Not a lot - the best stat I know of is:
https://www.osscensus.org/packages-rank-public.php
It places Lang at 11th at 50% of surveyed machines. More popular than
activation.jar or junit.jar :) [Or samba, openoffice, openssl etc, and
with just a little more work we could eclipse Eclipse]. I'm not
On 2010-08-07, Oliver Heger wrote:
For instance, are there statistics about downloads from the Maven
central repository or something like that?
Since mvn itself and lots of the mvn plugins use commons-lang such a
statistic would only tell you how many people use mvn and not whether
the
Does it distribute the artifacts to the dist folders also?
Unfortunately not.
Nexus currently only handles Maven artifacts.
http://markmail.org/message/wmhm556j56757xt3#query:%22[Nexus]%20Only%20for%20Maven%20snapshots%20%2F%20releases%22+page:1+mid:wmhm556j56757xt3+state:results
thanks for
On 7 August 2010 06:00, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Attachments don't come through. File a JIRA
+1 - please
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Doug Bateman d...@dougbateman.net wrote:
Dear Commons Developers,
Here's a suggestion for the commons-logging package...
I just had the opportunity to install scxml-eclipse and try it out, and
I wanted to say that I agree with Chris's comments. 1 and 3, especially,
are in my opinion showstoppers bugs that prevent the tool from being
generally useful. I hope these can be resolved, because overall,
everything else
On 6 August 2010 23:44, jcar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jcarman
Date: Fri Aug 6 22:44:38 2010
New Revision: 983137
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983137view=rev
Log:
Generifying toMap() method (adding in possibility for type inference on
return type).
Modified:
On 7 August 2010 13:04, jcar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jcarman
Date: Sat Aug 7 12:04:46 2010
New Revision: 983219
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983219view=rev
Log:
Some code clean-up. Removing unnecessary boxing, array creation for varargs,
etc.
Modified:
On 2 August 2010 11:08, joc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jochen
Date: Mon Aug 2 10:08:42 2010
New Revision: 981442
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981442view=rev
Log:
EOL fixes
Modified:
commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/.project
Generally not a good idea to include Eclipse
On 30 July 2010 08:39, joc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jochen
Date: Fri Jul 30 07:39:09 2010
New Revision: 980669
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=980669view=rev
Log:
Publishing site for 1.2.2
Modified:
commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/.classpath
Generally a bad idea to include
On 27 July 2010 21:21, mben...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mbenson
Date: Tue Jul 27 20:21:24 2010
New Revision: 979842
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=979842view=rev
Log:
mark lang3 as non-optional until/unless I can figure out how to make a
dependency required-for-test (transitive),
Here's the JIRA issue.
Sebb, you're right, it seems the Thread.getStackTrace() is Java 1.5, while
Throwable.getStackTrace() is Java 1.4. I probably should use the
Throwable.getStackTrace() instead. I had started there, which is where the
Java 1.4 assumption came from.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
+ assertFalse(StringUtils.startsWithAny(abcxyz, null, xyz,
abcd));
Most of the above changes seem wrong to me, as they change what is being
tested.
By all means add tests for varargs, but surely the array tests need to
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:25 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
As it stands, the code allows calls of the form:
MapInteger,Integer map = ArrayUtils.toMap(new String[][] {{foo,
bar}, {hello, world}});
without complaining.
Failing to check the types of the array entries on creation means that
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:25 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is it safe to suppress warnings?
If it is really necessary, please document why it is safe, e.g. as is
done in ArrayUtils.addAll()
It's safe because the code is making the assumption that the user
isn't trying to do something
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
StringUtils.length() is now deprecated, and is replaced by
CharSequenceUtils.length(), but surely the deprecated methods should
still be tested?
The deprecation warnings can be suppressed.
When the deprecated method is deleted, the
Am 08.08.2010 09:47, schrieb Henri Yandell:
Not a lot - the best stat I know of is:
https://www.osscensus.org/packages-rank-public.php
It places Lang at 11th at 50% of surveyed machines. More popular than
activation.jar or junit.jar :) [Or samba, openoffice, openssl etc, and
with just a little
On 2010-08-08 13:38, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Does it distribute the artifacts to the dist folders also?
Unfortunately not.
Nexus currently only handles Maven artifacts.
To make sure I'm actually passing in the exact same values (by letting
the compiler create the arrays using the varargs feature) I added the
following output to the startsWithAny() method:
System.out.println(startsWithAny(): Received + string + input
with + (searchStrings == null ? null :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ManageAttachments.jspa?id=12471073
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Doug Bateman d...@dougbateman.net wrote:
Here's the JIRA issue.
Sebb, you're right, it seems the Thread.getStackTrace() is Java 1.5, while
Throwable.getStackTrace() is Java 1.4. I
It just isn't my day. It's rainy here. Here we go:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-137
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Doug Bateman d...@dougbateman.net wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ManageAttachments.jspa?id=12471073
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Doug
So I'm wondering if this should exist, or if it should stay in StringUtils.
Personally I think String is a good colloquialism for CharSequence and
we don't need to create a new class.
i.e.
StringUtils.length(CharSequence) == good.
Hen
+1. I'm good with that. I think that's where most people would tend
to look. I would doubt if most folks even know that the CharSequence
interface exists.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'm wondering if this should exist, or if it should stay in
I do not think we can create a transition without a target, target is a
necessary element for a transition.
To feature 1 and 3 in Chris's commends, we can achieve them, not a big
thing. What do you mean about showstoppers bug ?
在 2010年8月8日 下午9:05，Jacob Beard jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca写道：
I just had
Hi, Long,
Replies below:
On 10-08-08 09:06 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote:
I do not think we can create a transition without a target, target is a
necessary element for a transition.
The spec says that the target attribute on transition is not required.
In that case, I think the semantics are
On 8 August 2010 21:30, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:25 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is it safe to suppress warnings?
If it is really necessary, please document why it is safe, e.g. as is
done in ArrayUtils.addAll()
It's safe because the
On 8 August 2010 21:28, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:25 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
As it stands, the code allows calls of the form:
MapInteger,Integer map = ArrayUtils.toMap(new String[][] {{foo,
bar}, {hello, world}});
without complaining.
Hi Jake,
Thanks for your reply. It seems that we should re-define transition EMF data
model for this tool, rebuild the tool from the base. I will read SCXML
transition specification carefully and carry on the rebuild job
在 2010年8月9日 上午9:22，Jacob Beard jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca写道：
Hi, Long,
Replies
On 8 August 2010 22:34, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
To make sure I'm actually passing in the exact same values (by letting
the compiler create the arrays using the varargs feature) I added the
following output to the startsWithAny() method:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:51 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Although the compiler changes varargs into String[] arrays, the two
tests are not equivalent.
Using varargs exclusively can hide bugs.
For example, method(String, String[]) is not the same as method(String ...).
We're talking
Hi Long,
I should mention that I had missed this part of the specification as
well, and I only recently discovered it while trying to determine how
best to express static reactions with SCXML. I'm currently updating
scxml-js to support this.
Jake
On 10-08-08 10:12 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote:
Hi
On 9 August 2010 04:08, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:51 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Although the compiler changes varargs into String[] arrays, the two
tests are not equivalent.
Using varargs exclusively can hide bugs.
For example,
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes.
But the current change makes it harder to find errors.
Previously, the compiler would warn about unsafe casts; with the
current implementation the warnings are suppressed.
IMO this is a retrograde step.
I expect generic
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO the tests are now less stringent, e.g. they no longer distinguish
leading string parameters from varargs when calling
StringUtils.startsWithAny.
And, neither would the user's code. We're using the code exactly as
the user
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The UsingNexus page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier.
The comment on this change is: switches from manual tagging to release:prepare.
35 matches
Mail list logo
