kristian, these sound like serious regressions. Do you have a fix or did you analyse the code yet?
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Kristian Liivak <k...@wavecom.ee> wrote: > Hello, > > I have created issue in jira 2 month ago. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10141 > > In version 4.10 VR password and ssh key distribution don´t work on > instance creation. > When instance is allreay excisting reset function is operational. > > Also there is major security hole. When instance is destroyd and expunged > and new instance is created with old IP all old data is unaffected in VR > New instance will get then old root password and ssh key if they were > present in VR > > In my knowledege cloudstack older versions are not affected. > > Lugupidamisega / Regards > > Kristian Liivak > > CTO > > WaveCom As > Endla 16, 10142 Tallinn > Estonia > Tel: +3726850001 > Gsm: +37256850001 > E-mail: k...@wavecom.ee > Skype: kristian.liivak > http://www.wavecom.ee > http://www.facebook.com/wavecom.ee > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 8:41:15 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 > > All, > > > To give you update, all feature PRs have been reviewed, tested and merged > towards the 4.11.0.0. I'll engage with Mike and others for any post-merge > regressions (smoketest to be kicked shortly). > > > I see an outstanding PR that may be a critical/blocker PR, please advise > and also review: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2402 > > > If anyone has any blocker to report, please do so. Thanks. > > > I'll cut RC1 as planned by EOD today (Mon/15 Jan 2018). > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ________________________________ > From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 3:23:40 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 > > I’m investigating these now. I have found and fixed two of them so far. > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > On Jan 12, 2018, at 2:49 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > > > > Thanks Rafael and Daan. > > > > > >> From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> > >> > >> I believe there is no problem in merging Wido’s and Mike’s PRs, they > have > >> been extensively discussed and improved (specially Mike’s one). > > > > Thanks, Mike's PR has several regression smoketest failures and can be > accepted only when those failures are fixed. > > > > We'll cut 4.11 branch start rc1 on Monday that would be a hard freeze. > If Mike wants, he can help fix them over the weekend, I can help run > smoketests. > > > >> Having said that; I would be ok with it (no need to revert it), but we > need > >> to be more careful with these things. If one wants to merge something, > >> there is no harm in waiting and calling for reviewers via Github, > Slack, or > >> even email them directly. > > > > Additional review was requested, but mea culpa - thanks for your > support, noted. > > > > - Rohit > > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > > wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> > >> We're down to one feature PR towards 4.11 milestone now: > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2298 > >> > >> > >> The config drive PR from Frank (Nuage) has been accepted today after no > >> regression test failures seen from yesterday's smoketest run. We've also > >> tested, reviewed and merge Wido's (blocker fix) PR. > >> > >> > >> I've asked Mike to stabilize the branch; based on the smoketest results > >> from today we can see some failures caused by the PR. I'm willing to > work > >> with Mike and others to get this PR tested, and merged over the > weekends if > >> we can demonstrate that no regression is caused by it, i.e. no new > >> smoketest regressions. I'll also try to fix regression and test failures > >> over the weekend. > >> > >> > >> Lastly, I would like to discuss a mistake I made today with merging the > >> following PR which per our guideline lacks one code review > lgtm/approval: > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2152 > >> > >> > >> The changes in above (merged) PR are all localized to a xenserver-swift > >> file, that is not tested by Travis or Trillian, since no new regression > >> failures were seen I accepted and merge it on that discretion. The PR > was > >> originally on the 4.11 milestone, however, due to it lacking a JIRA id > and > >> no response from the author it was only recently removed from the > milestone. > >> > >> > >> Please advise if I need to revert this, or we can review/lgtm it > >> post-merge? I'll also ping on the above PR. > >> > >> > >> - Rohit > >> > >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > Apache CloudStack: Open Source Cloud Computing<https://cloudstack. > apache.org/> > > cloudstack.apache.org > > CloudStack is open source cloud computing software for creating, > managing, and deploying infrastructure cloud services > > > > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> > >> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:17:26 PM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 01/10/2018 07:26 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >>> I hope we understand each other correctly: No-one running an earlier > >>> version then 4.11 should miss out on any functionality they are using > >> now. > >>> > >>> So if you use ipv6 and multiple cidrs now it must continue to work with > >> no > >>> loss of functionality. see my question below. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev < > >> kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Daan, yes this sounds reasonable, I suppose who would like to fix, > could > >>>> do custom build for himself... > >>>> > >>>> But still it should be aknowledged somehow, if you use several cidrs > for > >>>> network, don't use v6, or don't upgrade to 4.11 because things will > stop > >>>> running well. > >>>> > >>> Does this mean that several cidrs in ipv6 works in 4.9 and not in 4.11? > >>> > >> > >> No, it doesn't. IPv6 was introduced in 4.10 and this broke in 4.10. > >> > >> You can't run with 4.10 with multiple IPv4 CIDRs as well when you have > >> IPv6 enabled. > >> > >> So this is broken in 4.10 and 4.11 in that case. > >> > >> Wido > >> > >>> > >>> if yes; it is a blocker > >>> > >>> if no; you might as well upgrade for other features as it doesn't work > >> now > >>> either. > >>> > >> > >> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > [http://www.shapeblue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/logo.png]< > http://www.shapeblue.com/> > > > > Shapeblue - The CloudStack Company<http://www.shapeblue.com/> > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > Rapid deployment framework for Apache CloudStack IaaS Clouds. CSForge is > a framework developed by ShapeBlue to deliver the rapid deployment of a > standardised ... > > > > > > > >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > >> @shapeblue > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Rafael Weingärtner > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > -- Daan
