Re: [DISCUSS] CSS framework for CloudStack UI

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:53:18AM +0530, Amit Das wrote: > Hi Brian, > > I agree with Edison on usage of grunt & using maven-exec to call grunt. > > Will wait for your repository that has your experiments. > I believe setting up the Maven tasks will be a one-time setting & should > work without

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

> On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:51 AM >> To: dev >> Subject: Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers! >> >> H Animesh and the rest, >>

2013 CloudStack Collaboration Conference Europe - Calling for dev talks!

Hey folks, In case you haven't seen this, the 2013 CloudStack Collaboration Conference Europe has been scheduled for November 20 to 22 in Amsterdam. It's looking to be another really great event, and what makes events like this even better is a strong showing from the developer community. The co

[RESULTS][VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)

This vote has passed with no 0 or -1 votes. +1 votes were from (with * binding): Marcus*, Rohit, Sebastien*, Ian, David*, Sateesh I'll start the process of staging the artifacts and edit the website to support the new distribution! -chip On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 09:23:52AM -0400,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:36:11AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 > Commit: 69c459342c568e2400d57ee8

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)

5.0.0 version on Pypi with the sdist archive from the official tagged version. Going forward, we should only publish to pypi after a release is official (since it's easy to do this now). -chip On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:37:40AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > > This vote has passed with

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:44:51PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > I'd like to get a final word on this - is it OK to be removed? Is there > someone who is knowledgable with what it will take to remove it and/or is > comfortable removing it? I don't know how tied into the rest of the codebas

Re: whoa! our official upgrade procedures require 8096?

Or make it a cloudmonkey script. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I don't think one example of abuse means we shouldn't have it > altogether. I do agree that we can't have any customer procedures > requiring it. I'm not really sure why this script even exists, it > looks

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 05:42:03PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > If you remove it, it will break the following APIs: Alex had suggested that it's not maintained. Anybody want to try to maintain it / update it?

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #3302

Fixed (hopefully) with 87dde7024bddb6d27b5002f47b3549b097d9a14b. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:15:58PM +, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [alex.huang] Committing review 13891. > > [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-46

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

Animesh, I'm going to publish the current download page to include CloudMonkey now. I'll then stage a new version for the 4.2 release, which can be published after you move the artifacts (today?) and we wait 24 hours for the mirrors to sync. -chip On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:21:19AM +, Anime

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0

The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 release. Apache CloudStack's CloudMonkey is a Python-based command line utility for interacting with Apache CloudStack IaaS clouds. The software provides an interactive shell

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0

The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 release. Apache CloudStack's CloudMonkey is a Python-based command line utility for interacting with Apache CloudStack IaaS clouds. The software provides an interactive shell

Re: Review Request 14299: fix rpm/deb build error caused by moving systemvm to its own maven project

91aee8bc98ca2fa7ae62ab70fc2f30c69e321ddb Author: ynojima Date: Mon Sep 23 17:47:14 2013 -0600 fix rpm/deb build error caused by moving systemvm to its own maven project - Chip Childers On Sept. 24, 2013, 2:21 a.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote

[ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajesh Battala to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and e

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

Hey Kelven - This topic was discussed briefly in the past [1]. Are you able to provide any thoughts on Alex's ideas below? -chip [1] http://markmail.org/message/fznrszaswruvlmuy On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:53:04AM -0500, Alex Ough wrote: > For a resolution without breaking possible flows, I'd

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:00:32AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I guess I'm in the minority though, since we're the > only ones discussing it. No you are not. Personally, I'm thinking about this problem a bit before adding my 2 cents. Don't take that silence as thinking we are "ok". Short ve

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:21:19AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > This vote has passed with no -1 votes. > > +1 votes were from (with * binding): > Chiradeep*, Hugo*, Chip*, Milamber, Amogh > > +0: Marcus* > > Marcus agreed to change his VOTE to +1 with a Release Note change

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:21:36PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > 4 - Move the source artifacts from dist/dev to dist/release and stage > the download page changes > > A PMC member needs to do this. I'll take this one. Done: http://cloudstack.staging.apache.org/downloads.html

CloudMonkey Release Process now documented

FWIW - I created this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudMonkey+Release+Procedure To document the process of releasing a new cloudmonkey version.

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:12:15PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > 6 - Publish the website and announce the release (using the finished > > > announcement) after 1 through 5 are done. > > > > > > This can be any committer, but Animesh you'd probably want the > > honors! > [Animesh>] Chip f

Re: 4.2 rpm nonoss

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Larry Hernandez wrote: > Does the http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/ repo have nonoss built is > like 4.1? > > -Larry > David typically includes nonoss in the RPMs, and he's the one that loaded them up there. I would expect that they do.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:30:33PM +, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi, > > Currently in virtual router there is no way to recover and notify if some > service goes down unexpectedly. > > This feature is about monitoring all the services rendered by the virtual > router, ensure that the serv

Re: Review Request 14325: Contrail network virtualization plugin.

clearance process. - Chip Childers On Sept. 24, 2013, 11:38 p.m., Pedro Marques wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

Re: Review Request 14325: Contrail network virtualization plugin.

Pedro, Thanks for posting this! Here's the process that we'll need to follow: I'm going to call a vote to accept this donation to the project on this list. Concurrent with that, we need the appropriate legal representatives from Juniper to complete the Software Grant contract for the donation [

[VOTE] Accept the donation of a Contrail plugin into Apache CloudStack

Hi all! As stated in other threads, Juniper is proposing the donation of a Contrail plugin to Apache CloudStack. The code itself has been posted to reviewboard [1]. The design has been documented by Pedro [2]. [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/14325/ [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/disp

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:12:15PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > I can do this, but it may be tomorrow before it gets done. > [Animesh>] I updated the RN yesterday. David what needs to be done to publish > to cloudstack.apache.org/docs https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK

Re: instance metadata

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 03:19:51PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > In EC2 every instance has metadata that it can retrieve from: > http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ > > Do we have something like this ? maybe via the vrouter ? > > -Sebastien > IIRC, we only do the userdata

Re: instance metadata

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Yes > then I'm wrong! hey marcus - do you know if it's documented somewhere?

Re: instance metadata

/me learns to use google. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=cloudstack+instance+metadata leads to http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Admin_Guide/user-data-and-meta-data.html On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Mar

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:59:49PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [Animesh>] I don't have publican installed. Will give it a try and let > > you know if I run into issues. > [Animesh>] Chip couple of questions. > > 1. The referenced instructions call out to install Apache Cloudstack branding

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of a Contrail plugin into Apache CloudStack

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I like, but let's add a lot of unit tests before merging in master. It has > some tests, but in comparison to the amount of code it does not suffice. I actually agree, but my proposal is to sort out things like that after the hurdle

Re: Lines of contributed code

This is a good tool: http://www.ohloh.net/p/CloudStack On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:38 PM, La Motta, David wrote: > Hey everybody, as an advocate of CloudStack for NetApp and our customers, > I am often times asked to compare and contrast ACS with OpenStack. One > interesting metric that I am lo

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:24:24PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] David, Chip Mathias has incorporated the comments received so far. > What is pending here? The feature description is brief should we add more > details? I think (IMO) we are fine as is. However, folks can chime in

Re: [DISCUSS] UI: New look and feel

Looks great Brian! One request actually. I'm working on a proposed cloudstack.apache.org site redesign right now, and I'd actually love to get the relevant CSS you used for the header area (faded blue). It might be nice to have some relationship between the cs.a.o branding and the product itself

Re: [DISCUSS] UI: New look and feel

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 06:31:10PM +, Brian Federle wrote: > Hey Chip, the BG is basically a layered background with a gradient and > overlay pattern on top. I can send along the PNGs I used for those and a > snippet of CSS, and you can apply them to the site. > > I'm also using Noto Sans fo

[ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Darren Shepherd

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Darren Shepherd to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eli

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates and uploaded volumes in VMWare

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:54:55AM +, Likitha Shetty wrote: > Hi, > > Currently, Cloudstack only supports Template creation based on OVA files > containing a single disk. If a user creates a template from a OVA file > containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates and uploaded volumes in VMWare

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 03:26:54PM +, Likitha Shetty wrote: > Chip, > > In Cloudstack, for Xen and KVM hypervisors since the files used for templates > and volumes are virtual disks (VHD, QCOW2) the current CS assumption of > template and volumes containing a single virtual disk seems fine.

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 06:48:00PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] Chip so should I go ahead and publish the website? For the > announcement tomorrow, I have to send an email to dev, user, marketing > mailing list at 7 AM PST (10 AM EST) right? Let me know if I missed anything Plea

Announcement emails...

Animesh, I've not moderated the emails through, hoping that I can get you to re-send them to include URLs for our site and the download page. -chip

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:26:11AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > Did you guys tagged the release yet? I don't see the tag on git... > > Francois Thanks for the reminder. I've tagged the release and pushed. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/4.2.0

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Daan Hoogland

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Daan Hoogland to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Daan! -The CloudStack PMC

[RESULTS][VOTE] Accept the donation of a Contrail plugin into Apache CloudStack

With 13 +1 votes, and no other votes, this passes. I'll work with Pedro and Juniper to complete the donation. -chip On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:13:07PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all! > > As stated in other threads, Juniper is proposing the donation of a > Contrail

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 05:27:57AM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > The proposal does > not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger the > AGPL. The proposal talks about using it, and that's enough to trigger the AGPL. This is a *very bad* thing IMO. For example, $dayjob

Re: Hi

Welcome Steve! On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Steve Wilson wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I just wanted to take a second and introduce myself. I recently joined > Citrix as the VP of Cloud Engineering, and I'm responsible for the Citrix > CloudPlatofrm (powered by Apache CloudStack). I just joine

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

> > Once a bare metal host / vm has booted up, you need to determine its ISCSI > initiator iqn and then use the > AssociateLUN > <http://download.cloud.com/releases/3.0.6/api_3.0.6/user/associateLun.html> > API set the LUN mask on the filer for that LUN. Then the ISCSI

Re: [MERGE] marvin-refactor to master

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:12:40PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I've also tried to disconnect marvin from depending on CloudStack's > build and repo. This will help split marvin from CloudStack which I > will discuss in a seperate thread. Should we just use this branch as the source for a ne

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:38:33PM +, Alex Huang wrote: > I don't really understand what purpose would this serve. Would we ever use > newer marvin against older CloudStack or vice versa? What's the benefit? > > I can understand it for cloudmonkey because cloudmonkey is an admin cli tool

Re: Wiki access

There were major issues with Spam on the wiki, so infra changed the permissions. I've just gone and added all PMC members to the space as space admins. That means all PMC members can help deal with this issue (or at least those that I could find in the wiki user list). I'm going to deal with com

Re: Wiki access

Not all committers were easy to find, but those that I did should be all set. So committers / contributors = provide your confluence ID's if you can't add / edit pages. PMC folks - help add them please. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > There were major iss

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > It's actually really easy to turn this off. If you look at the last > commit of the branch you'll see what changes to turn it on. So you can > just reverse that one commit to disable it. > > I'd rather merge this and then do the BVTs on

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:55:14AM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > I believe both can exist independently. The framework should have more > flexibility and facilitation to run features\test cases based upon a given > release and version on a given test bed. It should be intelligent enough to

Re: Can't compile cloudstack 4.2 rpms from source

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:21:57AM +0200, benoit lair wrote: > A precision, the linux centos 6.3 i used is a ghost of the centos 6.3 > environment i use for compiling apache cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating, which > works very well, but not with cs 4.2.0 Are you able to build using maven (don't use the

Re: Wiki access

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:58:03AM +, Bharat Kumar wrote: > Hi All, > any one please grant me the edit or add page permission to cwiki. my user > name is bharat.kumar Done

Re: Review Request 14467: fix for Invalid SMTP breaks HA

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:31:50AM +, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > Description > --- > > added the connection and socket timeout parameters for SMTP and sending > message in new thread so that HA doesn't get blocked beacause of hang in > sending email alert Wouldn't a better approach be to e

Re: [Proposal] Improve VR upgrades

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:47:57AM +, Kishan Kavala wrote: > During CS upgrade, VRs are required to be upgraded to use newer systemVm > template . > The current VR upgrade procedure has following limitations: > - takes 'long' time and the time exponentially increases with the size of > the

Re: Can't compile cloudstack 4.2 rpms from source

stall > mvn - P deps (as the install way of cs 4.0.0) > mvn clean install > > > I got always the same errors. > > > 2013/10/3 Chip Childers > > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:21:57AM +0200, benoit lair wrote: > > > A precision, the linux centos 6.3 i used is

Re: Can't compile cloudstack 4.2 rpms from source

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:24:57PM +0200, benoit lair wrote: > Hi Wei, > > What is the result expected with "mvn -P developer" ? > > It will intent to give me rpms usable for a production environment ? No, it's intended to test that maven builds are functional for you. If you just want the RPMs

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:44:46AM -0500, Alex Ough wrote: > I'm not sure what else commands 'MigrateCommand' actually execute in > addition to 'Start/Stop/CopyCommand', but can we include 'MigrateCommand' > if it consists of only those 3 commands? > > Thanks > Alex Ough In the case of VMware, th

Re: Wiki access

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:26:19PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi, > > May I get access to edit/add pages as well? > My username is imduffy15. Added

Re: Wiki access

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:33:14PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I'm not seeing any links for editting permissions either. id == dahn You have space admin rights... Do this: 1) go to any page in the space (this will do: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Home ) 2) click on B

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:27:27PM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > >The problem with tests being broken out from the main repo is that we > > end up having a really hard time confirming that new features include > > appropriate tests. Plus, tests are tied to features, which are tied to > > the c

Re: Wiki access

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:47:15PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Daan, it is at the 'Browse' drop down at the upper right. Heh Yeah - not sure what UX genius decided to put it there... ;-)

Re: [DISCUSS] Leaky abstractions [was review requests 13238, 13896, 14320]

> On Oct 3, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: > > I was thinking along the same lines that a offering could have a generic > key/value map (where the value could be a string/json string/whatever). > CloudStack core wouldn't have any idea about the semantics of the keys or > values, but

Re: Wiki access

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:48:34PM +, Manan Shah wrote: > My id is manans. Can someone grant me access? Done

Re: [DISCUSS] Leaky abstractions [was review requests 13238, 13896, 14320]

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:55:41PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > > a model for extensions like that makes perfect sense. > > > > This model sound fine indeed. It makes no sense for httpClose however. M

Re: Review Request 14467: fix for Invalid SMTP breaks HA

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > On Thursday 03 October 2013 08:44 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:31:50AM +, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > >> Description > >> --- > >> > >> added the connection and s

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve "assign to me" option, > and if unassigned goto "component" maintainer? Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal the actual assignee. Component-based assignment is just a wa

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:40:06PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [Animesh>] Chip does that mean you are open to folks assigning tickets to > others? Should this be posted in the original thread > http://markmail.org/thread/btovj6t6opqxge5q. because the threads where Ilya > reopened the d

FWD: [IP CLEARANCE] Contrail Plugin for CloudStack

FYI - We have received the SGA for this plugin, and the 72 hours of lazy consensus over at general@incubator.a.o has started. I'll update this thread when we have cleared that hurdle, allowing us to accept the patch into the repo. -chip - Forwarded message from Chip Childers -

Re: System VM

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Hi guys, > Not arguing against it, but I would be very much interested in your reasoning > behind why having docs in a separate repo makes them easier to work on. What > have we experienced since this time last year which has led

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:55:58PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] Chip I get the principle behind the reasoning in thread[2] which > should be maintained but at the same time not being able to assign the issues > is a big hindrance in running a release. I am not sure if you saw m

Re: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and > destroy. > > For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket (rest > call) to track the decomision process. > When VM is deployed, we

Re: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > > We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and > > destroy. > > > > > > For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket >

Re: Review Request 14477: Refactor Storage Related Resource Code

anagerImpl.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/#comment52000> Unit tests for this if logic? - Chip Childers On Oct. 4, 2013, 12:57 a.m., Chris Suich wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e

Re: [1/2] Refactor Storage Related Resource Code These changes are a joint effort between Edison and I to refactor some of the code around snapshotting VM volumes and creating templates/volumes from V

I some outstanding questions I just posted to the review. Any thoughts on those questions? https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/ On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:07 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master c9f41d404 -> 180cfa19e > > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/blob

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Fair warning - some of this is a straw man argument to explore the situation, and a little bit of ranting at the end. On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:57:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I'll summarize and address the concerns raised so far. > > Marvin has been in this repo for a long time for

[ANNOUNCE] New committer: Laszlo Hornyak

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Laszlo Hornyak to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and elim

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:55:27PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > >&g

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

m still to junior to . > > Kind regards > Frankie Onuonga > Sent from my Windows Phone > > From: Chip Childers<mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com> > Sent: 10/7/2013 5:34 PM > To: <mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: C

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

and discuss finer > details. > > Thanks . > Kind Regards > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ____ > From: Chip Childers<mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com> > Sent: 10/7/2013 6:23 PM > To: <mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> &g

Re: Review Request 14477: Refactor Storage Related Resource Code

thanks for the comments, seems fair!

Re: Review Request 14477: Refactor Storage Related Resource Code

su...@netapp.com > NetApp Software Engineer > Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions > Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat > > On Oct 4, 2013, at 5:28 PM, edison su wrote: > >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/

Re: Wiki access

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:52 PM, David Ortiz wrote: > Hello, > Is it possible to get edit permission? Username is dortiz. > Thanks, David Ortiz > Done

Re: FWD: [IP CLEARANCE] Contrail Plugin for CloudStack

I'll proceed with accepting this patch now. IP clearance is now done. -chip On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:52:13PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > FYI - We have received the SGA for this plugin, and the 72 hours of lazy > consensus over at general@incubator.a.o has started. > >

Re: Review Request 14325: Contrail network virtualization plugin.

ranch. IP clearance process complete. - Chip Childers On Sept. 24, 2013, 11:38 p.m., Pedro Marques wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://revi

Contrail plugin

As stated, I've imported the contrail plugin donation into the contrail branch. I've taken the time to add the ASF license header to all of the new files in that branch. I think we have to complete the following in order to merge into master. 1) I'd like to see the package structure changed to m

Re: Contrail plugin

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:59:24PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:23:32AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > > 3) I'd love if we could get some consensus on what additional tests and / > > or changes to the test approach are needed. Prasann

Re: [DISCUSS] Return ssh publickeys in listSSHKeyPairs

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 01:05:32PM +, Frankie Onuonga wrote: > Hi guys , > From my fundamentals of security I do not think returning a public key is > wrong . > What is sensitive is the private key. > As long as that is bit exposed in any way then all should be well. +1 to Frankie's comment

Re: Wiki access

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 06:14:39AM +, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > May I get access to edit pages as well? > username: rajanik Looks like this was already taken care of.

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > Whomever wants to take the lead for 4.3 should probably (IMO), start a > > discussion on (1) coordination of work and > [Animesh>] Since we are getting closer to code freeze date and we cannot find > overall release manage

Re: Contrail plugin

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:43:39AM -0700, Pedro Roque Marques wrote: > Chip, > > On Oct 8, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > > > As stated, I've imported the contrail plugin donation into the contrail > > branch. > > > > I've taken the ti

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:41:42AM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Technicality here, can we call the functionality SSL termination? > While technically we are "offloading" ssl from the VM, offloading > typically carries a connotation that its being done in hardware. So > we are really talking abo

Re: Typo in KVM docs

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:44:43PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I see the KVM install guide says: > > tcp_port = "16059" > > > I'm wondering if this is correct or if it should be 16509, which is what is > in /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf by default. Which doc version? I found these bug

Re: Typo in KVM docs

Careful which branch you are working on Mike. I think that David's plan is that we are baselines on 4.2 in the new docs repo, and he was going to then pull from 4.2 into master (again, in the new repo). On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > I have some other KVM docs that I'v

Re: LXC and Networking

Adding Phong, who was the original author of the LXC plugin. Phong, can you help Francois out? -chip On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:04:31AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > I posted on the users list, but no one responded. I am trying here :) > > In addition to this, I tried to add an LXC cluste

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

+1 from me too. On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Here's the BVT result from spring-modularization branch: Failures that > are listed exist on master as well. So the branch doesn't break > anything additionally. > > +1 to merge > > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/t

Re: Docs have moved

I just opened a request with infra for that (and for cloudmonkey): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6857 On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > Hi, > I want to submit CloudStack Plugin guide for VXLAN Plugin, > but there isn't cloudstack-doc repo in ReviewBoard.

CloudStack Collab Conference EU - November 20 through 22

Hey all, Just a reminder that we have our collaboration conference coming up in Amsterdam on November 20 through 22. It would be great to get as many members of the development community there as can make it! More info can be found here: http://cloudstackcollab.org/ Register here: http://clou

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >