Re: "Maintainer" as an alias of PMC Member?

I totally get the problem. I think if we can find a suitable title for PMC Member we could socialize it in a few years. Should have done this years ago. But "Maintainer" does not do it for me. Keep looking... Craig > On Mar 23, 2024, at 01:47, tison wrote: > > Hi, > > Random thought. > >

Reporter tool for board reports needs some love

Hi, Is there anyone who can take a look at the Reporter tool that many projects rely on to help create board reports? A number of projects have commented that the statistics seem to be in conflict with reality. Thanks, Craig Craig L Russell c...@apache.org

Web site checker needs help

While reviewing some of the project reports for the board meeting, I use the tool https://whimsy.apache.org/site/ to help me understand the projects' conformance with policy. I noticed many "false negatives" and "false positives" that need attention. I believe that the tool is extremely useful

Re: [WG: Sharpeners] Propose: milder name

Hi Gary, I like the name "Advisor" since to me it has no negative associations. By the way, in reviewing project board reports, I often see projects that recognize and report on areas of improvement, and that would welcome having an Advisor try to help them. Craig > On Feb 18, 2024, at

Re: reporter.a.o 502 Proy error

I believe this is due to an outage on the whimsy machine that was reported by Daniel Gruno at 06:50 PST today... > On Jan 1, 2024, at 20:47, Benchao Li wrote: > > For me, it's "503 Service Unavailable". > > On 2023/12/31 19:07:49 Gary Gregory wrote: >> For me it says "Loading base data" and

Re: Community docathon in Halifax?

Shane and Rich, All of that > On Oct 6, 2023, at 05:49, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > > All of this. Hopefully we can focus on actual achievable goals, and not > spend the entire time falling down philosophical rabbit holes. I > definitely want to be part of this conversation. I very much want

Re: [POLL] Should we ask Infra to change the defaults used to generate GitHub integration email subjecs?

August 2023 um 08:10 >> An: dev@community.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: [POLL] Should we ask Infra to change the defaults used to >> generate GitHub integration email subjecs? >> +1 >> >> Am 2. August 2023 07:47:25 MESZ schrieb Jarek Potiuk : >>> +1 >

Re: projects.a.o "maintainer" field

I think projects would just put as the name and dev@project... as the mail address. But there is already a mail-list field so it seems redundant. So I agree that we should drop "maintainer". Craig > On Sep 7, 2023, at 10:08, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > > With some attention on projects.a.o

Re: Requests for comdev membership

> On Sep 3, 2023, at 04:36, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Craig L Russell wrote on 9/1/23 2:28 PM: >> I recently sent a PR for the site and nothing happened. No one reviewed. No >> one commented. > > Link? There's only one open PR (not from you), and the most recent closed PR > you submitted

Re: [PR] Update mailing-lists.md (comdev-site)

Hi Chris, I really appreciate your dedication, hard work, and perseverance in making this happen. Best, Craig > On Aug 17, 2023, at 04:11, chrisdutz (via GitHub) wrote: > > > chrisdutz merged PR #127: > URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/127 > > > -- > This is an automated

Re: [POLL] Should we ask Infra to change the defaults used to generate GitHub integration email subjecs?

>>> >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 8:46 AM Christofer Dutz >>> mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de>> wrote: >>> Well, >>> >>> stating the obvious, I’ll add my +1 ;-) >>> >>> And yes Craig, I said the defaults … if you have e

Re: [POLL] Should we ask Infra to change the defaults used to generate GitHub integration email subjecs?

Hi Christofer, As long as projects with their own settings can continue to use them, I'm +1 to change the defaults for all projects. If the projects don't like being able to use their lists again, they can always go back to what they had before. Thanks, Craig > On Aug 1, 2023, at 05:16,

Re: Improving Onboarding Experiences - Updating PMC Chair onboarding

Hi Shane, Thanks for taking on this task. A couple of comments: 1. Congratulations on being appointed by the board as a project VP and Chair of your PMC! I do not believe that there is a "project VP". There is an ASF VP and a project Chair. So I'd change this to : Congratulations on being

Re: [PR] What makes a good report? (comdev-site)

> On Jun 26, 2023, at 05:29, Rich Bowen wrote: > > In the past we have avoided linking to whimsy in public facing > documentation. It encourages people to dig to find what they can find. > Whimsy is *not* a place that we want people digging, IMHO, and if there's > alternate (there is) we

Re: [PR] What makes a good report? (comdev-site)

> On Jun 23, 2023, at 16:28, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 06:10 rlenferink (via GitHub) wrote: > >> >> rlenferink commented on code in PR #125: >> URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/125#discussion_r1239637617 >> >> >> >> Review Comment: >> Great addition!

Re: Proposal: Consolidate the various pages about voting/deciding

I agree there is too much overlap among the four pages, and would lean toward one page with decision making as the primary driver. Contents of the other pages could fit well into that page.. Craig > On May 30, 2023, at 12:45, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > > We have four pages that discuss

Re: [website] FYI, tag-based navigation added to community.a.o

I would put a link to the tags page in lots of places, including the top of the apache.org main page, just after > Projects  > > People  > > Community  > > Infrastructure  > > License  >

Re: Standardise on 'main' as the default branch?

Yes, of course change master to main. Craig > On Apr 2, 2023, at 04:33, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 09:39, Christofer Dutz > wrote: >> >> I would like to make a slightly different proposal. >> Name the branch, on which development happens "develop" and the one that >> contains

Re: Back to basics: What we do @comdev

> On Mar 16, 2023, at 10:07, sebb wrote: > > I think there need to be 3 mailing lists instead of just dev@ > > general community help > GSOC > tool development > > I agree having a separate JIRA for GSOC would be a good idea. > That would leave COMDEV for the website and various tools.

The Lone Developer Problem

I thought this might be of general interest. Enjoy! https://evanhahn.com/the-lone-developer-problem/?utm_source=clr Craig L Russell c...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional

Re: Idea: build a New Contributor Guide Tool

As an experiment, I logged into chat.openai.com and asked it to tell me how to contribute code to Apache. [1] Then I asked why the ICLA is needed. [2] These AI are smarter than we might think, I expect that refining the questions and editing the replies might be easier than creating the

Please review/merge this PR

This PR is ready for comments in preparation for merge to main. Regards, Craig > Begin forwarded message: > > From: clr-apache (via GitHub) > Subject: [GitHub] [comdev-site] clr-apache commented on pull request #82: > Update newcommitter.md > Date: February 3, 2023 at 14:59:53 PST > To:

Re: MODERATE for ment...@community.apache.org

> On Jan 15, 2023, at 20:27, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > Hello TALHA BHATTI, > > mentors@ is the list for mentors only, not for GSoC contributors :) > I can recommend you to check this page: https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html > > Then find the project you would like to participate in

Re: MODERATE for ment...@community.apache.org

> On Jan 15, 2023, at 20:25, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > Hello Cheshtha Vasudeva, > > mentors@ is the list for mentors only, not for GSoC contributors :) > I can recommend you to check this page: https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html > > Then find the project you would like to participate

Re: Idea: Monthly Members Moment/Critical Committer Communications

I could not find where we decided whether to use members@ or members-notify@ but I approved it. If anyone objects to the mail list, we can have that discussion for next time. Craig > On May 3, 2022, at 10:16 AM, Josh Fischer wrote: > > sent. > > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 12:05 PM Jarek Potiuk

Re: [ALC Shenzhen] Text "shenzhen" in logo is not clear

Hi, I understand the concern. The font used for the chapter name is very light grey which against a white background is difficult for many people to read. Perhaps the font could be changed? Warm regards, Craig > On Mar 13, 2022, at 11:23 PM, Swapnil M Mane wrote: > > Hi Willem, nice

Re: Effective ways of getting individuals funded to work on ASF projects

I very much like the direction here. One other top post that falls into item 2 (rules of engagement): Apache does operate in the open with discussions, bug fixes, etc. all out for anyone to see. Except for security issues. I'd like to discuss how we treat committers with security privileges

Re: MODERATE for ment...@community.apache.org

> On Jan 11, 2022, at 10:03 AM, Mohammad Noureldin > wrote: > > Hi Harjout, > > In addition to what has been suggested by Maxim, I would like your feedback > on something. > > Where on the Apache Community Development website [1] you've that you may > need to send an email to mentors@ ?.

Re: [Announcement] - Establishing ALC Shenzhen Chapter

This is great news. Congratulations, Craig > On Dec 20, 2021, at 6:45 AM, Swapnil M Mane wrote: > > Hello all, > > ComDev PMC is pleased to announce our next Apache Local Community [1] > ALC Chapter - ALC Shenzhen [2] and Eason Chen as ALC Shenzhen Chapter > lead. > We have the following

Re: Proposal to add "release requirements" check

Hi Jarek, I think that updating the reporter tool to check for a conformant download(s) page is a great idea. I encourage you to see how to incorporate that check into the tool. I agree with you that sending out mass mailings is probably not going to result in changes in behavior. Only

Re: Hi there Amber Williams/WolfMaven/Snowflakes are for Winter

Hi Amber, I'm afraid that there is no longer a community developing Wookie. There are many other projects that you might be interested in here. For example, the Maven project is quite active and I'm sure they would love to welcome you... d...@maven.apache.org Warm regards, Craig > On Oct 25,

Re: Request: New Mailing List for Security-oriented community

+1 for security-disc...@community.apache.org Craig > On Sep 19, 2021, at 11:27 PM, Mark J. Cox wrote: > > On 2021/09/19 21:44:34, Dave Fisher wrote: >> This is a good idea. Assuming that this is a public list then either pick >> another name, or do not use self serve to request it, instead

Re: community website fails branding checks

> On Sep 13, 2021, at 8:32 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > If someone with more design chops than I could add the Apache logo to the > header of the page, we'll have all of the boxes ticket. I have some skills but no commit. And PR's are daunting for stuff like this. Is there a reason why we

Master branch in web site https://github.com/apache/comdev-site

I think now would be a good time to consider changing the main branch name from "master" to "main". WDYT? Craig Craig L Russell c...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional

Re: Attempt to "reboot" Apache Pivot community

Hi Rich, This is the best advice I have seen in a long time for projects facing reduced activity. It probably belongs in an FAQ to memorialize its wisdom. Best, Craig > On Aug 23, 2021, at 6:29 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > On 8/20/21 1:11 PM, Roger Whitcomb wrote: >> Hi all, >> My name

Re: New committer invitation template proposal

l#submitting> C. When creation of your account is noted, you will receive a follow-up message with next steps. We hope you accept and continue to make a difference in the project. On behalf of the [PROJECT] PMC, > On Jul 20, 2021, at 4:29 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 03:08

New committer invitation template proposal

Hi, I would like to suggest how we can improve the new committer onboarding process by changing the standard committer invitation email. This is after the new committer has been voted on and if PMC membership is offered, after the board has been notified with 72 hour notice. This will

New committer work flow: request ICLA much earlier in the process

Hi, I'd like to propose that PMCs consider requesting that significant contributors submit ICLAs earlier than when the PMC votes to invite a new committer to the project. What constitutes a significant contribution is left to the discretion of the PMCs. There are a few reasons to request

New committer work flow: check for ICLA already on file

Hi, I'd like to discuss the process for accepting new committers into projects. Our documentation is often used as a model for projects to use, and I believe it is not optimal. https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html The immediate concern is that Secretary often receives duplicate

Changes to new committer process guidelines

Hi, There are a few changes I'd like to propose to the published guidelines here: https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html#new-committer-process These changes will help to make the new committer process smoother as well as to avoid possible leakage of PII during the process. There are

comdev-site updates

Hi, I see that there are a few PRs for the comdev-site that have not been processed. I'm not a PMC member, nor a committer, but I'm happy to help if given the commit bit for the git repository. Regards, Craig Craig L Russell c...@apache.org

Update to templates for new committers

Hi, I've got an open action item to update the recommended ICLA process for new committers to avoid leaking PII. The page is https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html Can you tell me the current status of this page? Is comdev-site mirrored to github or do I need to use gitbox directly?

Re: Update to How it Works for developers/contributors

> On May 9, 2021, at 1:37 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> >> >> I'm proposing that any PMC member can review contributions and write an >> email to the contributor thanking them for their contributions and >> suggesting that they may want to submit an ICLA "to clarify the >> intellectual

Re: Update to How it Works for developers/contributors

on from the > new committer-to-do. This makes sure that the new committer is aware about > the new powers/responsibilities coming with it. > > Side comment: If some projects have a very high bar to become committers, > maybe they should lower the bar rather than ask for ICLA from their > c

Re: Update to ICLA to include github id

to be associated with one GitHub id so I think we are ok there. Happy to have operations verify this. Craig > On May 8, 2021, at 6:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 6:03 PM Craig Russell wrote: >> >> I propose to modify the ICLA to include the

Update to ICLA to include github id

I propose to modify the ICLA to include the submitter's github id. These days, with GitHub, projects propose new committers and all they really know about them is the contributors' github id. This sometimes makes it challenging for Secretary to find the corresponding PMC vote, which delays

Update to How it Works for developers/contributors

Hi, Looking at How it Works, I think it needs an update to reflect current thinking on community. 1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#developers I believe there is consensus that contributors are not only developers with their hands on the code, but: people who ask and

Re: How NOT to test OSS security

I'd say that the time is long past when we should expect such bogus patches to appear in our most popular projects. Some of these bogus patches might be very tricky and appear to be valid. Let's all watch out. Craig > On Apr 21, 2021, at 8:16 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > For those who

Re: New Apache.org product concept: Digital Merit Badges

Hi Matthew, Your message makes me think you did not get past Daniel's first eight words. If you read the message, he gives a few reasons to dislike badges. Your snarky response is not a good example of healthy community discussion. Craig > On Apr 5, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Matthew Sacks wrote: >

Re: ASF wide policy on github's squash and merge?

Hi Antonio, > On Apr 5, 2021, at 1:01 PM, antonio wrote: > > Hi all, > > First of all, apologies if this is not the proper list to ask these sort of > questions. If this is the case I'd appreciate some guidance on who to ask > these questions. IMHO this is a fine place to discuss this

Re: Board reporting project stats feature broken - Email stats seem to have zero weeks

Hi Mike, Take this for what it's worth... > On Mar 8, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Beckerle, Mike > wrote: > > It appears you are correct. There is tons of activity in our commits mailing > list, and our private list was also busy at that time, but dev was actually > quiet during the period both from

Re: Unclear/ambiguous statement in Maturity Model - RE30

Hi Sebb, https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html > On Mar 8, 2021, at 3:41 AM, sebb wrote: > > What does "and/or" in RE30 really mean? > Is it intentional? > > - > RE30 > Releases are signed and/or distributed along with digests that can be >

Re: One year anniversary of ALC Beijing

Congratulations to everyone involved in the Beijing ALC on this anniversary. I'm looking forward to meeting you all once the global disaster is under control. Best, Craig > On Feb 26, 2021, at 4:09 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi > > > This is Willem Jiang, the chapter leader of Apache

Re: Moderators needed for community.apache.org lists

nd > has a Jira open with Infra. > > I'm happy to be added as a moderator too. > > Thanks > Sharan > > On 2021/02/22 16:22:46, Craig Russell wrote: >> It appears that there are not enough moderators for the mentors@ list. >> >> If you can volunteer

Moderators needed for community.apache.org lists

It appears that there are not enough moderators for the mentors@ list. If you can volunteer to moderate this list (and the students@ list seems to have the same moderators) please speak up on this list. I'll volunteer to moderate both lists at this time. Regards, Craig Craig L Russell

Re: Apache Roadshow - China recap

Hi Ted, Thanks for sharing this. Great work and great response from the audience! Best regards, Craig > On Dec 14, 2020, at 9:33 PM, Liu Ted wrote: > > Dear Rich, Sally and Craig, > > Thank you for your support the Apache Roadshow - China (co-located with > COSCon'20). Here comes the event

Re: Audit of sub-processors 2020

There is no need for the project or Apache to do anything with this request. If you want to be polite, I'd say it's ok to respond and let them know that we're not going to take any action whatsoever. Just to avoid them "reminding" us... Craig > On Nov 17, 2020, at 6:08 AM, David Smiley

Re: [ALC]ALC Beijing Meetup August 16

Hi, Just for my understanding: is the event 14:00 ~ 17:30 in Beijing time? is the event in Chinese? Thanks, Craig > On Aug 10, 2020, at 8:53 PM, 适兕 wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The ALC [1] Beijing Chapter [2] will host a meetup (support online > participation) this weekend. > > This

Fwd: Multilingual Content (forwarded from apachecon planners discussion)

I think this may be worth a discussion here. I am totally in favor of being more inclusive by having presentations about Apache in multiple languages. There have been many presentations to non-English-native-listeners about Apache topics. I am a small bit concerned that translations of

Re: Question for can not access reporter.apache.org

I think it takes a while for these tools to catch up with reality. I can see ShardingSphere in the All Projects section of the tool. Is it ok now for you? Craig > On Apr 22, 2020, at 1:03 AM, zhangli...@apache.org wrote: > > Hi, > > I cannot access project shardingsphere in

Re: [VOTE] ALC Website with Git/Hugo framework

+1 (non-binding) Craig > On Mar 31, 2020, at 10:30 PM, Swapnil M Mane wrote: > > Hello team, > > We had a discussion on setting up the Apache Local Community (ALC) [1] > initiative website at > https://s.apache.org/4ge6w > > Here is the summary for the discussion, > > 1. ALC website will be

Re: [ALC] ALC Warsaw Event

+1 LGTM Craig > On Mar 31, 2020, at 10:30 AM, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > > Hello, > > As per ALC Event guidelines [1], we would like to ask for PMC approval > for the upcoming ALC Warsaw Event. The detailed agenda and speakers > can be found on the confluence page dedicated to this event: >

Re: [Announcement] - Establishing ALC Beijing Chapter

Congratulations to everyone involved in the new ALC in Beijing. I can only imagine how hard it is for you during the coronavirus situation and wish you a speedy resolution to the crisis. Best regards, Craig > On Feb 18, 2020, at 3:02 AM, Swapnil M Mane wrote: > > Hello all, > > ComDev PMC

Looking for community development stories

Hi, I'm working on a presentation to the Huawei Developer Conference in Shenzhen February 11 on the subject of "Growing Communities The Apache Way". I'd like to share with the audience some stories of Apache Projects that have grown their communities, either in the incubator or after becoming

Re: ALC, and who can speak on behalf of Apache

Hi Swapnil, I realize I'm coming late to this discussion but would like to offer a small bit of feedback. Like others, I think we need to try to get qualified people running local groups. One Member plus two PMC members gives us three, which is a magic number for decision-making here. Even if

Re: [DISCUSS] OSS-bot project sponsored by comdev

s "official", as long as > they use this project? This is a proof of concept and it's premature to discuss changing policy. Regards, Craig > > Thanks, > Ray > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 11:02 AM Craig Russell wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> tldr; I'd like to

[DISCUSS] OSS-bot project sponsored by comdev

help guide them in the Apache Way https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/OSSBotProposal Several people have already volunteered to help mentor the project, including Ted Liu, Liang Zhang, Willem Jiang, Junping Du and Craig Russell. But there are a few reasons that incubating

Re: on "meritocracy"

- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org >> >> Craig Russell Member, Apache Incubator PMC apache@gmail.com

Re: on "meritocracy"

Hi Griselda, I was thinking along similar lines: measuring where we are, setting goals, making policy, putting together a team to make it happen. I love your enthusiasm and hope we can actually create something great from your ideas. Just as we recognized the value in a fund-raising group,

Re: on "meritocracy"

To me, meritocracy was always a force-fit to describe what we strive for. The terms with -ocracy all have the intended effect of invoking a top-down rule system of governance. I reject all such descriptions of how Apache works. How about just "merit-based" as a guiding principle. We don't have

Re: Omission in vote summary email template

Hi Sebb, > On Feb 28, 2019, at 2:54 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 09:52, sebb wrote: >> >> The section: >> >> https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html#close-vote >> >> says to summarise the binding vote counts only. >> >> I think that is wrong on two counts: >> -

Re: Omission in vote summary email template

Hi Sebb, This page needs more than a little bit of work. I've been looking at both the community.apache.org pages and the apache.org/dev pages and they are not synchronized well and have missing information. I'm particularly keen to fix the processes for discussing, voting, inviting, and

Re: Proposed process for recognizing *Non-Technical* Contributions

Hi Mark, > On Jan 21, 2019, at 10:50 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 21/01/2019 17:59, Roy Lenferink wrote: >> I think it is an excellent idea to suggest submitting an ICLA to >> contributors when they submit a contribution. > > Generally, adding barriers to participation reduces contributions

Re: Proposed process for recognizing *Non-Technical* Contributions

> On Jan 20, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi Sharan, > >> On Jan 13, 2019, at 5:59 AM, Sharan Foga > <mailto:sha...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi Craig >> >> One thing that we have done in OFBiz is that when a contributor re

Re: Proposed process for recognizing *Non-Technical* Contributions

n actually start assigning tasks > (including the non technical ones) to themselves. > > Perhaps this could be one of the potential suggestions that we could include > for projects. > > Thanks > Sharan > > On 2019/01/10 15:52:19, Craig Russell <mailto:apache@gmail.co

Re: Proposed process for recognizing *Non-Technical* Contributions

Hi Sally, > On Jan 10, 2019, at 12:53 AM, Sally Khudairi wrote: > Great writeup and I can wholeheartedly agree with everything except this: > 3) All project/committee participants are encouraged to sign an ASF ICLA in > order to have their contributions recognized. With my Secretary hat on:

Re: Beam's recent community development work

I realize that this message might be hard to read since copy/paste formatting is gone. So here goes my attempt to clarify... On Jan 7, 2019, at 8:28 AM, Craig Russell wrote: Hi Kenn, Thanks for contributing this. I think it's a nice introduction to Beam's community building efforts. Here

Re: Beam's recent community development work

Hi Kenn, Thanks for contributing this. I think it's a nice introduction to Beam's community building efforts. Here are a couple of comments: We want our contributor-base (hence committer-base) to be more spread across companies and backgrounds, for the usual Apache reasons. I'd elaborate

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

ker wrote: >>> I like this template suggestion. It may also be helpful to note >>> that the >>> Apache ids must be letters and numbers only as some people request >>> special >>> characters in their ids. >> >> Not to toot my own horn too much,

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

atches our syntax). Could be > an idea to point to that for easy ICLA work :) > > >> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 09:24, Craig Russell wrote: >>> Hi Hugo, >>> >>> The intent is for the PMC member sending the invitation to do the check >>> befor

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

rwise follow this instead. > > Thanks, > Hugo > >> On Dec 29, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> In order to simplify the process of granting new committers write access to >> a project's repository, I'd like to propose a change

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

is proposed change. After I update the community page, there are references from other pages that will need to be changed. And I'd like to have each community that has their own templates start using an adaptation of this one. Craig > > Thanks, Tony > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018,

Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

Hi, In order to simplify the process of granting new committers write access to a project's repository, I'd like to propose a change in the invitation letter sent to candidates after the PMC has voted to accept them as committers. The original is at

Re: Keeping PMC communications public when possible -- is an obvious-looking address responsible?

Hi Julian, I've read this thread and I'm afraid I don't understand the problem you're trying to solve. For wide-reach public information we already have committ...@apache.org For wide-reach private information we already have memb...@apache.org For wide-reach private information that will

Re: The Apache Way and good developers don’t like to communicate

+1 to what Myrle says. I especially like the idea of engaging the submitter to discuss a pull request. Even if it's to say "Thanks for this. It looks perfect as is". But often, there will be a bit of back and forth. One potential problem is the work flow using the github tools, which can have

Re: Our Privacy Policy and GDPR

I'd suggest opening a LEGAL JIRA to track this issue. It will get the proper attention from VP Legal. Craig > On May 21, 2018, at 5:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 20/05/18 20:47, Michael Osipov wrote: >> Folks, >> >> is there any legal statement from the ASF how to

Re: New Member Orientation

Happy joy. Short and sweet. Craig > On Mar 14, 2018, at 11:36 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >> ...Bertrand (or, anyone else!!) do you still compose music? What are >> the chances we could

Update to web site

Hi, I made an update to the new committer guidelines at http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html to clarify that after a successful vote, there should be a message with subject [RESULT][VOTE]. The update failed because of permissions. Could someone on the PMC review the change and commit

Fwd: Forbidden

gust 9, 2016 at 10:12:51 AM PDT > To: infrastruct...@apache.org > > On 08/09/2016 07:10 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I updated the community web page via CMS, but cannot publish it. If I don’t >> have karma to publish it, should CMS allow me to get throug