Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29856&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 07:00:13 +
Finished at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 07:04:49 +
Total time: 4m 36s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29866&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 08:20:47 +
Finished at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 08:24:53 +
Total time: 4m 5s
Build Trigger: Sched
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29867&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 09:00:03 +
Finished at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 09:04:31 +
Total time: 4m 27s
Build Trigger: Sche
ok, Olivier did a refactoring of maven structure and it seems the best
we can do now. Here a little patch fixing some dependencies (mainly
cleanup): https://gist.github.com/rmannibucau/40f4bcf03dbcf17b8448
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn:
On 28.04.14 20:55, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/04/2014 20:44, Thomas Vandahl a écrit :
>
>> This throws me out of the game. My Snow Leopard MacBook is 1.6 only.
>
> You can't upgrade it to Mavericks and install Java 7?
No I can't. MacBook One 32bit, you know.
Bye, Thomas.
--
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29890&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 20:00:03 +
Finished at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 20:04:23 +
Total time: 4m 19s
Build Trigger: Sche
Hi all,
I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC1.
Math 3.3 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/
(svn revision 5199)
Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommo
plz folks do a full build before committing stuff next time.
Will fix the hamcrest deps now.
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014, 20:58, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
On 28.04.14 20:55, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 28/04/2014 20:44, Thomas Vandahl a écrit :
>>
>>> This throws me out of the game.
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29893&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 20:20:54 +
Finished at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 20:21:01 +
Total time: 7s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Hi Thomas,
I noticed that the user guide is using deprecated classes in the
examples for least squares optimization. Do we want to update the user
guide to help new users find/understand the new API?
Best Regards,
Evan
On 04/29/2014 04:07 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:43:42 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I noticed that the user guide is using deprecated classes in the
examples for least squares optimization. Do we want to update the
user
guide to help new users find/understand the new API?
Updated documentation is certainly welc
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29894&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 21:00:04 +
Finished at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 21:00:09 +
Total time: 5s
Build Trigger: Schedule
I don't know if that matters but I got some problems with Java 8:
1. Jacoco crashed:
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29901&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 22:20:34 +
Finished at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 22:24:21 +
Total time: 3m 46s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29902&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 23:00:04 +
Finished at: Tue 29 Apr 2014 23:04:25 +
Total time: 4m 21s
Build Trigger: Sche
Hello,
while running javadoc on VFS2 I get quite a few errors, especially
about self-closing (I can fix those) and (I am not sure how
to fix those).
Is there any (ASF) JavaDoc guidelines which is recent enough to explain
the JDK8 absudities? The Oracle Guide is outdated and actually
recommends
If you think XHTML/XML you should be fine.
Gary
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while running javadoc on VFS2 I get quite a few errors, especially
> about self-closing (I can fix those) and (I am not sure how
> to fix those).
>
> Is there any (ASF) JavaDoc
Am Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:19:03 -0400
schrieb Gary Gregory :
> If you think XHTML/XML you should be fine.
Hm, actually I dont know. It looks that neighter block (HTML)
nor self-closing (XHTML) is valid/preferred. (So I plan to only
use and as paragraph or line seperators.)
BTW: Gary, did you fin
Bernd,
For paragraphs I use la di da, never the concept of a "line
separator", that's a rendering concept IMO, not content, which is what
Javadoc is. For code examples, then you end up in ... unless
it's inline then you use {@code ...}.
For IO-424, I've seen some discussion on the Maven ML and Ji
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29910&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 30 Apr 2014 01:20:39 +
Finished at: Wed 30 Apr 2014 01:24:35 +
Total time: 3m 55s
Build Trigger: Sche
JDK Javadoc only supports HTML. It doesn't support XHTML. I remember
someone saying this on the OpenJDK lists but don't know where it is... but
I do remember that.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Bernd,
>
> For paragraphs I use la di da, never the concept of a "line
> sepa
Well, it does not support HTML in the sense that you MUST close all tags.
No lonely s...
Gary
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> JDK Javadoc only supports HTML. It doesn't support XHTML. I remember
> someone saying this on the OpenJDK lists but don't know where it is... bu
That's actually a really good point :-)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Well, it does not support HTML in the sense that you MUST close all tags.
> No lonely s...
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Paul Benedict
> wrote:
>
> > JDK Javadoc only supports HTML.
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29911&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 30 Apr 2014 02:00:06 +
Finished at: Wed 30 Apr 2014 02:04:19 +
Total time: 4m 13s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=29914&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 30 Apr 2014 02:20:51 +
Finished at: Wed 30 Apr 2014 02:24:46 +
Total time: 3m 55s
Build Trigger: Sche
On 04/30/2014 03:50 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Well, it does not support HTML in the sense that you MUST close all tags.
> No lonely s...
Unless something has changed for jdk8, lonely s are supported and
even advertised like this in the main javadoc guide from Sun/Oracle:
http://www.oracle.com/tec
Looks like I found the message I alluded to. Make sure you read the whole
thread for fun ;-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-July/019269.html
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 03:50 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Well, it does not su
Btw, fixed a few broken tests yesterday night, fixed the broken pom and added a
few ALv2 license headers.
Now all builds fine on my local box (w java8).
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014, 22:20, Mark Struberg wrote:
plz folks do a full build before committing stuff next time.
>Will f
well submitted a patch yesterday fixing 1 failling test (due to j7 or
j8) in core and fixing jcache module (my previous patch was not
totally applied), hopefully it is the same fix but here is the patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-120
when I updated this morning it was still broken
29 matches
Mail list logo
