Re: [PROPOSAL] Improving the quality of CouchDB

I dont think CI is a dream, It should take an afternoon at most to get CouchDB setup on travis on a single platform to ensure no major regressions come though. If anyone wants help doing that feel free to ping me on #pouchdb / #couchdb, we already test couchdb master in travis. I do think

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improving the quality of CouchDB

And if anyone wants to make a start on travis https://github.com/pouchdb/pouchdb/blob/master/.travis.yml and https://github.com/pouchdb/pouchdb/blob/master/bin/run-couch-master-on-travis.sh Should get you most of the way there On 10 September 2015 at 11:40, Dale Harvey

CouchDB Weekly News – Submissions

Hello all! please send me submissions for the CouchDB Weekly News if you have any!! Especially for - News in the CouchDB and PouchDB universe - Opinions, good articles/talks - Interesting use cases - CouchDB related events Your support is much appreciated. Have a great day! Katharina

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improving the quality of CouchDB

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Dale Harvey wrote: > I do think multirepos is an issue and that solution is not so simple, we > went through the same issues with pouchdb as we attempted to split out our > repository. > If I understand correctly, this is what we do now...

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improving the quality of CouchDB

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Dale Harvey wrote: > I dont think CI is a dream, It should take an afternoon at most to get > CouchDB setup on travis on a single platform to ensure no major regressions > come though. If anyone wants help doing that feel free to ping me on >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improving the quality of CouchDB

> On 10 Sep 2015, at 12:18, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Dale Harvey wrote: >> I dont think CI is a dream, It should take an afternoon at most to get >> CouchDB setup on travis on a single platform to ensure no major

[PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list

Hello, I would like to open mailing thread for CouchDB designers, design advocates, and design enthusiasts. It is a place to discuss all things design related with respect to CouchDB. It could be a good place for people to learn about design. Michelle Phung

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list

Good idea, Michelle! One idea that I think could be powerful for a group like this is to explore d3 Data journalism is a strong wave and CouchDB and d3 are a perfect match. It's also showcase Couch in a powerful way outside the DBA group. Other 2D and 3D graphics libraries in JavaScript might

[BLOG] The CouchDB Weekly News, September 10, is out!

Hi everybody! Here we go with the CouchDB Weekly News: http://blog.couchdb.org/2015/09/10/couchdb-weekly-news-september-10-2015/ Including: Discussions: CouchDB _rewrite A proposal to enhance quality by new testing

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improving the quality of CouchDB

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Ilya Khlopotov wrote: > > Is there a way to publish an Erlang module for downstream users > independently of git? If yes, we could move back to a single-git-tree > model for > CouchDB, but we can still release parts as independent modules. I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list

Will repeat myself from IRC: Why not to reuse www@ ML, which is abandon now, for web design bits? -- ,,,^..^,,, On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Michelle Phung wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to open mailing thread for CouchDB designers, design advocates, > and design

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove oAuth for 2.0

+1 On 09/10/2015 06:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Heya all, > > I just had occasion to look into 2.0s oAuth support and it looks like chttpd > doesn’t ever talk to couch_httpd_oauth. > > In addition, oAuth in 1.x has only ever been half-baked (no automatic > handling of tokens among many

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list

I think a design mailing list would be great. > On 10 Sep 2015, at 4:24 PM, Johs Ensby wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 10. sep. 2015, at 16.15, Michelle Phung wrote: >> I recently was asked how to render a front end application visualization >> that could

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove oAuth for 2.0

+1 to delete. I would rather limit the scope of CouchDB 2.0 and rather focus on getting the core out. > On 10 Sep 2015, at 7:06 PM, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > -1. We need to fix this, not drop. > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Jan Lehnardt

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove oAuth for 2.0

Oh, and I don’t know anyone who uses this. Best Jan -- > On 10 Sep 2015, at 18:18, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Heya all, > > I just had occasion to look into 2.0s oAuth support and it looks like chttpd > doesn’t ever talk to couch_httpd_oauth. > > In addition, oAuth in 1.x has

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improving the quality of CouchDB

> On 10 Sep 2015, at 18:31, Robert Kowalski wrote: > > Hi Jan, > > how would testing of a PR/change work in practice? > > Example: I am opening 3 Pull-Requests that depend on each other, one in > chttpd, one in fabric and one in rexi. > > Or is the idea that the testsuite

[PROPOSAL] Remove oAuth for 2.0

Heya all, I just had occasion to look into 2.0s oAuth support and it looks like chttpd doesn’t ever talk to couch_httpd_oauth. In addition, oAuth in 1.x has only ever been half-baked (no automatic handling of tokens among many other things), it is not maintained, and it is barely documented.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improving the quality of CouchDB

Hi Jan, how would testing of a PR/change work in practice? Example: I am opening 3 Pull-Requests that depend on each other, one in chttpd, one in fabric and one in rexi. Or is the idea that the testsuite turns red when the deps are updated in the top level module? On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:09

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove oAuth for 2.0

-1. We need to fix this, not drop. -- ,,,^..^,,, On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Oh, and I don’t know anyone who uses this. > > Best > Jan > -- > >> On 10 Sep 2015, at 18:18, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >> Heya all, >> >> I just had occasion

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improving the quality of CouchDB

Cool! I like the idea! :) On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > On 10 Sep 2015, at 18:31, Robert Kowalski wrote: > > > > Hi Jan, > > > > how would testing of a PR/change work in practice? > > > > Example: I am opening 3 Pull-Requests

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Michelle Phung wrote: > You didn’t say it like that exactly in irc :P but you did allude to it :) > > I thought you meant that if I opened a design@ML that people would use it > sparsely as they used the www@ML sparsely. :) Then I was not

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list

Kxepal, You didn’t say it like that exactly in irc :P but you did allude to it :) I thought you meant that if I opened a design@ML that people would use it sparsely as they used the www@ML sparsely. :) We could reuse www@ but its a narrow label for all things design. Although www@ML as a name

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list

> On 10 Sep 2015, at 19:50, Michelle Phung wrote: > > Kxepal, > > You didn’t say it like that exactly in irc :P but you did allude to it :) > > I thought you meant that if I opened a design@ML that people would use it > sparsely as they used the www@ML sparsely. :) > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove oAuth for 2.0

> On 10 Sep 2015, at 19:06, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > -1. We need to fix this, not drop. The feature is already very poor, hard to understand and configure, and again, I don’t know anyone who is using this. “Fixing” this would, imho, mean, starting from scratch and making

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove oAuth for 2.0

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> On 10 Sep 2015, at 19:06, Alexander Shorin wrote: >> >> -1. We need to fix this, not drop. > > The feature is already very poor, hard to understand and configure, and > again, I don’t know anyone who is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove oAuth for 2.0

> On 10 Sep 2015, at 20:20, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>> On 10 Sep 2015, at 19:06, Alexander Shorin wrote: >>> >>> -1. We need to fix this, not drop. >> >> The feature is already

RE: CouchDB Weekly News – Submissions

Hey Kathrine, Thanks for rounding all these things up. Sad I missed todays shipment of great news, but here's some items for next week (full disclosure, two of the talks below are mine): ApacheCon: Big Data in Budapest will feature four CouchDB related talks: CouchDB 2.0: The Awkward Bits -