an exception if an unknown tag is used in a
TagLibrary - FIXED
Regards,
John
- Original Message -
From: sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 17:27 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Russel Winder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big-snip/
I think the bulk of this message would have been better off in a new
thread, marked [OT].
Possibly but I didn't think of it. On other lists that would
John,
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 05:28 +, John Spackman wrote:
[ . . . ]
I think you're talking about a different problem - Jelly is used for far
more than Ant/Maven replacement (I don't usually use either) and maintaining
it is not an altruistic choice for me, but a practical one because I
:16 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/
FederatedCommons
John,
Le 10-nov.-08 à 07:11, John Spackman a écrit :
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept
of DVCS but it was my intention to look at using a DVCS for this.
But DVCS only does
: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs.
Open/FederatedCommons
We're converging John here,
I'll try to keep up with patches and commits in order for you to
become a committer.
Henri, can you please agree that we try to make jelly enter
Hi Henri,
Using Henri's analogies from his recent blog, I took Jelly home from the
Commons a couple of years ago and we're now ready to put it in the
window
and see if we're invited to play [...snip...]
As below - analogy was about other Apache projects but probably
applies here as you say.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons
We're converging John here,
I'll try to keep up with patches
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're converging John here,
I'll try to keep up with patches and commits in order for you to become a
committer.
Henri, can you please agree that we try to make jelly enter a maintained
mode, within a month or so,
John,
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 06:11 +, John Spackman wrote:
[ . . . ]
Isn't this whole Subversion centralism problem solved by using a DVCS
such as Bazaar, or Git -- and soon, I gather, Mercurial.
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of DVCS
but it was my
John,
Le 10-nov.-08 à 07:11, John Spackman a écrit :
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of
DVCS but it was my intention to look at using a DVCS for this.
But DVCS only does source code - setting up a seperate branch only
works if the community at large see the
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Russel Winder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big-snip/
I think the bulk of this message would have been better off in a new
thread, marked [OT].
Some of these discussions have been happening at the ASF, on a more
appropriate list whose public archives are here:
Repling inline to both Paul and John:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 09-nov.-08 à 05:35, John Spackman a écrit :
snip
Using Henri's analogies from his recent blog, I took Jelly home from the
Commons a couple of years ago and we're now ready to put
find it
so very useful.
John
- Original Message -
From: Russel Winder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons
Hi Russel,
Forgive me for butting in on a conversation but . . .
Anytime :)
Isn't this whole Subversion centralism problem solved by using a DVCS
such as Bazaar, or Git -- and soon, I gather, Mercurial.
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of DVCS
but it was
, 2008 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm thinking we should:
a) remove from trunks-proper
b) Update
AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking we should:
a) remove from trunks-proper
b) Update the homepage
Federated Jelly website repository.
Regards,
John
- Original Message -
From: Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development
Hello John,
I think it would
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 04:35 +, John Spackman wrote:
[ . . . ]
I am prepared to upgrade Jelly to Maven2 (not that I know much about what
that involves, yet) and to improve the website but I have to be confident
that the changes will happen quickly and easily, and that the project will
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 05-nov.-08 à 10:22, XuQing Tan a écrit :
I'm recently investigating some excutable xml scripters. So I want to know
is Jelly still in development
Hi, all
I'm recently investigating some excutable xml scripters. So I want to know
is Jelly still in development, since it's last release is in 2004?
--
Thanks Best Regards!
Nick
Le 05-nov.-08 à 10:22, XuQing Tan a écrit :
I'm recently investigating some excutable xml scripters. So I want
to know
is Jelly still in development, since it's last release is in 2004?
Nick,
Unfortunately no.
For a long time it was annoyed by the fact that building it required
huge
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 05-nov.-08 à 10:22, XuQing Tan a écrit :
I'm recently investigating some excutable xml scripters. So I want to know
is Jelly still in development, since it's last release is in 2004?
Nick,
Unfortunately
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:55 +0100, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Jelly is still unbeatable as a glue in xml processing.
I think that is a conjecture, a claim even, that needs justification and
support. Groovy, Python, Ruby people would argue (and I think quite
rightly) that XML is a data specification
23 matches
Mail list logo
