vishesh92 commented on PR #225:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/225#issuecomment-3323585698
@sidshas03 Why is this change required? Can you share the failing test run?
The wait here is waiting for the simulator server to be ready. After which the
tests
DaanHoogland commented on PR #225:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/225#issuecomment-3312335221
@sidshas03 , most of the acceptance tests are failing. Can you have a look
at the failures?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To res
kiranchavala commented on PR #225:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/225#issuecomment-3310699837
@vishesh92 could you please review the changes
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a
sidshas03 commented on PR #225:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/225#issuecomment-3308647140
> CI-only change to stabilize the acceptance matrix for #218. No provider
code touched. If you prefer not to alter the action, I can temporarily scope
acceptance ru
, with jobs failing out of the "Run acceptance test" step.
This is consistent with CloudStack simulator readiness rather than provider
logic.
## Solution
Double the simulator readiness wait from 10 minutes (20 × 30s) to 20 minutes
(40 × 30s).
## Changes
- In `.gith
shwstppr merged PR #211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/211
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
sudo87 opened a new pull request, #211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/211
This PR is to add instruction for specific test execution
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
IMHO, your changes is more likely an enhancement, so... main branch would
be the best.
Kind regards,
Wei
On Wednesday, June 4, 2025, Jason Hollis
wrote:
> Wei,
>
> I've found out that I can run a docker build of the simulator under the
> tools directory and have tried going
Wei,
I've found out that I can run a docker build of the simulator under the
tools directory and have tried going that path.
I was able to checkout 4.19.0.0 tag, add my code changes and test it and got it
to work
with the simulator!
My question now is what is the correct branch/tag to ba
Hi Jason,
I think the issue is not caused by your changes. It might be caused by
database settings.
You may refer to simulator CI how to configure and run the simulator in a
docker container
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml
Kind regards,
Wei
On Tue, Jun
t the simulator built with my changes and
test with 4.19.0.0, and 4.20.0.0...but not 100% sure that is what I need
to do before submitting my PR? Should I just build this simulator off
of "main" and test things and then submit my PR for that??...but then
how can I get these changes in 4.19.
Hi Jason,
Can you share your changes ?
Kind regards,
Wei
On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 8:27 PM Jason Hollis
wrote:
> I'm trying to setup and run simulator via maven so I can test against
> some code changes I have. I'd like to be able to easily test between
> different versions
I'm trying to setup and run simulator via maven so I can test against
some code changes I have. I'd like to be able to easily test between
different versions of CS. In the past I've just ran the simulator via
Docker, but I need to be able to use my modified code.
I've ra
Hi Antonio,
I have pushed an image for cloudstack 4.17.0.0 to my docker repo.
Can you test it ?
https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/ustcweizhou/cloudstack-simulator
-Wei
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 10:34, Antonio Perpinan wrote:
> Hi I am teach cloudstack and the easiest way is us
Hello,
Can you please send some more information and logs?
---
Nux
www.nux.ro
On 2022-06-22 01:33, Antonio Perpinan wrote:
Hi I am teach cloudstack and the easiest way is using
cloudstack/simulator
But recently it has completely stopped working.. any help, with this
issue
which is a DB
Hi I am teach cloudstack and the easiest way is using cloudstack/simulator
But recently it has completely stopped working.. any help, with this issue
which is a DB error during the setup or finding a similar software would be
highly appreciated.
--
Antonio Perpinan
Fundación
Código Libre
Thanks Rafael for sharing and sending the PR, I think that should fix the
problem.
Regards.
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:33:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: jetty simulator problem
Now travis started presenting
t,address=8787,server=y,suspend=n"
>>
>>
>> Rafael - you may review the Travis build/run scripts in `tools/travis`.
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>> From: Daan Hoogland
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 12:
fael - you may review the Travis build/run scripts in `tools/travis`.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 12:50:29 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: jetty simulator problem
>
> @Rohit, all of this is with -Dsi
s/travis`.
Regards.
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 12:50:29 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: jetty simulator problem
@Rohit, all of this is with -Dsimulator. It is probably due to one of my
many bad habits but I have this on fedora 26, macos 10.13 and macos 10.11
On
ave not caught
> any issues ib Travis or Trillian yet. Keep me posted if you still face the
> issues.
>
> Regards.
>
> From: Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 5:56:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject:
nt: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 5:56:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: jetty simulator problem
>
> It works without removing annotation because they are not being processed
> (@component). That is why when you deleted the beans declaration in the XML
> Spring started complaining abou
: Re: jetty simulator problem
It works without removing annotation because they are not being processed
(@component). That is why when you deleted the beans declaration in the XML
Spring started complaining about those beans. So, if they are not being
used, we can simply remove them.
On Tue, Nov
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > trying with only the depends-on lines removed now
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Daan Hoogland <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
&g
t; > > >
> > > > > from maven:
> > > > > mvn -pl client jetty:run -Dsimulator
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
; > >
> > > > from maven:
> > > > mvn -pl client jetty:run -Dsimulator
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> The
t; [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> The error changed! That is good... It is a misconfiguration with
> > >> dependencies between modules.
> > >> How are you running the simulator?
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, N
lt;
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The error changed! That is good... It is a misconfiguration with
> >> dependencies between modules.
> >> How are you running the simulator?
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Daan Hoogland
or changed! That is good... It is a misconfiguration with
>> dependencies between modules.
>> How are you running the simulator?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Daan Hoogland
>> wrote:
>>
>> > didn't work:( trying with on
from maven:
mvn -pl client jetty:run -Dsimulator
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
[email protected]> wrote:
> The error changed! That is good... It is a misconfiguration with
> dependencies between modules.
> How are you running the simulator?
>
The error changed! That is good... It is a misconfiguration with
dependencies between modules.
How are you running the simulator?
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> didn't work:( trying with only some parts removed now
>
> Caused by: org.springframework
on properly. The configuration
> "depends-on" you find in the XML "bean" element is to define an exotic and
> not obvious dependency.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > I'm looking at a problem, any one reco
ou find in the XML "bean" element is to define an exotic and
not obvious dependency.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> I'm looking at a problem, any one recognises this on master? simulator does
> not start cleanly.
>
> [WARNING] Failed startup of
I'm looking at a problem, any one recognises this on master? simulator does
not start cleanly.
[WARNING] Failed startup of context o.e.j.m.p.JettyWebAppContext@51de5efa
{/client,file:/Users/dahn/apache/cloudstack/client/target/classes/META-INF/webapp/,STARTING}{file:/Users/dahn/apache/cloud
Hello, comunity.
We recently developed simulator image for ACS 4.9.3 integrated with Apache
Kafka event bus logging system. This is for development purposes. We use
Kafka as integration point, so we need it. It's published in:
GitHub: https://github.com/bwsw/cs-simulator-kafka
DockerHub:
ave it
> in distribution repo? My idea is that ACS should support CI/CD for external
> apps/integrations, so it should include plugin facilities included somehow
> optionally into simulator.
>
> 16 окт. 2017 г. 16:34 пользователь "Rohit Yadav" <
> rohit.ya...@shape
Thanks for the fast reply. Ok, do you think the community wishes to have it
in distribution repo? My idea is that ACS should support CI/CD for external
apps/integrations, so it should include plugin facilities included somehow
optionally into simulator.
16 окт. 2017 г. 16:34 пользователь "
Hi Ivan,
Yes, please "cook it yourself".
- Rohit
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 2:19:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Simulator w/ Kafka event export
Hi, Rohit. I know the doc, but what I need is C
2017 1:08:37 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Cloudstack Simulator w/ Kafka event export
>
> Hello, dev team. Please advice what is suggested way to build/run
> dockerized simulator env with Kafka?
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> [email protected]
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
: Cloudstack Simulator w/ Kafka event export
Hello, dev team. Please advice what is suggested way to build/run
dockerized simulator env with Kafka?
Thank you in advance.
[email protected]
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Hello, dev team. Please advice what is suggested way to build/run
dockerized simulator env with Kafka?
Thank you in advance.
)
$ docker pull cloudstack/simulator
$ docker run --name cloudstack -d -p 8080:8080 cloudstack/simulator
$ docker exec -ti cloudstack python \
/root/tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i
/root/setup/dev/advanced.cfg
After a while login to the UI: localhost:8080/client (admin:
Ok, then it isn’t installed but that it can.
# yum install cloudstack-usageit makes sense to look at the docker definition
and do it there
On 12/07/17 09:07, "John McDonnell" wrote:
Hi,
Any idea how to start it when running in the Docker simulator?
Obviously t
start it when running in the Docker simulator?
>
> Obviously the service talked about here[1] isn’t available in the container,
> so I can’t just 'service cloudstack-usage restart’.
>
>
> [1]:
> https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4
Hi,
Any idea how to start it when running in the Docker simulator?
Obviously the service talked about here[1] isn’t available in the container, so
I can’t just 'service cloudstack-usage restart’.
[1]:
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.8/usage
ught I'd ask here.)
>
>
> I use the container as a development tool(to avoid using a real life
> system) to test the API out and usage collection is a major part of
> what I use the API for.
>
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> (Have docker installed)
> $ docker pull cloudst
ave docker installed)
$ docker pull cloudstack/simulator
$ docker run --name cloudstack -d -p 8080:8080 cloudstack/simulator
$ docker exec -ti cloudstack python \
/root/tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i /root/setup/dev/advanced.cfg
After a while login to the UI: localhost:8080/client (admin:pass
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1461
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1461#issuecomment-206559157
@bhaisaab would you mind doing a `push -f` on this PR to kick off the
Jenkins job again so we can verify it is not failing before I merge. Thx.
---
If your project
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1461#issuecomment-206181988
@swill thanks, can you help merge this so all current and PRs can be
correctly evaluated by travis.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1461#issuecomment-205615803
### CI RESULTS
**85/85 TESTS PASS**
Everything is looking pretty good from this side.
**Associated Uploads**
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1461#issuecomment-205170921
+1 LGTM based on code review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1461
travis: Fix simulator tests and optimize default global configs
- Migrate to trusty based Travis VMs
- Increase tests across five build matrices
- Fix xunit-reader output, include time
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/282/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 336
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 544
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/281/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 335
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 543
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/280/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 334
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 542
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/279/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 333
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 540
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/278/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 332
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 538
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/277/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 331
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 536
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/276/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 330
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 534
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/275/>
--
[...truncated 109 lines...]
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/274/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 328
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 532
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/273/>
--
[...truncated 270 lines...]
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/272/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 326
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 524
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/271/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 325
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 523
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/270/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 324
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 522
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/269/>
--
Started by user Daan Hoogland
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on simulator in workspace
<http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/268/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 323
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 521
original
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-136280810
Merging as 2 LGTMs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135777004
@DaanHoogland I figured it was something nice, but really wasn't sure about
what you meant exactly. Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135776711
@miguelaferreira you know what ip my email lives on but to explain it to
the world; your approval is very much appreciated and binding to me.
---
If your proje
Successful=
[root@cs2 cloudstack]# nosetests --with-marvin
--marvin-config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg \
> test/integration/smoke/test_scale_vm.py -s -a
tags=advanced,required_hardware=false \
> --zone=Sandbox-simulator --hypervisor=simulator
Marvin Init S
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135769042
@DaanHoogland I get the feeling that by this time tomorrow I might have a
clue about what you meant
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135768876
@miguelaferreira your opinion feels like shackles to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135740495
will test it now...
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135739986
@wilderrodrigues can you please test this PR, it LGTM but my approval is
not binding!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
=false --zone=Sandbox-simulator
--hypervisor=simulator
Marvin Init Started
=== Marvin Parse Config Successful ===
=== Marvin Setting TestData Successful===
Log Folder Path: /tmp//MarvinLogs//Aug_27_2015_12_55_07_HK730O. All
logs will be
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135394943
Thanks. I'm testing again with a clean environment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135394707
@miguelaferreira Done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135393345
@koushik-das Then, please merge my PR (here:
https://github.com/koushik-das/cloudstack/pull/1)
And then @wilderrodrigues and myself will test this P
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135391862
Ran the test, LGTM.
test_02_scale_vm_without_hypervisor_specifics
(integration.smoke.test_scale_vm.TestScaleVm) ... === TestName:
test_02_scale_vm_witho
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-135358954
@koushik-das my PR to your PR is ready for you to review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/267/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 322
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 520
original
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-134935544
Cool! I would that that once @miguelaferreira is done with the tests and
the PR of PR, we can give a 2nd LGTM and then merge it.
Thanks, Miguel!
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-134933068
Thanks @miguelaferreira.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/266/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 321
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 518
original
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-134905914
Sure, I can help you.
I will write the test for this PR and then make another PR that you can
merge into this one. PR of PR :) I love the github workflow!
with simulator.
While working on PR #725 I had to fix the simulator to test that specific
scenario (dynamic scaling with migration) and thats how I ended up fixing the
simulator creating this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-134897494
I completely understand the reasoning behind the header text, I just don't
agree that ".. following fixes .." is a good header for a commit. But given the
cu
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-134895552
@miguelaferreira For running tests using simulator follow this
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Validating+check-ins+for+your+local+changes
Github user miguelaferreira commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#discussion_r37956660
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/simulator/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/MockVmManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -449,12 +450,34 @@ public Answer
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#discussion_r37955517
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/simulator/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/MockVmManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -449,12 +450,34 @@ public Answer
ethod names, extra spaces in
log messages, etc). It shows attention to detail. Kudos for that.
I would like to run this somehow. Can you give me some pointers to how can
I do that?
I mean, I get I need to run the simulator (although I never have before, I
will learn), but then what
Github user miguelaferreira commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#discussion_r37952326
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/simulator/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/MockVmManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -449,12 +450,34 @@ public Answer
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741#issuecomment-134556011
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
GitHub user koushik-das opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/741
Made following fixes in simulator
- Support for ScaleVmCommand/NetworkRulesVmSecondaryIpCommand in resource
layer
- Added support for scaling up a running VM in simulator
- Fixed
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/265/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 320
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 517
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/264/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 319
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 516
original
See <http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/263/>
--
Started by upstream project "build-4.5-simulator" build number 318
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "build-4.5" build number 515
original
1 - 100 of 1872 matches
Mail list logo
