still in place. > > пн, 28 мая 2018 г., 19:50 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > > Ivan can you share the log bit during startup where it tries to run the > > 41000to41100 sql file? > > > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:

Re: CS 4.10 to 4.11.1 upgrade error

Ivan can you share the log bit during startup where it tries to run the 41000to41100 sql file? On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hello, yes It looks like the problem is like that, I just suggested it > could be connected with 'delimiter'

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.1.0 LTS [RC1]

I checked three verification files, unpacked and build the code, and am trusting the process otherwise: 0 (binding) The reason I am not giving a +1 is because the code presently does not build on anything but linux, due to the configdrive test not building on macosx (and I presume windows) If we

Re: ACS 4.11 Domain router placeholder record.

, May 22, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Glen Baars <g...@onsitecomputers.com.au> wrote: > Hello Daan, > > It seems that they are getting a similar result but from a different cause. > > Is a network suppose to have a placeholder record? > > Kind regards, > Glen Baars > -----O

Re: Can't build master

mkisofs can be installed using brew indeed. It won't help out off the box though. I think it should not be used from a unit test but at best from an integration test. As it is an integration with an external tool. (look later) On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Wido den Hollander

Re: build/replace.properties

ckaging deb/rpm scripts. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ____ > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 2:56:34 PM > To: dev > Subject: build/replace.pro

build/replace.properties

Anyone knows any reason we have this file called build/replace.properties (still)? It is reported to be in the .gitignore file, yet it has a history in git. -- Daan

Re: ACS 4.11 Domain router placeholder record.

Glenn, this sounds like it is related to a bug that was just fixed; https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2653 Did you do a AddNicToVMCmd manually or was it a consequential action as a result? When saying it is related I do not think it is the same. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 6:21 AM, Glen Baars

Re: Dynamic roles question

e issue with changing the > role. Don't think it's good for business cases. > > 2018-05-18 15:41 GMT+07:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > > actually whet is in place is moving users between accounts, and thus > > allowing for their role to change. The accou

Re: Dynamic roles question

actually whet is in place is moving users between accounts, and thus allowing for their role to change. The accounts would stay the same, but the effective role of the users changes with it's account. MoverUserCmd is the API. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev

Re: John Kinsella and Wido den Hollander now ASF members

Wow, nice surprise On Wed, 2 May 2018, 18:38 Dag Sonstebo, wrote: > Congratulations both! > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 02/05/2018, 17:33, "Nitin Kumar Maharana" < > nitinkumar.mahar...@accelerite.com> wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction

; Future work can be driven towards making all VRs redundant enabled by > default that can allow for a firewall+connections state transfer > (conntrackd + VRRP2/3 based) during rolling reboots. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > __

{NOTICE] merging 4.11

H, I just merged forward some commits that had been waiting on the upgrade paths PR [1]. There where conflicts but I think I solved them correctly. As far as I can tell the affected PRs where: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2563 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2567

Re: Welcoming Mike as the new Apache CloudStack VP

hang tough, Mike! And thanks, Wido. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:37 AM, Boris Stoyanov < boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Thank you Wido and congrats Mike! > > -Boris Stoyanov > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >

Re: New committer: Dag Sonstebo

hey Dag, keep up the good work, thanks and welcome On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Simon Weller wrote: > Congrats Dag, much deserved! > > > From: John Kinsella > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 8:58 AM > To:

Re: Notice that Gabriel Bräscher now works at PCextreme

nice going Gabriel and congratulations to PCextreme! On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher < gabrasc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, guys :) > > 2018-03-20 16:23 GMT-03:00 Wei ZHOU : > > > Congratulations Gabriel! > > > > Welcome to NL :) > > > > > > >

Re: Rohit Vavaldas - GSoC - 2018

ground with upgrade process of individual > instances? > > Thanks, > Rohit Vavaldas > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hey Rohit, nice to see you here. What you should be looking at is mostly > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Relax strict requirement of JIRA ID for PRs

Let me add to the below that I do think a ticketing system is a big help for keeping track of *un*implemented changes and *un*fixed bugs. On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Boris, I hate to be strongly opinionated but I have to violently

Re: [DISCUSS] Relax strict requirement of JIRA ID for PRs

t; >>> I was checking and for some reason ACS does not have an issue tab ( > >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues). It might be some > >>> configuration in the repository. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < &

Re: [DISCUSS] Relax strict requirement of JIRA ID for PRs

right, also when an issue is created? On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > We already have. All messages on ACS' GH go to commits@c.a.o > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> &

Re: [DISCUSS] Relax strict requirement of JIRA ID for PRs

one with Jira cannot be achieved on > Github. > > It's just a matter of changing habits to simplify the workflow for new > > comers (and old joiners too ;-) ). > > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Relax strict requirement of JIRA ID for PRs

Will, you are speaking my mind; any external registration tool should be based on the source. The only reason for having an external tool without relation to the code is to keep track of what is *not* (or not fully) implemented. On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <

Re: GSoC ideas for the 2018 edition

ewhere to > make them public? > > I guess it would be better for anyone to see the list, and not make them to > register first. > > [1]: http://s.apache.org/gsoc2018ideas > > Khosrow Moossavi > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at

Re: Rohit Vavaldas - GSoC - 2018

Hey Rohit, nice to see you here. What you should be looking at is mostly the register template API and service calls and then the update version code for the last version that required an upgrade. Off the top of my head it is in the class Upgrade410to411.java (don't kill me if I'm off by a few

Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2018 Mentor Registration

-- Forwarded message -- From: Ulrich Stärk Date: Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 10:19 PM Subject: Google Summer of Code 2018 Mentor Registration To: ment...@community.apache.org Cc: "d...@community.apache.org" Dear PMCs, I'm happy to announce

Re: [cloudstack] annotated tag 4.9.1-RC1 updated (af26799 -> 2d788ee)

did you resolve this yet, @rafael? it doesn't seem right that a commit other then a pom change has such a tag. On the other hand it says it is an RC-tag which could be deleted by now, or replaced by a GA-tag. On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>

Re: [PROPOSAL] reducing VR downtime on upgrade

Thanks Wido, I suspect to start a PoC on fase 1 shortly. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > On 02/15/2018 04:36 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> The intention of this proposal is to have a way forward to reducing >> ma

Re: I'd like to introduce you to Khosrow

So that's where that new fellow's from ;) welcome Khosrow! Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico On 23 Feb 2018 16:51, "Nicolas Vazquez" wrote: > Welcome Khosrow! > > > From: Giles Sirett

Re: Potential backward incompatibility problem in building SystemVM

Khosrow, If I read your description correct you want the script to (effectively) build the systemvm64template if I pass appliance name "bla" on the commandline. I don't think we want that. What am I missing? On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Khosrow Moossavi wrote: > Hi

[PROPOSAL] reducing VR downtime on upgrade

The intention of this proposal is to have a way forward to reducing maintenance downtime for virtual routers. There are two parts to this proposal; 1. Dealing with legacy routers and replacing them before shutting down. 2. Unifying router embodiments and making use of redundancy mechanisms

Re: [DISCUSS] DB upgrade issue workaround for 4.10.0.0 users upgrading to 4.11.0.0

work to do in terms of solving merge conflicts but these are generally less then port work as the order of any commits to the intemediats is always preserved. On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Rene Moser <m...@renemoser.net> wrote: > Hi Daan > > On 02/14/2018 05:26 PM, Daan

Re: [DISCUSS] DB upgrade issue workaround for 4.10.0.0 users upgrading to 4.11.0.0

Rene, The issue is certainly not due the git workflow but to upgrade schemes we have. The result of this workflow for us is that it is easier to find to which branches a particular commit is added as by merging forward the commit id of the actual fix doesn't change. so instead of looking in each

4.11 repo on cloudstack.eu

is someone on making this repo dir in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/7/ ? I think I did this in 4.4 but I totally forgot howto. -- Daan

Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction

to stop the vote and continue the discussion. I personally want unification of all router vms: VR, 'shared network', rVR, VPC, rVPC, and eventually the one we want to create for 'enterprise topology hand-off points'. And I think we have some level of consensus on that but the path there is a

Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction

> > (and back). In the end, if the redundant VPC is rock solid, you most > likely > > don't even want single VPCs any more. But that will come. > > > > As I said, we're rolling this out as we speak. In a few weeks when > > everything is upgraded I can share wha

Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction

any more. But that will come. > > As I said, we're rolling this out as we speak. In a few weeks when > everything is upgraded I can share what we learned and how well it works. > CloudStack could use a similar approach. > > Kind Regards, > Remi > > > > On 05/02/20

Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction

I'm afraid I don't agree on some of your comments, Wido. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > On 02/05/2018 04:44 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> H devs, >> >> I have recently (re-)submitted two PRs, one by Wei [1] an

Re: Releases in Progress

2/2018 4:13 PM, Will Stevens wrote: >> >> As a project, especially around the topic of 'releases', I >> assume we should >> leverage any SEO placement we can use. I don't have specific >> content I >> think we sho

Re: Releases in Progress

t; Search Engine Optimization. Basically, placement of the page in google > searches... > > *Will Stevens* > Chief Technology Officer > c 514.826.0190 > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wr

Re: Releases in Progress

hief Technology Officer > c 514.826.0190 > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > no one had made use of it since the RM for 4.4 (no who was that again) We > > can undelete if

Re: Releases in Progress

st update it? It would have > been good to take advantage of the SEO that page already had working for us > and just update the content to represent the latest details. No? > > *Will Stevens* > Chief Technology Officer > c 514.826.0190 > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > >

Re: Releases in Progress

deleted On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Relea > ses+in+Progress is old and needs to be update to talk about ACS 4.10, > 4.11 and 4.12. > > Ron > > -- > Ron Wheeler > President > Artifact

Re: Clean wiki

Ron, this page is outdated and we are still adhering somewhat to the 4.6 release principles, other then that LTS support has been added. Do you want to edit that page so they are in line? On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: > If you search in

[DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction

H devs, I have recently (re-)submitted two PRs, one by Wei [1] and one by Remi [2], that reduce downtime for redundant routers and redundant VPCs respectively. (please review those) Now from customers we hear that they also want to reduce downtime for regular VRs so as we discussed this we came

Re: [fosdem] Anybody going to Fosdem this weekend?

what he said !!! On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:58 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi all, > > I will be at Fosdem in Brussels this weekend, and I know Daan is going to > be there too - if you're going it would be lovely to meet you and discuss > CloudStack among other things,

GSoC2018

People, I went ahead and added some projects with label gsoc2018 to ur issues list. I'm sure all of you can do way better then me ;) https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2018 ​regards,​ -- Daan

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

did package verification with all three sig files and including my own monkeying and Boris testing; +1 (binding) On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.11.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for > testing and a vote: >

master merges

I am unclear of our present state. have we opened master for merging again? -- Daan

Re: [4.11] VR Problem on Releasing Expunged Instance IP from dnsmasq.leases file

tnx Özhan, that sounds like a feasible workaround. The bigger issue is that dhcp_release should be called on instance removal. There is code to delete the dhcp leases file already. I wonder why this isn't called in your case. We actually have complaints that it is being cleaned to rigorously as

GSoC ideas for the 2018 edition

devs, Google Summer of Code is coming again. Apache is applying as organisation and we can hitch on that. I know we have a lot of ideas with varying probability of success for which we have no time ourselves. Let me share some relevant information: Google Summer of Code [1] is a program

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

t; created a PR for this problem which is below: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10242 > > I select its priority as blocker, if its wrong developers will update its > priority. > > Thanks > Özhan > > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:25

Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem

Özhan, this is sure to break ipv6. can you make it use another delimiter? On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman < oruzgarkara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rohit; > This is a fresh install of 4.11 rc1 and we have only ipv4 setup on our test > environment no ipv6 addresses, our VR's

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

there is the new mindblow called meltdown. I think in general we should try to keep the 72 hours but for this release it is not realistic. On 17/01/2018, 15:48, "Rene Moser" <m...@renemoser.net> wrote: On 01/17/2018 03:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > People, People, >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

People, People, a lot of us are busy with meltdown fixes and a full component test takes about the 72 hours that we have for our voting, I propose to extend the vote period until at least Monday. Is that a good idea? On 17/01/2018, 14:33, "Kris Sterckx" wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

el: +3726850001 > Gsm: +37256850001 > E-mail: k...@wavecom.ee > Skype: kristian.liivak > http://www.wavecom.ee > http://www.facebook.com/wavecom.ee > > - Original Message - > From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > To: "users" &

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

I suggest you discuss it on the vote thread for RC1 Kristian. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Kristian Liivak wrote: > > This fix is only for smaller part of password management.. > Is´t possible that someone have look VR password distribution with > instance creation ? --

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

​Kristian, ​ On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Kristian Liivak wrote: >> > ​... ​ ​As for this one:​ > Also there is major security hole. When instance is destroyd and expunged >> > and new instance is created with old IP all old data is unaffected in VR >> > New instance

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

m.ee > Skype: kristian.liivak > http://www.wavecom.ee > http://www.facebook.com/wavecom.ee > > - Original Message - > From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > To: "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Cc: "dev" <dev@

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

riginally on the 4.11 milestone, however, due to it lacking a JIRA id > and > >> no response from the author it was only recently removed from the > milestone. > >> > >> > >> Please advise if I need to revert this, or we can review/lgtm it > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

e PR. > > > > > > - Rohit > > > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> > > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:17:26 PM > > To:

Re: Which StringUtils to use?

rogrammer was running out of places to write code > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > All, I am having second thoughts. I think we should maintain a wrapper > for > > string utils and pass through as much a

Re: Which StringUtils to use?

ly better to find the references and remove them if you can get > that done in a single effort. > > Just a technical question: Could one not just add the Warning to the > constructor? > Might have to create a null (log warning only) constructor. > > Ron > > > On

Re: Which StringUtils to use?

gged WARNing would be detected during testing as well as at run-time. > > Ron > > On 10/01/2018 3:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > Ron, we could but that would only log during compile-time, not on runtime. > I am doing some analysis and commenting in Wido's ticket. > > On We

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >