+1.
--Sheng
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/head
+1
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:13 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Bra
+1 (binding)
Tested:
Nicira NVP plugin with XenServer
Nicira NVP plugin with VMWare
VPC with other service providers (NiciraNVP)
Cheers,
Hugo
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 sep. 2013, at 08:17, Vijayendra Bhamidipati
wrote:
> +1
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mail
+1
Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.
+1 (binding)
Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3:
create advanced zone
create VPC
register template
create VPC tier
create VM on tier w/NFS
create VM on tier w/CLM
create VM on tier w/Local storage
create static NAT to vm, ssh in
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala
wrote:
> +1
>
>
+1 (binding)
Tested with simulator.
On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3:
> create advanced zone
> create VPC
> register template
> create VPC tier
> create VM on tier w/NFS
> create VM on tier w/CLM
> create VM on tier w/
+1
Tested VM life cycle with Xen in advanced zone.
On 16/09/13 7:48 am, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>Tested with simulator.
>
>
>
>On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3:
>> create advanced zone
>> create VPC
+1
Tested VM life cycle with VMware in advanced zone and AWSAPI EC2 interface.
Thanks,
Likitha
>-Original Message-
>From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.
+1 (binding)
Followed testing procedure.
Added Cloudmonkey 5.0.0 basic tests
Ran AWSAPI server and started instance with boto
-sebastien
On Sep 16, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Likitha Shetty wrote:
> +1
> Tested VM life cycle with VMware in advanced zone and AWSAPI EC2 interface.
>
> Thanks,
> Likith
+1 (binding)
I verified what I could:
- Build DEB packages
- Installed DEB packages
- Tested RBD/Ceph functionality
CloudStack is a big project, so I only tested the portion of CloudStack
I'm most familiar with and my vote is based on that.
Wido
On 09/16/2013 10:41 AM, sebgoa wrote:
+1 (bi
+1 (binding)
The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2
since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions.
Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2]
[1]
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/
[2] http://jenkins.bui
+1
Ran against simulator.
On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2
> since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions.
> Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2]
>
> [1]
> ht
At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on
router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that
name.
The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this
could be solved.
I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a
blo
I'm not sure I understand... my impression from your message is the
stock 4.2 image works. This is for Xen, right? Does this mean that
there's a step missing in building a custom system vm to make it match
the stock image?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> H,
>
> The probl
This is for xen.
the stock image works and it is build in february 2012.
We did some further investigation. It turns out that due to license
issues the xen server tools where removed the 6th of september 2012.
any template newer should not work unless you install
xe-guest-utilities yourself. bug 29
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
> Xenserver
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
I know, it does not have the xenstore binary on board that is called
by xe-update-guest-attrs
Ok, so you mean even the stock one does not work for Xen. Can anyone
else who as been testing Xen comment?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> Xenserver
>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate
Sorry, july.
Xenserver
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
KVM
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
VMware (generic)
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
H,
The problem is when creating a newer image for the system template as
we did on our installations. It will not work with the 4.2 scripts. I
am not making hard my thread of this being a blocker but it is a
serious impediment for people wanting to harden their cloudstack
environment.
I am voting
It does not not work completely. It has no xe-daemon running when
instantiated so migration would fail is the theory, also some of our
monitoring scripts fail.
We failed to see it at first as well as it starts up and networking works
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Ok,
The stock image is actually from June 2013, I believe. There is a
requirement for a new system vm in 4.2 to support some of the newer
features. It's absolutely necessary to use this image (or one with the
same capabilities) in KVM, maybe less so with Xen.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Daan Ho
inside Linux VM.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 10:23 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
It does not not work completely. It has no xe-daemon running when instantiated
so
In general we are maintaining tested stock images of system vm templates
and they have been now tested by the community for couple of months.
The cloudstack migration and HA is not dependant on the xe-daemon running
on the VM, that is the reason nobody noticed it.
-abhi
On 16/09/13 10:53 pm, "D
Daan,
It will be interesting to know the monitoring use cases, if the
community likes these in general we can include these in the maintenance
release.
The templates can be modified and generated independently as working
copies are maintained separately from the artefacts put for vote here.
We s
72 hours for this VOTE has passed, I had kept this VOTE open until Wednesday
because of weekend, but many community members tested this over weekend and we
have 12 (+1) Votes and one (+0). Should I keep the VOTE open until Wednesday or
is the community OK to close it out.
Thanks
Animesh
_
Agree to keep the VOTE open.
+1
Tested following scenarios on CentOS 6.4 x64:
1> create advanced zone
2> template registration & create instance
3> network feature as VPC, LB, static NAT
4> Tried NFS as primary storage on XenServer 6.2 and KVM(CentOS 6.4)
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Anim
Some people might be expecting that they still have time.
On Sep 16, 2013 6:55 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
wrote:
>
>
> 72 hours for this VOTE has passed, I had kept this VOTE open until
> Wednesday because of weekend, but many community members tested this over
> weekend and we have 12 (+1) Votes
let me change my vote to +1,
we still have some monitor scripts that are based on the xenserver
tools, but migrations of system vms works indeed. sorry for kicking
trouble on this thread.
Daan
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Some people might be expecting that they sti
+1
Tested using the release procedure.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 9/16/13 5:54 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
wrote:
>
>
>72 hours for this VOTE has passed, I had kept this VOTE open until
>Wednesday because of weekend, but many community members tested this
>over weekend and we have 12 (+1) Votes and one (+0
+1
Built nonoss RPMS and deployed fresh installation on RHEL 6.3.
Tested CLVM on KVM, adding users, adding projects, adding templates/isos and
deploying VMs.
I have not tested an upgrade as of yet.
- Original Message -
From: "Animesh Chaturvedi"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sen
+1(binding) followed release procedure and tested on devCloud.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:13 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
>
>
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
