Or kick it off at apache-extras.org :)
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Frank,
>
> why not propose this as another project?
> It requires more maintenance, that is true.
> Sandbox is designed for that, including to evaluate if there are user bases.
>
> I tend to feel your
Frank,
why not propose this as another project?
It requires more maintenance, that is true.
Sandbox is designed for that, including to evaluate if there are user bases.
I tend to feel your contribution is not useless.
A readable syntax instead of java syntax for formulæ that are rather longer
t
On Jan 5, 2011, at 18:05, "Stephen Colebourne" wrote:
> I would recommend against this for [lang].
>
> [lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or
> "religious" aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements
> that assist the basic Java packages. A maths parser, ho
I would recommend against this for [lang].
[lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or
"religious" aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements
that assist the basic Java packages. A maths parser, however useful,
isn't that closely related IMO.
Stephen
On 5 Janu
These things tend to be a slippery slope. Turing completeness is at the
bottom of that hill.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:18 PM, frank asseg wrote:
> Hola Ted,
>
> On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy?
> sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking
05, 2011 16:12
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] math expression parser
>
> Hola Gary!
>
> On 05.01.2011 22:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Why should this be in [lang] instead of [math]?
> I actually thought about posting on [math] but when i browsed the ma
Hola Gary!
On 05.01.2011 22:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Why should this be in [lang] instead of [math]?
I actually thought about posting on [math] but when i browsed the math
library i gained the impression that it's much more concerned with more
complex mathematical issues like integration of numer
Hola Paul,
On 05.01.2011 21:49, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> I find the classname PostfixExpression pretty bizarre... should it be simply
> MathExpressionParser ?
heh, you got me there, the naming is pretty awkward and stems from the
fact that an infix expression "2 + 2", where the operator stands bet
: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:p...@hoplahup.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 15:49
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] math expression parser
>
> Well... I never thought about such but maybe it's indeed useful.
> Something short and tiny that is a lot more
Well... I never thought about such but maybe it's indeed useful.
Something short and tiny that is a lot more compact than the java syntax for
math but would have about the same capabilities.
I am not used to commit to lang so we'll have to wait for them to answer.
I find the classname Post
While we're at it, I also have a feature complete mathematical parser that
evaluates sets of expressions, variables and functions all at once over an
arbitrary domain. Go to http://zee.dev.java.net and see the code samples.
What do you think?
On Jan 5, 2011 3:18 PM, "frank asseg" wrote:
> Hola Te
Hola Ted,
On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy?
sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking about a pure
mathematical expresssion parser, intended for evaluating user input and
the like, not a turing complete grammer but simply a way to evaluate
thi
Hola Paul,
On 05.01.2011 20:51, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves
> variables, scopes, objects, etc.
> Can you compare that to JEXL ?
In comparison to JEXL i was looking for a possiblity to pass a simple
math expression to an eva
Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy?
Why yet another?
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Frank,
>
> I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally
> involves variables, scopes, objects, etc.
> Can you compare that to JEXL ?
>
> paul
>
>
> Le 5 janv. 20
Frank,
I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves
variables, scopes, objects, etc.
Can you compare that to JEXL ?
paul
Le 5 janv. 2011 à 20:49, frank asseg a écrit :
> hola guys,
>
> i am currently working on a math expression parser, and wanted to ask if
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
