Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-05-13 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:24 AM Shane Curcuru wrote: > Grant Ingersoll wrote on 5/11/17 10:41 AM: > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:01 AM Shane Curcuru > wrote: > ...snip... > > I'll be at AC on Thursday (work schedule got screwed up, so I have to > scale > >

Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-05-11 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:01 AM Shane Curcuru wrote: > > So, just over another month has gone by w/ no movement. Anyone still > > interested in this? > > > Yes, but not until after ApacheCon. Hopefully we can find a few > like-minded people to figure out a project plan in Miami? > I'll be at A

Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-05-10 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:36 PM Grant Ingersoll wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:46 AM Shane Curcuru > wrote: > >> >> >> Totally understand, although that will take a fair bit of custom coding > that people have to maintain, even if you are "just" wir

Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-03-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:46 AM Shane Curcuru wrote: > > > -- Branded (primarily) as an Apache Lucene/Solr powered search tool. > Fusion is also powered by Spark, Tika and a number of other ASF projects, FWIW. You have direct, secured access to Solr and all of the usual Solr constructs are avai

Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-03-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
https://github.com/lucidworks/searchhub has all the crawlers/setup already setup for a number of ASF projects (email, Github, websites, wikis, Stack Overflow) and a pretty easy framework for specifying others (I looked at the FOAF stuff, but it wasn't consistent enough to automate). Lucidworks (my

Re: Content Committee, ApacheCon 2014

2013-12-13 Thread Grant Ingersoll
ovides. Final schedule construction falls > > to the producer, and, I suppose, to me. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Rich Bowen > > rbo...@rcbowen.com > > http://rcbowen.com/ > > > > > > > -- > *Lewis* > Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers http://www.lucidworks.com

Re: Call for New Moderation Technology was Re: Call for moderators

2013-04-17 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Apr 17, 2013, at 7:04 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > On 17.04.2013 12:53, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> I don't know if this is the right list or not (infra?), but I saw the topic >> here (and it is the 4th or 5th such request I've seen in the past 3-4 >> month

Call for New Moderation Technology was Re: Call for moderators

2013-04-17 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I don't know if this is the right list or not (infra?), but I saw the topic here (and it is the 4th or 5th such request I've seen in the past 3-4 months) and in my mind it relates to improving the community, so I figured I'd discuss here first and then maybe we can take a proposal to infra@.

Re: increasing GSoC visibility within the ASF

2013-04-10 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > Folks, > > I perceive a low interest of our projects in GSoC. The list of projects that > submitted project ideas > that I compiled for Sally contained 33 entries of which some are subprojects > I believe. With 138 > PMCs plus 35 podlings, t

Re: Shared Calendars

2011-05-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll
alendar of events in the > past, if we provide some visibility for it maybe we can actually make it > worthwhile. > > Ross > > > >> >> Christian >> >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll >> wrote: >>> I'm c

Shared Calendars

2011-05-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I'm curious, do any projects have shared calendars? For instance, the thought occurred to me that I might put up a Google Calendar for Lucene or Mahout that is public read-only, but committers have write control on it. On the calendar, we could put things like potential release dates, reminder

Re: Capturing mail (was Re: Stackoverflow)

2011-05-14 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:47 PM, David Blevins >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Another thought. Sometimes I wonder how hard it would be to just allow >>>>> tagging and voting on top of a plain mailing list emails. A simple DB >> with >>>>> the messageId as the key for tags and vote count then a slightly >> fancier >>>>> archive view than we have now. And hey, markdown happens to look nice >> as >>>>> plain email. I've actually been indenting code snippets for years. >>>>> >>>>> I admit I like getting SO points and badges but they do not factor in >> at >>>>> all when looking for the right answer. >>>>> >>> >> -- Grant Ingersoll Lucene Revolution -- Lucene and Solr User Conference May 25-26 in San Francisco www.lucenerevolution.org

Re: Univ. Field Experience

2011-03-17 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Here's what I submitted: Site Name: (it's the only address I could find!) Apache Software Foundation Dept. 9660, Los Angeles, CA 90084-9660, U.S.A. - Contact: Grant Ingersoll VP, Apache Lucene gsing...@apache.org (For Lucene/Solr, Mahout, OpenNLP and Open

Re: Univ. Field Experience

2011-03-17 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Mar 17, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 17/03/2011 13:20, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >> On Mar 16, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: >>> >>>> Do I need Board approval? I think as an Officer of the ASF I can >>>> do some of this

Re: Univ. Field Experience

2011-03-17 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Mar 16, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> Do I need Board >> approval? I think as an Officer of the ASF I can do some of this, >> but want to make sure I'm proceeding correctly. > > No need to bother the Board. It's in our charter to provide whatever support > you need. It's nice t

Univ. Field Experience

2011-03-16 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I've been talking with a Prof. at a local university who heads up their Field Experience (FE) program and was mentioning that some of the projects I work on (most notably Open Relevance Project, Lucene, Mahout, OpenNLP) would fit really nicely with what his students are learning as part of their

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-27 Thread Grant Ingersoll
ed there in the first place. > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Grant Ingersoll >> wrote: >>> ...More or less, here's what I tell them: >>> 1. I won't answer any development questi

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-27 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Two cents on a slightly different, but related subject. I interviewed 3 different people this year and as part of that laid out my basic "mentoring" philosophy and each seemed a bit surprised by it at first (but they quickly get why), but to me it is a reflection of the Apache Way. More or les

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-22 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On the other hand, this has been the single criterion that has defined > successful students in Mahout (which is definitely less standards driven). > > In Derby and similar projects, I think that this can be interpreted > differently, but it sti

Re: GSoC mentee evaluation: Original ideas

2010-04-15 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:40 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 15/04/2010 23:00, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> Suggestion for next year, so I think d...@community is appropriate. >> Perhaps some folks on code-awards@ may have input, so CC'ed that list. >> >> I think those mentees that suggest original ideas fo