Upayavira wrote:
> hepabolu wrote:
> > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >
> >> +1 to new skin but only with new content.
> >
> > I'd like a more lighter (i.e. in color) skin, much along the lines of
> > the current Maven site.
> >
> > If you want to make new content a prerequisite for a new skin, it w
hepabolu wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
>> +1 to new skin but only with new content.
>
>
> I'd like a more lighter (i.e. in color) skin, much along the lines of
> the current Maven site.
>
> If you want to make new content a prerequisite for a new skin, it won't
> happen for a long time. T
Il giorno 02/nov/05, alle ore 23:06, Stefano Mazzocchi ha scritto:
+1 to new skin but only with new content.
Agree.
-1 to the logo, no reason to change a widely recognized one with a
new one just for sake of change.
Agree as well. Let's keep the current logo, at least until we release
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 18:30, Jorg Heymans wrote:
> Agreed, but a new logo when we release 2.2 or 3.0 would be highly
> desirable from a marketing point of view. The current one is starting to
> show its age IMO.
The reason that you drink Coca-Cola, smoke Marlboro, drive Mercedes and buy
S
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
+1 to new skin but only with new content.
I'd like a more lighter (i.e. in color) skin, much along the lines of
the current Maven site.
If you want to make new content a prerequisite for a new skin, it won't
happen for a long time. The speed of updating/adding conte
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Agreed, but a new logo when we release 2.2 or 3.0 would be highly
desirable from a marketing point of view. The current one is starting to
show its age IMO.
Call me old fart, but I'm *strongly* -1 about a logo change.
me too
--
Reinhard Pötz
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Agreed, but a new logo when we release 2.2 or 3.0 would be highly
desirable from a marketing point of view. The current one is starting to
show its age IMO.
Call me old fart, but I'm *strongly* -1 about a logo change.
--
Stefano.
Torsten Curdt wrote:
I agree that the Cocoon website needs a redesign. However, a redesign
with the same old content doesn't really makes sense and could do more
harm than good. But with the cool new documentation that is coming, we
definitely have to change the skin of our website to clearly s
Jorg Heymans wrote:
I won't argue marketing tactics here. If this is the general feeling
then I have no problem with this :)
FWIW, my suggestion was inspired by the maven project, compare [1] with
[2]. (ok their first logo wasn't really a logo, but still)
Jorg
[1] http://web.archive.org
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>
> A new logo should at least look similar to the current one to get
> recognized again - even with new versions of Cocoon. Anything else is
> bad from marketing POV.
>
I won't argue marketing tactics here. If this is the general feeling
then I have no problem with this
On 02.11.2005 20:08, Ralph Goers wrote:
Aren't there 3 o's each cocooning a dot?
Yes, there are 3 o's each containing a dot. In what strange world does
that make them into cocoon's?
These look more like cocoon's to me.
Must it always be that obvious ;)
Jörg
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 02.11.2005 15:42, Ralph Goers wrote:
I've always wondered why the logo isn't a cocoon?
Aren't there 3 o's each cocooning a dot?
Jörg
Yes, there are 3 o's each containing a dot. In what strange world does
that make them into cocoon's?
These look more like coco
On 02.11.2005 10:48, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
About the logo, however, I really prefer the current one, which is way
more readable and is also well-known.
And IMO it looks even more "modern" than the proposal.
On 02.11.2005 11:30, Jorg Heymans wrote:
Agreed, but a new logo when we release 2.2 o
On 11/2/05, Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> >
> > About the logo, however, I really prefer the current one, which is way
> > more readable and is also well-known.
> >
> > Sylvain
>
> I prefer the current one as well, but I have to be honest. I've always
> won
> I've always wondered why the logo isn't a cocoon?
that's exactly what I liked about the new logo (Frédéric's). The
arragement of the letters let it look like a cocoon (at least a bit).
Perheps having a combination of the old cocoon 'logo' and a little
cocoon makes it easier to remember (A coco
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
About the logo, however, I really prefer the current one, which is way
more readable and is also well-known.
Sylvain
I prefer the current one as well, but I have to be honest. I've always
wondered why the logo isn't a cocoon?
Ralph
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I agree that the Cocoon website needs a redesign. However, a redesign
with the same old content doesn't really makes sense and could do more
harm than good. But with the cool new documentation that is coming, we
definitely have to change the skin of our website to clearly
Thank for all your comments.
I agree the name "cocoon" in the logo is not that evident, specially
if you don't know what it is all about.
I take note for the website, be sure I gonna work on it and hope I'll
be able to show you something soon, at least about the samples.
Looking forward,
Frédér
Le 1 nov. 05, à 19:54, Frédéric Moser a écrit :
...I had an attack of inspiration for a cocoon logo, I don't know if
you
need a new one and if you'll like it...
I'm not sure if we need a new *different* logo - I like your proposal
from a pure graphical point of view, but it's not obvious tha
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> I agree that the Cocoon website needs a redesign. However, a redesign
> with the same old content doesn't really makes sense and could do more
> harm than good. But with the cool new documentation that is coming, we
> definitely have to change the skin of our website to cl
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
>> Jeroen Reijn wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Frédéric,
>>>
>>> looks nice! Beside the cocoon logo, I personally would like to see
>>> that the cocoon website gets a redesign. Especially if we want make
>>> the buzz.
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree that the Cocoon website need
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Jeroen Reijn wrote:
Hi Frédéric,
looks nice! Beside the cocoon logo, I personally would like to see
that the cocoon website gets a redesign. Especially if we want make
the buzz.
I agree that the Cocoon website needs a redesign. However, a redesign
with the same old
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Jeroen Reijn wrote:
>
>> Hi Frédéric,
>>
>> looks nice! Beside the cocoon logo, I personally would like to see
>> that the cocoon website gets a redesign. Especially if we want make
>> the buzz.
>
>
> I agree that the Cocoon website needs a redesign. However, a redesign
>
I agree that the Cocoon website needs a redesign. However, a
redesign with the same old content doesn't really makes sense and
could do more harm than good. But with the cool new documentation
that is coming, we definitely have to change the skin of our
website to clearly show people that s
Jeroen Reijn wrote:
Hi Frédéric,
looks nice! Beside the cocoon logo, I personally would like to see
that the cocoon website gets a redesign. Especially if we want make
the buzz.
I agree that the Cocoon website needs a redesign. However, a redesign
with the same old content doesn't really ma
Jeroen Reijn wrote:
> Hi Frédéric,
>
> looks nice! Beside the cocoon logo, I personally would like to see that
> the cocoon website gets a redesign. Especially if we want make the buzz.
Yes, the logo is rather fun, but a more modern skin would really help too.
Regards, Upayavira
> Frédéric Mose
Hi Frédéric,
looks nice! Beside the cocoon logo, I personally would like to see that the
cocoon website gets a redesign. Especially if we want make the buzz.
Jeroen
Frédéric Moser wrote:
Hi all,
I had an attack of inspiration for a cocoon logo, I don't know if you
need a new one and if you'
Hi all,
I had an attack of inspiration for a cocoon logo, I don't know if you
need a new one and if you'll like it.
I would be glad if it could bring something to the project which
helped me more than once.
Anyway I join a sketch of it, tell me if you would like me to change anything.
Have a nic
28 matches
Mail list logo
