Yes, I know. I made that that's why i asked. This fix isn't in 4.10 but is in 4.11.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Kristian Liivak <k...@wavecom.ee> wrote: > > We made lot testing but did´nt had time to dig code this time. > There was similar VR password management related and fixed issue > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10113 > > > > Lugupidamisega / Regards > > Kristian Liivak > > CTO > WaveCom As > Endla 16, 10142 Tallinn > Estonia > Tel: +3726850001 > Gsm: +37256850001 > E-mail: k...@wavecom.ee > Skype: kristian.liivak > http://www.wavecom.ee > http://www.facebook.com/wavecom.ee > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > To: "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Cc: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 1:22:23 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 > > kristian, > > these sound like serious regressions. Do you have a fix or did you analyse > the code yet? > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Kristian Liivak <k...@wavecom.ee> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I have created issue in jira 2 month ago. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10141 > > > > In version 4.10 VR password and ssh key distribution don´t work on > > instance creation. > > When instance is allreay excisting reset function is operational. > > > > Also there is major security hole. When instance is destroyd and expunged > > and new instance is created with old IP all old data is unaffected in VR > > New instance will get then old root password and ssh key if they were > > present in VR > > > > In my knowledege cloudstack older versions are not affected. > > > > Lugupidamisega / Regards > > > > Kristian Liivak > > > > CTO > > > > WaveCom As > > Endla 16, 10142 Tallinn > > Estonia > > Tel: +3726850001 > > Gsm: +37256850001 > > E-mail: k...@wavecom.ee > > Skype: kristian.liivak > > http://www.wavecom.ee > > http://www.facebook.com/wavecom.ee > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > > Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 8:41:15 PM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 > > > > All, > > > > > > To give you update, all feature PRs have been reviewed, tested and merged > > towards the 4.11.0.0. I'll engage with Mike and others for any post-merge > > regressions (smoketest to be kicked shortly). > > > > > > I see an outstanding PR that may be a critical/blocker PR, please advise > > and also review: > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2402 > > > > > > If anyone has any blocker to report, please do so. Thanks. > > > > > > I'll cut RC1 as planned by EOD today (Mon/15 Jan 2018). > > > > > > - Rohit > > > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > > Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 3:23:40 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 > > > > I’m investigating these now. I have found and fixed two of them so far. > > > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > On Jan 12, 2018, at 2:49 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Rafael and Daan. > > > > > > > > >> From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> > > >> > > >> I believe there is no problem in merging Wido’s and Mike’s PRs, they > > have > > >> been extensively discussed and improved (specially Mike’s one). > > > > > > Thanks, Mike's PR has several regression smoketest failures and can be > > accepted only when those failures are fixed. > > > > > > We'll cut 4.11 branch start rc1 on Monday that would be a hard freeze. > > If Mike wants, he can help fix them over the weekend, I can help run > > smoketests. > > > > > >> Having said that; I would be ok with it (no need to revert it), but we > > need > > >> to be more careful with these things. If one wants to merge something, > > >> there is no harm in waiting and calling for reviewers via Github, > > Slack, or > > >> even email them directly. > > > > > > Additional review was requested, but mea culpa - thanks for your > > support, noted. > > > > > > - Rohit > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Rohit Yadav < > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> All, > > >> > > >> > > >> We're down to one feature PR towards 4.11 milestone now: > > >> > > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2298 > > >> > > >> > > >> The config drive PR from Frank (Nuage) has been accepted today after > no > > >> regression test failures seen from yesterday's smoketest run. We've > also > > >> tested, reviewed and merge Wido's (blocker fix) PR. > > >> > > >> > > >> I've asked Mike to stabilize the branch; based on the smoketest > results > > >> from today we can see some failures caused by the PR. I'm willing to > > work > > >> with Mike and others to get this PR tested, and merged over the > > weekends if > > >> we can demonstrate that no regression is caused by it, i.e. no new > > >> smoketest regressions. I'll also try to fix regression and test > failures > > >> over the weekend. > > >> > > >> > > >> Lastly, I would like to discuss a mistake I made today with merging > the > > >> following PR which per our guideline lacks one code review > > lgtm/approval: > > >> > > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2152 > > >> > > >> > > >> The changes in above (merged) PR are all localized to a > xenserver-swift > > >> file, that is not tested by Travis or Trillian, since no new > regression > > >> failures were seen I accepted and merge it on that discretion. The PR > > was > > >> originally on the 4.11 milestone, however, due to it lacking a JIRA id > > and > > >> no response from the author it was only recently removed from the > > milestone. > > >> > > >> > > >> Please advise if I need to revert this, or we can review/lgtm it > > >> post-merge? I'll also ping on the above PR. > > >> > > >> > > >> - Rohit > > >> > > >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > Apache CloudStack: Open Source Cloud Computing<https://cloudstack. > > apache.org/> > > > cloudstack.apache.org > > > CloudStack is open source cloud computing software for creating, > > managing, and deploying infrastructure cloud services > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ________________________________ > > >> From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> > > >> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:17:26 PM > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> On 01/10/2018 07:26 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > >>> I hope we understand each other correctly: No-one running an earlier > > >>> version then 4.11 should miss out on any functionality they are using > > >> now. > > >>> > > >>> So if you use ipv6 and multiple cidrs now it must continue to work > with > > >> no > > >>> loss of functionality. see my question below. > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev < > > >> kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Daan, yes this sounds reasonable, I suppose who would like to fix, > > could > > >>>> do custom build for himself... > > >>>> > > >>>> But still it should be aknowledged somehow, if you use several cidrs > > for > > >>>> network, don't use v6, or don't upgrade to 4.11 because things will > > stop > > >>>> running well. > > >>>> > > >>> Does this mean that several cidrs in ipv6 works in 4.9 and not in > 4.11? > > >>> > > >> > > >> No, it doesn't. IPv6 was introduced in 4.10 and this broke in 4.10. > > >> > > >> You can't run with 4.10 with multiple IPv4 CIDRs as well when you have > > >> IPv6 enabled. > > >> > > >> So this is broken in 4.10 and 4.11 in that case. > > >> > > >> Wido > > >> > > >>> > > >>> if yes; it is a blocker > > >>> > > >>> if no; you might as well upgrade for other features as it doesn't > work > > >> now > > >>> either. > > >>> > > >> > > >> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > > >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > > [http://www.shapeblue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/logo.png]< > > http://www.shapeblue.com/> > > > > > > Shapeblue - The CloudStack Company<http://www.shapeblue.com/> > > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > > Rapid deployment framework for Apache CloudStack IaaS Clouds. CSForge > is > > a framework developed by ShapeBlue to deliver the rapid deployment of a > > standardised ... > > > > > > > > > > > >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > >> @shapeblue > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Rafael Weingärtner > > > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Daan > -- Daan
