> > I seem to remember struggling with this specific naming decision when the
> > projects.a.o site was first put up.
> This was setup in the PRC, correct? (IIRC - PRC was split into comdev,
> conference, trademark, and press about 12 years ago)
I did that naming research and implementation in
> On Feb 4, 2022, at 8:51 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/4/22 11:03, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> As I understand the ASF governance there are:
>> 1. Project Management Committees -> Projects. For example: Apache Logging.
>> 2. Products which are named artifacts from projects. For example:
On 2/4/22 11:03, Dave Fisher wrote:
As I understand the ASF governance there are:
1. Project Management Committees -> Projects. For example: Apache Logging.
2. Products which are named artifacts from projects. For example: Apache Log4J
3. Releases which are released artifacts of a project’s
(Dropped press@ from reply)
I don't find the wording there too confusing if you know that "Projects"
includes both top-level and sub-projects. This seems obvious to me when the
site says "199 committees managing 351 projects", but that could be
clarified further by having it say "199 project
As I understand the ASF governance there are:
1. Project Management Committees -> Projects. For example: Apache Logging.
2. Products which are named artifacts from projects. For example: Apache Log4J
3. Releases which are released artifacts of a project’s product. For example:
Apache Log4J
