Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries

2012-03-02 Thread Noah Slater
Dave, Please leave the binaries in place, or remove them. I, myself, leave them in place. I then replace them with for the next round. Please do not use "rcX" anywhere in the release artefact name. It sends the wrong message. Thanks! On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > H

Re: Please report your indexing speed

2012-03-02 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
# localhost, mac with vmware fusion internal network to windows 7 vm Disk: /dev/disk0 Device / Media Name: APPLE SSD TS128C Media Solid State: Yes dave@akai slow_couchdb % ./bench.sh small_doc.tpl Testing 5 of small_doc.tpl in batches of 1 all with js 1.8.5, I can c

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries

2012-03-02 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
Hey folks, We're aborting in line with the 1.2.0 source release, so I've moved the binaries https://people.apache.org/~dch/dist/1.2.0/rc2/ Thanks very much for your testing -- this week has been chaotic with our move to Vienna so I hope to get some proper couch time again next week. Dirkjan, Ale

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Good catch, will do in the morning. Cheers Jan -- On 02.03.2012, at 20:00, Noah Slater wrote: > Have you updated NEWS and CHANGES? > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> >> On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote: >> >>> Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1424) make check hangs when compiling with R15B

2012-03-02 Thread Dave Cottlehuber (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13221251#comment-13221251 ] Dave Cottlehuber commented on COUCHDB-1424: --- FYI. I've not had these hangs on

Re: Elixir

2012-03-02 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Yo, > > What do peeps make of this: > > http://elixir-lang.org/ > > Thanks, > > N I thought it would be really coold to have a view server with that. The only problem I see is the lack of sandboxing you have with javascript. - benoît

[jira] [Updated] (COUCHDB-1427) Replication task not cancelled when documen was deleted from _replicator db

2012-03-02 Thread Robert Newson (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Newson updated COUCHDB-1427: --- Summary: Replication task not cancelled when documen was deleted from _replicator db (was:

Elixir

2012-03-02 Thread Noah Slater
Yo, What do peeps make of this: http://elixir-lang.org/ Thanks, N

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Noah Slater
Have you updated NEWS and CHANGES? On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote: > > > Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part. > > > > Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks: > > > > * Bob Dionne will driving

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1427) Kept trying to run erratic replications half an hour after I'd deleted their docs from _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Kurt Milam (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13221143#comment-13221143 ] Kurt Milam commented on COUCHDB-1427: - here's the finally-fixed replication doc - th

[jira] [Created] (COUCHDB-1427) Kept trying to run erratic replications half an hour after I'd deleted their docs from _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Kurt Milam (Created) (JIRA)
Kept trying to run erratic replications half an hour after I'd deleted their docs from _replicator -- Key: COUCHDB-1427 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUC

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote: > Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part. > > Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks: > > * Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424 > * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426 > * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R1

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Noah Slater
Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part. Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks: * Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424 * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426 * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R15B patch * Robert Newson will be driving the performance work

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:02 , Noah Slater wrote: > I think we should, at a minimum: > > * Abort this round > * Land the R15B patch > * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy) > * Start round three > > I think we should try to: > > * Try to land COUCHDB-1424 > * Get clarification on the performance i

[jira] [Assigned] (COUCHDB-1426) error while building with 2 spidermonkey installed

2012-03-02 Thread Benoit Chesneau (Assigned) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benoit Chesneau reassigned COUCHDB-1426: Assignee: Benoit Chesneau > error while building with 2 spidermonkey installe

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Robert Newson
+1. Abort this, get the fixes we have in and start round 3. The performance regression issue is elusive, we might, out of necessity, have to defer action on that until post 1.2.0. On 2 March 2012 16:02, Noah Slater wrote: > I think we should, at a minimum: > > * Abort this round > * Land the R15

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:02, Noah Slater wrote: > I think we should, at a minimum: > > * Abort this round > * Land the R15B patch > * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy) > * Start round three > > I think we should try to: > > * Try to land COUCHDB-1424 > * Get clarification on the performance is

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Noah Slater
I think we should, at a minimum: * Abort this round * Land the R15B patch * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy) * Start round three I think we should try to: * Try to land COUCHDB-1424 * Get clarification on the performance issues For these last two items, I think we should impose a time limit

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On Mar 2, 2012, at 16:47 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> Proposed Action: >> >> I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following points mentioned >> in the release notes (the exact wording of which is to be done): >> >> 1. Note that this rel

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Proposed Action: > > I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following points mentioned > in the release notes (the exact wording of which is to be done): > > 1. Note that this release is incompatible with Erlang R15B. A patch is > available

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Robert Newson
+1 On 2 March 2012 15:29, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Thanks Benoit! > > * * * > > As an update to the ongoing 1.2.0 release these issues were raised: > >  - Performance regression (A thread on dev@) >  - Multiple Spidermonkey version detection (COUCHDB-1426) >  - R15B icu_driver compatibility (git bra

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Stefan Kögl
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > I just created a replication doc under 1.1.1 and then copied the > _replicator.couch file to a 1.2.x. On update I the expected result > Robert also got ("Only the replicator can edit replication documents > that are in the triggered state.". a

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Thanks Benoit! * * * As an update to the ongoing 1.2.0 release these issues were raised: - Performance regression (A thread on dev@) - Multiple Spidermonkey version detection (COUCHDB-1426) - R15B icu_driver compatibility (git branch R15B0-driver) - R15B make check hang on Mac OS X Lion (COU

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
I just created a replication doc under 1.1.1 and then copied the _replicator.couch file to a 1.2.x. On update I the expected result Robert also got ("Only the replicator can edit replication documents that are in the triggered state.". a curl -X DELETE on the doc with ?rev=4-abcd... (no quotes)

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1426) error while building with 2 spidermonkey installed

2012-03-02 Thread Paul Joseph Davis (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13220966#comment-13220966 ] Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-1426: I'm so confused. JSOPTION_ANONF

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Robert Newson
yes, you should be able to delete it (I can, locally). Running out of ideas but could you try double quotes around the rev? i.e, ?rev="131-57b4da8d3163468cb0bbf4fd30c87832" B. On 2 March 2012 14:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Was the replication doc created in a 1.1.x CouchDB? > > Cheers > Jan > -- >

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Was the replication doc created in a 1.1.x CouchDB? Cheers Jan -- On Mar 2, 2012, at 14:58 , Stefan Kögl wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Robert Newson wrote: >> could you redo the DELETE or PUT with '-sv' so we can see what's >> really being sent? Perhaps there's a weird shell thing h

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Stefan Kögl
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > could you redo the DELETE or PUT with '-sv' so we can see what's > really being sent? Perhaps there's a weird shell thing happening > causing the rev to be sent incorrectly. $ curl -sv -X DELETE "http://stefan:*@127.0.0.1:5984/_repli

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Robert Newson
could you redo the DELETE or PUT with '-sv' so we can see what's really being sent? Perhaps there's a weird shell thing happening causing the rev to be sent incorrectly. On 2 March 2012 13:51, Robert Newson wrote: > tbh you should be getting this error: 'Only the replicator can edit > replication

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Robert Newson
tbh you should be getting this error: 'Only the replicator can edit replication documents that are in the triggered state'. I do. B. On 2 March 2012 13:38, Stefan Kögl wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> can you try >> http://stefan:youpassword@127.0.0.1:5984/_repl

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Stefan Kögl
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > can you try > http://stefan:youpassword@127.0.0.1:5984/_replicator/mygpo?rev=131-57b4da8d3163468cb0bbf4fd30c87832 >                   ^^^ - note the auth info > > Same with the PUT. > > This is something that has changed in 1.2

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On Mar 2, 2012, at 14:11 , Stefan Kögl wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> On Mar 2, 2012, at 13:25 , Stefan Kögl wrote: >>> Again something I noticed during my 1.2.x experiments: It seems I >>> can't update or remove a document from the _replicator database, which >>

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Stefan Kögl
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > On Mar 2, 2012, at 13:25 , Stefan Kögl wrote: >> Again something I noticed during my 1.2.x experiments: It seems I >> can't update or remove a document from the _replicator database, which >> I use for pull-replication into my 1.2.x instance. >

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-523) View API POST keys to retrieve multiple docs by key could also allow for multiple 'range' queries, i.e. an array of { startkey: .., endkey: ... } params in the POST

2012-03-02 Thread Ludovic Patey (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13220899#comment-13220899 ] Ludovic Patey commented on COUCHDB-523: --- Could there be a preview of the future syn

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round

2012-03-02 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > Posted a patch fixing COUCHDB-1426. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1426 After some discussions, I made the issue none blocking but critical. I'm now +0 I guess. - benoît

[jira] [Updated] (COUCHDB-1426) error while building with 2 spidermonkey installed

2012-03-02 Thread Benoit Chesneau (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benoit Chesneau updated COUCHDB-1426: - Priority: Critical (was: Blocker) Affects Version/s: 1.3 make it non bloc

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On Mar 2, 2012, at 13:25 , Stefan Kögl wrote: > Hi, > > Again something I noticed during my 1.2.x experiments: It seems I > can't update or remove a document from the _replicator database, which > I use for pull-replication into my 1.2.x instance. > > # get current _rev > $ curl http://127.0.0.

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Robert Newson
also I think it's ?rev= not ?_rev= On 2 March 2012 12:34, Robert Newson wrote: > The document is updated periodically, I expect you just had the wrong _rev? > > On 2 March 2012 12:25, Stefan Kögl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Again something I noticed during my 1.2.x experiments: It seems I >> can't updat

Re: Update Conflict for PUT/DELETE in _replicator

2012-03-02 Thread Robert Newson
The document is updated periodically, I expect you just had the wrong _rev? On 2 March 2012 12:25, Stefan Kögl wrote: > Hi, > > Again something I noticed during my 1.2.x experiments: It seems I > can't update or remove a document from the _replicator database, which > I use for pull-replication i

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1426) error while building with 2 spidermonkey installed

2012-03-02 Thread Benoit Chesneau (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13220869#comment-13220869 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1426: -- @filiippe thanks for the test @dav

Re: Crash of CouchDB 1.2.x

2012-03-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On Mar 2, 2012, at 11:29 , Stefan Kögl wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> Where in there did you do the git pull? And was a make clean or git clean >> involved? > > IIRC I did not pull in between, only apply the patch I mentioned > earlier ( http://friendpaste.com/1

Re: Crash of CouchDB 1.2.x

2012-03-02 Thread Stefan Kögl
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Where in there did you do the git pull? And was a make clean or git clean > involved? IIRC I did not pull in between, only apply the patch I mentioned earlier ( http://friendpaste.com/178nPFgfyyeGf2vtNRpL0w ). And I probably did a make clean &