Re: FOSDEM 2017 Open Source Conference - Brussels

2017-01-12 Thread Benoit Chesneau
either way their COC doesn't comply to *your* standards. Fosdem is the event to go if you would like to meet many technologies and meet really different people and not the usual average attendee of trendy conferences. If you're really curious ans open then the fosdem is the event to go in europe.

Re: [VOTE] CouchDB Logo - Round #3

2015-04-08 Thread Benoit Chesneau
-1 Paul Davis -1 Nick Pavlika globe -1 Nick Pavlika pentagon/hexagon -1 Nick Pavlika couch (I like the second one down the most) -1 Brad Noble -1 Sean Barclay -1 Constantin Angheloiu +1 Old logo On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Alexander Shorin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > here we start third roun

Re: CouchDB Committters Meetup 2015-02-08 right after CouchDB Day

2015-02-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau
unfortunately my planning was already fixed when this was announced and I won't be there. Among the thing I hope you will be able to talk are the following: - what is the plan to add auto-balancing to the cluster - what do you think about reducing the number of sub projects. It's actually very pa

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2310) Add a bulk API for revs & open_revs

2015-01-27 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14293459#comment-14293459 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-2310: -- sorry i have been horribly

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2310) Add a bulk API for revs & open_revs

2015-01-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14264488#comment-14264488 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-2310: -- [~janl] correct :) > Add

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2310) Add a bulk API for revs & open_revs

2015-01-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14264486#comment-14264486 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-2310: -- Sorry, I didn't see that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Naming releases

2014-11-01 Thread Benoit Chesneau
dedicating a releease is the worst idea i've seen on this mailing-list since a long time. Couchdb is the a result of a team and community work. dedicating a work will just split more people and is prone to conflict. I you want to put a name then choose a charayers,animal, ie something neutral. Any

Re: master release doesn't run

2014-10-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
://github.com/robertkowalski/couchdb/commit/2eaf50b16c4f0001a1fe1478330be2e77ce20896 which could explain why a release is not well tested or why it could hangs. What is the position of other devs on this? - benoit > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Benoit Chesneau > wrote: > &

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2384) Provide configuration options for lager

2014-10-13 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14169949#comment-14169949 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-2384: -- The rcouch branch has all

Re: Moving swiftly towards 2.0

2014-10-12 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > Hey everyone. > > master has been stable for a number of weeks now. We should start moving > towards releasing CouchDB 2.0. > > What does that mean? I think the items remaining, before we can consider > a release candidate are limited to: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Erlang whitespace standards (was: [POLL])

2014-10-12 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Following these guidelines: https://github.com/inaka/erlang_guidelines should be enough imo. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. - benoit On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > reindent: > @# requires either vim 7.4, or > github.com/vim-erlang/vim-erlang-runtime

master release doesn't run

2014-10-12 Thread Benoit Chesneau
I dunno if I missed something after a succesful build, running couchdb failed: https://www.friendpaste.com/7AjX8IxnwIQT11maMtD3f0 I guess it's a problem of starting the auth cache before having the user db created but not sure. Before reporting it to jira, is there any step in between before simp

Re: More View Changes Input

2014-10-11 Thread Benoit Chesneau
hat make sense? > What i could say. Getting changes for a group / doc makes sense I guess though it is not what the rcouch merge branch was about and not the reason i given the code for. - benoit > > Ben > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Benoit Chesneau > wrote: > &

Re: More View Changes Input

2014-10-03 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:57 PM, benjamin.bast...@gmail.com < benjamin.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, what Paul said is correct. > > As far as replication, you would be able to manually mediate a view > replication with the view changes feed, but there's no built-in > functionality to do it for

Re: More View Changes Input

2014-10-03 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:12 AM, benjamin.bast...@gmail.com < benjamin.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > So, the view changes PRs have been hanging out for a bit (review welcome!) > but things have changed a fair bit since I last emailed wider dev > community. Bob's had a chance to do a bit

Re: View changes API

2014-08-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
> > As far as signaling to the user if a key was updated or removed, I'm a bit > more partial to the idea of storing the operation in the value of the seq > tree. That we we could avoid doing a btree lookup in the log tree for every > row in the seq tree fold at query time. > > The log is mainly he

PMC resignation

2014-08-16 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Hi all, Yesterday, some members of the PMC asked me on the private mailing-list to rename the opencouch project because of possible trademark infringements without any direct contact before. They did it after I linked the project in a discussion on irc [1]. The same request has already been done

Re: merge, where is the doc?

2014-08-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau
15 Aug 2014, at 08:10, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Paul Davis > > > wrote: > > > >> Benoit, > >> > >> I'm not exactly sure what you're asking for here. As I read it, it > >> sounds like you&#

Re: View changes API

2014-08-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:20 PM, benjamin.bast...@gmail.com < benjamin.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: > For filtered replication, I think it'd be good to keep the rcouch > filter=_view optimization when the appropriate flag is enabled. If the > flags aren't enabled, fall back on the old, inefficient st

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.1-rc.1

2014-08-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Robert Kowalski wrote: > > I might be wrong, I think that according to semver this would raise the > > version number to 1.7 , http://semver.org/ says: "Given a version number > > MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, incr

Re: merge, where is the doc?

2014-08-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > Benoit, > > I'm not exactly sure what you're asking for here. As I read it, it > sounds like you're wanting documentation both on the merge process > itself and then documentation on all the various things the merge > introduces. As to the merg

Re: View changes API

2014-08-13 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:27 AM, benjamin.bast...@gmail.com < benjamin.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > I've been working on merging the view changes functionality from rcouch > into CouchDB. I've made a few (hopefully) uncontroversial tweaks, but I'd > like to build some consensus on wha

merge, where is the doc?

2014-08-12 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Sometimes in the past we blamed some people because they were committing big chunks of code not atomically and not really documented. And I am afraid this is happening right now again. This is not the first time I asked for it but could the merge be more documented? Commits message are not enough

Re: [VOTE] CouchDB Code of Conduct & Diversity Statement

2014-08-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau
-1 , I can't support anything that introduce empathy in a code of coduct. This is the key for more troubles and possibilities to manipulate others. I could be OK for the rest. - benoit. On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Joan Touzet wrote: > Voting period starts 03:00:00 UTC on Sunday, Au

Re: [VOTE] Amend CouchDB bylaws

2014-07-30 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > Hi Benoit, > > We already have a notion of Lazy 2/3 Majority in the bylaws as passed > for many different vote types. As the -1 veto process is proposed to be > dropped outside of justifiable technical blocks on commits, there would > then be

Re: [VOTE] Amend CouchDB bylaws

2014-07-29 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Jul 30, 2014 7:35 AM, "Benoit Chesneau" wrote: > > > On Jul 30, 2014 7:20 AM, "Benoit Chesneau" wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 28, 2014 4:55 PM, "Noah Slater" wrote: > > > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Amend CouchDB bylaws

2014-07-29 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Jul 30, 2014 7:20 AM, "Benoit Chesneau" wrote: > > > On Jul 28, 2014 4:55 PM, "Noah Slater" wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > > In a discussion between myself, Joan, and Bob on IRC today, it became > > clear that there are some majo

Re: [VOTE] Amend CouchDB bylaws

2014-07-29 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Jul 28, 2014 4:55 PM, "Noah Slater" wrote: > > Hello folks, > > In a discussion between myself, Joan, and Bob on IRC today, it became > clear that there are some major errors that need fixing ASAP. > > Here's my candidate doc that we are voting on: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/

Re: [VOTE] accept bigcouch donation from cloudant

2014-07-29 Thread Benoit Chesneau
+1. I like the couch_event addition... - benoit On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > Hi All, > > Cloudant is in the process of donating the work they’ve done on BigCouch > since last years initial drop ( > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/couchdb-bigcouch2.h

Re: [VOTE] accept bigcouch donation from cloudant

2014-07-28 Thread Benoit Chesneau
noit > > On 28 Jul 2014, at 20:02, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Robert Samuel Newson < > rnew...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> It’s the day-to-day development on BigCouch since last year,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Code of conduct - edit of the point 2

2014-07-28 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > On 28 July 2014 20:53, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > Quoting the "bylaws" you're refferrng: > > > > If a proposal is particularly controversial, try making it > reversible. > > This proposal

Re: [VOTE] accept bigcouch donation from cloudant

2014-07-28 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > > It’s the day-to-day development on BigCouch since last year, the tarball > contains all the patches being donated. > > B. > > what do they change/add ? Is there a branch we could check with the patch applied? - benoit > On 28 Ju

Re: [PROPOSAL] Code of conduct - edit of the point 2

2014-07-28 Thread Benoit Chesneau
based on this discussion is indeed the last I will have. - benoit. - benoit. > > On 27 July 2014 21:04, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > > > >> - Original Message - > >> From: "Benoit Ch

Re: [PROPOSAL] Code of conduct - edit of the point 2

2014-07-27 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Benoit Chesneau" > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Dave Cottlehuber > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > > > > &

Re: [NOTICE] Updated Bylaws - final readthrough before vote

2014-07-27 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Benoit Chesneau" > > >No, just adding that discussion should be done following the code of > >conduct. > > Again, the code of conduct is not part of this vote, jus

Re: [PROPOSAL] Code of conduct - edit of the point 2

2014-07-27 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > > > Empathy is the capacity to recognise emotions of others. > > > > > > > This is not a capacity. Just a feeling that you are able to. A > behaviorist > > assumption by the

Re: [VOTE] [REVISED] Official CouchDB bylaws

2014-07-27 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Joan Touzet wrote: > This is a final reminder to PMC members to cast binding votes > on the official CouchDB bylaws. Not all PMC members have voted. > > The vote ends today, Sunday, at 23:59 UTC. > > Committers and contributors are welcome to cast any non-binding

Re: [NOTICE] Updated Bylaws - final readthrough before vote

2014-07-27 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 19 Jul 2014, at 10:46 , Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Joan Touzet wrote: > >> After discussion with Noah Slater today, and as discussed in the CouchDB > >> IRC mee

Re: [PROPOSAL] Code of conduct - edit of the point 2

2014-07-27 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Empathy is the capacity to recognise emotions of others. > This is not a capacity. Just a feeling that you are able to. A behaviorist assumption by the way. > > The first order of empathy is recognising that you can never know > another'

Re: [PROPOSAL] Code of conduct - edit of the point 2

2014-07-20 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > I am +1 on including empathy and -1 on removing it. > > Empathy is difficult (perhaps one of the most difficult things to do > as a human, behind perhaps forgiveness) but it's also the most > important thing that we're looking for on the proj

Re: [PROPOSAL] Code of conduct - edit of the point 2

2014-07-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > To save this going on forever, are you vetoing the use of the word "empathy"? > If so, can you suggest alternate wording that captures the intent? That does > not include removing it and replacing it with different virtues like hone

Re: [PROPOSAL] Code of conduct - edit of the point 2

2014-07-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > Again, I am -1 on this. Having awareness of the emotional state of others > has proven time and again to be of critical importance, especially in this > community where tempers have flared. You don't have any possibility to know what is the em

Re: [PROPOSAL] Code of conduct - edit of the point 2

2014-07-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 19 Jul 2014, at 11:03 , Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > Sorry for the delay. I planned to propose that change sooner, but I am > > really busy these days. > > > > > > I don't have access to

Re: CouchDB 2.0: breaking the backward compatibility

2014-07-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > > I think this is backward. We are not proposing API changes "just because" > BigCouch happens to make them. > > Given that we have to bump the major version number, we are afforded an > opportunity to improve our API in significant

[PROPOSAL] Code of conduct - edit of the point 2

2014-07-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Sorry for the delay. I planned to propose that change sooner, but I am really busy these days. I don't have access to the confluence website neither I see a simple way to patch it so here is my proposal on the point 2. I would replace it with: Be honest, welcoming, friendly, and patient: We work

Re: [REQUES] Review proposed bylaws (Was: Re: [DISCUSS] Project bylaws)

2014-07-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > Sorry for the delay. I don't have access to the confluence website > neither I see a simple way to patch it so here is my proposal on the > point 2. I would replace it with: > > Be honest, welcoming, friendly,

Re: [REQUES] Review proposed bylaws (Was: Re: [DISCUSS] Project bylaws)

2014-07-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
ne of his best books > (Island is his best), Huxley was no more advocating against empathy than the > Savage was advocating for venereal disease. > > > On 5 Jun 2014, at 12:22, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: >>

Re: [NOTICE] Updated Bylaws - final readthrough before vote

2014-07-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Joan Touzet wrote: > After discussion with Noah Slater today, and as discussed in the CouchDB > IRC meeting today, I will be driving the bylaws and CoC through to votes > and formal adoption. > > Based on unaddressed comments in the previous mailing list discussion

jenkins configuration

2014-07-17 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Hi all, Is the jenkins confguration used for couchdb available somewhere? So far I only found this wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/CI?highlight=%28jenkins%29 Is there any doc/repository somwhere about it? - benoit

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1998) Scripts and docs to boot dev cluster

2014-07-17 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14065275#comment-14065275 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1998: -- but where is the doc? >

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2248) Replace "master" and "slave" terminology

2014-07-10 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14057493#comment-14057493 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-2248: -- well I saw the discussion b

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2248) Replace "master" and "slave" terminology

2014-07-10 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14057405#comment-14057405 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-2248: -- While I don't see any

Re: The Merge Needs You

2014-07-08 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Robert Samuel Newson > wrote: >> Documentation / API change notes are release-blocking but not >> merge-blocking, imo. >> > > I remember this time where a patch

Re: The Merge Needs You

2014-07-08 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > Documentation / API change notes are release-blocking but not merge-blocking, > imo. > I remember this time where a patch was because it was big and not documented ;) Anyway my request was not about blocking the merge if we have no

Re: The Merge Needs You

2014-07-08 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at

Re: The Merge Needs You

2014-07-07 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Robert Samuel Newson >> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> The merge of bigcouch has reached a stage now where

Re: The Merge Needs You

2014-07-07 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > Hi All, > > The merge of bigcouch has reached a stage now where I think it’s time to > merge to master. I’m therefore asking folks if there are any blockers > preventing me from proceeding, which involves you each taking a look at >

Re: rcouch merge: integration with the bigcouch branch questions

2014-07-07 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Russell Branca wrote: > I switched to using chttpd in couch_mrview for delayed responses as it > has more robust error handling logic (in particular it fixes a nasty > bug where error messages were sent as full responses with headers in > the stream) . > > Benoit,

Re: rcouch merge: integration with the bigcouch branch questions

2014-07-07 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > Benoit writes: > >> - how the fauxton build is handled right now in the bigcouch branch. >> What are requirements to make it automatic? (no manual installation). >> Is there a way to disable it > > It has been the intent of the Fauxton team to d

Re: rcouch merge: integration with the bigcouch branch questions

2014-07-07 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> >> Some blocking points/questions I have about the integration of rcouch >> and bigcouch. >> >> >> - OTP release: the bigcouch and the rcouch br

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2097) Avoid performance regression with a single fd

2014-07-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14052909#comment-14052909 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-2097: -- Reads are not going via

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2097) Avoid performance regression with a single fd

2014-07-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14052889#comment-14052889 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-2097: -- This is not about having 2 f

rcouch merge: integration with the bigcouch branch questions

2014-07-04 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Some blocking points/questions I have about the integration of rcouch and bigcouch. - OTP release: the bigcouch and the rcouch branches are quite similar but I still wonder about the usage of this configure script. Is this really nedded? Can't we just rely on a makefile? - HTTP api. some recent

question: mix between the sharding level and couch_* applications

2014-07-04 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Hi all, While doing a review on the bigcouch branch (for the rcouch merge) I found that the sharding level is mixed with the current applications and I wonder if we could skip some of it. The one that could probably easily be done is the usage of chttpd in couch_mrview: src/couch_mrview/src/couc

[jira] [Reopened] (COUCHDB-2097) Avoid performance regression with a single fd

2014-06-30 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benoit Chesneau reopened COUCHDB-2097: -- > Avoid performance regression with a single

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2097) Avoid performance regression with a single fd

2014-06-30 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14048548#comment-14048548 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-2097: -- @Russel Branca what are

Re: info: quickcheck free for opensource projects

2014-06-30 Thread Benoit Chesneau
gt; >>> QC is not a CI tool. It’s more like an additional layer of more thorough >>> unit testing that could (depending on their terms) run by our existing CI >>> solutions. >>> >>> I’d be in favour of looking at how we can make it work! >>

rcouch+bigcouch merge & need for a "developer" guide

2014-06-30 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Hi, I started to look at the merge of both branches started by sagelywizard who provided me the links on IRC: https://github.com/sagelywizard/couchdb-couch/tree/working and https://github.com/sagelywizard/couchdb-couch-mrview/tree/working And while I can of course look in the code to see how to

Re: have look ..

2014-06-29 Thread Benoit Chesneau
start_key="2014-06-27 00:03", end_key="2014-06-27 00:05\0" or such thing probably. On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Sebastian Rothbucher < sebastianrothbuc...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Anish, > > I'd never have instable functions like 'now' in a view - it will not work. > View+list could do th

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1963) Move from etap to eunit

2014-06-17 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033615#comment-14033615 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1963: -- i tested the new branch create

info: quickcheck free for opensource projects

2014-06-11 Thread Benoit Chesneau
quickcheck made quickcheck-ci available for free for open-sources projects: http://quickcheck-ci.com/ It would be interresting to use it for couchdb imo. Thoughts? - benoit

Re: [REQUES] Review proposed bylaws (Was: Re: [DISCUSS] Project bylaws)

2014-06-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 10:49:49AM +0200, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > This question always raised the question about who is right on naming > > thing. Who has more empathy than the others. If you really think that by > >

Re: [REQUES] Review proposed bylaws (Was: Re: [DISCUSS] Project bylaws)

2014-06-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Proof by counterexample: I have been involved in a private gaming > > community for a long time where the only rule was "be polite" / "don't > > be an asshole". Recently it has been

Re: [REQUES] Review proposed bylaws (Was: Re: [DISCUSS] Project bylaws)

2014-06-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau
so add a part to manage discussions by themselves and define how/when they should close in a graceful manner. (I proposed that in an early mail). Thoughts? - benoit On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Benoit Chesneau > wr

Re: [REQUES] Review proposed bylaws (Was: Re: [DISCUSS] Project bylaws)

2014-06-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Joan Touzet wrote: > >> - Original Message - >> From: "Alexander Shorin" >> >> > Well, mostly all CoC points could be replaced by sin

Re: [REQUES] Review proposed bylaws (Was: Re: [DISCUSS] Project bylaws)

2014-06-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Joan Touzet wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Alexander Shorin" > > > Well, mostly all CoC points could be replaced by single sentence: "Be > polite.": > > Being polite is insufficiently rich to describe what we expect from > people. I also explained

Re: [DISCUSS] provides a good place for couchapps documentation

2014-05-29 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Benoit Chesneau > wrote: > > > > 1. create a separate website: couchapps.couchdb.org or > > couchdb.apache.org/couchapps (maybe better). Once it would be possible > &g

Re: Summary of IRC Meeting in #couchdb-meeting

2014-05-28 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > > I based the rebar work on yours, though I did remove the > cross-compile/static build bits for simplicity. I am also pretty confident > that my work does not work on all the platforms that rebar.config.script > implies. It’s certain

[DISCUSS] provides a good place for couchapps documentation

2014-05-28 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Hi all, couchapp.org is down since a long time now and more and more people are asking for its content a location where to find/discuss about it. While the couchapp.org domain name issue is actually solved separately, I would like to put the content of the old website back somewhere and possibly

bigcouch/rcouch merge follow-up Was: Summary of IRC Meeting in #couchdb-meeting

2014-05-28 Thread Benoit Chesneau
reposting it as a separate thread. As promised last day on irc, answering about the merge. . There some redundant things in bigcouch and rcouch branches. Both have different builds tricks and different changes which will require some decisions and synchronisations I guess. Some features need prob

Re: Summary of IRC Meeting in #couchdb-meeting

2014-05-28 Thread Benoit Chesneau
As promised last day on irc, answering about the merge. . There some redundant things in bigcouch and rcouch branches. Both have different builds tricks and different changes which will require some decisions and synchronisations I guess. Some features need probably to be freezed before to go furt

Re: [DISCUSS] Project by-laws

2014-05-16 Thread Benoit Chesneau
I saw the review thread, but inline answer look more appropriate. Anyway, feel free to forward to it if needed. On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > On 5 May 2014 10:54, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > > I am not sure to see the interest of these by-laws. They

Re: [DISCUSS] Project by-laws

2014-05-05 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Modified the bit in the committer section to read: > > "Committers are expected to work cooperatively and to have good people > skills. This is more important that any other sort of skill." > > Reminder to folks: please review this. It is an ex

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CouchDB Developer Code of Conduct

2014-04-29 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > > The PMC would like to move forward towards establishing an Apache > CouchDB Developer Code of Conduct (CoC for short). To make that happen, we > need your help. > > Sounds like a goo

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CouchDB Developer Code of Conduct

2014-04-28 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > All, > > The PMC would like to move forward towards establishing an Apache CouchDB > Developer Code of Conduct (CoC for short). To make that happen, we need > your help. > > We do not at this time have a specific text proposal. We'd like to o

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1994) merge rcouch with couchdb 1.6 in a branch

2014-04-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13974940#comment-13974940 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1994: -- [~wohali] not sure wh

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1994) merge rcouch with couchdb 1.6 in a branch

2014-04-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13974837#comment-13974837 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1994: -- [~wohali] really cool, will

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1994) merge rcouch with couchdb 1.6 in a branch

2014-04-18 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13974570#comment-13974570 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1994: -- [~wohali]you misread the

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1994) merge rcouch with couchdb 1.6 in a branch

2014-04-17 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13973359#comment-13973359 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1994: -- [~wohali] yeah some systems

Re: [DISCUSS] merge all the forks

2014-04-16 Thread Benoit Chesneau
Benoit! :) > > > > Glad you like it. Will post now. > > > > Best > > Jan > > -- > > > > On 16 Apr 2014, at 22:41 , Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > >> awesome. LGTM. > >> > >> Thanks Jan! > >> > >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] merge all the forks

2014-04-16 Thread Benoit Chesneau
as been around for a while, the internal codebase is a > little crufty. We are constantly working on improving that, but one of the > larger efforts have been done within the rcouch project by Apache CouchDB > committer https://twitter.com/benoitc";>Benoit Chesneau. > > At the

Re: [DISCUSS] merge all the forks

2014-04-16 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > What about doing a blog post? > My time is very limited these days, if anyone want to take the lead on this, that would be cool. - benoit > > On 16 April 2014 15:36, Andy Wenk wrote: > > On 16 April 2014 15:28, Beno

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1994) merge rcouch with couchdb 1.6 in a branch

2014-04-16 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13971451#comment-13971451 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1994: -- [~andywenk] The warnings have

Re: Your links for the CouchDB weekly news?

2014-04-16 Thread Benoit Chesneau
new release of couchbeam version 1.0.3 and 1.0.4: https://github.com/benoitc/couchbeam/releases/tag/1.0.3 rcouch review: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994 On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Lena Reinhard wrote: > Hi everyone, > > the weekly question: > if you want to submit

Re: [DISCUSS] merge all the forks

2014-04-16 Thread Benoit Chesneau
iki are still valid also: https://wiki.refuge.io/display/RCOUCH/rcouch Hope it helps. - benoit > On 6 April 2014 10:22, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Cottlehuber > wrote: > > > >> Hi again, > >> > >> Benoit'

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1994) merge rcouch with couchdb 1.6 in a branch

2014-04-16 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13970564#comment-13970564 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1994: -- [~wohali] thanks! rcouch n

Re: [builds] master is failing in 231-cors.t

2014-04-14 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > fi > > if test -f $TGT; then > -prove $OPTS $TGT > +prove -v $OPTS $TGT > else > prove $OPTS $TGT/*.t > fi > > > > ./test/etap/run test/etap/231-cors.t > test/etap/231-cors.t .. > test/etap/231-cors.t:

Re: 1.6.0: please review changelog, etc

2014-04-10 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > Are you going to take the latest master commit for 1.6.0? > > yes, on which branch should we review?

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1993) Make fabric work with the refactored view engine

2014-04-07 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13962611#comment-13962611 ] Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1993: -- Can you also answer to

Re: [DISCUSS] merge all the forks

2014-04-06 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > Hi again, > > Benoit's mentioned that the rcouch import is more or less complete from > his perspective. No doubt we'll have some mucking around wrt docs, fauxton, > build etc to sort out, but he feels its ready to go. > > More or less f

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >