+1, but...
Old release branches could be just dropped without a worry. If something
there wasn't released since today - well, nobody actually has any need for
it. If someone does - make a release, tag it and drop the branch.
Unexpetable action.
90 days is quite long. 30 would be more than enough
This obviously will break all the current PR to master branch just because
of naming. Is it worth this?
What problems renaming will solve? And why does that suddenly become
important?
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 6:40 PM Paul Davis
wrote:
> Howdy Folks!
>
> Words matter. I've just
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 7:17 PM Joan Touzet wrote
>10:07 * In the 20.x series don't got below 20.3.8.11 There was
> a nasty monitor
> related bug in Erlang that davisp fixed
> https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/bb3f1ed6945a8cca2efa1a571f26e831911944a1
>
Oh...I
+1
P.S. Though I would raise it even to 20. Move fast with the new features!
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:55 AM Jay Doane wrote:
>
> Currently, CouchDB requires at least OTP 17 or later to build and run
> [1][2]. However, recent work undertaken to eliminate compiler warnings
>
passed
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 12:30 AM Joan Touzet wrote:
>
> Testing to see if this gets through.
1.x, you was good and we'll never forget you, but it's time to move
forward to better CouchDB future.
+1, bury it!
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Joan Touzet wrote:
> DISCLAIMER: This is a non-technical proposal to make a project decision.
> Per our Bylaws[1], this means that
+1
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Joan Touzet wrote:
> Hello PMC Members and developers,
>
> Subsequent to the confusion recently over the proposed change to an
> as-of-yet-unreleased API change, and follow-on concerns that existing
> HTTP API endpoints not be
Thanks, Jan!
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Dear CouchDB Community,
>
> The Apache CouchDB development team is proud to announce the
> immediate availability of version 1.7.1.
>
> 1.7.1 follows shortly after 1.7.0 because some users have
+1. Ship it!
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I would like to release Apache CouchDB CouchDB 1.7.1-RC1.
>
> Changes since 1.7.0:
>
> - Fix authorisation issue with /db/_all_docs:
>
+1
Gentoo Linux, Erlang 20.1
P.S. docs miss a bits about R20 support and ejson improvements, but I
feel these are not blockers - docs always has what to improve and we
can update online version in anytime.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
FYI:
https://medium.com/@excieve/benchmarking-couchdb-views-abb7a0a891b2#.y8os5bk3v
--
,,,^..^,,,
> Fixed by removing couchdb alltogether
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904288#c7
--
,,,^..^,,,
Does anyone confirm these issues for voted candidate?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-3145
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-3146
IIRC there are few else issues about invalid escaping and error
handling in backlog.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:39 PM,
Paul,
_metadata is our special database which is valid.
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-cassim/blob/master/src/cassim_metadata_cache.erl#L63-L64
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> I'm pretty sure its saying that you're trying to
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> I’d really like a 1.7.0 release to go alongside 2.0.0, Alexander, what’s your
> status on this?
Fighting with the tests. Won't make it today, sorry. But hope for
tomorrow to propose candidate for the review and to vote for.
Robert,
This is an old bug that compactor has no matter what Erlang version
was used. I hit it during work on munin-couchdb:
https://github.com/gws/munin-plugin-couchdb/#open-files
Graph shows what will happen if you'll compact a lot of databases
continuously for some time. I recall how I with
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Preview here: http://jan.prima.de/couchdb-2.0/
Please remove "Data sync done right" - that's not true. Our
replication is far from"done right" state and has quite a large room
for improvements. Let's be honest with ourselfs
Good concern. Indeed noone needs a database without clients
ready-to-go. From our side it would be good to have nano updated /as
well as jquery.couch/.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> from Joan’s excellent blog post about
t;
> wrote:
>> New logging also doesn't actually have stdout as an option but that'd
>> be a trivial change to make. Though the name of the writer could be
>> weird.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> I'd say we keep 1.x behaviour of logging to file by default with an option to
> override to stdX for the envs that want that.
Actually, 1.x behaviour is about to log both to stdout/stderr and file
at the same time. Package
Indeed, missed that. Thanks!
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote:
> Two different processes. :)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 18 Jul 2016, at 10:51, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:29 PM, wrote:
> +exit(Worker, {timeout, ibrowse_stream_cleanup}),
> +exit({timeout, ibrowse_stream_cleanup})
Why exit twice? Will the second cause any effect?
--
,,,^..^,,,
Please keep:
developer-preview-2.0
1994-merge-rcouch
1994-merge-rcouch-multi-repo
1956-attachment-handling
Thanks.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Heyall,
>
> in light of 2.0 getting real, I’d like to clean up the git repo.
>
> We have A
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Constantin Teodorescu
wrote:
> Just wanted to know where are (in 2.0 release) the old files:
>
>- _utils/script/jquery.couch.js
>- _utils/script/base64.js
>- _utils/script/sha1.js
>- _utils/script/json2.js
>
> I'm using
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> We have patches going into FreeBSD & OSX Homebrew for 19.0 support of
> 1.6.1 atm now with Eugene's efforts. From my side I am OK to shepherd
> this through the release process, in & around my couple of weeks holiday
> in
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Robert Kowalski wrote:
> Couch 1.x and Couch 2.x will choke as soon as the indexer tries to
> process a too large document that was added. The indexing stops and
> you have to manually remove the doc. In the best case you built an
> automatic
Finally we are sure that CouchDB is used for really big data in the wild (:
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Link here:
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/hackers-breach-us-company-and-unwittingly-expose-154-million-voter-records-505553.shtml
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>> On 18 Jun 2016, at 01:07, Ilya Khlopotov wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We at Cloudant using our own bug tracker. Quite often we have two tickets
>> opened for the same problem.
>> One ticket is in ASF JIRA
I think that's better call feature/improvements freeze, since we still
have to commit the code that includes bugfixes.
+1
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> +1 for code freeze.
>
> The only changes we will merge to master branches must
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Ilya Khlopotov wrote:
>
> Thank you for you feedback and great discussion. It looks like I am the only
> one who prefer multi-repo model (with tools assistance).
You're not alone, actually, but it's hard to fight with reality now. I
think we
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 19 Apr 2016, at 21:06, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Nolan Lawson <no...@nolanlawson.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Jan, a setup wi
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Nolan Lawson wrote:
> Thanks Jan, a setup wizard sounds awesome. Believe me, no one would be
> happier than me to deprecate add-cors-to-couchdb! :)
What had happened with the story about enable CORS by default, btw?
--
,,,^..^,,,
Congratulations, Nolan! (:
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Nolan Lawson wrote:
> Thanks, Jan and Garren!! I'm happy to join up with such a fine and
> welcoming community. :) Here's to a great 2016 for CouchDB!
>
> Cheers,
> Nolan
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>> On 18 Apr 2016, at 10:57, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> we are getting close to 2.0. In the list of blockers, there are only two
>> issues left that aren’t docs, that we’ll need some concerted
Hi Paul!
Yes, Admin Party is harmful and must be fixed if your CouchDB gain
access not only from localhost. There are no doubts on that.
CouchDB 2.0 will force you to fix it if you're going to setup a cluster.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Paul Hammant
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> It's a thread derail but this notion that we're being "fairly rude" needs
> resolving. It might be lost to history now but we got here, I think, with the
> best intentions of ensuring all the code that appears in
Hi Paul!
Thanks for great input!
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> If anyone has a strong objection to a monolithic Erlang repo I'd like
> to hear it. Otherwise I may work up a lengthier and more thorough
> proposal for dev@ to consider
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Ilya Khlopotov wrote:
>
> > - If you rebase/update any of your subcomponent PRs you must update
> commit hash on apache/couchdb one;
>
> Above is an error prune step which actually makes the following false
> > - No new new steps/files/work
Hi Robert,
Point about flattening to a single repository is valid: in the end, we
have our apps repos in broken state all the time as they are not
declare their decencies. So noone can pick fabric@master and run it -
he'll spend quite a lot of time to figure the deps of the right
versions. But
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Mutton, James wrote:
> Is the proposal to calculate and store the md5 as a meta field, or to
> calculate md5(_rev, body) at request time? Doing this at request time would
> be very expensive for heavily loaded servers.
Good point and
+1 if we also add X-Couch-Document-Rev so something that reflects the
_rev value in HTTP headers.
Currently, while Etag matches the _rev value, it makes quite handy
feature for getting the document revisions without fetching whole the
body. To not break this feature, we need to introduce
^5!
I curious how we would upgrade for Erlang 19 in this way (:
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:09 PM, robertkowalski wrote:
> GitHub user robertkowalski opened a pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/689
>
> node5
>
>
>
> You can
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Constantin Teodorescu
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
>
>> As part of a new effort to improve replicator performance I'm planning to
>> add new built-in filter functions. These run in the
Hi Bastian!
> Failures with reason "eunit_replicator"
Replicator tests were fixed very recently and should be fine since *now*.
> Failures with reason "eunit_compression"
Compression failure is something new and seems like we're rarely flaky
in this test. Need magic debug io:format/2 for the
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Clemens Stolle <
clemens.sto...@fastmail.com> wrote:
> CouchDB now has an official docker image:
> https://hub.docker.com/_/couchdb/
>
Thank you a lot for this!
--
,,,^..^,,,
Hi!
I'm +1 to see JWT auth support in CouchDB.
The code will be need to pass review, IP clearance and else
procedures, but the idea is good in anyway.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Darío Cravero wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After today's discussion on Twitter with
Congratulations, Garren! (:
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Michelle Phung wrote:
> Happy Birthday Garren!!
Finally, this is happened. Congratulations, Ilya!
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee
> has elected Ilya Khlopotov as a
to public project infrastructure.
This election was made in recognition of Ilya's commitment to the
project. We mean this in the sense of being loyal to the project and
its interests.
Please join me in extending a warm welcome to Ilya!
On behalf of the CouchDB PMC,
Alexander Shorin
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Bastian Krol
wrote:
>>> you can also just send them as PR to
>>> https://github.com/apache/couchdb-documentation
>>
>> +1 for the docs for permanent documentation.
>
>
> Thanks for the replies. I'll send a PR to couchdb-documentation
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Clemens Stolle
<clemens.sto...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> Am 25.01.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi Clemens!
>>
>> My own opinion below:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:32 PM,
Hi Eli!
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Eli Stevens (Gmail)
<wickedg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Clemens Stolle
> <clemens.sto...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>>> Am 25.01.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com>:
>>&
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Clemens Stolle
<clemens.sto...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> Am 25.01.2016 um 20:04 schrieb Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Clemens Stolle
>> <clemens.sto...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>> Why did you think that idea to keep CI documentation in the couchdb-ci
>> repository is bad?
>>
>> - couchdb-documentation is the place for project documentation. CI
>> could be described there from the point how to setup
Hi Clemens!
My own opinion below:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Clemens Stolle
wrote:
> - Should we use ubuntu and the PPA instead of building from source? The
> ubuntu base image is 60MB bigger than debian's.
We don't provide any PPA builds to use, especially
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Robert Kowalski wrote:
> is there anyone for couchdb core available? it would be cool to join
> forces on one topic that requires changes in fauxton and the core.
Wouldn't regular workflow be enough for such kind cooperation: ask
question on
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Robert Kowalski wrote:
>> We're stable community (;
>
> cool that you want to volunteer as we are such a stable community. :))
No sure what I will do on that celebration of life, but you know how
to call me (;
--
,,,^..^,,,
Hi Nick,
That's my fault definitely. The fix should be simple, however.
This is our file:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-snappy/blob/master/c_src/snappy/snappy-stubs-public.h
This is their:
https://github.com/google/snappy/blob/master/snappy-stubs-public.h.in
Their rules:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick North wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what you are proposing here. Are you saying we should
> run autoconf for the snappy code? There is an earlier commit in
> couchdb-snappy repository that removed autotools, saying they did not work
> well
Hi Bastian,
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Bastian Krol
wrote:
> Right now we clone/update the repo from git and then run "./configure &&
> make all check dist" and that's it. I wonder if that is enough? Currently I
> am not doing anything with the binary or the
>>>>> - - issues and issue history
>>>>>>> - - pull requests (there are two currently open where I do not have any
>>>>>>> opinion, sorry!)
>>>>>>> - - startgazers
>>>>>>> - - wiki
&g
Where is my pirate flag? YARRR! (:
P.S. There is no any attachment - our MLs strips them eventually.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
> OH NO ... I forwarded the wrong email. I am very sorry!!! Please be
> fair and ignore the attachment.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
> gosh ... you are right Alex. Anyway - I wrote to JetBrains in panic that
> they invalidate the license ... let's see ...
>
> Damn! It's too late ;-)
>
> Good night
>
> Andy
>
> P.S.: I hate when I make mistakes like this :(
Hi everyone!
Following the PouchDB discussion[1].
TL;DR we have quite a lot[2] of functions defined in the global
context of executed JS functions (map, show, list, etc.). While
everything is quite simple: read the docs @ use a function, this makes
life harder if you want to write unit tests for
Hi Garren,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Garren Smith wrote:
>
> This is an interesting idea. I think passing the emit function in is a good
> idea and might make somethings easier in PouchDB. I would rather a map
> function looked something like this
>
> function (doc,
ify, web pack, requirejs etc
> So a full example would be
>
> function (doc, emit) {
>var isArray = require(‘helpers’).isArray;
>var allHelpers = require(‘helpers’);
>
>
> }
>
> That is my 2 cents worth.
>
> Cheers
> Garren
>
>> On 02 Dec 2015, at 2:4
Why oranges are more tasty than lemons?
Apache HTTPD is just a web server with no backend storage, logic, etc.
CouchDB is a database with HTTP interface (read web server + backend).
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Andy Wenk wrote:
> Hey,
>
> this is an
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Giovanni Lenzi wrote:
> I'm writing you privately because I don't want the main thread to go
> off-topic
Well, no (:
> Thanks for your roadmap to 1.7.0.. seems very very juicy!
>
> About the "COUCHDB-2752: Validate Host header" in your
Dear CouchDB team,
While we're all working on 2.0 is in progress, I fear that we'll end
this year without a single release. Technically, there is only one
month left till 2016 excluding holidays, but let's be honest - that's
not enough for 2.0. So I propose the plan for 1.7 release to not end
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Tomas Novysedlak
wrote:
>
> Just a quick one. How about long promised
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1415 ?
I'll take a look, but no promises. I'm also not quite sure which exact
changes fixed this for 2.0 and will
Hi everyone!
I'm happy to announce our new ML: couch...@couchdb.apache.org !
TL:DR mailto:couchapp-subscr...@couchdb.apache.org
Recently we had quite hot discussions around about CouchApps and their
future. This is complex topic, that lies on the border line of user,
dev and marketing ML, so
Hi everyone!
We didn't run our regular meetings for a long time...
Time to get back our good old tradition! See y'all on the next meeting in
#couchdb-meeting on irc.freenode.org at 19:00 UTC, Wednesday as usual.
The meeting room:
irc://irc.freenode.net/couchdb-meeting
Or you can access the
Good news that there are no bad news (:
Since noone objects, will proceed with following plan.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> Recently we had quite hot discussions around CouchApps feature: what
>
Hi everyone.
Recently we had quite hot discussions around CouchApps feature: what
the future it has, what the problems it has, what the plans people
have on it and so on, but basically we have a lot of talks, but only.
However, these discussions showed that we have quite enough people in
our
>> >>>>>>> checking, less preprosessor and other build tools that let you keep
>> >> a
>> >>> well
>> >>>>>>> organized ddoc as a source project (in one couchdb document) and
>> you
>> >>>>>>> publich a ddoc to any targe
Welcome, Michelle!
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Garren Smith wrote:
> Congratulations Michelle. This is great news.
>
>
>> On 19 Oct 2015, at 11:52 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> Dear community,
>>
>> I am delighted to announce that
Congratulates, Garren! (:
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I am delighted to announce that Garren Smith joins the Apache CouchDB Project
> Management Committee today.
>
> Garren has made outstanding, sustained
Good news!
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:59 PM, ermouth wrote:
> PS. Code was reviewed by @kxepal (Alexander, thank you for it!), and
> received several not yet fixed non-critical remarks. I‘m working on
> cleaning em up. Please note: this preview is NOT intended for production
>
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Ilya Khlopotov wrote:
> None of them perfect though. Even though going with elixir would provide
> technological advantage. It would impose a steep learning curve on
> developers.
Sure. But I think it doesn't really matter what to learn: a
Hi Iliya,
I'll add my 5 cents.
Current test suite isn't perfect. It's actually the same what we have
with etap + few cosmetic improvements and isolated on resource usage.
It must be improved, no doubt and any move on this way is all welcome!
Most of our tests issues are actually not about fight
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Johs Ensby wrote:
> will you welcome ermouths rewrite contribution?
The decision is depends on the implementation. If it will be good, why
not? Finally, CouchDB is open source project: we cannot forbid people
right for contributions, we only welcome
Hi, ermouth!
I think that's good idea at least from point of consistency: if we
have other function in Javascript or else language, why we can't have
the same for rewrites? This will remove any need to learn new special
DSL that rewrites uses now and be limited by it.
As about performance, it's
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Jason Smith wrote:
>
> 1. Basically swap the current system with Perl-compatible URL rewrites. So
> if you know Perl or sed, now you can rewrite couch requests.
vmx proposed usage regexp in rewrite rules long time ago:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Michelle Phung wrote:
>
> I have been sick with the flu for the past week, so I haven’t had time to set
> it up yet, and announce.
> I will be out next week as well, so no time then either. (ApacheCon!)
Get well and take care!
> But it is
; Agree that is not crazy at all, on the contrary. I am using Inliner now
>>> > and it is a very good candidate to extend into Medium-like community
>>> app.
>>> > Integration with AFS mailing list would then be possible to customize
>>> for
>>> > "
Hi,
The lists of CouchDB committers and PMC members are available on
people.apache.org:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#couchdb
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#couchdb-pmc
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Giovanni Lenzi
SOON, I’d be okay with
>> keeping it.
>>
>> At this point, we are not discussing additional features for 2.0.
>>
>> If we get JWT, it goes into 2.1.
>>
>> Best
>> Jan
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 11 Sep 2015, at 16:50, Klaus
negative and
useless. No need to afraid any critique, especially if it comes with a
reason.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 14 Sep 2015, at 12:08, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jan
&g
Good morning, Michelle!
That's really good idea to choose better platform for target audience
which simplifies main use cases. Should be interesting experiment (:
The problem could be with the policy that all the ASF project
discussions should happens on ASF mailing lists. So, with using
still not clear exactly what would be considered on-topic for the
>> > proposed space (Fauxton? Couchapps? Anything with a CouchDB backend?).
>> >
>> > To my old-fashioned MVC brain, the model is separated from the view by
>> > the controller, which means th
Hi Jan
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> We agreed on a “Yes and…”-style of feedback, and it looks like that we
> are defaulting to a “But…”-style feedback.
Could you explain what are "Yes and..." and "But..." feedback styles
and how they are different?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Klaus Trainer <klaus_trai...@posteo.de> wrote:
>
> On 09/10/2015 08:20 PM, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>> Seems like there are no much options.
>>
>> I disagree that it's very poor. The only flaws it has is the lack of
>> RSA s
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Dale Harvey wrote:
> I dont think CI is a dream, It should take an afternoon at most to get
> CouchDB setup on travis on a single platform to ensure no major regressions
> come though. If anyone wants help doing that feel free to ping me on
>
Will repeat myself from IRC:
Why not to reuse www@ ML, which is abandon now, for web design bits?
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Michelle Phung wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to open mailing thread for CouchDB designers, design advocates,
> and design
-1. We need to fix this, not drop.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Oh, and I don’t know anyone who uses this.
>
> Best
> Jan
> --
>
>> On 10 Sep 2015, at 18:18, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> Heya all,
>>
>> I just had occasion
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Michelle Phung wrote:
> You didn’t say it like that exactly in irc :P but you did allude to it :)
>
> I thought you meant that if I opened a design@ML that people would use it
> sparsely as they used the www@ML sparsely. :)
Then I was not
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 10 Sep 2015, at 19:06, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> -1. We need to fix this, not drop.
>
> The feature is already very poor, hard to understand and configure, a
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Robert Kowalski wrote:
>> So, what is the immediate next step that you propose to fix or improve?
>> What is the most squeaky wheel, or the most modest gain that we can make?
>
> I think one of the biggest problems is that we don't have a working
Hi Robert,
TL;DR what's the step-by-step plan?
P.S.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Robert Kowalski wrote:
> [2] https://cloudup.com/cOgxRPbt9aP
> [3] https://cloudup.com/c0VJDIoYqmI
Flash... /:
--
,,,^..^,,,
Welcome to CouchDB, Clemens! (:
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Robert Kowalski
robertkowal...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee
has elected Clemens Stolle as a CouchDB committer.
Apache ID: klaemo
1 - 100 of 1603 matches
Mail list logo