Hello all!
I'm writing a program that uses the VFS (2.0) so I could manage SFTP and
samba connections.
When I try to reach smb server I get FileSystemException - Badly formed uri
I understand that I have to import the sandbox jar, but do I get it from?
Whenever I've felt like there is "too much work and too little people to do
it", I remind myself Apache is not a job (unless someone is paying you for
your work), but a volunteer organization. Everyone does what he/she wants
to do... and if it's not personally fun or interesting, those people will
The CP35 says:
true
...
site-deploy
Looks like
http://commons.apache.org/site-publish.html
needs updating for the single module component.
On 1 December 2014 at 01:24, Bruno P. Kinoshita
wrote:
> Hi there,
> Tried the mvn clean site-deploy,
Hi there,
Tried the mvn clean site-deploy, and noticed a similar message.
kinow@chuva:~/java/apache/commons-text$ mvn clean site-deploy -e -XApache Maven
3.2.1 (ea8b2b07643dbb1b84b6d16e1f08391b666bc1e9;
2014-02-14T15:37:52-03:00)Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.2.1Java version:
1.7.0_65, vendor:
Hello Benedikt!
I guess I'm being too cautious to commit or work on issues in other components
:)
I'll slowly start working on [jelly] to port the changes made in Jenkins. But
first will spend more time on [text], [functor] and [lang].
Thanks!Bruno
From: Benedikt Ritter
To: Commons Deve
On 30 November 2014 at 21:57, Gary Gregory wrote:
> 2.0 would mean breaking BC to me.
Not necessarily. A big jump in minimum Java version might deserve a
major version bump.
> Keep it at 1.x to convey a warm and fuzzy feeling of compatibility.
Compatibility is not guaranteed by keeping the same
2.0 would mean breaking BC to me. Keep it at 1.x to convey a warm and fuzzy
feeling of compatibility. I would keep the changes to a minimum. For anything
more I would point to log4j 2.
Gary
Original message From: Christian Grobmeier
Date:11/30/2014 16:27 (GMT-05:00)
To: C
Hi folks,
I am perfectly aware that I was saying CL needs to be deprecated only
before month.
Tomcat uses CL and that was more or less the reason it would stay - so I
thought.
Recently I talked to a person actively involved in Spring. He explained,
Spring would use
CL and they are quite happy with
On 2014-11-29, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> currently I feel really overwhelmed by the stuff I'd like to do at commons
> and the little time I can spend for it.
As many others have already said, most of us know exactly what you are
talking about and IMHO the only solution for you is to not pick too m
On 30 November 2014 at 18:23, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> TEXT inherits from commons parent (like BeanUtils2 does) because the
> sandbox parent pom only adds unnecessary complexity and yet another thing
Using the sandbox pom instead of the normal pom does not affect the complexity.
> we need to rel
TEXT inherits from commons parent (like BeanUtils2 does) because the
sandbox parent pom only adds unnecessary complexity and yet another thing
we need to release. I updated BeanUtils2 to commons parent because I wanted
to use the new commons skin for example. Since the BeanUtils2 site build
works,
Hello Bruno
2014-11-30 0:31 GMT+01:00 Bruno P. Kinoshita :
> Hi Thomas!
> I use Jelly almost every week in Jenkins plug-ins. Talked about the forked
> repo they have in the project, and even told them I could spend some hours
> every week to fix the necessary issues.
> Even though it is possible
Hello James,
2014-11-29 19:30 GMT+01:00 James Sawle :
> Hi all,
> Two things from me, a relatively new member of the community.
>
> I think much more effort needs to be on pushing things through code-review
> and to completion. There are many issues in LANG that have been awaiting
> review for we
FYI: the proposal depends on Java 8 and BeanUtils which is fine if it is in
a separate module. Unless we want to make a Commons CSV 1.2 depend on Java
8.
I'm not sure if I like the 'story' from a user-POV but it's a start ;-)
I was wondering more about an annotation based system, but that would b
We should start a separate ML thread of VFS.
Gary
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> well I dont think we need to dig into the past, no matter if a RM is
> assigned or not, a release will happen when people get around to do it.
> And since the people who can do
Releasing VFS is long overdue. Whether it should be 2.1 or 3.0 (WRT
compatiblity) is the first thing we should discuss.
Gary
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> I acted as release manager for 2.0. I did that because at the time I had
> a need for Commons VFS, I had a need to
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2014 10:53, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > currently I feel really overwhelmed by the stuff I'd like to do at
> commons
> > and the little time I can spend for it. Here is an (incomplete) list of
> the
> > things
On 29 Nov 2014 10:53, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> currently I feel really overwhelmed by the stuff I'd like to do at commons
> and the little time I can spend for it. Here is an (incomplete) list of
the
> things I'd like to work on:
>
> - get a new release of the build plugin out of t
In general I do not think we should delete things unless they are harmful. Who
knows what bits of history will be helpful... we can certainly have better docs
of what we think is useful. That said, I won't stand in the way of folks who
consider this helpful work.
Gary
Original messag
19 matches
Mail list logo
