: Firewall rule question
Ya, I am not sure. I am working off a master branch from about 2-3 weeks
ago. I was kind of expecting it to error and it didn't, so it was not
clear how
that case would behave. I am currently developing an integration with the
Palo Alto firewall and they don't
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:43:44AM +, Koushik Das wrote:
Prasanna,
Interesting point. On one hand there is consistency and on the other
hand flexibility. Not sure if the framework should be restrictive or
as flexible as possible but I personally like the latter option.
Sorry, don't
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Firewall rule question
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:43:44AM +, Koushik Das wrote:
Prasanna,
Interesting point. On one
: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Firewall rule question
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:43:44AM +, Koushik Das wrote:
Prasanna,
Interesting point. On one hand there is consistency and on the other
hand flexibility. Not sure if the framework
This applies to both Egress firewall rules as well as IP specific firewall
rules.
If you specify TCP but do not specify any port details, it saves fine. I
am wondering what this config implies. Does this mean that all TCP traffic
is allowed?
Thanks,
Will
I'm hoping thats not the default behavior, and nothing happens on the
firewall. I guess the fact that empty values entered returns success is a
bug?
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
This applies to both Egress firewall rules as well as IP specific
Ya, I am not sure. I am working off a master branch from about 2-3 weeks
ago. I was kind of expecting it to error and it didn't, so it was not
clear how that case would behave. I am currently developing an integration
with the Palo Alto firewall and they don't support specifying a protocol
like
.
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Will Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, 15 May 2013 12:19 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; aemne...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Firewall rule question
Ya, I am not sure. I am working
...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Will Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, 15 May 2013 12:19 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; aemne...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Firewall rule question
Ya, I am not sure. I am working off a master branch from about 2-3 weeks
ago. I
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:29 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; aemne...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Firewall rule question
For the createFirewallRule and createEgressFirewallRule APIs the port
-Original Message-
From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Will Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:19 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; aemne...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Firewall rule question
Ya, I am not sure. I am working off
11 matches
Mail list logo