Re: Javadocs

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: But now I run into another problem: When I use the find/xargs command, the working directory is the directory where I entered this command and not the directory where the create-apidocs.sh script is located. Is there a way to set the working directo

Re: Java 1.5

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 25.09.2007 15:45 Uhr, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Our problem is not minimum Java requirement for Cocoon 2.2. The problem is release time lines. [..] Java requirements? Nah, that's peanuts... Thanks, you hit the nail. When was the vote? 1 year ago? Despite being still co

Re: Java 1.5

2007-09-27 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 28.09.2007 0:46 Uhr, Ralph Goers wrote: However, the language features of 1.5 are worth it. For example, I would love to replace some pieces of code that require synchronized blocks with java.util.concurent. I would love to be able to specify the object types on Maps and Lists. It just ma

Re: Java 1.5

2007-09-27 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 28.09.2007 0:46 Uhr, Ralph Goers wrote: I'm sure we could find a way to take advantage of NIO if we really thought about it. But we can't do any of that because we are stuck at 1.4. NIO is 1.4. Joerg

Re: Java 1.5 [was svn commit: r579132 - in /cocoon/trunk/core/cocoon-core/src/test/java/org/apache/cocoon/transfo rmation:I18NTransformerTestCase.java I18NTransformerTestCase.java.disabl

2007-09-27 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 25.09.2007 15:45 Uhr, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Our problem is not minimum Java requirement for Cocoon 2.2. The problem is release time lines. [..] Java requirements? Nah, that's peanuts... Thanks, you hit the nail. When was the vote? 1 year ago? Despite being still convinced that raising the

Re: Java 1.5

2007-09-27 Thread Ralph Goers
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 25.09.2007 16:20 Uhr, Felix Knecht wrote: May I ask why can't just make a jump and goto java 1.6? What's the benefit of using not the latest version - do any contracts exists that we can't jump over a java version? And what's the use of it? I just don't get it why a f

Re: Java 1.5

2007-09-27 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 25.09.2007 16:20 Uhr, Felix Knecht wrote: May I ask why can't just make a jump and goto java 1.6? What's the benefit of using not the latest version - do any contracts exists that we can't jump over a java version? And what's the use of it? I just don't get it why a framework should set re

Re: Javadocs

2007-09-27 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Reinhard Poetz wrote: But now I run into another problem: When I use the find/xargs command, the working directory is the directory where I entered this command and not the directory where the create-apidocs.sh script is located. Is there a way to set the working directory the way I have expect

Re: Javadocs

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: thanks. The command seems to work but I have a problem to execute the script because David is the owner and neither chown nor chmod are permitted using my account: /x1/www/cocoon.apache.org/2.2/core-modules/pipeline-api/1.0/apidocs > ls -lsa total

Re: Javadocs

2007-09-27 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Reinhard Poetz wrote: thanks. The command seems to work but I have a problem to execute the script because David is the owner and neither chown nor chmod are permitted using my account: /x1/www/cocoon.apache.org/2.2/core-modules/pipeline-api/1.0/apidocs > ls -lsa total 14 2 drwxrwxr-x 3 cro

Re: Javadocs

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Could somebody help me with an additional script which recursivly scans for the download scripts, sets the "x" attribute on the file and executes it then? Sure; what's the script name / name pattern?

Re: Code freeze - over

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: All release artifacts and their docs have been created. This means that the code freeze is over and our SVN is happily awaiting your commits again! Currently trunk doesn't build because the parent pom references are not set correctly. I will take

Re: Code freeze - over

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Reinhard Poetz wrote: All release artifacts and their docs have been created. This means that the code freeze is over and our SVN is happily awaiting your commits again! Currently trunk doesn't build because the parent pom references are not set correctly. I will take care for this tommorrow

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Cocoon

2007-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8469&projectId=51 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Thu 27 Sep 2007 11:00:34 -0700 Finished at: Thu 27 Sep 2007 11:00:48 -0700 Total time: 13s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numb

Code freeze - over

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
All release artifacts and their docs have been created. This means that the code freeze is over and our SVN is happily awaiting your commits again! Currently trunk doesn't build because the parent pom references are not set correctly. I will take care for this tommorrow morning if nobody else

Re: Renewing Apache Fop processor

2007-09-27 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Robby Pelssers wrote: Hi, I regularly seem to have problems because the current distributed version of apache fop processor (fop-0.5.20.jar) does not support a lot of needed attributes like for instance "linefeed-treatment". http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-object-block-sect

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Cocoon

2007-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8462&projectId=51 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Thu 27 Sep 2007 10:00:33 -0700 Finished at: Thu 27 Sep 2007 10:00:43 -0700 Total time: 9s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numbe

Renewing Apache Fop processor

2007-09-27 Thread Robby Pelssers
Hi, I regularly seem to have problems because the current distributed version of apache fop processor (fop-0.5.20.jar) does not support a lot of needed attributes like for instance "linefeed-treatment". http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-object-block-sectio n How difficult/easy

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Cocoon

2007-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8445&projectId=51 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Thu 27 Sep 2007 07:01:38 -0700 Finished at: Thu 27 Sep 2007 07:02:08 -0700 Total time: 29s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numb

Re: Springifying CForms

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Felix Knecht wrote: Do you know why we have these extra directories at all instead of flat block directory? Just my 2 cents Why do some blocks have 'super' poms including api/impl/sample and others don't? I've removed those extra POM level from all blocks that I have to release because this

Re: Springifying CForms

2007-09-27 Thread Felix Knecht
> Do you know why we have these extra directories at all instead of flat > block directory? > Just my 2 cents Why do some blocks have 'super' poms including api/impl/sample and others don't? Felix > Vadim >

Re: Springifying CForms

2007-09-27 Thread Giacomo Pati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Giacomo Pati wrote: >>> BTW: Do we create a branch of cocoon-form-(sample|impl) so that we >>> will have a new version for the >>> sprinigied blocks? >> >> As nobody commented on this I'll going to branch cocoon-form before I

Re: Springifying CForms

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Giacomo Pati wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: As nobody commented on this I'll going to branch cocoon-form before I commit the sprinified CForms, as soon as Reinhard has finished releasing. Do I have to branch each block (cocoon-forms-impl and cocoon-forms-sample) individually or is branching their

Re: Springifying CForms

2007-09-27 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Giacomo Pati wrote: BTW: Do we create a branch of cocoon-form-(sample|impl) so that we will have a new version for the sprinigied blocks? As nobody commented on this I'll going to branch cocoon-form before I commit the sprinified CForms, as soon as Reinhard has finished releasing. Do I have t

Re: Springifying CForms

2007-09-27 Thread Giacomo Pati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reinhard Poetz wrote: > >> As nobody commented on this I'll going to branch cocoon-form before I >> commit the sprinified CForms, >> as soon as Reinhard has finished releasing. Do I have to branch each >> block (cocoon-forms-impl and >> cocoon-forms

Re: Springifying CForms

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Giacomo Pati wrote: Giacomo Pati wrote: Giacomo Pati wrote: Hi all If there is nobody working on the subject I'll spend a few hours on doing that. I'm done with it :-) but need an advice on a special case: There are some special 'custom' stuff which had been referenced in form definitions/b

Re: Springifying CForms

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
As nobody commented on this I'll going to branch cocoon-form before I commit the sprinified CForms, as soon as Reinhard has finished releasing. Do I have to branch each block (cocoon-forms-impl and cocoon-forms-sample) individually or is branching their upper directory (cocoon-forms) enough?

Re: Springifying CForms

2007-09-27 Thread Giacomo Pati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Giacomo Pati wrote: > > > Giacomo Pati wrote: >> Hi all > >> If there is nobody working on the subject I'll spend a few hours on doing >> that. > > I'm done with it :-) but need an advice on a special case: > > There are some special 'custom' s

Re: ObjectModel exception

2007-09-27 Thread Leszek Gawron
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Leszek Gawron pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Leszek Gawron pisze: Because stack implementation used to maintain local scopes uses some variation of ListArray class that uses equals() when remove() method is called. Just for efficiency I guess that real scope cou

Re: [DAISY] CollectionCreated

2007-09-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Reinhard Poetz pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze: The formatting of a nice message for this event hasn't been implemented yet, so I'll just put an XML dump of the event here. http://outerx.org/daisy/1.0";> Isn't site just for s

Re: Springifying CForms

2007-09-27 Thread Felix Knecht
Giacomo Pati schrieb: > I'm done with it :-) Great, I'm looking forward to make my first experiences with it :-) > but need an advice on a special case: > > There are some special 'custom' stuff which had been referenced in form > definitions/bindings by the > mentioned 'class' attribute which

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Cocoon

2007-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8400&projectId=51 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Thu 27 Sep 2007 00:02:34 -0700 Finished at: Thu 27 Sep 2007 00:03:09 -0700 Total time: 34s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numb