Re: Google Play change to Android ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permissions

ould we find a way of installing it so you can choose the > permission > > > on install time and then document that for using enableHighAccuracy you > > > have to use the ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission and gps feature? > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Discuss] cordova-plugin-geolocation release

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Pridham, Marcus wrote: > This change might cause issues if you have an Android application that > perhaps you want to use GPS on the phone but also want to allow to run on > Chromebooks? I got an email recently from Google about the >

Re: Google Play change to Android ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permissions

wrote: > Do it! > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > FYI. I'm going to create an issue to add this to the plugin.xml for > > geolocation later. > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: Goo

Fwd: Google Play change to Android ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permissions

FYI. I'm going to create an issue to add this to the plugin.xml for geolocation later. -- Forwarded message -- From: Google Play Date: Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:40 AM Subject: Google Play change to Android ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permissions To:

Re: [Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x

intended to get > pulled in as part of the Cordova Android 6 release: > https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/469 > > If it is, I have an additional commit to add that fixes the JS spec tests: > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-lib/pull/1 > > > On 13 September 2016 at 10:

Re: Regarding Cordova and Gamepad

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 7:56 AM, iono sphere <999ionosphe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am developing a game using Construct 2 which could export the project to > Cordova. Then, I could put the game into Crosswalk and play the game on my > Android. My Construct 2 game supports gamepad, and this is the

Re: [DISCUSS] Not requiring an iCLA for contributions

<purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > You decide per pr if you think it is trivial. > > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'll agree to this, since I don't know what the definition o

Re: [DISCUSS] Not requiring an iCLA for contributions

I'll agree to this, since I don't know what the definition of trivial is w.r.t. Apache. +1 On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Jesse wrote: > +1 > > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Shazron wrote: > > > Bump. There

Re: [Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x

b Support." > > From: > https://help.github.com/articles/why-are-my-contributions-not-showing-up- > on-my-profile/ > > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey > > > > So, this is exciting. Thin

Re: [Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x

er/ > framework/AndroidManifest.xml#L22 > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/master/ > test/AndroidManifest.xml#L48 > > Maybe I looked into the wrong place and that is not being used > > > > El martes, 6 de septiembre de 2016, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com >

Re: [Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x

it when bumping up to API 24, but an issue would be nice. > > El martes, 6 de septiembre de 2016, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> > escribió: > > > Merging the nougat_update code today. Master will now be targeting API > 24. > > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM

Re: [Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x

Merging the nougat_update code today. Master will now be targeting API 24. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I already added android-24 to that line, and now the error is even > more explicit and it's telling me straight up to install

Re: [Android] Need a solution to config.xml and AndroidManifest.xml feature requests

; > > > > > > > > > > >android:label="@string/app_name"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x

e/cordova-android/blob/master/.travis.yml#L9 > > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > BTW: The nougat update has been added, but this broke our CI > > > > https://travis-ci.org/apac

Re: [Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x

BTW: The nougat update has been added, but this broke our CI https://travis-ci.org/apache/cordova-android/builds/156860827 Can we get android-24 added to Travis? On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds good! > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at

Re: [Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x

Sounds good! On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:48 AM, julio cesar sanchez <jcesarmob...@gmail.com> wrote: > You asked for a reason to NOT do it, so if there is no answer you can do > it. > > > > 2016-09-01 17:44 GMT+02:00 Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>: > > >

Re: [Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x

BUMP!!! This is a major version! Are people getting my e-mails? On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey > > This week, I'm going to start merging things that will break certain APIs, > such as the Third Party WebView. This is done so

Re: Merging gradle_respect into cordova_android master today

to determine whether CordovaLib/CordovaAAR is a dependency for gradle dependency management, and reading every gradle file isn't a good solution. If people have any thoughts about this, or want to help, please let me know. Joe On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:

[Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x

Hey This week, I'm going to start merging things that will break certain APIs, such as the Third Party WebView. This is done so we can have solid compatibility with Nougat, as well as fix some threading issues that people are having when embedding CordovaWebView in native projects. Before I do

Merging gradle_respect into cordova_android master today

Hey After leaving this pull request open for a couple of weeks, I'm going to land it into the master of Cordova-Android at the end of the day. Can people take one final look before I land this thing in? https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/323 Let me know if you have any questions

Re: Does Cordova 6.0.0 support iOS 10 and Android N operating systems?

As of right now, Cordova-Android does work on N, but the following doesn't work: 1. Window Resizing 2. Camera We have been working on fixing these issues and adding support for API 24, but that will be in the next major version of Cordova-Android, which will probably be in the next major version

Re: [VOTE] cordova-android@5.2.2 release (Attempt 2)

I vote +1 * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos * Ran Mobile Spec Auto Tests * Created Hello World application using tag * Created Hello World application using CLI On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Steven Gill wrote: > Please review and vote on this

Re: [Android] What is Cordova Plugin Fake, and why is it missing a gradle file?

r script 'test-build) > is not part of `npm test`. > > My guess is the file was inadvertently not checked in to git thus the test > failure. > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey > > > > I just noticed that t

[Android] What is Cordova Plugin Fake, and why is it missing a gradle file?

Hey I just noticed that travis broke on this test that someone wrote for plugin installation, and I have a few questions about it. 1. Where is the repo for this test? 2. What is fakeLib, and why doesn't fakeLib have a gradle file copied over (all plugins are required to have if if it doesn't

[Android] API change: Where to put a utility method?

Hey So, after working on the Camera fix for Android N, I found that we need the Java plugins to be able to get the Application ID, and that we shouldn't expect the application ID to be the same as the namespace of the application, so I propose we add a getBuildConfigValue to Cordova. The only

Re: [VOTE] cordova android 5.2.2 release

I vote -1 The latest cordova-common in this release doesn't work properly and keeps giving me a JS error saying that pluginInfo.getEditConfigs is not a function. This appears to be something added in the past month. On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) <

Re: [Android] FileProvider Hell

ompat? > > > El martes, 26 de julio de 2016, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> escribió: > > > Hey > > > > It looks like we're hit by this change in Android, which makes it so that > > we can no longer use file providers. There's an easy fix, but it's

[Android] FileProvider Hell

Hey It looks like we're hit by this change in Android, which makes it so that we can no longer use file providers. There's an easy fix, but it's not a pretty one. We're going to have to add Android-Compat as a dependency for Cordova. This is really bad, and could cause a lot of things to screw

[Android] Road to 6.0.0

Hey So, after the 5.2.2 release of Android, I think we should start merging the API breaking changes that we have setup for 6.0.0 into mainline. If we need to do another patch release of Cordova-Android, we should do that on the 5.2 branch. We currently have the following waiting to go in:

Re: Resigning

Hey I believe that you can resign your committership and PMC membership and go emeritus on this project. http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#emeritus The main advantage I can see in becoming emeritus and giving up committership is that it's one less account you have to worry about. Also,

[Android] Framework Fixes POC - Adding ability for Plugins to be written as Android Library Modules

Hey I recently got around the brittleness with the framework_fixes branch of cordova-android adding modules by reading in the module's gradle file and checking for the dependency. It slows down plugin installation, but since the GradleBuilder.js is super simple, I really don't think there's a

Re: Proof of Concept: Plugins as Android Modules

Hey Does anyone have a solution to the problem I'm facing with Gradle dependencies. I can use some more eyeballs on this. Thanks Joe On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > I know, that's extremely annoying, and I would like to remove that &

[Android] Dropping support for ICS and CB-8834

Hey I'm looking through old issues, and I noticed that CB-8834 is still open because we still needed to support ICS, but since we're no longer supporting ICS, should we add the ability to force install an APK, even if the version numbers are all screwed up? Thoughts? Joe

[Android] Creation of 5.0.x branch and addition of Cordova-Android 6.0 featues

In case anyone missed the Snapchat hints today, an Android N release is imminent and I think it's important that we make sure that we release the latest version of Cordova built against that target as soon as possible. Because of other API changes, we should make sure that we support the old

Re: [Vote] 5.2.0 Android Release

I vote +1 * Ran coho audit-license-headers * Ran through testing section at https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/platforms-release-process.md#what-to-test On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Steven Gill wrote: > Please review and vote on this 5.2.0

Re: Proof of Concept: Plugins as Android Modules

a-android/compare/master...infil00p:framework_fixes#diff-417ebeefa9eab114cf248463f6886bbaR103 > [2] > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/compare/master...infil00p:framework_fixes > > - > Best regards, Vladimir > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Bowser [m

Cordova on API Level 24 (Android N)

Hey I took a quick look at the Android N API changes and saw that there's a few webview changes, namely the change to shouldOverrideUrlLoading(). I have a branch here where I've added a few of the changes and it seems to work, but I still have more testing to do.

Re: Proof of Concept: Plugins as Android Modules

t somebody read it and support > it. > > > 2016-06-14 22:58 GMT+02:00 Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>: > > > Hey > > > > Here's a proof of concept for Android Modules. It works for cordova core > > plugins, but it's kinda brittle because I need to figure out how to

Re: [Discuss] Why was device.name removed from the device-plugin?

t case, nothing? and > document it > > We return manufactur + model in that case. > > @Joe: the devices I checked had pretty useful BT sharing names. And it is > functionality belonging to the device. Where else would it belong to? > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Joe Bow

Re: [Discuss] Why was device.name removed from the device-plugin?

-1 This is a new feature and something we never supported. The model feature was the user-readable type of phone on Android (i.e. Nexus 5X) where the name was the in-house codename for it, in this case bullhead. When we switched to device.model, we removed device.name. Getting the Bluetooth

Re: Android 6 permission prompts for Web APIs

It should be added as a plugin, similar to Geolocation for consistency. I don't want to try adding it to core again because that turned out to be a bad idea since we don't know which webview we're running. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016, 4:34 PM Darryl Pogue wrote: > Hey folks (in

Proof of Concept: Plugins as Android Modules

Hey Here's a proof of concept for Android Modules. It works for cordova core plugins, but it's kinda brittle because I need to figure out how to handle dependencies and excluding duplicate compilation in our tools. https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/tree/framework_fixes

Re: New whitelist jira issue and merge request

Please stop sending the same email with a slightly modified header. We did receive this pull request, and someone will look at it when they are available. Thanks Joe On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Close, Rob wrote: > Hi, > > The Jira issue:

Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 5.2.0 Release

wrote: > Support for incremental prepare (PR #295) has been merged. We should be > ready for a release. > > -Nikhil > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:52 PM > To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org> &

Re: [FYI] If you are using Gmail, emails from microsoft.com may be in your Spam folder

Yeah, that's definitely making things frustrating. I was wondering what was going on. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Carlos Santana wrote: > thanks, I had a few there, how do I tell Inbox that it's not spam? > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:57 PM Steven Gill

Re: Proposal: Change Android Project Directory Structure to Android Studio style

change which ensures most plugins for Android do not stop working. > > [1] > https://github.com/search?q=%22res%2Fxml%2Fconfig.xml%22+filename%3Aplugin.xml=searchresults=Code=%E2%9C%93 > [2] > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/compare/master...infil00p:studio_project_structu

[Android] Deprecating project.properties

Hey After doing more exploratory work on migrating the Android project's structure from the old Eclipse structure to the new Android Studio structure, I realize that we're very heavily reliant on project.properties, even though the build API level sub projects are now specified in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 5.2.0 Release

Do we have an N PR yet? I've seen the proposal, but not the PR. On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can we merge the android N PR too? > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > O

Re: re-write tests for new Android JUnit test framework

idea how to do this except that we should do this because we may run into the day when our Instrumentation doesn't work anymore, and it's something that's been on the backburner for a while. (I'm glad we still have working tests). > Tony > > On 5/25/16, 5:50 PM, "Joe Bowser"

Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 5.2.0 Release

> On 5/25/16, 3:31 PM, "Carlos Santana" <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >+1 > > > >- Carlos > >@csantanapr > > > >> On May 25, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> >

[DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 5.2.0 Release

Hey I know that we haven't done a minor release for a few months for Android, and I think that we have enough worthwhile changes in Android that we should probably do a release soon. If possible, I would like for us to do a 5.2.0 release with the versioning fix, and the other build script fixes

Re: Yet another Cordova-Android 6.0.x release thread, and another 5.x release soon

I was going to say something more witty here, but I haven't had coffee yet. :P I think I'm going to start another thread for a 5.2 release at this point, since I want to see that happen before 6.0.x On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > That w

Re: Yet another Cordova-Android 6.0.x release thread, and another 5.x release soon

ng or be bit after) > > > > And as normal process we need to care and feed both branches (master & > > 6.x) having them green and CI testing as Android N builds come out. > > > > Any plugins need a 6.x branch corresponding to cordova-android@6.x > > branch, I

Re: Yet another Cordova-Android 6.0.x release thread, and another 5.x release soon

mp version? > > Can we implement one first let's say June call it 6.0 and continue > releasing each month or as features get implemented 6.1, 6.2, etc. . > > Which will be the first one that make most sense to implement? New Studio > Project? > > - Carlos > @csantanapr &g

Yet another Cordova-Android 6.0.x release thread, and another 5.x release soon

Hey Since Google IO didn't really throw any new features at us, and since Google hinted at Android N being released at the end of August, do people think that aiming for a Cordova-Android 6.0.x release in September with the following features makes sense: * Android Studio project structure *

Re: Proposal: Change Android Project Directory Structure to Android Studio style

> > Thanks, > Richard > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 3:51 PM > To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Proposal: Change Android Project Directory Structure to > Android Studio s

Re: Proposal: Change Android Project Directory Structure to Android Studio style

ved around. Does your proposal handle that or do plugins need to update > to reflect the new structure? I figure there isn't much we can do for > plugins that use hooks. > > > >Richard > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] &g

Proposal: Change Android Project Directory Structure to Android Studio style

Hey I know people have been waiting for this for a very long time, but I wrote up a proposal to change the project so it's an Android Studio project. Given that Android Studio is on 2.1.1, I think it's time we moved forward and changed things around. Proposal PR is here:

Fwd: Android Studio Security Alert: Update to Android Studio 2.1.1

This is pretty important, and the vulnerability has been out for a week now but has just been released for Studio. (Upstream IntelliJ had it patched) Everyone using Studio should update ASAP. -- Forwarded message -- From: Android Studio Developer Support <

Re: Extended LTS version

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:19 AM, julio cesar sanchez < jcesarmob...@gmail.com> wrote: > But for the CLI? For each platform? > > I don't think it makes sense on iOS platform where a new iOS version is > released every year and apple ends forcing to use latest SDK sooner or > later, and on new

Re: proposal for new core plugin to control screen orientation

Agreed. I'm not even sure why we need this plugin, but I will most likely ignore it like I do the statusbar plugin, which I also thought wasn't necessary. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Darryl Pogue wrote: > I think this is a good feature to have as a supported core

Re: [Android] New Bridge: evaluateJavascript

Simon Mac Donald > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hey, I'm bumping this thread up and creating an issue for this. > > > > > > https://issues.ap

[Android] Ending support for Ice Cream Sandwich?

Hey So, it's been a while, but it looks like we should really drop support for ICS, because Crosswalk is dropping support for ICS. https://crosswalk-project.org/blog/deprecate-40.html So, yeah, I think we should drop support for ICS. I know it's been a "Meh, why not?" thing for people to

Re: [Android] New Bridge: evaluateJavascript

10 March 2016 at 16:29, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Darryl Pogue <dar...@dpogue.ca> wrote: > > Semver aside, this change sounds good to me. I've definitely encountered > >> some bizarre issues with the online/offline event

Re: Users mailing list

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Nikhil Khandelwal < > nikhi...@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> I’m hearing two purposes of a user list: >> - Key announcements >> - Self-h

Re: Users mailing list

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Nikhil Khandelwal wrote: > I’m hearing two purposes of a user list: > - Key announcements > - Self-help for users > > I’m not totally convinced that slack + stack overflow are not sufficient > for finding resources & common answers for

Re: Users mailing list

On Apr 28, 2016 5:37 PM, "Shazron" wrote: > > Perhaps it's time for a users mailing list. No dev is expected to answer > questions on it. > I like this expectation. With the migration to the PhoneGap Adobe Forum from the defunct Google Group, a users list now makes sense.

Re: [DISCUSS] Patch release for Cordova Plugin File

How critical is this? How many devices have removable external storage? Why can't this wait for a full plugins release? On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, 11:08 AM Raghav Katyal wrote: > Recent release of cordova-plugin-file introduced an app crash scenario > when external storage

Re: Publishing the AAR after the next release of Cordova

y, April 8, 2016 12:43 PM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: Publishing the AAR after the next release of Cordova > > +1 to adding it > > El viernes, 8 de abril de 2016, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> escribió: > > > BTW: I contacted asfinfra to be added to

Re: [Android] Library Project/AAR alternatives to current plugin situation

on, but here's the tool that links > RN plugins into RN app projects: https://github.com/rnpm/rnpm, > https://github.com/rnpm/rnpm-plugin-link > > > Jason > > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 10:12 A

Re: Publishing the AAR after the next release of Cordova

BTW: I contacted asfinfra to be added to the ASF org on BinTray, so we'll see how that goes. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey > > So, here's something that I want to put on the dev list before we do it, > which is that for the next

Publishing the AAR after the next release of Cordova

Hey So, here's something that I want to put on the dev list before we do it, which is that for the next release of Apache Cordova, we publish an AAR on JCenter/BinTray and/or MavenCentral/Sonatype with the new release. Basically, this is a convenience package and we could technically do it now,

Re: [Android] Library Project/AAR alternatives to current plugin situation

r can you publish on >> github >> the plugin as library project (I mean the plugin with the changes you >> made, but without the cordova sample project) >> >> 2016-04-07 2:51 GMT+02:00 Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>: >> >> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016

Re: [Android] Library Project/AAR alternatives to current plugin situation

he changes you > made, but without the cordova sample project) > > 2016-04-07 2:51 GMT+02:00 Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>: > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Does this aligns in a similar w

Re: [Android] Library Project/AAR alternatives to current plugin situation

iew use case, not even with plugman. > > Did you publish it on jcenter or mavencentral? or can you publish on github > the plugin as library project (I mean the plugin with the changes you > made, but without the cordova sample project) > > 2016-04-07 2:51 GMT+02:00 Joe Bowser <bows..

Re: [Android] Library Project/AAR alternatives to current plugin situation

egap.com/develop/1-embed-webview/ios/#pods > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey > > > > I recently looked at how native Android developers could use the current > > Cordova code with their projects, and I've no

[Android] Library Project/AAR alternatives to current plugin situation

Hey I recently looked at how native Android developers could use the current Cordova code with their projects, and I've noticed that there's some major problems with our current approach of just copying the Java classes into a project, such as resources getting merged together, and other related

Re: [DISCUSS] Core Plugins and Android API 23

C%2fqlI%3d > > > > > > > > 2016-04-03 18:43 GMT+02:00 Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Simon I like approach > > > Can we move to this approach now? Yes Then once the downstream > > > distro's support API 23 and the new API

Re: [DISCUSS] Core Plugins and Android API 23

gt; >> wondered why it was retained for media. > > > >> Was this an oversight? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks! > > > >> Tony > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > &g

Re: [BUG] CB-10944 NoSuchMethodError in InAppBrowser plugin

> risingj.com > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I managed to get a repro on a Jellybean device. > > > > BTW: Nexus devices can be downgraded in a pinch, but I usually test my > > KitKat stuff on a Moto E, bec

Re: [BUG] CB-10944 NoSuchMethodError in InAppBrowser plugin

d > > -----Original Message- > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:41 AM > To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [BUG] CB-10944 NoSuchMethodError in InAppBrowser plugin > > Are you sure? I couldn't reproduce this on my K

Re: [BUG] CB-10944 NoSuchMethodError in InAppBrowser plugin

probably document > that somewhere or have medic print it out; I'll look into doing that. > > Thanks, > Richard > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 8:43 AM > To: dev <dev@cordova.ap

Re: [BUG] CB-10944 NoSuchMethodError in InAppBrowser plugin

Seriously, it would be super helpful to know which version of Android this failure happened on. I'm having a really difficult time trying to reproduce this bug, and I'm not keen on just throwing things at the CI to see what passes. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.

Re: [BUG] CB-10944 NoSuchMethodError in InAppBrowser plugin

Well, that's an easy fix, but it would be helpful to know which AVD is failing, since I have no idea which version of getDrawable() is falling apart. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30266971/why-getdrawable-doesnt-work-on-some-android-devices On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Dmitry Blotsky

GitHub pull request housekeeping

Hey So, I don't know about the other repositories, but cordova-android on GitHub has a lot of pull requests that are obviously never going to be accepted because they're out of date or are not on the master branch. Since we have no plans to merge things onto 3.7.x or the 4.1.x branches, it would

[Android] Need a solution to config.xml and AndroidManifest.xml feature requests

Hey So, if you've been paying attention to the JIRA, we've been getting slammed with a ton of feature requests/bugs regarding the Android Manifest where people want to add a 1:1 mapping between the two XML files. The thing is that it's getting out of control, and we need to find a better

Re: Does Cordova have a problem making developers happy?

t;I tried to answer what I can, but reading it daily which is not every > >day that I get something probably most every other day with a few. > > > >At least reading all the new questions gives me a sense on what people > >are having problems on. > > > > > >

Re: Does Cordova have a problem making developers happy?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Jesse wrote: > Never trust people's answers when you ask them what they like! They are > almost always wrong, and will tell you what they think they like, or think > they will seem cooler if they liked. > > +1 It's interesting that

Re: Does Cordova have a problem making developers happy?

not PhoneGap, Ionic, Taco or the other distributions. > > > Ryan J. Salva | Principal PM Manager > Visual Studio Tools for Apache Cordova > rsa...@microsoft.com > 425 706 5270 office > 206 612 5079 mobile > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gma

Re: Does Cordova have a problem making developers happy?

nswers are largely driven by the > checkbox options. > > So, we somehow pissed off the Stack Overflow guys??? > > > Ryan J. Salva | Principal PM Manager > Visual Studio Tools for Apache Cordova > rsa...@microsoft.com > 425 706 5270 office > 206 612 5079 mobile > &g

Re: Does Cordova have a problem making developers happy?

BTW: The last one was a joke. But in all honesty, we should all spend a bit more time on Stack seeing what's going on there with our respective products/distributions. On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:23 PM

Re: Android N

1. I don't want to use a Kanban board. 2. I did some initial investigation and the WebView on N isn't ready to be used. There's crashes the moment you try and resize a cordova application, and it's clear that we should probably wait until the next Developer Preview before we do anything. As far

Re: [Android] New Bridge: evaluateJavascript

t say it was a private API what I meant is that based on what you > > shared that this Will be a new public API another bridge people can use > > with the current API not broken. > > > > So a minor bump on the version is OK > > > > - Carlos > > @c

Re: [Android] New Bridge: evaluateJavascript

. > > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I don't think we

Re: [Android] New Bridge: evaluateJavascript

and lower versions of Android? How do we support them? > Do we use ONLINE_EVENT if we detect were are running on those versions of > Android? > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:36 PM Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So, apparently some people are reporting that the ONLI

[Android] New Bridge: evaluateJavascript

So, apparently some people are reporting that the ONLINE_EVENT bridge that we currently use by default in Android has a race condition when you start using more than one WebView in an application. Even though we decided to not support the case of having multiple webviews in an Application, it's

Re: Can we please kill the Battery Plugin on Android

Actually, we already document this as clear as possible in the README.md for the plugin. I think this is a very serious understatement. https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-battery-status On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On M

Re: Can we please kill the Battery Plugin on Android

ek, I'd say we would have lazy > consensus and you can delete the Android part of the plugin (maybe prep the > PR now) > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey > > > > Once again, I ran into someone using the Battery Plugi

Can we please kill the Battery Plugin on Android

Hey Once again, I ran into someone using the Battery Plugin that actively kills the Battery on Android, and can we please discourage people from using this very broken plugin that we have no ability or intention of fixing? The reason I don't want to fix it because the browser already supports it

Re: [Android] CB-8976, CB-8453 and is there anyone building multiple APKs

OK, because I'm paranoid about this one due to the backlash I think it could get, here's a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/270 Can people review it and let me know if this makes sense? Then we can merge it in. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Joe Bowser <b

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >