Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Hello. Le jeu. 2 avr. 2020 à 13:53, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > I have this ready to go on branch 1.0-beta1. Based on the discussions and the > git tag vote, I plan on using the tag "commons-numbers-1.0-beta1-rc1" for the > release candidate +1 > and "rel/commons-numbers-1.0-beta1" for the ac

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 10:23 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal Hi all, After reading all of the comments, here is what I propose for moving forward: * Use version number "1.0-beta1" instead of "1.0-B1". (Gary, were you p

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

7;t do any of the other changes until it seems like we have a consensus on this approach. Does anyone have any comments or objections? Regards, Matt J From: Gilles Sadowski Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 5:53 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [numbers

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:55, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 4:51 PM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:30, Gary Gregory a > > écrit : > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Gilles Sadowski > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > >

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 4:51 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:30, Gary Gregory a > écrit : > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > > > > > > > Why not

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Hi. Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:30, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > > > > > Why not dropping the redundant reference to the component > > > > and project, since the

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > [...] > > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > > > Why not dropping the redundant reference to the component > > > and project, since they are in the repo's name? > > > And how about focusing on the tag's purpose

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

> > [...] > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > Why not dropping the redundant reference to the component > > and project, since they are in the repo's name? > > And how about focusing on the tag's purpose by mentioning > > it first? > > Thus: > > rc1_v1.0-beta1 > > > >

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 17:24, sebb a écrit : > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 16:04, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory a écrit > > : > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Greg

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:04 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory a > écrit : > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 16:04, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a > > écrit : > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11,

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a > écrit : > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb a écrit : > > > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadows

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb a écrit : > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb a écrit : > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen > > > a écrit : > > > > > > > > Thanks. I think I have th

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb a écrit : > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen > > a écrit : > > > > > > Thanks. I think I have the gpg key sorted now. > > > > > > I can probably start on RC2 tomorrow. It soun

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen > a écrit : > > > > Thanks. I think I have the gpg key sorted now. > > > > I can probably start on RC2 tomorrow. It sounds like we've agreed to go > > with "1.0-beta1" for the release ver

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Hi. Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Thanks. I think I have the gpg key sorted now. > > I can probably start on RC2 tomorrow. It sounds like we've agreed to go with > "1.0-beta1" for the release version so I'm wondering what to do with the > existing release branch (1.0

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

: sebb Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 12:25 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 17:24, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > On 30/03/2020 16:30, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 17:27, Gilles Sadowski a > > é

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 17:24, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > On 30/03/2020 16:30, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 17:27, Gilles Sadowski a > > écrit : > >> Hi. > >> > >> Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:19, Matt Juntunen > >> a écrit : > >>> The issue I saw with the site [1] was that the

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On 30/03/2020 16:30, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 17:27, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : Hi. Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:19, Matt Juntunen a écrit : The issue I saw with the site [1] was that the text under the Releases section says "There is no offcial release yet. Come and join

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 17:27, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > > Hi. > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:19, Matt Juntunen > a écrit : > > > > The issue I saw with the site [1] was that the text under the Releases > > section says "There is no offcial release yet. Come and join development > > work!" Clea

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Hi. Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:19, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > The issue I saw with the site [1] was that the text under the Releases > section says "There is no offcial release yet. Come and join development > work!" Clearly, that won't work for a release version. Ah OK. I had created that co

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

me.apache.org/~mattjuntunen/commons-numbers-1.0-B1-RC1-site/ > > From: Rob Tompkins > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 10:13 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal > > > >> On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrot

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

rs List Subject: Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal > On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 9:58 AM Alex Herbert <mailto:alex.d.herb...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > >> >> On 30/03/2020 14:27, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> If

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

> On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 9:58 AM Alex Herbert > > wrote: > >> >> On 30/03/2020 14:27, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> If "B" stands for "Beta", then make the POM version "1.0-beta1", no need >>> for mystery. >>

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 9:58 AM Alex Herbert wrote: > > On 30/03/2020 14:27, Gary Gregory wrote: > > If "B" stands for "Beta", then make the POM version "1.0-beta1", no need > > for mystery. > > In Matt's defence I think he was following the naming conventions from > the commons versioning guide

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

On 30/03/2020 14:27, Gary Gregory wrote: If "B" stands for "Beta", then make the POM version "1.0-beta1", no need for mystery. In Matt's defence I think he was following the naming conventions from the commons versioning guide [1]. That uses: "Beta releases are denoted by adding "B" I thi

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

to not create a new RC for each and every improvement. Regards, Gilles > > > > -Matt > > > > From: Alex Herbert > > Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 9:15 AM > > To: Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Releas

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

I'm not sure what problem you are referring to. [Perhaps RC1 is fine (?).] Regards, Gilles > > -Matt > > From: Alex Herbert > Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 9:15 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Prop

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

the downloads page. So, I'm going to > scrap RC1 and start RC2 either later today or tomorrow. > > -Matt > > From: Alex Herbert > Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 9:15 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

9:15 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal > On 29 Mar 2020, at 12:17, Matt Juntunen wrote: > > Hello, > > I propose releasing commons-numbers 1.0-B1. I will serve as the release > manager. Here are a few notes on the release: > &g

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

> On 29 Mar 2020, at 12:17, Matt Juntunen wrote: > > Hello, > > I propose releasing commons-numbers 1.0-B1. I will serve as the release > manager. Here are a few notes on the release: > > > * This will be a beta release. No guarantees are made for stability or > compatibility with futur

[numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

Hello, I propose releasing commons-numbers 1.0-B1. I will serve as the release manager. Here are a few notes on the release: * This will be a beta release. No guarantees are made for stability or compatibility with future releases. * The package coordinates for the project will not be