One comment regarding upgrade path: due to internal DB schema change
documented in our FS:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+Backup+Objec
t+Store+Plugin+Framework, we do need to handle upgrade cases in 4.2, which
are mainly related to data migration in DB level. I am wo
Nitin,
Please see my comments in-line below.
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 14, 2013, at 4:16 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
>
>
> On 13/06/13 10:08 PM, "John Burwell" wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Edison Su, Min Chen, Animesh Chaturvedi, and myself met via
>> teleconference on 11 June 2013 @ 1:30 PM EDT. The go
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:13:37AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> [Animesh>] I was not sure if we have an open slot in Collab for design
> session on storage discussed above but now that Joe mentioned the HackDay
> being an open collaborative day in other email it's probably best to have
> t
On 13/06/13 10:08 PM, "John Burwell" wrote:
>All,
>
>Edison Su, Min Chen, Animesh Chaturvedi, and myself met via
>teleconference on 11 June 2013 @ 1:30 PM EDT. The goal of the meeting
>was determine the path forward for merging the object_store branch by the
>4.2 freeze date, 30 June 2013. Th
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:55 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Object_Store storage refactor Meeting Notes
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 05:52:01PM +, Ani
Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 05:52:01PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:43 AM
>>>> To: dev@cloud
rsday, June 13, 2013 10:43 AM
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: Object_Store storage refactor Meeting Notes
>> >
>> > First, thanks for bringing this back to the list. I'm +1 on the
>> > technical approach.
>> >
>> > A couple of t
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 05:52:01PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:43 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: O
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:43 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Object_Store storage refactor Meeting Notes
>
> First, thanks for bringing this back to th
First, thanks for bringing this back to the list. I'm +1 on the technical
approach.
A couple of thoughts though, just so that we make sure that we keep
operating in the right manner as an Apache project:
Let's be careful about declaring something a "decision" or that
something was "determined" w
storage refactor Meeting Notes
Sudha,
The current plan is to merge once. We explored the feasibility of decomposing
it into independent, testable chunks, and determined it was not possible.
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 13, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti
wrote:
> Thanks John for summary. F
Sudha,
The current plan is to merge once. We explored the feasibility of decomposing
it into independent, testable chunks, and determined it was not possible.
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 13, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti
wrote:
> Thanks John for summary. From QA stand point it would make sen
Thanks John for summary. From QA stand point it would make sense to merge once
- assigned test cases are executed and pass rate is on par with release
criteria ( test plans published and execution results are being posted)
- automation runs are successful and shows same pass rate as Master
- blo
13 matches
Mail list logo
