RE: JSR-168 Portlets

2004-11-15 Thread Ralph Goers
Carsten Ziegeler said: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> > Ok, I have thought about this: running the portlets as a web app > inside Cocoon sounds like a great idea, but emulation a servlet > engine or even worse an app server seems not like the easiest > thing to do. > I looked briefly at Jetspeed-2

RE: JSR-168 Portlets

2004-11-15 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > > Well, I like the idea of deploying them inside of Cocoon. > I'm not sure > > why the Portlet spec says they should be web apps. > > > I might be wrong but afaiu the spec, it only says that a > portlet should be deployed as a web app.

Re: JSR-168 Portlets

2004-11-15 Thread Ralph Goers
DURDINA Michal wrote: There might be some change in Tomcat. We are using Tomcat 4.1.27 and know nothing about Tomcat 5, but in Tomcat 4.1 classloader hierarchy is as of: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/class-loader-howto.html From the picture there it is evident that "shared/lib"

RE: JSR-168 Portlets

2004-11-15 Thread DURDINA Michal
> > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > >I did get it running in Tomcat with just the Pluto libs in > >lib/shared and it worked - it's a long time ago > > > >Now, the better way imho would be if the portlets would > >run "inside of Cocoon" rather than "inside of Tomcat". > >So, you deploy your portle

RE: JSR-168 Portlets

2004-11-15 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Ralph Goers wrote: > > > Well, I like the idea of deploying them inside of Cocoon. I'm > not sure why the Portlet spec says they should be web apps. > I might be wrong but afaiu the spec, it only says that a portlet should be deployed as a web app. But in my understanding this does not include t

Re: JSR-168 Portlets

2004-11-14 Thread Ralph Goers
Ralph Goers wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I did get it running in Tomcat with just the Pluto libs in lib/shared and it worked - it's a long time ago Now, the better way imho would be if the portlets would run "inside of Cocoon" rather than "inside of Tomcat". So, you deploy your portlet wars i

Re: JSR-168 Portlets

2004-11-14 Thread Ralph Goers
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I did get it running in Tomcat with just the Pluto libs in lib/shared and it worked - it's a long time ago Now, the better way imho would be if the portlets would run "inside of Cocoon" rather than "inside of Tomcat". So, you deploy your portlet wars into your Cocoon war

RE: JSR-168 Portlets

2004-11-14 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I did get it running in Tomcat with just the Pluto libs in lib/shared and it worked - it's a long time ago Now, the better way imho would be if the portlets would run "inside of Cocoon" rather than "inside of Tomcat". So, you deploy your portlet wars into your Cocoon war (or a totally differen

RE: JSR 168 in new portal

2004-06-25 Thread Grofčík Martin
Thak you a lot. It helps. Regards Martin -Original Message- From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: JSR 168 in new portal You have to enable cross context access for Cocoon. Add a cocoon.xml in the webapps

RE: JSR 168 in new portal

2004-06-25 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: JSR 168 in new portal > > The version of the Tomcat is 4.1.30. > > Pluto (version 1.0.1) was build and deployed by maven rc1. > (maven fullDeployment command). > > Then I check pluto instalation - test portlets were OK. > > I stoppe

RE: JSR 168 in new portal

2004-06-24 Thread Grofčík Martin
t-api*.jar. I start Tomcat. And there were no output for test portlet #1, #2. -Original Message- From: Menke, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 4:44 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: JSR 168 in new portal >>I deployed cocoon app as JSR 16

RE: JSR 168 in new portal

2004-06-24 Thread Menke, John
>>I deployed cocoon app as JSR 168 compatibile portlet into the pluto. What version of Tomcat are you using? You deployed by creating the .war and putting it in the webapp folder right? i am using 4.1.30 and Cocoon is not coming up -jm

RE: JSR 168 in new portal

2004-06-24 Thread Grofčík Martin
Hello all, I have the similar problem (cocoon 2.1.5). I deployed cocoon app as JSR 168 compatibile portlet into the pluto. As testsuite.TestPortlet1 (in the web.xml .. TestPortlet1 TestPortlet1 Wrapper Automated generated Portlet Wrapper org.apache.pluto.co

Re: JSR 168

2004-06-22 Thread Ralph Goers
Big problem here. Cocoon JSR 168 portlets won't work in a war file. At 6/22/2004 05:42 AM, you wrote: Hello all, I would like to get answer to these questions: First of all: 1. How could I deploy JSR 168 porlet in to the 2.1.4 Cocoon portal engine? 2. I am trying to make cocoon coplet as JSR168 co

RE: JSR 168

2004-06-22 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
> -Original Message- > From: Grofcík Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 2:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: JSR 168 > > Hello all, > > I would like to get answer to these questions: > First of all: > 1. How could I deploy JSR 168 porlet in to the 2.1.

Re: JSR 168

2004-06-22 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Grofčík Martin wrote: Hello all, I would like to get answer to these questions: First of all: 1. How could I deploy JSR 168 porlet in to the 2.1.4 Cocoon portal engine? If it is possible, Carsten should know. Carsten? :-) 2. I am trying to make cocoon coplet as JSR168 compatible portlet and pac