+1
site, release notes and mvn artifacts are OK
fresh checkout from branch works fine
I would have upgrated the parent pom from 17 to 20, but that's non blocking
Have a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Phil
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:25:59PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
I would prefer not to make that method static, since that means it
cannot be overridden and it is used internally in this class as well
as Spearman's. If we want to provide a convenience method with
static signature, we should add
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 3/29/11 4:43 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:25:59PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
I would prefer not to make that method static, since that means it
cannot be overridden and it is used internally in this class as well
as Spearman's. If we want to provide a convenience
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The UsingNexus page has been changed by sebbapache.
The comment on this change is: Add vote result info.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus?action=diffrev1=23rev2=24
On 29 March 2011 04:21, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/28/11 4:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I am having a heck of a time pushing the release out.
I cannot seem to be able to create the sym links per the instructions in
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
I cannot get the
On 29 March 2011 04:55, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/28/11 4:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I am having a heck of a time pushing the release out.
I cannot seem to be able to create the sym links per
On 29 March 2011 04:45, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/28/11 4:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I am having a heck of a time pushing the release out.
I cannot seem to be able to create the sym links per
The Commons Codec team is pleased to announce the commons-codec-1.5 release!
The codec package contains simple encoder and decoders for various formats
such as Base64 and Hexadecimal. In addition to thes widely used encoders
and decoders, the codec package also maintains acollection of phonetic
After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
Commons web pages describes a process that works. I suggest that we
standardize on that process, adding some simple automation scripts
that RMs can choose to use or
Modified:
commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/correlation/PearsonsCorrelation.java
URL:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
Commons web pages describes a process that works. I suggest that we
standardize on that
On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
Commons web
On 29 March 2011 16:01, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Modified:
commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/correlation/PearsonsCorrelation.java
URL:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
while, I think we
On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:08 AM, sebb wrote:
Yes, that is true.
Also, had the [net] release been using Nexus, it would have required 2
additional manual stages to close and then release the Maven
artifacts.
It is impossible to accidentally release Maven artifacts using Maven
command-line
On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
After another
I never saw the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail sent by Garry [1] with the subject line:
[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
which was sent on
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:00:42 GMT
It's not in my GMail bin, and I'm pretty sure it was not deleted as
part of spam cleanup.
Did you see it?
On 3/29/11 8:42 AM, sebb wrote:
I never saw the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail sent by Garry [1] with the subject line:
[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
which was sent on
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:00:42 GMT
It's not in my GMail bin, and I'm pretty sure it was not deleted as
part of
I did, but it was on the same thread as [VOTE] Release Apache Commons
Codec 1.5-RC1 (I don't know why my GMail client merged the two thread
into one).
HTH,
Regards,
Julien
2011/3/29 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
I never saw the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail sent by Garry [1] with the subject line:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Julien Aymé julien.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for information, Gary sent two emails (amongst others):
- One with subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
at 2011/03/28 20:54
(giving his +1 for the vote)
- One with subject [VOTE][RESULT] Release
On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz
Thanks, mystery solved - I also now found it in the same e-mail thread.
S.
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Julien Aymé julien.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for information, Gary sent two emails (amongst others):
- One with subject
On 3/29/11 8:01 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Modified:
commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/correlation/PearsonsCorrelation.java
URL:
Le 29/03/2011 17:16, sebb a écrit :
On 29 March 2011 16:01, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Modified:
commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/correlation/PearsonsCorrelation.java
URL:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29
Hi All,
Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this plan for codec 2.0:
- Create a SVN branch for 1.x
Then in trunk:
- Correct Maven group id, which implies:
- Repackage to o.a.c.codec2
- Use Java 5
- Use JUnit 4
What else? Thoughts?
Thank you,
Gary
--
+1 for me Gary, I strongly support this kind of initiatives!!!
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this
On 29 March 2011 18:44, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this plan for codec 2.0:
- Create a SVN branch for 1.x
Then in trunk:
- Correct Maven group id, which implies:
-1, see below.
- Repackage to o.a.c.codec2
This
I assume this is derived from the SVN tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC1
The NOTICE files still show 2010.
Otherwise the code seems OK, builds and tests OK on 1.3 and 1.6.
The site does not have the Branding updates, but that is not a blocker
for this
On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
On 3/29/11 11:54 AM, sebb wrote:
I assume this is derived from the SVN tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC1
The NOTICE files still show 2010.
That is a showstopper. Thanks, Sebb!
I will fix this and roll another RC this evening.
Phil
Otherwise the
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:52 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 18:44, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this plan for codec
2.0:
- Create a SVN branch for 1.x
Then in trunk:
- Correct Maven
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 20:56, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:52,
BTW, just noticed that Pool seems to be using a non-standard directory
layout - src/java rather than src/main/java.
But of course this is not a release blocker.
On 29 March 2011 20:10, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/29/11 11:54 AM, sebb wrote:
I assume this is derived from the
sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 18:44, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this plan for codec
2.0:
- Create a SVN branch for 1.x
Then in trunk:
- Correct Maven group id, which implies:
-1, see below.
- Repackage to
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 20:56, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at
Hi.
We have been talking about moving away from interfaces as the
preferred way to support people plugging in alternative
implementations because they have in several places gotten behind
due to the fact that adding anything to them breaks compatibility.
We should probably continue that
Hi Gilles,
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hi.
We have been talking about moving away from interfaces as the
preferred way to support people plugging in alternative
implementations because they have in several places gotten behind
due to the fact that adding anything to them breaks compatibility.
On 30 March 2011 01:15, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hi.
We have been talking about moving away from interfaces as the
preferred way to support people plugging in alternative
implementations because they have in several places gotten behind
due to the fact that adding
On 30 March 2011 01:13, pste...@apache.org wrote:
Author: psteitz
Date: Wed Mar 30 00:13:51 2011
New Revision: 1086810
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086810view=rev
Log:
Upgraded parent pom, downgraded assembly plugin to working version.
What is the exact problem? I'm happy to
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and dance from:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
It's the last time I'll pick that route.
I cannot seem to have published the Maven bits to Maven places. There is no
1.5 here:
On 30 March 2011 02:36, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and dance from:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
It's the last time I'll pick that route.
I cannot seem to have published the Maven bits to
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:52 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 March 2011 02:36, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and dance from:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
It's the last time
I've just double-checked, and the staged files were released at 29
March 2011 06:21 which is less than a day ago.
The files in the staging repo are dated Fri Mar 25 01:34:08, which is
what made me think it was taking too long.
So I won't send the e-mail yet.
On 30 March 2011 02:58, Gary Gregory
On 3/29/11 6:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
...
As I noticed this note, seems like a good point to interject a Maven war story:
I do not like Maven. I know I should, but it seems too complicated and too hard to use on complex projects. I may get
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
On 3/29/11 6:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
...
As I noticed this note, seems like a good point to interject a Maven war
story:
I do not like Maven. I know I should, but it seems too
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:24 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just double-checked, and the staged files were released at 29
March 2011 06:21 which is less than a day ago.
The files in the staging repo are dated Fri Mar 25 01:34:08, which is
what made me think it was taking too long.
On 3/29/11 7:33 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
...
So, lesson learned: Don't use Maven! ;-)
No, the other one: make copies of your code through multiple means until it is
completely safe. I hadn't lost code (or any data through paranoid backups
That wasn't maven. That was a sloppy eclipse create project
implementation.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams s...@lig.net wrote:
So, lesson learned: Don't use Maven! ;-)
No, the other one: make copies of your code through multiple means until it
is completely safe. I
On 30 March 2011 03:48, Gary D. Gregory (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary D. Gregory closed CODEC-107.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:20 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 March 2011 03:48, Gary D. Gregory (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
Gary D. Gregory closed CODEC-107.
On 3/29/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 01:13, pste...@apache.org wrote:
Author: psteitz
Date: Wed Mar 30 00:13:51 2011
New Revision: 1086810
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086810view=rev
Log:
Upgraded parent pom, downgraded assembly plugin to working version.
What is
55 matches
Mail list logo
