Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Samedi, 21 fév 2004, à 17:13 Europe/Zurich, Christopher Oliver a
écrit :
...I did some informal tests and it appears to actually be slower
than interpreted Rhino (not sure exactly why, perhaps because Rhino
bytecodes are higher level), but was significantly
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Samedi, 21 fév 2004, à 17:13 Europe/Zurich, Christopher Oliver a
écrit :
...I did some informal tests and it appears to actually be slower
than interpreted Rhino (not sure exactly why, perhaps because Rhino
bytecodes are higher level),
I recently took a look at joeq (http://joeq.sourceforge.net/) which is a
Java virtual machine written in Java. Included is a reflective Java
interpreter that can run on top of an existing Java virtual machine
(e.g. Sun JRE). It can interpret class files, but can also delegate some
(or all)
Le Samedi, 21 fév 2004, à 17:13 Europe/Zurich, Christopher Oliver a
écrit :
...I did some informal tests and it appears to actually be slower than
interpreted Rhino (not sure exactly why, perhaps because Rhino
bytecodes are higher level), but was significantly faster than
BeanShell (which is
From: Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Samedi, 21 fév 2004, à 17:13 Europe/Zurich, Christopher Oliver a
écrit :
...I did some informal tests and it appears to actually be
slower than
interpreted Rhino (not sure exactly why, perhaps because Rhino
bytecodes are higher level), but was
On 21 Feb 2004, at 17:48, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Since Cocoon supports continuations they seem to attract more and more
interest in the web development world ;-)
Which proves Ovidiu's visionary skills. We owe him a great deal because
of this.
/Steven
--
Steven Noels
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
If there is support for Groovy, Pyhton, [or whatever] continuations, I
personally don't care because it doesn't make a real difference
(languages are a matter of taste ...) and I don't think we should spread
our energy over different Flowscript interpreter implementations
From: Gianugo Rabellino
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
If there is support for Groovy, Pyhton, [or whatever]
continuations, I
personally don't care because it doesn't make a real difference
(languages are a matter of taste ...) and I don't think we should
spread our energy over different
From: Gianugo Rabellino
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
If there is support for Groovy, Pyhton, [or whatever]
continuations, I
personally don't care because it doesn't make a real difference
(languages are a matter of taste ...) and I don't think we should
spread our energy over different
On 21 Feb 2004, at 19:24, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Well, we actually have to maintain a non-current forked version of
Rhino (even if pretty stable actually), so I'd much rather change my
taste (I quite like Javascript flow actually) if that buys me a more
hassle-free continuation engine.
I'm
On Feb 21, 2004, at 2:47 PM, Steven Noels wrote:
Overall, I sense an interest to opt for ASF packages whenever
possible. Both Rhino++ and Groovy aren't (c) ASF, so that point is
moot.
Umh... continuations in PHP or Jelly. That covers Apache (c) languages
available ;-)
-Brian
Reinhard Poetz dijo:
Since Cocoon supports continuations they seem to attract more and more
interest in the web development world ;-)
This is great! This means Cocoon is the leader in webapp development! :-DD
Anyway, for me only **Java** Flowscript would really make sense because
this would
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
Umh... continuations in PHP or Jelly. That covers Apache (c)
languages available ;-)
Correction: as of a few days ago, PHP is no more a project of the ASF :-)
Interesting... I always wondered why PHP is sooo non-Apache...
Neither Apache
13 matches
Mail list logo
