On 26 October 2016 at 01:14, Artem Barger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on creating multi module configuration for commons-rng
> component I've extracted all configurations for maven plugins such as: pmd,
> findbugs, checkstyle into separate module "commons-rng-build-tools".
Hi,
While working on creating multi module configuration for commons-rng
component I've extracted all configurations for maven plugins such as: pmd,
findbugs, checkstyle into separate module "commons-rng-build-tools". Such
that parent project can now refer to it within build plugins section and
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> I don't think that's what caused all those files to be tracked:
>
Removing "/" from "/site-content" will make git to ignore this folder
within modules folders as well.
> ---CUT---
> $ git check-ignore
Hi all,
I agree that 'filter' is slightly problematic but I'd say because it's
been used in different contexts and often misleading. However, I cannot
think of a better word. That also depends where we place 2D image
processing. They are also called filters. For IIR , Kalman(and possibly
On 25 October 2016 at 20:06, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> On 24.10.16 08:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Sorry, if that has been decided, I must have missed it. I'll take another
>> look tonight.
>
> Could you please reconsider your vote? I fixed the check sums so give
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Eric Barnhill
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I am against this constant spinning out.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> The proposed commons-filter is not a spin out. There was one
I am against spinning out org.apache.commons.math4.complex out into yet
another component. The argument that Gilles refuses to
support org.apache.commons.math4.complex because he does not want to
support all of org.apache.commons.math4 in favor of supporting a COPY
of
Tracking here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CSV-201
Gary
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:37:13 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Using RE is a no-no, so we need to do _something_
>>
>> The code already suggests using
Hi,
when building on Windows 10 with Java 1.6 I get the error below. The
build with Java 1.8 is successful.
On the distributions, I found some problems:
- Both the source and the binary distribution deflate in the same
folder. Typically, different folders are used.
- The binary distribution does
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
>
> I am against this constant spinning out.
>
> Gary
>
>
The proposed commons-filter is not a spin out. There was one filter in math
and it didn't belong there. Now we have at least couple of people around
who know
Hi Benedikt,
On 24.10.16 08:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Sorry, if that has been decided, I must have missed it. I'll take another
> look tonight.
Could you please reconsider your vote? I fixed the check sums so give it
one more chance!
Bye, Thomas
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:32:20 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
Honestly, I really wonder why all this stuff has to fork yet another
commons component. IMO, CM could just have been changed to emit
multiple jar files
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:37:13 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
Using RE is a no-no, so we need to do _something_
The code already suggests using an ISE:
// TODO: This is not great, throw an ISE instead?
throw new RuntimeException(e);
Curious: Why is adding a
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:51:00 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 25/10/2016 à 17:46, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit :
Honestly, I really wonder why all this stuff has to fork yet another
commons component. IMO, CM could just have been changed to emit
multiple jar files with no need for other components.
Using RE is a no-no, so we need to do _something_
The code already suggests using an ISE:
// TODO: This is not great, throw an ISE instead?
throw new RuntimeException(e);
Curious: Why is adding a custom exception better that ISE? The question
will then be
Le 25/10/2016 à 18:20, dbrosIus a écrit :
> I think we should let the people doing the work, decide.
In general I agree with that, but there is a minimum level of formalism
to follow for creating new components. Otherwise Commons will just turn
into a GitHub/SourceForge clone inside Apache.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Honestly, I really wonder why all this stuff has to fork yet another
> commons component. IMO, CM could just have been changed to emit
> multiple jar files with no need for other components. No need for
>
I think we should let the people doing the work, decide.
Original message
From: Emmanuel Bourg
Date: 10/25/16 11:51 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [complex] commons-complex module
Le 25/10/2016 à
Le 25/10/2016 à 11:30, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> WDYT?
Good idea.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Le 25/10/2016 à 17:46, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit :
> Honestly, I really wonder why all this stuff has to fork yet another
> commons component. IMO, CM could just have been changed to emit
> multiple jar files with no need for other components. No need for
> discussions, no need for new repositories
Honestly, I really wonder why all this stuff has to fork yet another
commons component. IMO, CM could just have been changed to emit
multiple jar files with no need for other components. No need for
discussions, no need for new repositories in Git, no need for new
stuff in Jira. Or, to put it
Hi Bruno, Now the comment on formatting is fixed. I will be careful on
this the next time.
My understanding is, we need to traverse from the diagonal element [right
bottom corner] to find whether whether its insert or delete or substitute. I
might be wrong.
Regarding using 1D array
Hi.
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:42:56 +0200, Eric Barnhill wrote:
As the recent contribution shows the commons-math complex library
remains
quite useful to many applications.
Following in the footsteps of commons-rng, commons-complex seems like
a
good next component of math to spin out and
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Or IllegalStateExecption?
Bit generic, and not to be used inflationary. I'd clearly prefer a
custom RuntimeException, as suggested by Benedikt.
> On Oct 25, 2016 2:31 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
Or IllegalStateExecption?
Gary
On Oct 25, 2016 2:31 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in our iterator implementation returned by CSVParser.iterator() we wrap
> IOExceptions into RuntimeExceptions because we cannot throw IOException
> from the iterator methods. For this
Thanks.
That's quite a lot of stuff in there and to be honest I'm not sure how
to use the library by looking at the documentation (which just contains
the PLL papers) and/or code.
Again here most code works on 'array = filter (array)' and not 'sample =
filter(sample)' (see for example
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 10:26 +0100 schrieb Bernd Porr:
> Opps. Link doesn't work.
Sorry, here we are https://sourceforge.net/projects/dsp4j/.
there are subprojects fms(https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funkmeldesystem
) and zvei(https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/5-Ton-Folge)
I grap the audiosignal
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> in our iterator implementation returned by CSVParser.iterator() we wrap
> IOExceptions into RuntimeExceptions because we cannot throw IOException
> from the iterator methods. For this reason, user code has to catch
>
Hi,
in our iterator implementation returned by CSVParser.iterator() we wrap
IOExceptions into RuntimeExceptions because we cannot throw IOException
from the iterator methods. For this reason, user code has to catch
RuntimeException in order to recover from parsing failures.
I was thinking whether
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Eric Barnhill wrote:
> integrated into maven.
How is software for signal and image processing related to Maven (a
software build tool). That sounds strange to me.
Jochen
--
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
Hello Eric,
Eric Barnhill schrieb am Di., 25. Okt. 2016 um
10:22 Uhr:
> Dear PMC,
>
> I am writing to request a sandbox site be established for a proposed
> commons sub-project, commons-filter .
>
> The library will consist of widely used basic methods for signal and
Dear PMC,
I am writing to request a sandbox site be established for a proposed
commons sub-project, commons-filter .
The library will consist of widely used basic methods for signal and image
processing. As suits commons protocols the dependencies are only the Java
API and commons-math .
We
32 matches
Mail list logo