+1
Thanks for your work, much more better now! :-)
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2015-03-07 5:20 GMT+01:00 Pei Chen :
> This is pretty cool.
> Just curious- are the *.json automagically updated via a script of s
This is pretty cool.
Just curious- are the *.json automagically updated via a script of some
sort?
eg https://projects-new.apache.org/json/foundation/people.json
We were thinking of reusing the data to pull that and populate our own
people.html page dynamically via jQuery.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at
Same question for Apache Tez. How do we need to fix the new website to show the
Tez project?
thanks
— Hitesh
On Mar 6, 2015, at 1:46 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> I can see the Apache UIMA entry in the "old" page, but it's not listed on the
> new page. What needs fixing?
>
> -Marshall Schor
>
LGTM, but don't forget to update the www.apache.org homepageto base it on the
new stuff instead of the DOAP files.
On Friday, March 6, 2015 10:47 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)"
wrote:
+1 please do so :)
++
Chris Mattma
+1 please do so :)
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@na
I think those other comments about Jekyll had to do with keeping all of the
site storage on apache servers.
There have been objections in this thread about using github.io based sites
even with site name masquerading.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 6, 2015, at 14:36, Christopher wrote:
>
>
On 3/6/15 5:40 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>
> On 2015-03-06 23:39, Christopher wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
>>>
>>> The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
>>> people who ha
On 2015-03-06 23:39, Christopher wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
people who have linked to various parts of the site.
Similarly, are we still
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
>
> The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
> people who have linked to various parts of the site.
>
> Similarly, are we still using DOAP files? I could imagine
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2015-03-05 15:42 GMT+01:00 Sebastien Goasguen :
>
> > So FWIW, I never thought about using github pages for our website.
> > I just tried it.
> >
> > Created an orphaned gh-pages in our repo, pushed that. It got mirrored
> > right away and
Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
people who have linked to various parts of the site.
Similarly, are we still using DOAP files? I could imagine that there
are others who were also referring to individual DOAPs
Trials lead to services that need to be maintained. No trial unless we know we
can maintain it.
For that to happen someone needs to come up with a full proposal for the infra
team to evaluate with clear justification for the approach and clarity on how
ASF budgets would need to scale to support
I really like the idea of a GitHub-like platform link GitLab to power the
ASF's Git infrastructure instead of our current git-wip-us implementation.
Supposing there's no impediment to that (license, servers, etc), why not?
Stian's summary of why is quite good.
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:51:06 -
I can see the Apache UIMA entry in the "old" page, but it's not listed on the
new page. What needs fixing?
-Marshall Schor
On 3/6/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that p
Just happened to notice that the new website's header seems to be truncated
on mobile.
I use Chrome on Android..
http://imgur.com/8gZfu0i
On 6 Mar 2015 16:53, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the fu
Minor design nit: the content boxes should either be centered or do a
better job of auto filling the available horizontal space. Otherwise, it
looks spiffy, despite being fairly tiny on my monitor.
Would also like to see the releases page sort by date by default, and show
more than 10 entries. Thi
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org.
-0, do we need all these js/css/cookies from google(apis)?
I never had to disable noscript for anything than a.o on a.o until
then, whitelisting *.gg.c a
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:12 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman
> wrote:
> > Opening a new thread...
> >
> > Git without Github is like sex without a partner, sufficient but not very
> > satisfactory. Github option has been explored in the past, and due to
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
> has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you
> object to moving forward wi
+1
On 6 Mar 2015 17:53, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
> projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
> up. If you object to moving forward with thi
Is there a compiled list anywhere of the ASF projects proposed for
GSOC2015? Couldn't find it. Jira searches for the GSOC2015 gave me
results kinda all over the place.
Thanks,
Hadrian
On 03/06/2015 02:32 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
Dear PMCs,
I'm happy to announce that the ASF has made it onto t
+1
On 2015-03-06 17:52, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has
> all the functionality that projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no
> reason to have two sites
> up. If you object to moving forward with th
+1, with two comments:
1. the projects page on the new site has a link to "Contributors", which is
broken.
2. there's some information linked on the old site about DOAP files and
RSS/Atom feeds, which do not exist (or are not obvious) on the new site.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.co
+1
Jacques
Le 06/03/2015 17:52, Rich Bowen a écrit :
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o has,
and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you object to moving forward with
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org
+1
-Bertrand
Yes please!
> On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
> has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you object
> to m
+1
On 06/03/15 17:52, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with this, please s
+1
Hadrian
On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with
+1
On 6 March 2015 at 17:57, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> +1 but clearly biased ;-)
>
>
> On 2015-03-06 17:54, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
>> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@
+ 1.
Suresh
> On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
> has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you object
> to
One of your mentors or the champion will have to do the edits for now.
We can always relax this to include committers, but for incubator that
would equal universal commit bit on this as well.
But I think that is not for this thread :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-03-06 18:14, Stian Soiland-Re
+1 - looks great!
..Apologies if this was explained before I joined this list - How does
this work for podlings? For the old site I was able to make a DOAP
file, but on the Apache Taverna entry on projects-new I am unable to
edit it as I am not in the Incubator PMC.
Can we still maintain the old
+1 but clearly biased ;-)
On 2015-03-06 17:54, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
+1
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 8:53 AM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Replac
+1
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 8:53 AM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org
I'd like for us to go ahead and
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with this, please say so.
[ ] +1, do it
[ ] +0, whatevs
[
35 matches
Mail list logo
